Of course this is all useless to the O.P. because you
didn't include a link to a HOWTO.
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:04 +0200, Raimo Niskanen
raimo+open...@erix.ericsson.se wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 06:59:25PM +0800, shweg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
On
2010/4/18 Kim 4secure...@neomailbox.net
@ Zachary
fwiw - I have Windows XP, Linux, and OpenBSD running on one machine
using two drives, but it should be possible with one.
I would recommend installing Windows first, or if already installed, shrink
the partition using Ranish partition
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 08:48:26AM +0800, shweg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, J Sisson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:28 AM, trustlevel-...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
You can actually have MANY more than 4 OS on one drive, but it does get
rather
complicated and not worth the effort
OpenBSD does not require a primary partition, nor does NetBSD. Solaris does
for the moment,
although code to fix that has been committed.
I have a Windows 7 x64, OpenBSD, Solaris, NetBSD multiboot. It's not that
difficult to arrange.
I did most of the partitioning in Windows, setting up a
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 08:48:26AM +0800, shweg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, J Sisson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:28 AM, trustlevel-...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
You can actually have MANY more than 4 OS on one drive, but it does get
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:07 +0100, Peter Kay (Syllopsium)
syllops...@syllopsium.com wrote:
OpenBSD does not require a primary partition, nor does NetBSD. Solaris
does
for the moment,
although code to fix that has been committed.
I have a Windows 7 x64, OpenBSD, Solaris, NetBSD multiboot.
From: Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com
as appropriate if you're using grub etc or XP..
Another Option. Assuming a i386 or amd64 PC:
1. Put another hard drive into the computer.
2. Go into the BIOS and make the new hard drive have higher priority.
3. Boot the computer and install OpenBSD onto
On 04/19/10 07:13, Brad Tilley wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:07 +0100, Peter Kay (Syllopsium)
syllops...@syllopsium.com wrote:
OpenBSD does not require a primary partition, nor does NetBSD. Solaris
does
for the moment,
although code to fix that has been committed.
I have a Windows 7 x64,
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 06:59:25PM +0800, shweg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 08:48:26AM +0800, shweg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, J Sisson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:28 AM, trustlevel-...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
You
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:59 AM, shweg...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course I boot using the Vista bootloader and easybcd to edit the
configuration, which saves a lot of headache. The important thing is it can
be done.
:)
How Do you Tell the OpenBSD Installer to install to a logical partition?
From: Siju George sgeorge...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:59 AM, shweg...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course I boot using the Vista bootloader and easybcd to edit the
configuration, which saves a lot of headache. The important thing is it
can
be done.
:)
How Do you Tell the OpenBSD
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:52:36 -0400
Donald Allen donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
Donald Allen wrote:
After getting subjected to some of this nonsense personally, having
asked a question on openbsd-tech (and was in the midst of a useful
exchange with Bob Beck until it was interrupted out of
@ Zachary
fwiw - I have Windows XP, Linux, and OpenBSD running on one machine
using two drives, but it should be possible with one.
I would recommend installing Windows first, or if already installed, shrink
the partition using Ranish partition manager or Parted Magic.
Create two new primary
http://www.aei.mpg.de/~pau/zen_process_obsd.html
2010/4/18 Kim 4secure...@neomailbox.net:
@ Zachary
fwiw - I have Windows XP, Linux, and OpenBSD running on one machine
using two drives, but it should be possible with one.
I would recommend installing Windows first, or if already installed,
: OpenBSD Culture? - dual boot info
To: misc@openbsd.org
Date: Sunday, April 18, 2010, 7:24 AM
@ Zachary
fwiw - I have Windows XP, Linux, and OpenBSD running on one machine
using two drives, but it should be possible with one.
I would recommend installing Windows first, or if already installed, shrink
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:52:36AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote:
accumulation of discomfort about the behavior of this community.
It's not about a COMMUNITY here. It's about an OS and good code.
If you want am smooth, senseless
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de
wrote:
What detail in the original reply Theo sent to the OP (and quoted
it later on this list) was rude?
The lack of an answer. He could have said Yes. Check your nearest
search engine for details. Which would have
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Donald Allen donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the compliment, but I'm a *lot* older than nine.
Yet you still believe that it's ok for guests to tell the hosts how to
behave in their home. Amazing. What culture are you from?
//art
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Chris Dukes pak...@pr.neotoma.org wrote:
Multibooting is having several operating systems on one computer, and some
means of selecting which OS is to boot. It is not a trivial task! If you don't
understand what you are doing, you may end up deleting large
on their own if possible. I must say I detect a certain attitude that
smacks of superiority and even condescension at times. Is this a fair
assessment of 6the OpenBSD culture?
Zach
http://www.fidei.org
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Artur Grabowski a...@blahonga.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Donald Allen donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the compliment, but I'm a *lot* older than nine.
Yet you still believe that it's ok for guests to tell the hosts how to
behave in
Donald Allen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Artur Grabowski a...@blahonga.org
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Donald Allen
donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the compliment, but I'm a *lot* older than nine.
Yet you still believe that it's ok for guests to tell
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Tony Abernethy t...@servasoftware.com wrote:
Donald Allen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Artur Grabowski a...@blahonga.org
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Donald Allen
donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the compliment, but I'm a
Donald Allen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Tony Abernethy t...@servasoftware.com wrote:
Donald Allen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Artur Grabowski a...@blahonga.org
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Donald Allen
donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the
Donald Allen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Artur Grabowski a...@blahonga.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Donald Allen donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the compliment, but I'm a *lot* older than nine.
Yet you still believe that it's ok for guests to tell the
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Vijay Sankar vsan...@foretell.ca wrote:
Regardless of your standards of etiquette that anyone may have violated, it
is a shame that you would drop financial support for the OpenBSD project. It
is especially unfair because there is nothing a developer can do
Donald Allen wrote:
So you believe civility and correctness are mutually exclusive?
Interesting.
Hardly, but if I am given a choice, I will take correctness.
You seem to be under the impression that either correctness is
irrelevant or that somehow civility implies correctness.
As for mutual
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 04:16:08PM +0800, Artur Grabowski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Donald Allen donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the compliment, but I'm a *lot* older than nine.
Yet you still believe that it's ok for guests to tell the hosts how to
behave in their
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 04:16:08PM +0800, Artur Grabowski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Donald Allen donaldcal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for the compliment, but I'm a *lot* older than nine.
Yet you still
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 08:37:18AM -0600, Ted Roby wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 04:16:08PM +0800, Artur Grabowski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Donald Allen donaldcal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for the
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
yeah, you can also find culture in petri dishes, you know... ;-)
and Theo's counter?
(still more trolling)
*snag*
(how can one take this thread seriously ?)
You can't, if you take it correctly!
At least pink noise
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 03:26:14PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Chris Dukes pak...@pr.neotoma.org wrote:
Multibooting is having several operating systems on one computer, and some
means of selecting which OS is to boot. It is not a trivial task! If you
Now I'm seeing new PCs with.
1) Primary partition for the M$ equivalent of /boot
2) Primary partition with the main M$ install
3) Primary partition with the recovery bits.
Install Linux and that 4th primary partition becomes the
extended
partition. No place for OpenBSD.
You can actually
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:28 AM, trustlevel-...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
You can actually have MANY more than 4 OS on one drive, but it does get rather
complicated and not worth the effort which certainly wouldn't help here.
The point was that OpenBSD requires a primary partition.
=
Your analogy doesn't go far enough. Better: guests in a home being
asked for contributions and also being insulted, both by the hosts.
Guess it depends on your recent culture, I can recall many times when me and
my
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.orgwrote:
=
Your analogy doesn't go far enough. Better: guests in a home being
asked for contributions and also being insulted, both by the hosts.
On 4/16/2010 10:57 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
(yo, your momma used to suck dead Stallmans through straws)
I find this highly insulting. used to, indeed.
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, J Sisson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:28 AM, trustlevel-...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
You can actually have MANY more than 4 OS on one drive, but it does get rather
complicated and not worth the effort which certainly wouldn't help here.
The point was that OpenBSD
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:39 PM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Marco, instead of complaining about GNU, GPL, FSF, Linux, etc. Why
don't you write some code instead? I know it's a strange concept.
Hehehe. A funny hippie.
//art
On 04/15/10 01:39, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
Fascinating. I predicted Peereboom would post the same old rant.
My fix has nothing to do with childish attitude or being more nerdy than
you. It has everything do with GNU's twisted definition of freedom.
Yet, that's YOUR
Eh? Was it irony? I suppose that not and you need to learn A LOT about
who is Marco ;-)
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:39 PM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Marco, instead of complaining about GNU, GPL, FSF, Linux, etc. Why
don't you write some code instead? I know it's a
Eh? Was it irony? I suppose that not and you need to learn A LOT about
who is Marco ;-)
Search for Strange concept on marc.info.
Then apply some logical thinking yourself, and quit drinking Stallman's
kool-aid.
Funny.
How many restrictions are in the BSD and ISC licenses? For all intents
and purposes, one: keep the copyright message intact. Otherwise, *free*
to do with as you please. That's a fact.
http://marc.info/?w=2r=1s=%22Strange+concept%22q=t
and?
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:37 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Eh? Was it irony? I suppose that not and you need to learn A LOT about
who is Marco ;-)
Search for Strange concept on marc.info.
On 14/04/2010 19:27, J Sisson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:38:56PM -0500, Ron McDowell wrote:
Yup, nowhere in that goals page does it say anything about don't be
rude to the casual users. Maybe that is why
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:35 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
The fact that I'm not a developer does not means I should remain
in silence.
The general approach there has always been:
Shut up and hack!
-dav
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 04:35:36AM -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
That's because I don't yell GPL is not free while I'm using GPL.
what's wrong with that? if I use Windows and yell Windows is not free,
would you think the same?
I'm curious, what freedom do you think the GPL brings to
If you define freedom by the number of restrictions, then
the only
free license would be no license at all. Public domain. No
copyright.
Thus no restrictions. No ALL CAPs notices. Not even
crediting the
original developers.
So you think that giving people the freedom to know where the code
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de
wrote:
What detail in the original reply Theo sent to the OP (and quoted
it later on this list) was rude?
The lack of an answer. He could have said Yes. Check your nearest
search engine for details. Which would have
, and OpenBSD culture is when Theo forgets something on the kitchen
counter and doesn't put it back in the fridge before leaving town for a hike.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 02:39:29AM -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
Fascinating. I predicted Peereboom would post the same old rant.
My fix has nothing to do with childish attitude or being more nerdy
than
you. It has everything do with GNU's twisted definition of freedom.
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 04:35 -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Then apply some logical thinking yourself, and quit drinking Stallman's
kool-aid.
Funny.
He just spoke TRUTH, Your ilk is unfamiliar with that and its concept.
How many restrictions are in the BSD
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:38 +0100, - Tethys tet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de
wrote:
What detail in the original reply Theo sent to the OP (and quoted
it later on this list) was rude?
The lack of an answer. He could have said
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:49 AM, trustlevel-...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
So you think that giving people the freedom to know where the code has come
from to allow them to not get conned and not use old, possibly insecure
code
and giving them the ability to contribute to the original source of the
[begin quote]
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de
wrote:
What detail in the original reply Theo sent to the OP (and quoted
it later on this list) was rude?
The lack of an answer. He could have said Yes. Check your nearest
search engine for details. Which
Donald Allen wrote:
After getting subjected to some of this nonsense personally, having
asked a question on openbsd-tech (and was in the midst of a useful
exchange with Bob Beck until it was interrupted out of the blue by
someone who apparently enjoys behaving like an unruly 10-year-old; it
had
Donald Allen wrote:
After getting subjected to some of this nonsense personally, having
asked a question on openbsd-tech (and was in the midst of a useful
exchange with Bob Beck until it was interrupted out of the blue by
someone who apparently enjoys behaving like an unruly 10-year-old; it
That's because I don't yell GPL is not free while I'm using GPL.
what's wrong with that? if I use Windows and yell Windows is not free,
would you think the same?
If you were insulting a Windows user, probably.
I'm curious, what freedom do you think the GPL brings to those people
who use
For them? Maybe the freedom to give copies to their friends whithout
being sued or doing anything illegal.
That can easily be applied to any of the free licenses without any
other legal obligations.
Lets try it.
0 X (Y + Z)
Y 0
Z 0
ISC = X
GPL = X + Y + Z
Logical enough for you?
If you assume that the definition of freedom is the number of
restrictions, then neither ISC nor GPL are free. The only free
license would be no license at all. Public domain.
Since _my_ definition of
For them? Maybe the freedom to give copies to their friends whithout
being sued or doing anything illegal.
That can easily be applied to any of the free licenses without any
other legal obligations.
Yes! Because they are all free (in _my_ opinion). I like GPL, ISC,
BSD, all of them.
See I told you logic wouldn't work for you.
The dictionary definition of freedom is no restrictions therefore more
restriction is less free. Not sure how you can argue that.
ISC has one restriction, the GPL has numerous therefore less free.
Again not sure how this is debatable.
If you prefer
The dictionary definition of freedom is no restrictions
NO RESTRICTIONS
May I point out to you that ISC has restrictions. You are
contradicting yourself.
Logic works the same for everyone, since it's an abstract
field, but apparently you did not study it.
I work with a lot of systems integrator types - they deliver finished
platforms to run apps we develop on. A lot of familiarity with Solaris and
Centos. One day, a couple of load balancers died and one of them needed a
quick solution so I tossed them my 4.6 cd and sent them a link to man for
VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
Logic works the same for everyone, since it's an abstract
field, but apparently you did not study it.
It weems that you did not learn it.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:14:56AM -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
The dictionary definition of freedom is no restrictions
NO RESTRICTIONS
May I point out to you that ISC has restrictions. You are
contradicting yourself.
The ISC has one restriction and I never claimed otherwise.
Marco Peereboom wrote:
See I told you logic wouldn't work for you.
snip
Since _my_ definition of freedom for software is different, I
reach different conclusions.
Right. It didn't.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:02:23AM -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
Lets try it.
0 X (Y + Z)
Y 0
Z 0
ISC = X
GPL = X + Y + Z
Logical enough for you?
If you assume that the definition of freedom is the number of
restrictions, then neither ISC nor GPL are free.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:05 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
For them? Maybe the freedom to give copies to their friends whithout
being sued or doing anything illegal.
That can easily be applied to any of the free licenses without any
other legal obligations.
Yes!
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:02 PM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Lets try it.
0 X (Y + Z)
Y 0
Z 0
ISC = X
GPL = X + Y + Z
Logical enough for you?
If you assume that the definition of freedom is the number of
restrictions, then neither ISC nor GPL
On 04/15/10 23:14, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
The dictionary definition of freedom is no restrictions
NO RESTRICTIONS
May I point out to you that ISC has restrictions. You are
contradicting yourself.
Logic works the same for everyone, since it's an abstract
field, but apparently
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
You do not seem to understand how copyright works. When published, a
work is subject to a set of restrictions, laid down by copyright law.
A license grants rights (under conditions or restrictions) to the
receiver of a
attitude that
smacks of superiority and even condescension at times. Is this a fair
assessment of 6the OpenBSD culture?
Zach,
Theo was much more civil to you than I expected.
I've been watching OpenBSD since around 1998, and using it in various
projects since around 2001.
I came to be using OpenBSD
What if I release my work as Anonymous with
no text in regards to licensing?
Then nobody knows who owns the code, and lack of license goes to the
default case of ALL Rights Reserved.
Does anyone wanting to use that work in OpenBSD
actually have to track down who Anonymous was?
Does the code
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:55:11AM -0600, Ted Roby wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
You do not seem to understand how copyright works. When published, a
work is subject to a set of restrictions, laid down by copyright law.
A license grants
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
Yes, it's a tricky question. As for OpenBSD, we do not include
anonymous work.
A work can be public domain if the copyright expires. In some
jurisdictions, a work can be put into the public domain by the author.
If a
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:15:39AM -0700, Henry Sieff wrote:
I work with a lot of systems integrator types - they deliver finished
platforms to run apps we develop on. A lot of familiarity with Solaris and
Centos. One day, a couple of load balancers died and one of them needed a
quick solution
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Chris Dukes pak...@pr.neotoma.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:15:39AM -0700, Henry Sieff wrote:
[SNIP]
Unfortunately, for many of us the end goal is to get a pile of crap,
as dictated by management, working well enough that we get another paycheck.
Now this is interesting...
Does anything supersede Copyright Law?
What if I release my work as Anonymous with
no text in regards to licensing?
Does anyone wanting to use that work in OpenBSD
actually have to track down who Anonymous was?
Does the code become useless if its ownership
You do not seem to understand how copyright works. When published, a
work is subject to a set of restrictions, laid down by copyright law.
A license grants rights (under conditions or restrictions) to the
receiver of a work. No license means no extra rights, which means the
default defined
I think the best example is Free as in Beer.
Which already misses the point.
I can brew beer all day.
I can keep it to myself.
I can also share it.
If I share a beer with you, it is free. (I am giving it to you)
If you sell it to me it's also free. You are missing the point.
If I
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:13 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Now this is interesting...
Does anything supersede Copyright Law?
What if I release my work as Anonymous with
no text in regards to licensing?
Does anyone wanting to use that work in OpenBSD
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:05 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
I think the best example is Free as in Beer.
Which already misses the point.
That's why the example is so common?
It's in quotes because I didn't originate it.
I can brew beer all day.
I can
I don't know for certain, but I believe that in the United States
a work whithout copyright notices goes to the public domain after
25 years.
I don't know for certain, but I believe you are just making things up
as you go along, because you are nothing but a troll.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_copyright_law#Duration_of_copyright
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:13 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Now this is interesting...
Does anything supersede Copyright Law?
What if I release my work as Anonymous with
no text in regards
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_copyright_law#Duration_of_copyright
From http://copyright.cornell.edu/resources/publicdomain.cfm
1923 through 1977
Published without a copyright notice
None. In the public domain due to failure to comply
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:59:57AM -0700, Henry Sieff wrote:
Oh, absolutely - hence the proliferation of Linux and Solaris in our
solutions - the customer insists on oracle for the back-end db, they
get oracle. And as you say, that can be driven by the arbitrary
demands of the customer
The ISC has one restriction and I never claimed otherwise. The GPL has
MORE restrictions. I am not contradicting myself. You just want to
change the dictionary to match your little reality.
You are contradicting yourself. On your terms:
Axioms:
1 Freedom means no restrictions
2 ISC has
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 2:20 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
The ISC has one restriction and I never claimed otherwise. The GPL has
MORE restrictions. I am not contradicting myself. You just want to
change the dictionary to match your little reality.
You are
blah blah blah
blah blah blah
blah blah blah
blah blah blah
blah blah blah
blah blah blah
you love to hear yourself speak, eh?
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 05:20:45AM -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
The ISC has one restriction and I never claimed otherwise. The GPL has
MORE
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 05:20 -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Saying that ISC is more free than GPL makes no sense
Saying Do not remove our text does not restrict your freedom. That's
all the ISC asks of you. Leave the copyright notice and the permission
to use alone.
Would you freaking stop this?
Go hug Stallman or something.
It's not entertaining anymore.
The ISC has one restriction and I never claimed otherwise. The GPL has
MORE restrictions. I am not contradicting myself. You just want to
change the dictionary to match your little reality.
You
Saying that ISC is more free than GPL makes no sense
Saying Do not remove our text does not restrict your freedom. That's
all the ISC asks of you. Leave the copyright notice and the permission
to use alone.
Please do not take my mesages out of context. Removing sentences, and
twisting what
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:39:57PM -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
That's because I don't yell GPL is not free while I'm using GPL.
what's wrong with that? if I use Windows and yell Windows is not free,
would you think the same?
If you were insulting a Windows user, probably.
VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
Please do not take my mesages out of context. Removing sentences, and
twisting what I said can be very convenient to put me in the wrong
whithout factual evidence.
I do not please.
Since no message can be completely within context, that implies
that your are
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
I'm reasoning. I'm not bombing your house.
Good morning in the Lord.
Religious fanatics don't automatically bomb a house, some create museum.
--
Antoine
. Is this a fair
assessment of 6the OpenBSD culture?
Zach
http://www.fidei.org
. I must say I detect a certain attitude that
smacks of superiority and even condescension at times. Is this a fair
assessment of 6the OpenBSD culture?
Zach
http://www.fidei.org
if possible. I must say I detect a certain attitude that
smacks of superiority and even condescension at times. Is this a fair
assessment of 6the OpenBSD culture?
Zach
http://www.fidei.org
--
sergeyb@
attitude that
smacks of superiority and even condescension at times. Is this a fair
assessment of 6the OpenBSD culture?
Zach
The developers don't make OpenBSD for you, but they are good enough to
give away the fruits of those efforts for free.
You think people work hard on the code
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
