On 5/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know the maximum packets per second that can traverse a 100MB
internet link. From what I've been able to gather its about 8300 or so? Is
this number accurate? Do connections just start to timeout once I hit this
limit? I'm a little
Depends on the byte size of the packet. If most of your throughput is
standard 1500 byte packets, you should have little to no problem.
If someone starts blasting out 64 byte packets at wire speed though,
your link will be toast long before traffic ever reaches 100Mbps.
On 5/31/07, [EMAIL
On 5/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know the maximum packets per second that can traverse a 100MB
internet link. From what I've been able to gather its about 8300 or so? Is
this number accurate? Do connections just start to timeout once I hit this
limit? I'm a little
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 12:18 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know the maximum packets per second that can traverse a 100MB
internet link. From what I've been able to gather its about 8300 or so? Is
this number accurate? Do connections just start to timeout once I hit this
limit? I'm a
On 2007/05/31 12:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know the maximum packets per second that can traverse a 100MB
internet link. From what I've been able to gather its about 8300 or so?
100Mb - somewhere between that and about 220,000. depends on packet size.
you're probably more interested
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:43:56PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Were nearing the 8300pps mark so I was worried? But should I be?
You're fine. The 8300pps mark is not an upper limit, it's the best case
for a full 100Mbit ethernet link (ignoring jumbograms).
Becuase the majority of my
On 5/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depends on the byte size of the packet. If most of your throughput is
standard 1500 byte packets, you should have little to no problem.
If someone starts blasting out 64 byte packets at wire speed though,
your link will be toast long
[ qlength: 0/ 50 borrows: 0 suspends: 0 ]
[ measured: 6448.5 packets/s, 31.21Mb/s ]
Were nearing the 8300pps mark so I was worried? But should I be? Becuase the
majority of my packets are smaller then 64B, shouldn't I be able to pass a
lot more packets then 8300pps? If
On 5/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
by the way. I know where google is. I've been there and have even read some
of the links that are posted in this very thread. However I am confused and
there even seems to be some confusion/discrepancies within this thread... so
I
ok i feel better now and i think i got a better handle on this then before.
its a fast box with plenty of memory, intel pro gig eth cards (em), about
350k in the state table at the moment, with fairly small ruleset,
intelligenty would probably be up for debate! I would like to think so.
Thanks.
10 matches
Mail list logo
