Le Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 08:58:59PM +0100, Claudio Jeker a écrit :
> >
> > Should I also send the IFP, IFA and BRD sockaddrs from pppd(8) ?
>
> Don't think so.
>
> > How comes message sent from route(8) have more attributes when received by
> > monitor ?
>
> The kernel fills those in.
>
> Make
Le Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:33:42PM -0500, Tom a écrit :
> Hi list!
>
> Could you please guide me how to use link-local addresses with jumphost?
>
> I have a server 'X' with a link local IPv6 address of
> fe80::262:bff::
> that IP is reachable from the server 'jumpserver' via interface
drs:
::::::: ppp0 fe80::d97e:e77f:db7e:e780%ppp0
fe80::ca4c:75ff:fe16:9f00%ppp0
```
Le Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 06:25:18PM +0100, Denis Fondras a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to add IPv6 support for pppd(8) (IPv6CP) and I encounter a blocker
> when adding a default IP
Hello,
I am trying to add IPv6 support for pppd(8) (IPv6CP) and I encounter a blocker
when adding a default IPv6 route to PPP peer.
Feb 23 17:26:45 rt-01 pppd[64071]: Couldn't add IPv6 default route: Network is
unreachable
Adding the default route from route(8) works when the connection is
Le Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 03:13:21PM +0200, Alessandro Baggi a écrit :
> Hi list,
> there is a way to check if OpenBSD runs on VM or physical hardware?
>
> Something like in sysctl or similar.
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
You may want to check the `hw` variable :
$ sysctl hw
[...]
Hello,
Just for your information, when applying this diff :
http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/dev/ic/com.c.diff?r1=1.175=1.176=h
Deciso DEC750 (based on Ryzen Embedded) cannot boot anymore (reboot or
hang when loading kernel).
Regards,
Denis
Le Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 03:42:48PM +0200, Divan Santana a écrit :
>
> - if no audio, mute and unmute the tab
>
Thank you for the tip, it solved my audio issue.
Unfortunately, I lost the mic in the battle :D
So back to Firefox for Teams despite the screen sharing problem.
Le Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 10:01:01AM +, Laura Smith a écrit :
> Has anyone had the opportunity to experiment using OpenBSD in conjunction
> with AMD EPYC/RYZEN native 10gb ports ?
>
> As far as I can see there are no drivers for it in stable ? But maybe
> someone's been playing with it on
Le Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 06:37:16PM +0200, Denis Fondras a écrit :
> Le Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 09:18:44AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio a écrit :
> > Denis Fondras [open...@ledeuns.net] wrote:
> > > Le Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 04:55:51PM +0200, Erik van Westen a ?crit :
> >
Le Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 09:18:44AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio a écrit :
> Denis Fondras [open...@ledeuns.net] wrote:
> > Le Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 04:55:51PM +0200, Erik van Westen a ?crit :
> > >
> > > Have a look at shop.opnsense.com, they might have something.
> &g
Le Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 04:55:51PM +0200, Erik van Westen a écrit :
>
> Have a look at shop.opnsense.com, they might have something.
>
The DEC6xx/7xx/8xx are not fully supported by OpenBSD.
I don't know about the bigger boxes but being based on the same SoC they are
probably not supported.
Le Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:20:25AM +0300, Lars Noodén a écrit :
> On 7/11/22 12:25, Denis Fondras wrote:
> [snip]
> > I use Protectli devices : https://eu.protectli.com/
>
> Are all the network interfaces available?
>
I cannot speak for all the models. Yet, FW6C is fully s
Le Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 10:45:40PM -0600, Steve Williams a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> My pcengines APU system died on me catastrophically. It's my primary
> router / email / web server.
>
> First, I built a Raspberry Pi 4b system with a USB wired NIC and went to
> restore my backup from Google using
Le Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 08:23:35PM +1000, David Gwynne a écrit :
>
>
> > On 3 Apr 2022, at 21:46, Denis Fondras wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In vxlan(4) manual, we have :
> >
> > endpoint mode
> > When configured without a tunnel d
Hi,
In vxlan(4) manual, we have :
endpoint mode
When configured without a tunnel destination address, vxlan operates as
a bridge, but with learning disabled.
The question is : is it possible to set tunnel source address without a
destination ?
The subject says it all.
Is there any active BFD (Bidirectionnal Forwarding Detection) user ?
Denis
Le Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 05:03:42AM +0100, Radek a écrit :
>
> How can I restore the vendor's MAC address?
> It is 6.8/amd64.
>
Check dmesg, it will give you the original MAC address, then ifconfig lladdr...
Le Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 12:58:13PM +0100, Claudio Jeker a écrit :
> To be honest, you have arp or ND running on that prefix and then overload
> it with a /32 route. You really need to explain why you do that. This is
> in my opinion a broken setup.
>
It seemed like a smart idea back then, but
ind the route to be placed after ``rt''. */
while (mrt->rt_priority <= prio && SRPL_NEXT_LOCKED(mrt, rt_next)) {
prt = mrt;
Le Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 10:11:54AM +0100, Denis Fondras a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I am using BGP to connect 2 OpenBSD-current routers
Hi,
I am using BGP to connect 2 OpenBSD-current routers :
[static default GW]---RT1---[bgp]---RT2
I announce an IPv4 /32 from RT2.
After I start both RT1 and RT2, traffic flows to RT2 /32 without any issue.
However if I reboot RT2 (let's say for sysupgrade), RT1 loses the /32 (which is
Le Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 07:46:55PM +0200, EdaSky a écrit :
> Good day everyone
>
> Does anyone use supermicro 5019D-FTN4 server with AMD EPYC 3251 SoC
> Processor?
>
> https://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/system/Embedded/AS-5019D-FTN4.cfm
>
> Experience and dmesg would be perfect.
>
Experience is
Le Fri, May 28, 2021 at 03:30:58PM -0700, Chris Cappuccio a écrit :
> You might try "set state-defaults pflow, sloppy", also in some scenarios you
> might need "set state-policy floating"
>
> If "sloppy" fixes it, there may be some bugs to hunt.
>
"sloppy" seems to fix the issue. I will do more
Here are some more infos :
>- does running pf(4) without pflow(4) cause issue?
Yes, the issue is linked to pf(4) being enabled.
>- can you confirm you were running with pf(4) disabled prior to enabling
> pflow(4)?
I do confirm. I never enable pf(4) on edge routers, it bit in the past
Hello,
I used OpenBSD as a PE router on my network. The router is connected to an IX, a
transit and multiple peers with OpenBGPd.
Earlier this week, I enabled pflow(4) to track traffic usage.
Unfortunately enabling pf(4) on a edge router does not seems like a good idea.
Some peers called in to
Le Thu, May 06, 2021 at 10:48:55AM +0200, Radek a écrit :
> Hello,
> I want to use dhcpd server to push Wireless Controller's IP address to the
> APs.
>
> According to this:
> http://systemnetworksecurity.blogspot.com/2013/02/adding-custom-options-in-isc-dhcpds.html
>
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:58:41AM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> Am Fr., 30. Okt. 2020 um 11:54 Uhr schrieb Denis Fondras
> :
> > Please, fix your tweet. The default install answer for IPv6 is 'none'.
>
> This borders on "switch off v6 for security reasons",
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:36:33AM +0100, js-openbsd-m...@webkeks.org wrote:
> To close this thread, I found this:
> https://twitter.com/m00nbsd/status/1321524807473782784
>
Please, fix your tweet. The default install answer for IPv6 is 'none'.
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 08:09:25AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> A few tools have options like -s, but it is a problem.
>
> I'm also frustrated by this solution, and working on a better method.
>
> Pierre Emeriaud wrote:
>
> > What is the current canonical way to tweak source address
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 08:36:56PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> congrats to the new release.
>
> Question about https://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade67.html:
> Shouldn't it be
>
> net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
> net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1
>
> Thats what I found in my sysctl.conf
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 09:07:34AM +0100, Richard Chivers wrote:
> Another 5 or so seconds later the same LS-Update comes in with the same seq
> number. This appears to continue indefinitely. Our only fix appears to be
> restarting ospfd on the routers.
>
> Does anyone have an idea what is going
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 09:58:27PM +0200, Lars Bonnesen wrote:
> On an obsd 6.6, I use the vmx device, but the syntax:
> inet 172.18.11.9 255.255.255.252 NONE vlandev vmx2 description VLAN703
>
vlandev is not supported any more.
You have to use parent and vnetid, check man ifconfig.
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 08:54:22AM -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> Hi devs and all,
> I have been using spamd for quite a while and have been loving it.
> I've seen that spamd currently only supports ipv4 and have been
> wondering if it was possible to extend it to ipv6. I know that workforce
> is
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 10:19:36PM +, Pedro Caetano wrote:
> Hi misc@ happy new year!
>
> While running snapshot #584 on amd64 I noticed setting addresses using
> ifconfig is not consistent for ipv4 and ipv6.
>
> Is this expected behavior? I wasn't able to find anything in the FAQ.
>
It
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 08:29:42PM +, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Hi Denis,
>
> ok ..I hadnt read your email fully sorry about that...
>
> what are you trying to achieve here?
>
> you have a 172.16.0.249/30 address on em3 which includes
> 172.16.0.248-127.16.0.251
>
> and then you have a
Hi,
I have this setup :
em3: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr
index 4 priority 0 llprio 3
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseSX full-duplex)
status: active
inet6 fe80::aa9:b803:8a7a:ca72%em3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
inet 172.16.0.254 netmask 0xff00
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 02:08:50PM +0200, Rachel Roch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hopefully I'm not missing something silly here but I've read the paragraph in
> the man page and it only lists 15 variables:
>
> "The printed numbers are the sent and received open,
> sent and received notifications, sent
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 06:50:09PM +0200, list wrote:
> Hi,
>
> EDIT:
>
> I have taken a look at the website of my hosting provider.
>
> My IPv6 gateway would be fe80::1.
>
> When trying to add the route manually i get "network unreachable".
>
Did you specify the output interface ? With LL
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 08:36:45PM +0200, list wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thanks alot for your suggestions! I really appreciate it.
>
> Unluckily that didn't work out.
>
> My hostname.vio0 now looks like this:
>
> inet6 alias /64
>
> !route add -inet6 default
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 05:25:43PM +0200, list wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying to set up IPv6 on my OpenBSD machine.
>
> It is running on stable branch.
>
> The interface I am trying to configure IPv6 on is "vio".
>
> My hostname.vio0 looks like this:
>
>
> dhcp
>
> inet6 alias
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 09:44:28PM -0700, BSD user wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My apologies for sending this email multiple times.
>
> I was so mortified by Tutanota's awful text formatting that I created a
> new mail account that supported IMAP so that I could load it up in
> Thunderbird with text only
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 12:15:30PM +0200, Stefan Hagen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question regarding the IPv6 behavior of OpenBSD compared to
> Linux/FreeBSD. I tried to configure a static IPv6 address on my VPS.
>
> From my provider, I got the following data:
>
> IP Address:
Hi,
I had a weird problem today that I can't explain when I tried to add a peer
(185.22.129.11) to bgpd.
The prefix was accepted, shows up in RIB as valid, installed in FIB according to
bgpctl but kernel could not find a route. Group "liopen" provides a fullview.
OpenBSD-current from May 8th.
I
> user-friendly and easy-to-use
>
Sounds like the exact description of current OpenBSD...
> I don't understand how to use "allow from group"
>
Sorry, I responded too fast. You already receive the prefixes from $spamASN and
you want to redistribute them.
There is no filtering in the (old) versions you use IIRC.
> Yes I use 6.0, 6.1 and 5.8 on these machines. I'm waiting for 6.5 to
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 10:07:52AM +, Mik J wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to set up openbgpd.
>
> On site 2, I'm peering with us.bgp-spamd.net and eu.bgp-spamd.net sucessfully.
> The problem is that these routes are not in the bgp table on site 3. The BGP
> peerings are up.
> From site 3 I
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:07:47AM +0200, Torsten wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Problem description:
> In a customers network more than 2k clients connect to a server and
> perform https requests. When in the morning more and more clients become
> active, the number of connections rises until more and more
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 02:54:38PM +0100, open...@kene.nu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to make openbgpd strip private ASNs from updates it
> sends to certain neighbors?
> I am using openbgpd on my edge routers and distribute routes generated
> internally to the rest of the world. However,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 01:43:08PM +0700, Frank Beuth wrote:
> Is it possible to restrict network access on a per-user or per-application
> (rather than per-port) basis?
>
> pf does not seem to have any capability to do this, maybe I missed something.
>
Don't know what you are aiming to do but
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 01:05:59PM -0700, j...@bitminer.ca wrote:
> >
> > did you take a look at net/arpwatch?
>
> Too many emails; email to root is not a useful mechanism for me.
>
And net/arpwatch does not handle IPv6.
I'll use the route message ABI if I had to do what you are looking for.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:50:21AM -0600, Adam Thompson wrote:
> Running 6.4 (-stable, via openup/mtier).
> I have bgpd(8) talking to my border router, acting as a route collector.
> That part seems fine.
> I now have httpd(8) configured trivially to run bgplg(8) (per the bgplg(8)
> manpage) but
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 01:39:33PM -0600, Aaron Riekenberg wrote:
> I'm using OpenBSD 6.4 on a pcengines apu2 box as a router/firewall for a
> CenturyLink DSL (pppoe) connection.
>
> Today I set up rd6 for ipv6 for the first time, similar to what is
> described here:
>
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 03:29:50PM +, Bob Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to figure out the most suitable config params transform OpenBGPD
> into a route server.
>
> So far I have :
> route-collector yes
If you are configuring a route server, you don't want "route-collector yes".
Or if
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:22:58PM +, r303 wrote:
> Has anyone installed OpenBSD on an EdgeRouter 4?
> If so, can you share a quick rundown of the installation steps?
> The tutorial for the EdgeRouter Lite doesn't seem to match up with the ER-4.
>
> Do you see where I might've gone wrong? I know that my definition in the .h
> file is wrong, but I'm trying to get this working in baby steps, and perhaps
> I was mistaken but I thought that having a duplicated function would still
> make it appear in the bgplg menu. Is there anything obvious
> If you need specifics I can certainly supply screenshots or code snippets.
> It's probably something obvious that I'm just not seeing, but any help would
> be greatly appreciated.
>
Can you show some diff and detailed steps please ?
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:13:36AM +0200, Bastien Durel wrote:
> Because it's lower than RTP_CONNECTED and I don't know what it is. The
> /* local address routes (must be the highest) */ comment makes me think
> it MAY be 127.0.0.0/8 or ::1/128 (useless for rtadvd then), but it may
> be related to
Hi,
> I've been doing some light reading on the topic of new(er) networking
> protocols, and I've come across Locator/Identifier Seperation Protocol (LISP)
> (RFC6830 and onwards) and Identifier/Locator Network Protocol (ILNP) (RFC6740
> and onwards).
>
> There appear to be implementations of
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 04:02:34PM +0200, Bastien Durel wrote:
> shouldn't it check the rtm_priority to be RTP_LOCAL or RTP_CONNECTED ??
> it make no sense to start advertising prefix on an interface if the
> prefix is over a gateway.
>
Why RTP_LOCAL ?
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:43:30PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Denis Fondras(de...@openbsd.org) on 2018.05.24 17:57:19 +0200:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 07:04:04AM -0400, David Higgs wrote:
> > > But shouldn???t the answer be the same, since I have a valid de
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 07:04:04AM -0400, David Higgs wrote:
> But shouldn’t the answer be the same, since I have a valid default route?
>
It should but that's not how route(8) works for now :)
Barely tested diff, assumes that no netmask means /128 (similar to IPv4 handling
where no netmask
Hi,
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:34:19PM -0400, David Higgs wrote:
> I am using route(8) in a script but found some odd behavior when
> querying routes for some IPv6 addresses - lookups seem to fail if the
> trailing address bytes are zero (implicit or explicitly) as shown
> below. However, the
> does anyone can tell me what the state of spamd and IPv6 is? I would
> have expected it to work but I can't set for exampe ::1 or [::1] as a
> listening address (neither alone or together with 127.0.0.1).
>
Unsupported yet. phessler@ has a diff for it.
> If you actually donate and click on any links there you would see it
> bring you to a secure page.
>
But is this the right link ? Can I update the value of "hosted_button_id" and
send you to my Paypal account ?
Denis
> What would be the difference to your version where i use vether instead of
> an alias? Or did i missunderstand you?
>
The difference is broadcast trafic won't be sent over your provider network.
Hello,
> Can you people see something that i might missed?
The easy way would be enable forwarding, add a vether(4) on the host, bridge it
with tap0 and configure it with an IP in the 136.243.186.160/29 subnet. Use that
IP as the gateway in your VMs.
> I dont want loadbalancing here! I need to seperate the hosting of the domain
> to diffrent machines because of som software that is running on one of the
> machines but is not needed on the other one.
>
Something like that ?
# cat /etc/relayd.conf
ext_addr="185.xxx.xxx.xxx"
table {
Hello,
I noticed socppc has not been built since 5.8. I guess we can consider it dead
and remove it from 61.html. While at it, delete the duplicate mention of hppa.
Denis
Index: 61.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/61.html,v
retrieving
> It does also need some notice to users that old+new aren't compatible.
> But as far as I'm aware SHA1 and even MD5 are still considered suitable
> for HMAC aren't they?
>
You are right Stuart.
Hi,
A patch to get away from SHA1 in dhcpd
Index: sync.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/dhcpd/sync.c,v
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -p -r1.23 sync.c
--- sync.c 13 Feb 2017 23:04:05 - 1.23
+++ sync.c 25 Feb
Hi,
A patch to get away from SHA1 in spamd
Index: sync.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/libexec/spamd/sync.c,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.12 sync.c
--- sync.c 20 Oct 2016 21:09:46 - 1.12
+++ sync.c 25 Feb
> Thanks. I see the concept when you are in a LAN. But with a WAN, I can't see
> how you can accomplish this. For example: ip public source address is 1.1.1.1,
> destination public ip address is 2.2.2.2 and attacker ip public address is
> 3.3.3.3. To establish communications between these three
> ike from egress to 192.102.11/24 peer 192.102.11.1 srcid kwaccessability.ca
> dstid thinkage.ca tag ipsec-kwa
> ike from 192.168.254/24 to 192.102.11/24 peer 192.102.11.1 srcid
> kwaccessability.ca dstid thinkage.ca tag ipsec-kwa
>
Have you tried to replace 192.102.11/24 with 192.102.11.0/24
Hello,
Here is a patch to update the large communities attribute value. IANA has
changed it from 30 to 32.
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/nKnJVQfsJyAKu6k7ppaFh1GX5ig)
Denis
Index: rde.h
===
RCS file:
Hello,
socppc is mentionned in 60.html but I can't find a build of it.
Denis
Hello,
Is there any reason why ifconfig(8) do not display IPv4 aliases by default ?
If there isn't, I can send a patch to make it the default behaviour.
Denis
Hi John,
> Can anybody recommend a good cloud storage provider that has access via sftp
> or rsync tunneled through ssh? Everything I have found seems targeted at
> Windows, Linux, phones etc. with no platform-agnostic interface.
>
French hoster Online.net has a new storage service called C14.
> I'd like to acquire confident working knowledge in OpenBSD. If no
> such manuals exist, then I'm wondering how did you or other expert
> users learn how to use and administrate the system, what the best
> programming practices are, etc. and have confidence that what they're
> doing is what they
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 08:09:50PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> The idea of terse is that you don't need to parse. So in a way I agree
> with the diff. What I don't like is the inclusion of the number of
> prefixes. That count requires a roundtrip to the RDE to find and sometimes
> this takes a
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 08:09:50PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> The idea of terse is that you don't need to parse. So in a way I agree
> with the diff. What I don't like is the inclusion of the number of
> prefixes. That count requires a roundtrip to the RDE to find and sometimes
> this takes a
> If you do that, then you can also just parse the output of "bgpctl show
> sum", no?
>
Of course but I would have to parse day/hour/minute/second. It is simpler if
bgpd can give me the value straight.
Denis
Hello,
When monitoring my bgpd, I need to check the session duration and the number of
prefixes. Here is a patch that add these informations to "bgpctl show sum
terse"
Before :
# bgpctl show sum terse
10.20.30.254 65003 Established
After :
# bgpctl show sum terse
10.20.30.254 65003 Established
> ---
> r...@openbsd.test.local:~ # route -n show -encap
> route: botched keyword: -encap
> usage: route [-dnqtv] [-T tableid] command [[modifiers] args]
> commands: add, change, delete, exec, flush, get, monitor, show
>
Hi,
> Am I doing something wrong? Or is there any thing I missed?
> Any help would be really appreciated.
>
Are the packets reaching the Linux box ?
Can you see them pass through enc0 ?
What does "route -n show -encap" show ?
> network inet connected is broken in 5.6, 5.8 and -current.
> Restarting bgpd is required when making interface changes.
>
Thank you very much Tony.
Hello,
I'm using -current as a BGP router and "sometimes" it won't put the right
nexthop in FIB. The only thing I played with is the interface that support IP
185.1.2.12 (ifconfig up/down/delete ip /add ip). Anybody can reproduce ?
# bgpctl sh rib 185.22.131.1
flags: * = Valid, > = Selected,
Hi,
Can anyone tell me how to disable CSUM_TCPv4 on em(4) please ?
Thank you in advance,
Denis
Hi,
> I tried to duplicate the configuration on a machine with rl(4) interface and I
> cannot reproduce... em(4) issue perhaps ?
>
When I untag the switch port, I can add the interface and IPv6 address.
Re-tagging the port and everything is fine after that.
Hello,
I am using svlan(4) and when I add a new svlan(4) interface after the system has
booted I always get a duplicated IPv6 and the new interface is not usable. If I
add a /etc/hostname.svlan file and I reboot, everything is fine.
Any idea why ?
Thanks,
Denis
Example (after boot) :
# ifconfig
I tried to duplicate the configuration on a machine with rl(4) interface and I
cannot reproduce... em(4) issue perhaps ?
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 07:08:26PM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using svlan(4) and when I add a new svlan(4) interface after the system
> ha
> Is it possible to disable extra cores in the BIOS ?
> There was a thread on tech@ where someone had a boot issue with a Xeon CPU :
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=145150510526745=2
>
Thank you for the thread, I saw it and tried but without luck.
Anyway I have resolved the problem. It was
Hello,
I have 2 servers with an Intel S5000PSL motherboard and dual Intel Xeon L5420
CPU. When I boot a "recent" OpenBSD (>4.4) it hangs on "wskbd0 at pckbd0:
console keyboard, using wsdisplay1". I tried to disable xhci and acpi without
luck. I have the latest BIOS.
Anything I could try ?
Thank
> Merry Xmas everyone. I want Santa to take over the project :)
>
We already get the gifts in may and november ;)
> How to I tell smtpd to re-route massages currently in the queue to the
> smarthost at smtp.pvt.example.com?
>
I haven't checked lately but it was not possible last time I asked.
> Both, however, ended up shutting down after Theo and various users told them
> that their projects were worthless and that they weren't contributing to
> OpenBSD.
>
I guess they didn't strongly believe in their added value if they cancelled the
project after someone told them it was not worth.
Hello,
I'm using snmpd from base on 5.8 and while playing with snmpbulkget (from
net-snmp), I noticed a weirdness.
* 'snmpbulkget -v2c -c public 10.100.200.19 iso.3.6.1.2.1.1' is ok
* 'snmpbulkget -v2c -c public 10.100.200.19 iso.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1' is ok
By "ok", I mean it returns the correct
> dig and nslookup will remain in base. Go look in our tree at the contortions
> required to keep them there, since ISC has created a mess of their own
> libraries
> and makes the 800 lines of nslookup and 7000 lines of dig use them. Hold your
> nose when you look, ok?
>
As Unbound/nsd are in
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 07:28:48AM +0200, Remi Locherer wrote:
> Strange notation with "-". Never seen such an output from "routei show" or
> "netstat -rn" command.
>
Guess it is a rdns.
> You don't have a default route set for IPv6.
>
I second that :)
Hi,
Is anyone working to add sFlow support to PF ?
Denis
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 05:10:42PM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> I just committed an example configuration line to the sample OpenBGPd
> filter set:
>
> allow from any inet prefix 23.128.0.0/10 prefixlen 24 - 28
>
With OpenBSD5.7 amd64, adding this filter results in :
# bgpd -dnv
...
In light of what Lenovo has been doing to its customers by installing
spyware like superfish and now installing crapware using Microsoft's
Windows Platform Binary Table at the BIOS level. Do people still plan on
purchasing laptops from them going forward. If so whats your reasoning
behind
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
