Enji Cooper writes:
> Please leave this discussion on Twitter instead of flooding these mailing
> lists. Linux/
> OpenBSD should not be exposed to this unnecessary drama, and FreeBSD-CURRENT
> is the wro
> ng mailing list for this (try freebsd-chat@ if you are so inclined).
So you thought, why
James Huddle writes:
> If the following questions trigger a sense of road rage, you may
> safely assume they are not directed to you.
>
> Is anyone running in single-user mode regularly?
I regularly boot things into single user mode to fix something or
otherwise engage in acts which could be
shadrock uhuru writes:
> i've got a couple of follow up queries concerning post upgrade things todo.
>
> --- -dbus-1.12.10p0v0 ---
> Remember to update /etc/machine-id
> how do i update machine_id, i didn't find any man pages to explain ?
Ignore it. Nothing bad will happen. It's a
noah pugsley writes:
> Updated FVWM or a different default config?
>
> Sent from mobile.
> Original Message
> From: Christopher Turkel
> Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 04:22
> Cc: OpenBSD Misc
> Subject: Re: When will be created a great desktop experience for OpenBSD?
>
> I'd like to see an
trondd writes:
> On Sun, May 5, 2019 3:57 pm, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> > My goals are:
> >
> > * /etc/rc already handles fsck of plaintext devices mentioned in
> > /etc/fstab.
> > * /etc/rc already handles mount of plaintext devices mentioned in
> > /etc/fstab.
> > * I would like to activate
Thomas Frohwein writes:
> On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 08:57:55PM +0300, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> [...]
> > Currently after every upgrade I patch /etc/rc to run /etc/rc.blockdev
> > (containing bioctl -cC -p /etc/sd0.key -l sd0a softraid0) before the
> > additional filesystems are checked or mounted.
>
I have a laptop with two hard drives, a small fast ssd and a large slow
hdd (since replaced with a larger fast ssd). Both drives are encrypted
using bioctl. sd1 is the smaller boot device which becomes sd2, sd0 is
the larger device which becomes sd3. sd2 is activated before the kernel
by the
Theo de Raadt writes:
> "Stephane HUC \"PengouinBSD\"" wrote:
>
> > Hi, Tom. Ty for your reply.
> >
> > On my file /etc/doas.conf, i've only one line, as:
> >
> > "permit nopass setenv { ENV PS1 SSH_AUTH_SOCK } :wheel"
^
> So a javascript exploit
Strahil Nikolov writes:
> Hello All,
>
> can someone point me to the link of the OpenBSD code of Conduct ?
I believe OpenBSD's code of conduct can be summed up as "if you are the
type of person who needs a code of conduct to teach to you how to human
then you are not welcome here".
At least I
Anonymous writes:
> Some pointless bullshit or other
Turns out time's not as simple a concept as your average developer assumed.
Apparently you're going to have to learn some things. It could be a first!
Welcome to the real world.
Good luck.
Matthew
Otto Moerbeek writes:
>
> The mechanism is in the docs as well, not only in the code. You
You are of course correct, and OpenBSD has some of the best documentation
I've ever seen, but I've spent so long in linux land that whenever I'm
met with the question of how *exactly* something works, I just
Anonymous writes:
> Otto Moerbeek:
> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 03:13:00PM +, Anonymous wrote:
> >
> >> Here too: https://www.openbsd.org/65.html
> >
> > Does it matter? It is very common for publications to be dated in the
> > future.
> >
> > -Otto
>
> No, it's not common, neither for
Igor Podlesny writes:
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 at 00:59, wrote:
> [...]
> > >
> > > Oh, those hypocrite wankers here and there..
> >
> > If you actually read the code (I know, right? Who DOES that?) you'll see
> > how omalloc_
> init perfectly embarrasses you. In 6.4 it would read the symlink, then
Igor Podlesny writes:
> On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 18:09, Marc Espie wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 12:34:01PM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote:
> > > On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 12:26, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 12:17:21PM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote:
> > > > > Previously
Malte Wedel writes:
> Hello OpenBSD,
>
> I was trying to run Linux inside vmm, by converting an existing
> vmdk-image to qcow2 using qemu-img. While the configuration and setup
> seems to be straightforward, I had filesystem corruption issues on the
> ext4-fs inside the VM.
I would be more
Roderick writes:
> On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
>
> > > Any hint?
> >
> > Yes: [...]
>
> Did you try it?
No but I think you missed the part where I said "and editing
/etc/X11/xenodm/Xservers" which is the where the server binary's options
(and server binary) are specified. For
Roderick writes:
>
> The default changed, X does not receive Tcp connections. In FreeBSD
> I solved the problem with a file .xserverrc in my home directory
> with
>
> exec /usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg -listen tcp
>
> But this does not work with OpenBSD 6.4 (X does not even
> execute .xinitrc, I start X
Roderick writes:
>
> I suspect, umount (that always syncs) is enough and umount
> happens always at shutdown.
How do people cope with "I suspect"? "I suspect" would scare the crap
out of me. Did it never occur that it's possible to _know_?
Not unmounting is dangerous because there are in-memory
Additionally, under which circumstances could/should I use interface
groups and under which rdomains? I cannot discern any practical
difference between them except in how they're labeled (numeric vs.
symbolic) although I confess that my experience with network routing
has been tainted by the Other
Something in the documentation regarding VM network iterface groups is
unclear to me.
I have created a switch and VM in /etc/vm.conf:
switch "private" {
interface bridge0
group private
}
vm "test" {
memory 2G
disable
disk /srv/vm/test.img
interface { switch
Philipp Buehler writes:
> Am 20.12.2018 19:24 schrieb cho...@jtan.com:
> > I'm not sure what you mean by that. The script I posted the other day
> > is part of a (working, tested) process to create an openbsd image
> > within openbsd and then upload it to aws as an iam. I based it on, I
> > think,
Philipp Buehler writes:
> Am 20.12.2018 18:13 schrieb David Diggles:
> > However it's possible to build for AWS.
> > https://github.com/ajacoutot/aws-openbsd
>
> and there's more stuff "in the pipe", since the above
> needs a Linux or OSX environment
>
> Next year ;) it'll be possible to do this
Below is my work-in-progress code to take an openbsd cdXX.iso and inject the
bare minimum necessary to autoinstall from a configuration file embedded in the
image (it also reconfigures the console to run over the serial port -
especially useful on a VM). There are no doubt better ways to do
"Theo de Raadt" writes:
> First time you need to
>
> stty com0
> set tty com0
>
> then you can boot.
>
> The installer will remember this for next time, but our kernel does not
> know the speed so early on.
Strictly speaking the installer _asks_ you if you would like it to remember
the
"Jake D. Parsons" writes:
> You seem to be railing against some perceived notion of injustice in
Injustice? No. Irrelevence.
> some perceived notion utopia. What is the point and agenda here? Why do
Utopia? Have you ever even *run* a computer system? My point is that I'm tired
of the excessive
"Theo de Raadt" writes:
> > Is there, by chance, such a breakdown available for these already?
>
> No. We did our best.
To be fair, these statements are potentially contradictory. If you (plural)
only "did your best" (and what more could have been done?) then it is at least
in *theory*
"who one" writes:
> Hello,
>
> http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/
> http://firmware.openbsd.org/firmware/
>
> When can we have HTTPS connection on these websites?
>
> What website remains that doesn't have HTTPS yet and related to OpenBSD?
>
> Security should be in layers, HTTPS is one
leo_...@volny.cz writes:
>
> Lesson: never configure a public machine to misbehave. People might be
> trying to get work done and take offense if they're stopped in that rude
> manner (just a huge delay, 'permission denied' and closing the connection
> would've IMO certainly sufficed).
Excuse me,
Job control is disabled prior to setting up the auto-install timeout. It
is then re-disabled when the timer has been started.
The second set +m should be set -m or be removed.
# Stop monitoring background processes to avoid printing
# job completion notices in
Bodie writes:
> access then you are screwed. It is just matter of your importance to
> attacker if it will be sooner or later.
You briefly touch on it here
> Attacks on CEO level mentioned in postthey have already laptop
> made in China and there is plenty of examples how HW is screwed up
>
Eric Furman writes:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016, at 09:22 AM, Артур Истомин wrote:
> > With this approach, we will have only one email provider. His name is
> > Google.
> > Spam and other black sides of today email system is price we pay for
> > decentralized system. And it's worth it.
>
> What Nick
Christian Weisgerber writes:
> On 2016-02-06, Lampshade wrote:
>
> > Feb 6 17:57:25 host ntpd[7585]: peer 150.254.183.15 now valid
> > Feb 6 17:58:17 host ntpd[9279]: adjusting local clock by 9.096751s
> > Feb 6 18:02:02 host ntpd[9279]: adjusting local clock by 7.971861s
arrowscr...@mail.com writes:
> Thank you for your help Stuart. I'll just use curl for now. Actually use
torsocks seems a bad practice for any situation, I should just set a
transparent proxy (but the pf.conf
> from torproject.org does not work, I'll need to write is myself some day).
> Thanks
Luciano Rottava da Silva writes:
> Hello,
>
> Same here with fvwm2-2.6.5 (installed via pkg) and 5.8-release.
>
> But in my case it happens when moving or *resizing* any window (xterm,
> firefox, etc.) if I keep mouse pressed doing any of above event "long
> enough".
>
> Looks like this issue
101 - 134 of 134 matches
Mail list logo