Sorry, my mistake in wording. I am indeed wanting to
follow -stable here. Replace all my uses of 'world'
below with 'build' and the same questions apply.
I was following http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Bld
which appears to be a superset of the link you sent.
--
Ron McDowell
San Antonio
Ron McDowell wrote:
I'm relatively new to OpenBSD but have been working with FreeBSD for 15+
years and ATT/USL before that.
Welcome.
Rebuilt the kernel, reboot, build World, reboot.
make clean make depend make install is used for kernels, and make
build is used for userland. I do not know
On 2010-03-02, Ron McDowell r...@fuzzwad.org wrote:
I'm relatively new to OpenBSD but have been working with FreeBSD for 15+
years and ATT/USL before that.
I have installed OpenBSD i386 v4.6 via a boot floppy and ftp.
Installed the src and sys tarballs.
Rebuilt the kernel, reboot, build
If you will follow exactly this manual
http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html then no problem for sure.
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Ron McDowell r...@fuzzwad.org wrote:
Sorry, my mistake in wording. B I am indeed wanting to
follow -stable here. Replace all my uses of 'world'
below with 'build'
My script builds the 4.6-release and 4.6-stable pulled 1/26. It chokes
on 2 copies of 4.6-stable pulled today.
As I've said, I don't care about the error at this point, I want to know
how the build process works. Restating my question:
Does 'make build' install each subdirectory as it
[Not sure if netiquette on this list says trim off excess stuff or leave
it on...I'm leaving it on here this time. --rcm]
Scott McEachern wrote:
Ron McDowell wrote:
I'm relatively new to OpenBSD but have been working with FreeBSD for 15+
years and ATT/USL before that.
Welcome.
Rebuilt the
Oh so, then post your script. And looks like you may be interested in
this too http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=releasesektion=8
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Ron McDowell r...@fuzzwad.org wrote:
My script builds the 4.6-release and 4.6-stable pulled 1/26. B It chokes on
2
copies
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 03:15:30AM -0600, Ron McDowell wrote:
My script builds the 4.6-release and 4.6-stable pulled 1/26. It
chokes on 2 copies of 4.6-stable pulled today.
As I've said, I don't care about the error at this point, I want to
know how the build process works. Restating my
On 2010-03-02, Ron McDowell r...@fuzzwad.org wrote:
My script builds the 4.6-release and 4.6-stable pulled 1/26. It chokes
on 2 copies of 4.6-stable pulled today.
As I've said, I don't care about the error at this point, I want to know
how the build process works. Restating my question:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 03:15:30AM -0600, Ron McDowell wrote:
My script builds the 4.6-release and 4.6-stable pulled 1/26. It
chokes on 2 copies of 4.6-stable pulled today.
As I've said, I don't care about the error at this point, I want to
know how the build process works. Restating my
On 3/2/2010 12:32 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
No, it's more complicated than that. It obviously installs mk stuff, then
include, then it builds libs and install them, then it builds everything
else and installs it.
It's not a complicated bootstrap procedure like in freebsd land, it assumes
you
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 01:17:09PM -0600, Bryan wrote:
On 3/2/2010 12:32 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
No, it's more complicated than that. It obviously installs mk stuff, then
include, then it builds libs and install them, then it builds everything
else and installs it.
It's not a complicated
On 3/2/2010 1:22 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
ugh is ee bad scripting habits.
what happens if /usr/obj or one of the other dirs does not exist?
-Otto
I know Otto... I didn't write it for production purposes... yes, I'd
screw the pooch mightily if those directories did not
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Bryan bra...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/2/2010 12:32 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
No, it's more complicated than that. It obviously installs mk stuff, then
include, then it builds libs and install them, then it builds everything
else and installs it.
It's not a
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 01:17:09PM -0600, Bryan wrote:
#!/bin/sh
cd /usr/obj
rm -rf *
cd /usr/xobj
rm -rf *
cd /usr/build
rm -rf *
cp /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/conf/GENERIC.MP .
config -s /usr/src/sys -b . GENERIC.MP
make clean make depend make make install
Never *ever* write this,
On 3/2/2010 1:40 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
Never *ever* write this, even for your own purposes.
#! /bin/sh
set -e
cd /usr/obj rm -rf *
cd /usr/xobj rm -rf *
cd /usr/build rm -rf *
cp /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/conf/GENERIC.MP .
config -s /usr/src/sys -b . GENERIC.MP
make clean make depend make
That's why I don't get paid the big bucks... :) I will make the changes,
so I don't have to pull my hair out later...
I can't stress enough how important it is to prevent things, especially
computers, from causing severe loss of hair.
Miod
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 08:09:58PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
That's why I don't get paid the big bucks... :) I will make the changes,
so I don't have to pull my hair out later...
I can't stress enough how important it is to prevent things, especially
computers, from causing severe loss
Thanks to everyone on-list and off- for their hints; snide remark
silently ignored. Today the entire build went fine using the same
scripts as yesterday... Tomas asked to see my scripts, here they are.
Note that /usr/obj is symlinked to /Stash/Sources/obj, and /usr/src is
symlinked to
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 08:40:47PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 01:17:09PM -0600, Bryan wrote:
[...]
#! /bin/sh
set -e
cd /usr/obj rm -rf *
cd /usr/xobj rm -rf *
Stupid question: Is that even necessary before building a kernel
on i386?
I know mac68k/m68k archs
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Hugo Villeneuve
harpa...@jwales.eintr.net wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 08:40:47PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 01:17:09PM -0600, Bryan wrote:
[...]
#! /bin/sh
set -e
cd /usr/obj rm -rf *
cd /usr/xobj rm -rf *
Stupid question: Is
#!/bin/sh -x
ver=46stable
VER=OPENBSD_4_6
root=/Stash/Sources
DESTDIR=/
Is this necessary or desirable? I ask because it is my impression
that on NetBSD, DESTDIR=/ and DESTDIR unset is used to
discriminate between a full installation, including /etc and
what we're trying to do here, which
#!/bin/sh -x
ver=46stable
VER=OPENBSD_4_6
root=/Stash/Sources
DESTDIR=/
Is this necessary or desirable? I ask because it is my impression
that on NetBSD, DESTDIR=/ and DESTDIR unset is used to
discriminate between a full installation, including /etc and
what we're trying to do
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Ron McDowell r...@fuzzwad.org wrote:
the $ver $VER and $ROOT are my own. For $DESTDIR, see
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Bld section 5.3.5:
Make sure all the appropriate directories are created.
# cd /usr/src/etc env DESTDIR=/ make distrib-dirs
As a
I'm relatively new to OpenBSD but have been working with FreeBSD for 15+
years and ATT/USL before that.
I have installed OpenBSD i386 v4.6 via a boot floppy and ftp.
Installed the src and sys tarballs.
Rebuilt the kernel, reboot, build World, reboot.
cvs -d
What are you trying to accomplish?
If you want to follow -stable then use this
http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html (no make world anywhere in text).
If you want your own kernel then it's not supported. You can do that,
but you are on your own. Still -current or snapshots are best way with
OpenBSD
26 matches
Mail list logo
