dnsmasq not working on OpenBSD 6.1

Hi I have successfully setup unbound on OpenBSD 6.1 and I can query it. In the same setup I have tested dnsmasq, but it almost seems broken on OpenBSD 6.1. I have disabled unbound and confirmed nothing is running on port 53 using netstat. Then I have installed dnsmasq from packages and set

Re: dnsmasq not working on OpenBSD 6.1

On 04/24/17 19:27, Martin Hanson wrote: Hi I have successfully setup unbound on OpenBSD 6.1 and I can query it. In the same setup I have tested dnsmasq, but it almost seems broken on OpenBSD 6.1. I have disabled unbound and confirmed nothing is running on port 53 using netstat. Then I

Re: acme-client(1) and http_proxy

By definition, you will (probably) not be able to use the ACME protocol - it only works (normally) when your system is connected directly to the public internet with a static IP address. Simply because you say "behind a corporate firewall", I already know (or at least assume) that ACME will

Re: Performance Clang

Damian McGuckin wrote: > On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Marc Espie wrote: > > Apparently, it seems that lld might be better behaved than binutils > > ld in *some* respects like speed and memory consumption in *some* > > cases... > > > > we'll see. > > Doesn't Clang have superior (and integrated) static

Re: Performance Clang

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Marc Espie wrote: On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:14:24PM +0200, Heiko wrote: Thank you for the info. So you expect a lower time in future. If we eventually remove gcc 4.2.1, yes, the time will go down from clang+gcc to clang without gcc :) Apparently, it seems that lld

Re: Performance Clang

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 07:46:00PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > On 2017-04-20, Heiko wrote: > > > So I guess the main advantage is the license? > > Or is clang technically (binaries, debug) better? > > OpenBSD does not live in a bubble. If it did, we

Re: Performance Clang

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:14:24PM +0200, Heiko wrote: > Thank you for the info. So you expect a lower time in future. If we eventually remove gcc 4.2.1, yes, the time will go down from clang+gcc to clang without gcc :) Apparently, it seems that lld might be better behaved than binutils ld in

Re: nvi(1)

Hi, Marcus MERIGHI wrote on Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 08:46:33PM +0200: > florian.ermi...@mailbox.org (Florian Ermisch), 2017.04.23 (Sun) 22:32 (CEST): >> Am 23. April 2017 15:30:02 MESZ schrieb Unixway1 : >>> How copy and paste between xterms? >> tmux > It is not vi(1)'s

Re: Ubuntu in vmd and avx

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:50:07AM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 08:18:17PM +0200, Karl Pettersson wrote: > > I run 64-bit Ubuntu as a vmm guest, according to: > > https://gist.github.com/reyk/6d369c5c0bd0c76f4906f83933f3bb71 > > > > It works well for the most part; I have

Re: Ubuntu in vmd and avx

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 08:18:17PM +0200, Karl Pettersson wrote: > I run 64-bit Ubuntu as a vmm guest, according to: > https://gist.github.com/reyk/6d369c5c0bd0c76f4906f83933f3bb71 > > It works well for the most part; I have removed cloud-init becaue I do > not need it. However, I used Python 2.7

Ubuntu in vmd and avx

I run 64-bit Ubuntu as a vmm guest, according to: https://gist.github.com/reyk/6d369c5c0bd0c76f4906f83933f3bb71 It works well for the most part; I have removed cloud-init becaue I do not need it. However, I used Python 2.7 with numpy 1.12 (installed via Pip), and experienced crashes which seemed

Re: hotplugd attach script

ed...@pettijohn-web.com (Edgar Pettijohn), 2017.04.23 (Sun) 23:59 (CEST): > I'm working on a gui tool for mounting usb sticks. I want it to launch from > hotplugd, but so far I am unsuccessful. > > #/etc/hotplug/attach > > #!/bin/sh > > DEVCLASS=$1 > > DEVNAME=$2 > > > case $DEVCLASS in >

Re: OpenBSD 6.1, boot can't find kernel anymore

Here is the output of the dmesg.boot: OpenBSD 6.1 (GENERIC.MP) #20: Sat Apr 1 13:45:56 MDT 2017 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP RTC BIOS diagnostic error 37 real mem = 3645538304 (3476MB) avail mem = 3530371072

Re: OpenBSD 6.1, boot can't find kernel anymore

You need to post your /var/run/dmesg.boot if you want someone to help you debug this. - todd

Re: hotplugd attach script

Hello, Is it in french but you can take an eye on it: https://obsd4a.net/wiki/doku.php?id=system:hotplug-diskmount here the sh script: #!/bin/sh DEVCLASS=${1} DEVNAME=${2} LOGIN="id_user" case "${DEVCLASS}" in 2) /usr/local/libexec/hotplug-diskmount attach -u "${LOGIN}" -m

Re: OpenBSD 6.1 ix Intel 82598EB issue

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 08:39:52PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:31:52PM +0200, Robert Blacquiere wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have updated one of our machines from 6.0 to 6.1. > > It has 2 dual 10 gb interfaces . One of them a Intel 82598EB based > > dual card will

OpenBSD 6.1, boot can't find kernel anymore

Hello everyone, I've upgraded to OpenBSD 6.1 from 6.0 on my up board according the upgrade guide. As a result it seems something changed in boot which results in it not finding the kernel anymore. There are now two additional hd found by boot (4MB each, empty and one not readable) despite only

Re: S-nail, ssh, and vi

Good morning Predrag. Predrag Punosevac wrote: |mar...@martinbrandenburg.com wrote: .. |>> Can anybody help me understand what am I seeing. Namely I am trying to |>> send an e-mail using S-nail 14.8.12 (the last one which cleanly compiles |>> on OpenBSD). Actual

Re: hotplugd attach script

I was thinking the script would inherit the users environment. Which isn't the case. :( I think there are a few ways to work around this. I just suck at shell scripting, so I guess I'll get some practice. On Apr 23, 2017, 11:13 PM, at 11:13 PM, Jan Lambertz wrote:

Re: Load average changed in 6.1?

On 04/24/17 04:42, Christoph Borsbach wrote: Hello everyone, first off: I know that the topic of "load" has been discussed numerous times, and been a topic on undeadly [1]. I know that this number is not that important. However: After upgrading 3 of my systems to 6.1 (from 6.0) I noticed the

Re: OpenBSD 6.1 ix Intel 82598EB issue

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:31:52PM +0200, Robert Blacquiere wrote: > > Hi, > > I have updated one of our machines from 6.0 to 6.1. > It has 2 dual 10 gb interfaces . One of them a Intel 82598EB based > dual card will not initialize any more. > > The other 10gig works and is based on Intel

OpenBSD 6.1 ix Intel 82598EB issue

Hi, I have updated one of our machines from 6.0 to 6.1. It has 2 dual 10 gb interfaces . One of them a Intel 82598EB based dual card will not initialize any more. The other 10gig works and is based on Intel 82599. from dmesg: ix0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82598EB" rev 0x01: mmba

Re: Load average changed in 6.1?

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:09:37 +0200, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:42:16AM +0200, Christoph Borsbach wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > first off: I know that the topic of "load" has been discussed numerous > > times, and been a topic on undeadly [1]. I know that

Re: Load average changed in 6.1?

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:42:16AM +0200, Christoph Borsbach wrote: > Hello everyone, > first off: I know that the topic of "load" has been discussed numerous > times, and been a topic on undeadly [1]. I know that this number is not that > important. > > However: > After upgrading 3 of my systems

Re: Is there something to replace zaurus?

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:53:57AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:47:28AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > | > So if anyone knows of a way to rotate the screen from EFI, I'm all > | > ears. > | > | Add the Rotate option to your xorg.conf, for instance: > | > | Section

Re: Is there something to replace zaurus?

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:47:28AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: | > So if anyone knows of a way to rotate the screen from EFI, I'm all | > ears. | | Add the Rotate option to your xorg.conf, for instance: | | Section "Device" | Identifier "default device" | Driver "wsfb" |

Re: Is there something to replace zaurus?

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:37:20AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote: > I've not been able to get the X output rotated properly just yet: > > [weerd@taco] $ xrandr -o right > X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) > Major opcode of failed request: 140 (RANDR) > Minor

Load average changed in 6.1?

Hello everyone, first off: I know that the topic of "load" has been discussed numerous times, and been a topic on undeadly [1]. I know that this number is not that important. However: After upgrading 3 of my systems to 6.1 (from 6.0) I noticed the load average (15min value) has gone up by

Re: Is there something to replace zaurus?

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 08:47:09PM -0400, trondd wrote: | I've never seen these before: | | http://www.geekbuying.com/item/GPD-Win-5-5-inch-Game-Console-Intel-Atom-X5-Z8500-Windows-10-OS-4GB-64GB-Gamepad-Quad-Core-2-24GHz-Gorilla-Glass-Screen-1280-720-Type-C---Black-367872.html | | Anyone