Check that another pass rule later in the file is not overriding it.
Maybe try with quick.
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:01:18 -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
You are a prick.
I don't know what his problem was but
Back in early September I bought a new netbook. A samsung NC20. It has
1280x800 video.
In the past I've had fun with video doing X so I thought I'd toss a
quick install of a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
2009/11/29 Brynet
:
Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
Actually, I'm used to recommend nvidia cards (desk laptop)
for most people because they do support most open source systems
(Linux, FreeBSD, OpenSolaris), which is way better than ati at
Si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement, voir ici
Ajoutez tele-lois...@ml.tv-news.fr ` votre carnet d'adresses pour
recevoir vos programmes plus facilement
Programme-TV.net - TC)lC) Loisirs
Votre programme TV
Merc redi 09 DC)cembre 2009
C'est le
moment de comparer et de changer pour
I don't actually have any other rules at all after it, that was the
last rule and I haven't have quick anywhere...
I am keeping things as simple as possible and get things up and
running first, then I am tightening everything up.
Here's the whole of my pf.conf:
nat_if = pppoe0
www_if = pppoe1
Found a fix for it...
reply-to ($www_if ($www_if))
Got to put brackets around $www_if now.
Hi. My 'softraid' mirror is not being detected and assembled at the
boot time. I must run 'bioctl' to assemble it after a reboot. This
started happening after I removed another softraid mirror from the box
(physically - the card and the drives). Do I have to rebuild from
scratch to make it detect
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, David Vasek wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Mikael Bak wrote:
Hi list,
Seems to me that this card isn't recognized at boot time (dmesg pasted at
the end of this email). It's a PCMCIA card. Instead of a wifi device
OpenBSD tries to allocate a serial port (com3).
I don't
Am 08.12.2009 um 15:52 schrieb Bret Lambert:
The existing resolver code is compleat balls, as oga@ would spell it.
Frankly, it needs to be dragged behind the chemical sheds and
quietly suffocated.
Wouldn't it be possible to at least put a lock around it, so that at
least it does not
Am 08.12.2009 um 15:41 schrieb Otto Moerbeek:
Nobody did the work yet. If it's very important to you, consider
spending effort making it thread safe. I believe netbsd and freebsd
have thread safe implementations. But actullay verifying that is
pretty hard.
Yes, the NetBSD implementation is
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Jonathan Schleifer
js-openbsd-m...@webkeks.org wrote:
Am 08.12.2009 um 15:52 schrieb Bret Lambert:
The existing resolver code is compleat balls, as oga@ would spell it.
Frankly, it needs to be dragged behind the chemical sheds and
quietly suffocated.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Jonathan Schleifer
js-openbsd-m...@webkeks.org wrote:
Am 08.12.2009 um 15:41 schrieb Otto Moerbeek:
Nobody did the work yet. If it's very important to you, consider
spending effort making it thread safe. I believe netbsd and freebsd
have thread safe
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:56:58AM +0100, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Am 08.12.2009 um 15:41 schrieb Otto Moerbeek:
Nobody did the work yet. If it's very important to you, consider
spending effort making it thread safe. I believe netbsd and freebsd
have thread safe implementations. But
Hello,
I try to setup a new webserver with IPv6 and IPv4 connection. The IPv4
connection works great. I'm new in IPv6 and got some routing problems. I
called the provider support and he told me how to setup the gateway and the
interface... but for linux and not for OpenBSD. Maybe you can
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:47 PM, sys...@gmx.net wrote:
I try to setup a new webserver with IPv6 and IPv4 connection. The IPv4
connection works great. I'm new in IPv6 and got some routing problems. I
called the provider support and he told me how to setup the gateway and the
interface... but
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:47 AM, sys...@gmx.net wrote:
Hello,
I try to setup a new webserver with IPv6 and IPv4 connection. B The IPv4
connection works great. B I'm new in IPv6 and got some routing problems. B I
called the provider support and he told me how to setup the gateway and the
I think you mean assemble instead of build. If I follow your meager
description of the issue correctly this should work. You can move a
softraid volume to another machine and it should auto assemble. The
trick is to have all pieces in good shape. A dmesg might help because a
disk that wasn't
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 07:27:01AM -0500, Brynet wrote:
Hi,
From what I can find, this is a GeForce 7150M / nForce 630M based
chipset.. xf86-video-nv does not have the product ID listed in the
attach structure, this could be due to incompability with the chipset or
maintainer neglegence
Hello,
I'm currently using 4 active-active OpenBSD 4.4 servers as a fully
redundant firewall. CARP has been configured on the internal
interfaces to expose the load-balanced IP address using ip-stealth on
the four carpnodes.
Each OpenBSD server has a different external IP address and I've
My understanding is that OpenBSD still employs the Giant Lock approach
to SMP, serializing access to kernel services. Is this still true? If
it is, do Theo and the other kernel developers consider it a priority
to improve this?
(I am NOT complaining. I completely understand that OpenBSD is a
Due to unexpected reaction from the leader of the OpenBSD project
(please read below), I am terminating the ComixWall project. I will keep
the project server running until the end of this month. I might
resurrect the project in the future with another host OS perhaps.
I am going to unsubscribe
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:38:28AM -0500, Donald Allen wrote:
My understanding is that OpenBSD still employs the Giant Lock approach
to SMP, serializing access to kernel services. Is this still true? If
yes
it is, do Theo and the other kernel developers consider it a priority
to improve
On Dec 02 20:04:18, Jan Stary wrote:
This is 4.6-stable on a HP EliteBook 8530w (demsg below).
$ sysctl hw.setperf
hw.setperf=5
I wonder how the 5 got there. I am not setting it;
acpi is disabled (because boot hangs with acpi enabled),
apmd is not running.
No really, what could
No really, what could possibly set hw.setperf besides sysctl
(which I do not call) and apmd (which is not running)? And
where does the number 5 come from?
Or, what obvious triviality have I overlooked?
Is hw.setperf meaningless when apm/acpi is disabled?
The kernel is manipulating this.
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 06:31:05PM +0200, Soner Tari wrote:
Due to unexpected reaction from the leader of the OpenBSD project
(please read below), I am terminating the ComixWall project. I will keep
the project server running until the end of this month. I might
resurrect the project in the
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Jason Dixon ja...@dixongroup.net wrote:
I'm not taking sides, but how exactly are you trying to help? B The few
times I've seen you post to misc@ have been to promote your own fork of
OpenBSD, or to ask for help in getting your own stuff running. B How
exactly
This is a VERY sad day :(
Personally I managed to convert quite a few people to using OpenBSD by
coaxing an interest via COMIXWALL.
A grand pity and unfortunately if I were you I'd probably have done
the same :( OpenBSD is possibly the cleanest most delightful OS to
work on and most definitely
Hello,
For some reason I cannot get this to work properly... We have a
1Megabyte/sec connection, and I want this box to be capped at up to
200KiloBytes/sec .
However everytime I try, it just always ends up using the entire link.
If I modify it to 1Kb , it ends up using around 80Kilobytes/sec .
COMIXWALL isn't a fork, its just a preinstalled configuration panel
for OpenBSD and a collection of nice utilities.
And considering (and no offence here) the COMIXWALL developers are
enthusiasts not paid professional developers.
So where's the harm asking some advice?
After all lets face
This is just silly. If you make a firewall distribution to promote
OpenBSD instead of making a firewall distribution, your source of
motivation is wrong.
OpenBSD is free software. You are completely free to use it as a basis
for your firewall distribution.
The project, on the other hand, does
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:38:28AM -0500, Donald Allen wrote:
My understanding is that OpenBSD still employs the Giant Lock approach
to SMP, serializing access to kernel services. Is this still true? If
yes
it is, do
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Bob Beck b...@ualberta.ca wrote:
the point is simple:
* Release Announcements For things that are not OpenBSD do not belong
on OpenBSD lists *
In both quoted responses Theo specifically mentioned the lists and for the
OP to quit posting ads. I thought the
Quoting Donald Allen donaldcal...@gmail.com:
My understanding is that OpenBSD still employs the Giant Lock approach
to SMP, serializing access to kernel services. Is this still true? If
it is, do Theo and the other kernel developers consider it a priority
to improve this?
(I am NOT
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:03 PM, and...@msu.edu wrote:
Quoting Donald Allen donaldcal...@gmail.com:
My understanding is that OpenBSD still employs the Giant Lock approach
to SMP, serializing access to kernel services. Is this still true? If
it is, do Theo and the other kernel developers
http://www.computerlandnews.info/lt.php?id=ZR4HAgULBQNdDUUGCEhXVAoKUQAF
Ofertas
http://www.computerlandnews.info/lt.php?id=ZR4HAgULBQNdDEUGCEhXVAoKUQAF
Noticias
http://www.computerlandnews.info/lt.php?id=ZR4HAgULBQNdD0UGCEhXVAoKUQAF
Novedades
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:37:01 -0700
Bob Beck b...@ualberta.ca wrote:
COMIXWALL isn't a fork, its just a preinstalled
configuration panel for OpenBSD and a collection of
nice utilities.
So it belongs as a a port then. Not as a distibution -
and not sending release announcements to OpenBSD
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 07:26:39PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
I'm quite new to OpenBSD, but I already read a few NEW:
and UPDATED: announcements on the -ports mailing list.
misc != ports
The only problem is the advocacy list is quite dead. So the
decision to post the
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Christopher Zimmermann
madro...@zakweb.de wrote:
Do we see release announcements here for other new ports?
I'm quite new to OpenBSD, but I already read a few NEW:
and UPDATED: announcements on the -ports mailing list.
This is the misc list, not the ports list.
From recent experience ;) I would try disabling PF to make sure this
is not a filtering problem.
Hello,
I disabled PF, but the routing issue is the same. The support wrote me some
minutes ago, on linux is following routing needed:
# ip -6 r s
fe80::/64 dev eth0 metric 256 expires
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:16:28 +0100 (CET)
David Vasek va...@fido.cz wrote:
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, David Vasek wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Mikael Bak wrote:
Hi list,
Seems to me that this card isn't recognized at boot time (dmesg pasted at
the end of this email). It's a PCMCIA card.
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:38:56 -0500
Jason Dixon ja...@dixongroup.net wrote:
How does the announcement of new releases for ComixWall
help OpenBSD?
It helps in promoting OpenBSD. And this is the official
purpose of the advocasy mailing list.
So I think that announcements of ComixWall releases
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 5:01:05 pm Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:38:56 -0500
Jason Dixon ja...@dixongroup.net wrote:
How does the announcement of new releases for ComixWall
help OpenBSD?
It helps in promoting OpenBSD. And this is the official
purpose of the
Hello all,
I've run in some problem with gnome-mplayer. Basicaly, there is a
difference in functioning if I run this application from xterm or
graphical menu ( i use fbpanel menu). From xterm it works fine, it
plays the movie. From graphical menu, it doesn't. It reports a Bad
file descriptor.
On 20:01, Wed 09 Dec 09, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:38:56 -0500
Jason Dixon ja...@dixongroup.net wrote:
It helps in promoting OpenBSD. Promoting OpenBSD will make
OpenBSD more widely known. This will attract more possible
developers. They will write code for
Please, help!
--
with best re
On 11:33, Wed 09 Dec 09, Andres Salazar wrote:
Hello,
For some reason I cannot get this to work properly... We have a
1Megabyte/sec connection, and I want this box to be capped at up to
200KiloBytes/sec .
However everytime I try, it just always ends up using the entire link.
If I modify
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Christopher Zimmermann
madro...@zakweb.de wrote:
It helps in promoting OpenBSD. Promoting OpenBSD will make
OpenBSD more widely known. This will attract more possible
developers. They will write code for OpenBSD. This will help
OpenBSD.
If OpenBSD is hard to
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Christopher Zimmermann
madro...@zakweb.dewrote:
If this is true, it's a pity. Then comixwall just died.
Theo told Soner to cease. Soner came back with if you don't tell me you
were just joking, I'm going to terminate the Comixwall project. It was
Soner's
2009/12/9 Christopher Zimmermann madro...@zakweb.de:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:38:56 -0500
Jason Dixon ja...@dixongroup.net wrote:
How does the announcement of new releases for ComixWall
help OpenBSD?
It helps in promoting OpenBSD. And this is the official
purpose of the advocasy mailing list.
It's a bug, due to how libpthread uses SIGCHLD to detect when a thread
blocked in wait*() should be unblocked. The fix isn't entirely
trivial and I'm not going to have a chance to look at it closely for
quite a while, so please file a bug with sendbug so we don't lose
track of this if I
You must be joking. I buy it on Ebay from one shop for great price. Do it same.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:31 PM, jackwssp q jackw...@gmail.com wrote:
Please, help!
--
with best re
--
http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Donald Allen donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
Certainly I agree with you that a blazingly fast but unstable and/or
insecure system isn't worth much in most, if any, settings. On the
other hand, a rock-solid, secure system that simply doesn't deliver
the
So .. in the end, the fact that ComixWall uses OpenBSD as it's
fundation, _does_ help promote OpenBSD use and expand it's user
base
Bullshit.
Please get this off our lists.
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 5:25:59 pm Michiel van Baak wrote:
On 20:01, Wed 09 Dec 09, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:38:56 -0500
Jason Dixon ja...@dixongroup.net wrote:
It helps in promoting OpenBSD. Promoting OpenBSD will make
OpenBSD more widely known. This
Hello,
In this case the queue bulk is the one set as default and indeed I
do see the traffic passing through it with the command you gave me.
Please advise.
Thanks
Andres
Andres Salazar wrote:
Hello,
For some reason I cannot get this to work properly... We have a
1Megabyte/sec connection, and I want this box to be capped at up to
200KiloBytes/sec .
However everytime I try, it just always ends up using the entire link.
If I modify it to 1Kb , it ends up using
Of course people care. Any other answer is silly.
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 12:36:10PM -0500, Donald Allen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:38:28AM -0500, Donald Allen wrote:
My understanding is that OpenBSD still
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Donald Allen donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
Certainly I agree with you that a blazingly fast but unstable and/or
insecure system isn't worth much in most, if any, settings. On the
other hand,
If you think that someone from misc@ will offer you this book in PDF
then you are far away from understanding. If you really need it this
way then learn how to use search engines.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:20 PM, marellibsd marellibsd h5n...@gmail.com wrote:
I am far away from ebay, I need book
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 20:43:59 +0100
Martin Schr__der mar...@oneiros.de wrote:
2009/12/9 Christopher Zimmermann madro...@zakweb.de:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:38:56 -0500
Jason Dixon ja...@dixongroup.net wrote:
How does the announcement of new releases for ComixWall
help OpenBSD?
It helps
This book is not for free download.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:36 PM, jackwssp q jackw...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like piping.
You should share it for us or shut the mouth.
2009/12/9 Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com
If you think that someone from misc@ will offer you this book in PDF
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:01:05PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
How does abstraction of arguably the cleanest, easiest to
learn UNIX, help OpenBSD?
It helps in promoting OpenBSD. Promoting OpenBSD will make
OpenBSD more widely known. This will attract more possible
developers.
Thank you for your suggestions.. however in this particular case I
still can download at 615Kbytes/sec .. at least now I can download at
a lesser rate with the following:
altq on $t_externa bandwidth 200Kb hfsc queue { bulk, ack }
queue ack bandwidth 20% priority 2 qlimit 500 hfsc (realtime 40Kb
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
I think you mean assemble instead of build. If I follow your meager
description of the issue correctly this should work. You can move a
softraid volume to another machine and it should auto assemble. The
trick is to
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:02:24 -0600
Andres Salazar ndrsslz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
In this case the queue bulk is the one set as default and indeed I
do see the traffic passing through it with the command you gave me.
Please advise.
Thanks
Andres
I advise you to read his mail again.
I just tried on a new install in 4.5, and still no go.
Help is appreciated.
jsing is working on a add auto assemble flag back button. For now you
are stuck with bioctl -c until that is done.
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 04:21:23PM -0500, nixlists wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
I think you mean assemble instead of build.
Andres Salazar wrote:
Thank you for your suggestions.. however in this particular case I
still can download at 615Kbytes/sec .. at least now I can download at
a lesser rate with the following:
altq on $t_externa bandwidth 200Kb hfsc queue { bulk, ack }
queue ack bandwidth 20% priority 2 qlimit
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
jsing is working on a add auto assemble flag back button. For now you
are stuck with bioctl -c until that is done.
'softraid0 at root'
dmesg shows that softraid is not complaining at all, just the standard
'softraid0
I don't, and many times we don't have the luxury of having such
examples or data. I'm in a different kind of real-world situation: I'm
setting up a database server on a 4-core machine that is going to
carry a heavy load -- it's performance will be critical to the success
of the project -- and I
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:13:15 -0500
Donald Allen donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Donald Allen
donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
Certainly I agree with you that a blazingly fast but unstable
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM, sys...@gmx.net wrote:
I have no idea what to do now. Any ideas maybe?
Your default route should have another interface. Is that native IPv6
we are talking about?
I am dubious about your IPv6 address: 2a01:238:426e:5c00::1 prefixlen 56
My IPv6 address is a /64,
On 22:56, Wed 09 Dec 09, Robert wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:13:15 -0500
Donald Allen donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Donald Allen
donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
Certainly I agree
Andres Salazar wrote:
Thank you for your suggestions.. however in this particular case I
still can download at 615Kbytes/sec .. at least now I can download at
a lesser rate with the following:
altq on $t_externa bandwidth 200Kb hfsc queue { bulk, ack }
queue ack bandwidth 20% priority 2 qlimit
Sorry I'm not man enough...err savvy enough to know the man page ways
to write the needed lingo.
Could somebody update the man page for route with the following gist:
In a change or add command where the destination and gateway are not suf-
ficient to specify the route, the -ifp or
On 2009-12-09, sys...@gmx.net sys...@gmx.net wrote:
$ cat /etc/mygate
85.214.128.1
fe80::1
this wants to be scoped, like fe80::1%em0
inet 85.214.157.13 0x
inet alias 85.214.157.5 0x
!route add 85.214.128.1 -link \$if: -interface
ouch ;-)
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net wrote:
So, what's heavy for you may be just simple routine for others and no, I do
not miss the fine lock either yet anyway. Would be nice, but really, I
haven't run into it's need for me anyway yet.
That's true for me as
Also if I am paranoid about mirror data being exactly the same on the
two halves (yes, I understand softraid should guarantee it, but
still...), how can I verify it? Or this functionality currently
nonexistent? Or am I asking a stupid question because softraid is
guaranteed to notice these things
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:07:02 +0100
Michiel van Baak mich...@vanbaak.info wrote:
On 22:56, Wed 09 Dec 09, Robert wrote:
Just last month i have seen a database server being upgraded from
32GB to 256GB of RAM because that was easier (to justify) for them
than to fix their horrible db layout.
Wanted for Challenging Assignments:
Part-Time Facilitators on Contract Basis
A world-class Gulf-based organization development consulting firm specializing
in leadership development is looking for highly-experienced professionals
interested in becoming certified to facilitate two-and three-day
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net wrote:
So, what's heavy for you may be just simple routine for others and no, I do
not miss the fine lock either yet anyway. Would be nice, but really, I
Soo... Your performance requirements may met by OpenBSD despite it's
current poor SMP support - other OSes will scale on SMP. Trade-offs,
trade-offs... It's a psychological issue. We have all this multicore
hardware that doesn't get taken advantage of by this OS, and it's
always in the backs
Am 9 Dec 2009 um 19:01 schrieb Christopher Zimmermann:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:38:56 -0500
Jason Dixon ja...@dixongroup.net wrote:
How does the announcement of new releases for ComixWall
help OpenBSD?
It helps in promoting OpenBSD. And this is the official
purpose of the advocasy mailing
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:46:25 -0700
Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Soo... Your performance requirements may met by OpenBSD despite it's
current poor SMP support - other OSes will scale on SMP. Trade-offs,
trade-offs... It's a psychological issue. We have all this multicore
Hi list.
I have OpenBSD 4.6 GENERIC on my Acer laptop and can't seem to get my
NEC Aterm wl54ag pcmcia wfi card to work. The chipset is AR5212, which
_should_ be supported by the ath driver.
However, when I insert the card it isn't detected and dmesg spits out
cardslot0: cardbus support
hi there,
a couple of days ago, after seeing the cvs commit
for initiating suspend upon closing the lid,
i have asked to question how to revert this, as
i fairly often close the lid but prefer no action
taken. as my netbook dies a horrible death
on wakeup (and possibly at suspend itself) the
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Soo... Your performance requirements may met by OpenBSD despite it's
current poor SMP support - other OSes will scale on SMP. Trade-offs,
trade-offs... It's a psychological issue. We have all this multicore
hardware
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Corey J. Bukolt 0...@mail.ru wrote:
I have OpenBSD 4.6 GENERIC on my Acer laptop and can't seem to get my
NEC Aterm wl54ag pcmcia wfi card to work. The chipset is AR5212, which
_should_ be supported by the ath driver.
However, when I insert the card it isn't
Theo de Raadt wrote:
cardbus != pcmcia. pcmcia is a 16-bit ISA window visible through
the cardbus interface out onto the card. Sometimes one works, but
the other doesn't.
it might work better in -current, since bugs continue to be fixed..
but no promises...
.
Ahhh, okay.
Since the
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:05:46 -0600
Corey J. Bukolt 0...@mail.ru wrote:
Any ideas guys?
a full dmesg with the insert event of the card in question sent to the
list might help.
- Robert
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:18:36 +0100
frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
hi there,
a couple of days ago, after seeing the cvs commit
for initiating suspend upon closing the lid,
i have asked to question how to revert this, as
i fairly often close the lid but prefer no action
taken. as
Robert wrote:
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:05:46 -0600
Corey J. Bukolt 0...@mail.ru wrote:
Any ideas guys?
a full dmesg with the insert event of the card in question sent to the
list might help.
- Robert
.
OpenBSD 4.6 (GENERIC) #58: Thu Jul 9 21:24:42 MDT 2009
Daniel Melameth wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Corey J. Bukolt 0...@mail.ru wrote:
I have OpenBSD 4.6 GENERIC on my Acer laptop and can't seem to get my
NEC Aterm wl54ag pcmcia wfi card to work. The chipset is AR5212, which
_should_ be supported by the ath driver.
However, when I
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:38:20 -0600
Corey J. Bukolt 0...@mail.ru wrote:
cbb0 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 O2 Micro OZ69[17]2 CardBus rev 0x00:
apic 2 int 17 (irq 255), CardBus support disabled
That's a boot with the card inserted?
I guess not by the message at the end of the dmesg.
You could try
Robert wrote:
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:38:20 -0600
Corey J. Bukolt 0...@mail.ru wrote:
cbb0 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 O2 Micro OZ69[17]2 CardBus rev 0x00:
apic 2 int 17 (irq 255), CardBus support disabled
That's a boot with the card inserted?
I guess not by the message at the end of
Corey J. Bukolt wrote:
Robert wrote:
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:38:20 -0600
Corey J. Bukolt 0...@mail.ru wrote:
cbb0 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 O2 Micro OZ69[17]2 CardBus rev 0x00:
apic 2 int 17 (irq 255), CardBus support disabled
That's a boot with the card inserted?
I know that a filesystem in unix just exists wherever it exists (i.e.
it's 'identity' is its mountpoint), but I find it extremely handy with
ext* and FAT filesystems to be able to give every volume its own name.
I was just living with not being able to do this on OpenBSD, just
discovered
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:55:44 -0600
Corey J. Bukolt 0...@mail.ru wrote:
Robert wrote:
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:38:20 -0600
Corey J. Bukolt 0...@mail.ru wrote:
cbb0 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 O2 Micro OZ69[17]2 CardBus rev
0x00: apic 2 int 17 (irq 255), CardBus support disabled
Robert wrote:
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:55:44 -0600
Corey J. Bukolt 0...@mail.ru wrote:
Robert wrote:
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:38:20 -0600
Corey J. Bukolt 0...@mail.ru wrote:
cbb0 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 O2 Micro OZ69[17]2 CardBus rev
0x00: apic 2 int 17 (irq 255),
hmm, on Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 01:30:07AM +0100, Robert said that
dmesg of whatever openbsd version you are running atm might help.
yes, sorry, i did not send it because i thought this might
have been a more generic kind of a change not dependent
on hw.
OpenBSD 4.6-current (GENERIC) #447: Fri Dec
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
