Important message for Apple Silicon OpenBSD/arm64 users

2024-05-21 Thread Mark Kettenis
As indicated here: https://social.treehouse.systems/@AsahiLinux/112449204541186432 The system firmware that comes with macOS Sonoma 14.5 triggers a bug in the m1n1 bootloader that is used to boot OpenBSD on these machines. The bug will prevent OpenBSD from booting on some machines after the mac

important change: anoncvs (and cvsync) service at openbsd.cs.toronto.edu

2016-01-24 Thread Nick Holland
tl;dr version: openbsd.cs.toronto.edu anoncvs and cvsync users need to start using anon...@obsdacvs.cs.toronto.edu and cvsync://obsdacvs.cs.toronto.edu instead. Full story: === Important notice for those using the mirror at University of Toronto: Thanks to the OpenBSD Foundation and its

Important SSH patch coming soon

2016-01-14 Thread Theo de Raadt
Important SSH patch coming soon. For now, every on all operating systems, please do the following: Add undocumented "UseRoaming no" to ssh_config or use "-oUseRoaming=no" to prevent upcoming #openssh client bug CVE-2016-0777. More later.

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-15 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Even though the misunderstanding does not seem to occur often, > it does seem somewhat unsurprising because a lot of other software > encourages the (imho questionable) practice of copying example > configuration files. I think the document

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-14 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Jason, Jason McIntyre wrote on Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:58:00PM +: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote: >> Actually, both mandoc and groff would be happy with stuff like >> .Xr boot_alpha 8/alpha >> and off the top of my head, i don't see which tools might brea

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-12 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi Jason, > > Jason McIntyre wrote on Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:29:24AM +: > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 03:19:36PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:02 PM, d...@genunix.com wrote: > > >>> Question .. wher

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-12 Thread patrick keshishian
On 2/12/14, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > Em 12-02-2014 07:48, Ingo Schwarze escreveu: >> Hi, >> >> Giancarlo Razzolini wrote on Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 03:18:39PM -0200: >> >>> The main issue here is, that, the human brain, although being this >>> wonderful machine, makes a lot of assumptions to fill

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-12 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Jason, Jason McIntyre wrote on Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:29:24AM +: > On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 03:19:36PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:02 PM, d...@genunix.com wrote: >>> Question .. where do I get all the man pages? I have some of them >>> but then others are ab

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-12 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini
Em 12-02-2014 07:48, Ingo Schwarze escreveu: > Hi, > > Giancarlo Razzolini wrote on Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 03:18:39PM -0200: > >> The main issue here is, that, the human brain, although being this >> wonderful machine, makes a lot of assumptions to fill in the gaps, even >> when there are *no *gaps t

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-12 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote on Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 03:18:39PM -0200: > The main issue here is, that, the human brain, although being this > wonderful machine, makes a lot of assumptions to fill in the gaps, even > when there are *no *gaps to be filled. I don't know if the documentation > needs

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-10 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini
Em 10-02-2014 00:53, Nick Holland escreveu: > On 02/09/14 14:31, VaZub wrote: >> Sorry, my bad - I assumed that it was only natural for newcomers to >> copy the file and edit it afterwards instead of creating it from >> scratch to override some values. > If you can figure out how to help me write d

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-10 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 03:19:36PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote: > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:02 PM, d...@genunix.com wrote: > > Question .. where do I get all the man pages? I have some of them > > but then others are absent : > > > > > > # man reboot > > REBOOT(8) OpenBSD System Man

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-09 Thread Nick Holland
On 02/09/14 14:31, VaZub wrote: > Sorry, my bad - I assumed that it was only natural for newcomers to > copy the file and edit it afterwards instead of creating it from > scratch to override some values. If you can figure out how to help me write documentation to override people's assumptions, ple

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-09 Thread d...@genunix.com
> Hmm, you never actually came out and said it (no dmesg, ahem), but I'm > guessing that you're running on sparc64? Coming from the Solaris world I am clearly operating on a pile of wrong assumptions. Imagine my surprise where I saw that things like psrinfo and such are absent. OKay, not really

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-09 Thread Philip Guenther
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:02 PM, d...@genunix.com wrote: > Question .. where do I get all the man pages? I have some of them > but then others are absent : > > > # man reboot > REBOOT(8) OpenBSD System Manager's Manual REBOOT(8) ... > SEE ALSO > reboot(2), utmp(5),

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-09 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 18:02, d...@genunix.com wrote: > # man boot_amd64 > man: no entry for boot_amd64 in the manual. > # man boot_i386 > man: no entry for boot_i386 in the manual. > # man boot_sparc > man: no entry for boot_sparc in the manual. man -S sparc boot_sparc

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-09 Thread d...@genunix.com
> > You made a mistake, it got explained to you, you acknowledged it, all > fine. I would only add this: one of the things that is particularly > outstanding about OpenBSD is the documentation. Question .. where do I get all the man pages? I have some of them but then others are absent : # man

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-09 Thread Donald Allen
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:32 PM, VaZub wrote: > Sorry, my bad - I assumed that it was only natural for newcomers to > copy the file and edit it afterwards instead of creating it from > scratch to override some values. Obviously, this assumption was based > on my ignorance and therefore wrong. You a

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-09 Thread VaZub
Sorry, my bad - I assumed that it was only natural for newcomers to copy the file and edit it afterwards instead of creating it from scratch to override some values. Obviously, this assumption was based on my ignorance and therefore wrong. You are also right to point out that to "copy the lines" is

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-09 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
VaZub writes: > Both the man page for rc.conf(8) as well as the official OpenBSD FAQ > (10.3) suggest to avoid editing /etc/rc.conf directly and instead copy > it to /etc/rc.conf.local and edit afterwards. rc.conf(8) says It is advisable to leave rc.conf untouched, and instead create and

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-09 Thread Kirill Bychkov
On Sun, February 9, 2014 22:28, VaZub wrote: > Hi all, > > There is a small nuisance I've stumbled upon during my first > experiments with OpenBSD. > > Both the man page for rc.conf(8) as well as the official OpenBSD FAQ > (10.3) suggest to avoid editing /etc/rc.conf directly and instead copy > it

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-09 Thread Barry Grumbine
The FAQ says the same: "We strongly suggest you do not alter /etc/rc.conf itself. Instead, create or edit the file /etc/rc.conf.local, copy just the lines you need to change from /etc/rc.conf and adjust them as you like." rc.conf is gives a good hint as well: # To select the service options you de

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-09 Thread Rogier Krieger
Though I looked on a 5.3 system, rc.conf(8) suggests the following: "It is advisable to leave rc.conf untouched, and instead create and edit a new rc.conf.local file." That's rather different from creating a copy. From a brief look at CVS, it's the same for -current. Regards, Rogier On Sun, Fe

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-09 Thread Bret Lambert
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 08:28:43PM +0200, VaZub wrote: > Hi all, > > There is a small nuisance I've stumbled upon during my first > experiments with OpenBSD. > > Both the man page for rc.conf(8) as well as the official OpenBSD FAQ > (10.3) suggest to avoid editing /etc/rc.conf directly and instea

Re: Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-09 Thread Kenneth Westerback
rc.conf(8) says "create and edit a rc.conf.local". Not copy rc.conf. I'm not sure what the FAQ says but I'd think it would be similar advice. Ken On 9 February 2014 13:28, VaZub wrote: > Hi all, > > There is a small nuisance I've stumbled upon during my first > experiments with OpenBSD. > >

Documentation on rc.conf.local lacks important warning

2014-02-09 Thread VaZub
Hi all, There is a small nuisance I've stumbled upon during my first experiments with OpenBSD. Both the man page for rc.conf(8) as well as the official OpenBSD FAQ (10.3) suggest to avoid editing /etc/rc.conf directly and instead copy it to /etc/rc.conf.local and edit afterwards. Yet it seems bot

Re: Important: following -current update!

2013-04-16 Thread Nick Holland
On 04/16/13 06:13, Michał Markowski wrote: > $ cd /usr/src/sys/arch/`uname -m`/config > cd: no such file or directory: /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/config > $ cd /usr/src/sys/arch/`uname -m`/conf > $ > > > --- /cvs/www/faq/current.html Tue Apr 16 11:54:22 2013 > +++ /tmp/current.html Tue Apr 16 12:

Re: Important: following -current update!

2013-04-16 Thread Michał Markowski
$ cd /usr/src/sys/arch/`uname -m`/config cd: no such file or directory: /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/config $ cd /usr/src/sys/arch/`uname -m`/conf $ --- /cvs/www/faq/current.html Tue Apr 16 11:54:22 2013 +++ /tmp/current.html Tue Apr 16 12:10:27 2013 @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ Update entire source tree

Important: following -current update!

2013-04-15 Thread Philip Guenther
While it's often the case that you can leave our steps when building -current from source, it is sometimes ABSOLUTELY REQUIRED that you followed the steps precisely. This is one of those times. If you build a -current kernel without running config(8) and "make clean", then the resulting kernel WI

Is this CVS message important? Trying to update -stable sources.

2012-11-07 Thread John Long
Hello misc@ Trying to update -stable sources I got the following message: root@host:/usr/src# cvs -q -d$CVSROOT up -Pd cvs server: use `cvs add' to create an entry for gnu/usr.bin/gcc/INSTALL Attempting to comply with cvs's wishes: root@host:/usr/src# cvs add gnu/usr.bin/gcc/INSTALL cvs [add ab

Message: Important SN�GG Merchant Information !

2012-07-02 Thread SN�GG MEDICAL
We'd like to inform you that your Secure Messages Center has (1) new message. Please login to your SNØGG Merchant Services account and visit the Secure Message Center section in order to read the message. Login to your SNØGG MEDICAL Merchant account (The Message Center contains only impo

Re: hi, hope you are fine, my Name is Paulina, I will want us to be friends, for something important which I would like to share with u, & we will get to know each other better i am waiting for your r

2012-05-30 Thread paulinadiane27
Re: hi, hope you are fine, my Name is Paulina, I will want us to be friends, for something important which I would like to share with u, & we will get to know each other better i am waiting for your responds, ( distance or colour does not matter ) urs Paul thought you would be interested in

Virtual Merchant - Important Account Information

2012-01-06 Thread Virtual Merchant
VirtualMerchant We'd like to inform you that your Secure Messages Center has 1 new message. Please login to your VirtualMerchant account and visit the Secure Message Center section in order to read the message. Login to your VirtualMerchant account (The Message Center contains only impo

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-20 Thread Henning Brauer
* Hassan Monfared [2011-09-19 08:17]: > why don't you try xen ? > The XenB. hypervisor, the powerful open source industry standard for > virtualization, offers a powerful, efficient, and secure feature set for > virtualization of x86, x86_64, IA64, ARM, and other CPU architectures. can we please

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-20 Thread Tomas Bodzar
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Michel Blais wrote: > The're also proxmox ve that is really nice for virtualisation. > > http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Main_Page As it's based on OpenVZ and KVM it doesn't seems to be answer on question in subject.

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-20 Thread Michel Blais
The're also proxmox ve that is really nice for virtualisation. http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Main_Page

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-19 Thread Corey
On 09/19/2011 09:15 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote: > > > On 20 September 2011 14:08, Corey > wrote: > > On 09/19/2011 08:04 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote: > > If you are Going to use linux as your dom0 I STRONGLY > recommend against > virtual

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-19 Thread Joel Wiramu Pauling
On 20 September 2011 14:08, Corey wrote: > On 09/19/2011 08:04 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote: > >> If you are Going to use linux as your dom0 I STRONGLY recommend against >> virtual box. Vb is the retarded stillborn twin of kvm. Kvm is twice as >> fast >> in mainline and not controlled by oracle

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-19 Thread Corey
On 09/19/2011 08:04 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote: If you are Going to use linux as your dom0 I STRONGLY recommend against virtual box. Vb is the retarded stillborn twin of kvm. Kvm is twice as fast in mainline and not controlled by oracle sent from android handset. Please mind the brevity. On S

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-19 Thread L. V. Lammert
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote: > If you are Going to use linux as your dom0 I STRONGLY recommend against > virtual box. Vb is the retarded stillborn twin of kvm. Kvm is twice as fast > in mainline and not controlled by oracle > For production use, Xen and orchestrate seems to be g

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-19 Thread Joel Wiramu Pauling
ot; wrote: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 6:17 AM, lancebaynes87 wrote: >> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/20917/are-there-any-virtualization-solutions-for-openbsd-important-no-package-from >> >> I'm searching for Virtualization solutions: >> >> OpenBSD: host &

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-19 Thread ropers
Hassan Monfared wrote: > subject to correction of a lock-up bug in OpenBSD to support Xen Hosting On 19 September 2011 09:20, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > And eg. this one is not so hard > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&w=2&r=1&s=dom0&q=b Has anyone (qualified) ever taken an interest in the bug Chri

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-19 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 6:17 AM, lancebaynes87 wrote: > http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/20917/are-there-any-virtualization-solutions-for-openbsd-important-no-package-from > > I'm searching for Virtualization solutions: > > OpenBSD: host > CentOS: guest > &g

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-19 Thread Tomas Bodzar
64, IA64, ARM, and other CPU architectures. >>> > visit Xen at www.Xen.org >>> > >>> > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Tomas Bodzar >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> >> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:17 PM, lancebaynes87 >>> >> >>>

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-19 Thread Tomas Bodzar
architectures. >> > visit Xen at www.Xen.org >> > >> > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Tomas Bodzar >> > wrote: >> > >> >> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:17 PM, lancebaynes87 >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> &

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-19 Thread Hassan Monfared
ARM, and other CPU architectures. >> > visit Xen at www.Xen.org >> > >> > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Tomas Bodzar > >wrote: >> > >> >> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:17 PM, lancebaynes87 < >> lancebayne...@zoho.com> >> >&

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-19 Thread Hassan Monfared
; > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > > http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/20917/are-there-any-virtualization-so > > lutions-for-openbsd-important-no-package-from > >> > > >> > I'm searching for Virtualization solutions:

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-18 Thread Hassan Monfared
10 PM, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:17 PM, lancebaynes87 > wrote: > > > http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/20917/are-there-any-virtualization-so lutions-for-openbsd-important-no-package-from > > > > I'm searching for Virtualization solutions: &g

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-18 Thread Tomas Bodzar
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:17 PM, lancebaynes87 wrote: > http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/20917/are-there-any-virtualization-solutions-for-openbsd-important-no-package-from > > I'm searching for Virtualization solutions: > > OpenBSD: host > CentOS: guest > &g

Re: Are there any virtualization solutions for OpenBSD? (!important: no package from ports!)

2011-09-17 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
> What are my solutions? I'm searching for one that doesn't use packages from > ports. Are there any? There are none. Consider using qemu from ports, or better, don't use virtualization.

Important bge(4) diff to test!

2011-02-17 Thread Robert Nagy
Hello, The following diff is really important because on some machines bge(4) gets detached because of ASPM. The following diff is also in the latest snapshots but you can also compile a kernel with it. So if you have a bge(4) please update/compile a kernel and get back to me if it works or fails

Important message about your Account!

2010-11-29 Thread G00GLE
Dear AdWords Advertiser, For quality services and running your ads without any problems (Innactive account meaning Pausing your Ads) check your AdWords account. Verify your AdWords account now. 2010. Google is a trademark of Google Inc. All other company and product names may be trademarks of th

Important

2010-11-28 Thread Important
[IMAGE] Vous devez adhC)rer au service d'authentification des opC)ration carte sur internet. Cliquez ici [IMAGE]

Important Notification

2010-09-25 Thread notification
According to eBay @ 2010 license agreement , you are required to update your eBay Buyer Protection service . Please read the attached secure form , and follow instructions . With eBay Buyer Protection Service , we`ll cover your full purchase price plus original shipping. If you don`t receive your i

Important Notification

2010-09-25 Thread notification
According to eBay @ 2010 license agreement , you are required to update your eBay Buyer Protection service . Please read the attached secure form , and follow instructions . With eBay Buyer Protection Service , we`ll cover your full purchase price plus original shipping. If you don`t receive you

ANUNT IMPORTANT

2010-06-09 Thread Bancpost | Fastbanking
Stimate client, Luni, 07 iunie 2010, departamentul de securitate Bancpost a semnalat incercarea de spargere a bazei de date Internet Banking. Din acest motiv, pentru siguranta si buna desfasurare a tranzactiilor online, te rugam sa te inregistrezi in noua baza de date, cu o noua masura de siguran

Important Message

2009-07-13 Thread Egg Card
Egg - let's sort money out [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Your Egg Card. It's live and ready to go. [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Dear Egg customer It has come to our attention that your Egg Card needs to be updated as part of our continuing commitment toprotect your online ca

Important Security Information

2009-07-02 Thread CUA
Dear Member, Your CUA Member Number and Web Access Code (WAC) has been locked temporarily due to many unsuccessful login attempts. You are kindly advised to Logon to Web Banker and follow the instructions on your screen. The data submitted will be transmitted over an SSL encrypted connection (12

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-27 Thread J Sisson
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Bob Beck wrote: > Oh please. like the address coming from "openbsd.org" matters... It's > *email*... > You seem to have misunderstood my comment. If e-mail address "A" is in the set {"legit", "potentially spoofed"}, then you have to have additional measures to

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-27 Thread Bob Beck
> That's not *just* funny...it makes my sides hurt. > > To others thinking about responding: > > Check the OP's email address. Note that it doesn't end with "openbsd.org" > or similar. > Oh please. like the address coming from "openbsd.org" matters... It's *email*... $ dig openbsd.org mx ; <

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-27 Thread Bob Beck
> > > Original thread: > http://marc.info/?t=12428629293&r=1&w=2 > > Message that Bob replied to, starting a new thread (at least as far as > Gmail is concerned): The in-reply-to header was correct, just because the subject line changes doesn't make it a new thread. Mutt seems to u

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-27 Thread ropers
>> * Chris Harries [2009-05-26 10:48]: >>> >>> it sure beats everyone moaning at me as they cannot read e-mails clearly >>> marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WONT WORK, then moaning >>> when their email doesn't work >>> > Bob Bec

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-27 Thread Pete Vickers
-mails clearly marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WONT WORK, then moaning when their email doesn't work IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK We are refreshing our openbsd mailing lists to ensure that the list memberships correctly match our business process and securi

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-27 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 01:13:26AM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote: > >> explanation will follow once you provide the neccesary provide of > > > > ehhh s/provide/proof > > huh? > sed: 1: "s/provide/proof": unterminated substitute in regular expression who said I was using sed? vi allows that. >

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-27 Thread patrick keshishian
8]: >> >> >> >>> it sure beats everyone moaning at me as they cannot read e-mails clearly >> >>> marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WONT WORK, then moaning when their >> >>> email doesn't work >> >>> >> >> &g

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-27 Thread Otto Moerbeek
y cannot read e-mails clearly > >>> marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WONT WORK, then moaning when > >>> their > >>> email doesn't work > >>> > >> > >> IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK > >>

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-27 Thread patrick keshishian
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > Bob Beck wrote: >> >> * Chris Harries [2009-05-26 10:48]: >> >>> >>> it sure beats everyone moaning at me as they cannot read e-mails clearly >>> marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-27 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:29:10AM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > Bob Beck wrote: >> * Chris Harries [2009-05-26 10:48]: >> >>> it sure beats everyone moaning at me as they cannot read e-mails clearly >>> marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WONT WORK,

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-27 Thread Gregory Edigarov
Bob Beck wrote: * Chris Harries [2009-05-26 10:48]: it sure beats everyone moaning at me as they cannot read e-mails clearly marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WONT WORK, then moaning when their email doesn't work IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK We are

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-26 Thread J Sisson
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:58 PM, J Sisson wrote: > > Check the OP's email address. Note that it doesn't end with " > openbsd.org" > > or similar. > > b...@openbsd.org doesn't end with openbsd.org? You need to work on > your regex skills. >

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-26 Thread Ted Unangst
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:58 PM, J Sisson wrote: > Check the OP's email address. Note that it doesn't end with "openbsd.org" > or similar. b...@openbsd.org doesn't end with openbsd.org? You need to work on your regex skills.

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-26 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
>> > Sam Fourman Jr. >> > sfour...@gmail.com >> > rlz686 >> >> Now that's funny. >> >> kmw > > > That's not *just* funny...it makes my sides hurt. > > To others thinking about responding: > > Check the OP's email address. Note that it doesn't end with "openbsd.org" > or similar. Oh WOW I guess I

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-26 Thread J Sisson
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Kevin Wilcox wrote: > 2009/5/26 Sam Fourman Jr. : > > > Sam Fourman Jr. > > sfour...@gmail.com > > rlz686 > > Now that's funny. > > kmw That's not *just* funny...it makes my sides hurt. To others thinking about responding: Check the OP's email address. Note th

IMPORTANT : Alert About Your AOL Billing Information On File

2009-05-26 Thread AOL Member Services Team
Dear Valued Member, We were unable to process your most recent payment. Did you recently change your bank, phone number or credit card? To ensure that your service is not interrupted, please update your billing information today by clicking here https://bill.aol.com, After a few clicks, just veri

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-26 Thread Diana Eichert
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Bob Beck wrote: * Chris Harries [2009-05-26 10:48]: it sure beats everyone moaning at me as they cannot read e-mails clearly marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WONT WORK, then moaning when their email doesn't work IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-26 Thread Morris, Roy
lmao! -Original Message- From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Wilcox Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:02 PM To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK 2009/5/26 Sam Fourman Jr. : > Sam Fo

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-26 Thread Kevin Wilcox
2009/5/26 Sam Fourman Jr. : > Sam Fourman Jr. > sfour...@gmail.com > rlz686 Now that's funny. kmw -- To take from one, because it is thought that his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers have not exercised equal industry

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-26 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com rlz686 On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Bob Beck wrote: > * Chris Harries [2009-05-26 10:48]: >> it sure beats everyone moaning at me as they cannot read e-mails clearly >> marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WONT WORK, then moaning when

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-26 Thread Neal Hogan
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:00 PM, STeve Andre' wrote: > On Tuesday 26 May 2009 12:54:08 Bob Beck wrote: >> * Chris Harries [2009-05-26 10:48]: >> > it sure beats everyone moaning at me as they cannot read e-mails clearly >> > marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-M

Re: IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-26 Thread STeve Andre'
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 12:54:08 Bob Beck wrote: > * Chris Harries [2009-05-26 10:48]: > > it sure beats everyone moaning at me as they cannot read e-mails clearly > > marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WONT WORK, then moaning when > > their email doesn't work >

IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK

2009-05-26 Thread Bob Beck
* Chris Harries [2009-05-26 10:48]: > it sure beats everyone moaning at me as they cannot read e-mails clearly > marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WONT WORK, then moaning when their > email doesn't work IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK We are refreshing

Re: Help to test important azalia(4) diffs

2008-10-14 Thread Rafal Brodewicz
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:18:58PM +0300, Alexey Suslikov wrote: > Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > We have two important diffs to azalia(4) audio driver. > > 1. http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=122365193510743&w=2 > 2. http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=12238149282514

Help to test important azalia(4) diffs

2008-10-13 Thread Alexey Suslikov
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED] We have two important diffs to azalia(4) audio driver. 1. http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=122365193510743&w=2 (If you mixerctl output shows to many items, you definitely should try this one and report to us). 2. http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=122

Avis Important

2008-04-11 Thread Service Desjardins
[IMAGE] Configuration des paramhtres de sicuriti Cher Membres AcchsD: Particuliers et Entreprises Lors de votre prochaine connexion ` AcchsD ou ` AcchsD Affaires, vous serez inviti ` configurer vos nouveaux paramhtres de sicuriti pour maintenir la sicurit

Arab Beverages 2007, more important speakers confirmed

2007-06-11 Thread ABF Marketing Team

Important wpi(4) changes in -current

2007-06-05 Thread damien . bergamini
I've just committed some important changes to the wpi(4) driver for Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG adapters: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=118107389909915 Those changes require that you upgrade your wpi-firmware package to version 2.14.3 or your adapter will stop working. The firmwar

important issues

2007-04-17 Thread Bank of Montreal Estatement
e banking. Yours sincerely, Jeremy Dean's signature Jeremy Dean General Manager Consumer Distribution Consumer Financial Services PS From 16 April you'll be able to recycle all your important documents safely at most BMO Bank of Montreal Branches. Just look for the BMO Bank of Montreal Secur

Re: Important OpenBSD errata

2007-03-19 Thread Kyle George
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Karel Kulhavy wrote: What about Charlie Root testing something remotely through cron and then Ok, I'll bite. This is not hard. Here's something I did real quick. Use at your own risk. Replace XXX with your closest ftp mirror from http://www.openbsd.org/ftp.html. Read

Re: Important OpenBSD errata

2007-03-18 Thread Shane J Pearson
On 18/03/2007, at 4:25 PM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 19:08 +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote: I also suggest that the list include the cumulative amount for each donor, sorted so that the biggest donors are at the top. To me, this makes about as much sense as publishing a similar l

Re: Important OpenBSD errata

2007-03-17 Thread Shawn K. Quinn
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 19:08 +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote: > I also suggest that the list include the cumulative amount > for each donor, sorted so that the biggest donors are at the > top. To me, this makes about as much sense as publishing a similar list for penis size (and whatever its female equi

Re: Important OpenBSD errata

2007-03-17 Thread Jack J. Woehr
Travers Buda wrote: * Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-17 19:47:00]: It would be better if OpenBSD could be maintained secure even without a skilled security professional. Today's trend is that things are accomodated to ordinary people. You don't need a driver anymore to professio

Re: Important OpenBSD errata

2007-03-17 Thread Travers Buda
* Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-17 19:47:00]: > It would be better if OpenBSD could be maintained secure even without a > skilled > security professional. > > Today's trend is that things are accomodated to ordinary people. You don't > need > a driver anymore to professionally driv

Re: Important OpenBSD errata

2007-03-17 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 08:43:57PM +, Deanna Phillips wrote: > Ray Percival writes: > > > No. Everybody with a clue knows that there is two sources for > > good data. The errata page and source-changes. > > I'd like to add undeadly's RSS here, since I don't think anyone > has mentioned it yet

Re: Important OpenBSD errata

2007-03-17 Thread Ray Percival
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 17, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Karel Kulhavy wrote: On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 11:43:47AM +1100, fonkprop wrote: Yet again, we see that although Theo is willing to beg, wheedle and threaten his user community into sending him money when he needs it, h

Re: Important OpenBSD errata

2007-03-17 Thread Deanna Phillips
Ray Percival writes: > No. Everybody with a clue knows that there is two sources for > good data. The errata page and source-changes. I'd like to add undeadly's RSS here, since I don't think anyone has mentioned it yet. There are two RSS feeds that would have alerted people to this: one for stor

Re: Important OpenBSD errata

2007-03-17 Thread Theo de Raadt
> I get a kick out of people who are too slack to spend the two hours > of reading and twenty minutes of unattended execution time it takes > to CVS or patch a kernel and compile it. Some of these people clearly think they are entitled. But they are not entitled. Nothing entitles them to anythin

Re: Important OpenBSD errata

2007-03-17 Thread Ben Calvert
christ. buddha. the thread that would not die. i invoke godwins law in a (probably ) unsuccessful attempt to end the insanity: nazi nazi holocaust, nazi. On Mar 17, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Karel Kulhavy wrote: [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pkcs7-signature which had a

Re: Important OpenBSD errata

2007-03-17 Thread Karel Kulhavy
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 11:43:47AM +1100, fonkprop wrote: > Yet again, we see that although Theo is willing to beg, wheedle and threaten > his user community into sending him money when he needs it, he holds them in > too much contempt to respond to simple, uncontroversial and valid criticism. > >

Re: Important OpenBSD errata

2007-03-17 Thread Woodchuck
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Darren Spruell wrote: > On 3/16/07, Martin Schrvder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip blah blah blah...] > > I want > everyone trying to make that point to think of all the software > vendors they deal with, inclu

Re: Important OpenBSD errata

2007-03-17 Thread Jason George
>> > Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." >> > -- Robert A. Heinlein >> >> I was trying to decide if I should reply, and if so, how. >> >> I looked for your name on the donations list. I don't see it. > >Out of curiosity, when I bought several t-shirts at the

  1   2   3   >