Kostas Zorbadelos kzo...@otenet.gr writes:
I want to thank anyone who contributed info both on and off-list.
Regards,
Kostas
--
Kostas Zorbadelos
twitter:@kzorbadelos http://gr.linkedin.com/in/kzorba
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2011, 21:49:18 schrieb Henning Brauer:
in these cases - where runs is the top priority and manual
intervention is hard - you most probably want to run with ro / and an
mfs or three.
This is one nice approach but doesn't cover features like user changeable
settings and
I just noticed the vether/tun/bridge in your systat output.
To try and narrow things down, are you able to disable these
to see if there's any improvement?
On 2011-12-08, Nick Templeton n...@nicktempleton.com wrote:
I think you're right Stuart, raising kern.maxclusters is only buying me time.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 23:04:20 +0100
Steffen Daode Nurpmeso sdao...@googlemail.com wrote:
Welly, welly, welly, welly, welly, welly, well!
I dunno, but maybe Fritz simply misunderstood A Clockwork
Orange - completely, that is?
The same actor also played in Caligula.
That one is much much
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 06:14:19PM -0600, Chris Wopat wrote:
Claudio and crew,
Unsure if this is a bug or intended. I was testing BGP triggered
blackholes, one of the routers that will perform the blackhole has
this rule in its bgpd.conf:
match from group GROUP-IBGP community 1234:666 set
Hi,
I tried to install OpenBSD 4.9 on an Apple mac mini (new
generation).
Model : A1347
Core i5, thunderbolt Technology, HD 500Go
At
installation using 4.9 RELEASE :
It takes a long time to format slides.
At the reboot : i have a kernel panic just after starting network
So i
tried to use
Hi,
I tried to install OpenBSD 4.9 on an Apple mac mini (new
generation).
Model : A1347 ;
Core i5, thunderbolt Technology, HD 500Go
At
installation using 4.9 RELEASE :
It takes a long time to format slides.
At the reboot : i have a kernel panic just after starting network
So i
tried to use
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 04:10:16PM +0400, Wesley M. wrote:
Here is the ps message : http://i43.tinypic.com/mkufyo.jpg
Here is the
trace message : http://i40.tinypic.com/25syfxf.jpg
Have you tried to disable whatever it is on boot?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:33:56 -0200, Daniel Bolgheroni dan...@cria.org.br
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 04:10:16PM +0400, Wesley M. wrote:
Here is the ps message : http://i43.tinypic.com/mkufyo.jpg
Here is the
trace message : http://i40.tinypic.com/25syfxf.jpg
Have you tried to disable
On 2011/12/19 16:10, Wesley M. wrote:
So i
tried to use 5.0 RELEASE.
This time, it formats quickly. But it is the same
way : kernel panic when it starts the network.
The following message
appear :
Starting network
panic: mii_phy_setmedia
Stopped at
Debugger+0x4:popl %ebp
a show
* Rudolf Leitgeb rudolf.leit...@gmx.at [2011-12-19 10:17]:
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2011, 21:49:18 schrieb Henning Brauer:
in these cases - where runs is the top priority and manual
intervention is hard - you most probably want to run with ro / and an
mfs or three.
This is one nice
* Chris Wopat m...@falz.net [2011-12-19 01:15]:
Claudio and crew,
Unsure if this is a bug or intended. I was testing BGP triggered
blackholes, one of the routers that will perform the blackhole has
this rule in its bgpd.conf:
match from group GROUP-IBGP community 1234:666 set { localpref
Try this diff against -current. You'll have to apply
the patch from sys/dev/mii and run 'make' afterwards
to regenerate the headers.
Index: miidevs
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/mii/miidevs,v
retrieving revision 1.116
diff -u -p
It's committed so wait for new snaps and you can avoid this step.
On 2011/12/19 17:10, Wesley M. wrote:
Hi Stuart,
I tried this : boot -c at boot prompt (startup)
I have this message : kbc cmd word write error just after.
And i can't use keyboard at UKC Prompt :(
Wesley.
On Mon, 19
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:52:40 +0100
Henning Brauer wrote:
while we're really good in that and fsck almost always succeeds and
fixes things up i have seen different.
Same here, though I have to admit when there are lots to go through, I
can't rememeber not doing an fsck -y. Usually the datas not
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 22:47, Bryan bra...@gmail.com wrote:
This is happening on OpenSSH for OpenBSD.
LIttle backstory...
I have an Motorola Droid that I use SSHDroidPro to connect to it from
various PCs (windows and OpenBSD) to transfer files. B I upgraded to
the Galaxy Nexus, and found
Ok, thank's.
Therefore, i have a problem. I use mailserv project, and it works only on
4.8; 4.9 RELEASE. Not on 5.0
Is there a way for me to have a 4.9 with patches ?
In short, is it possible to have a patch to use with 4.9-stable ?
Thank you very much.
Wesley.
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:21:20
On 2011/12/19 17:43, Wesley M. wrote:
Ok, thank's.
Therefore, i have a problem. I use mailserv project, and it works only on
4.8; 4.9 RELEASE. Not on 5.0
Is there a way for me to have a 4.9 with patches ?
In short, is it possible to have a patch to use with 4.9-stable ?
Thank you very
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:39:42 +0100
Rudolf Leitgeb wrote:
Guess what your home router does, and what (if you have one)
your cell phone does?
It loses unimportant data.
Hennings points stand. One of the beauties of OpenBSD is it's init
which is easy to follow and edit. To give such a feature
* Rudolf Leitgeb rudolf.leit...@gmx.at [2011-12-19 14:40]:
Am Montag, 19. Dezember 2011, 13:52:40 schrieb Henning Brauer:
gotta compromise for crippled systems. solvable with a little shell
script run from cron and rc.shutdown.
Wait: your solution would be to periodically remount some volume
On 19 December 2011 11:39, Rudolf Leitgeb rudolf.leit...@gmx.at wrote:
Am Montag, 19. Dezember 2011, 13:52:40 schrieb Henning Brauer:
gotta compromise for crippled systems. solvable with a little shell
script run from cron and rc.shutdown.
Wait: your solution would be to periodically remount
On 2011-12-19, Bryan bra...@gmail.com wrote:
This is happening on OpenSSH for OpenBSD.
LIttle backstory...
I have an Motorola Droid that I use SSHDroidPro to connect to it from
various PCs (windows and OpenBSD) to transfer files. I upgraded to
the Galaxy Nexus, and found that once I
On 2011-12-19, Rudolf Leitgeb rudolf.leit...@gmx.at wrote:
Am Montag, 19. Dezember 2011, 13:52:40 schrieb Henning Brauer:
gotta compromise for crippled systems. solvable with a little shell
script run from cron and rc.shutdown.
Wait: your solution would be to periodically remount some volume
Hello.
I'm running multihomed OpenBSD server:
vlan5/carp5 - default
vlan2/carp2 and vlan4/carp4 are connected to other ISPs.
when there's no rdomain thing, everything seems to be working, except
all outgoing packets goes through vlan5/carp5.
so, I did
f2n0:/root#cat /etc/hostname.vlan2
vlan
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 01:02:59PM -0500, Richard Thornton wrote:
it appears
that the packages in 4.9 are not always upgradeable to those in 5.0 and
most packages in 5.0 fail to install due to library dependencies.
What?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by
On 19 December 2011 16:02, Richard Thornton thornton.rich...@gmail.com
wrote:
I upgraded my sun blade 100 from 4.9 to 5.0; no issues but, it appears
that the packages in 4.9 are not always upgradeable to those in 5.0 and
most packages in 5.0 fail to install due to library dependencies. one
On 19 December 2011 16:20, Richard Thornton thornton.rich...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do a simple clean 5.0 install. One would assume any browser package in the
packages folder would install. None do for me on sparc, but with a clean
4.9 install all 4.9 packages install. I am not a Unix specialist by
Richard Thornton thornton.rich...@gmail.com writes:
I upgraded my sun blade 100 from 4.9 to 5.0; no issues but, it appears
that the packages in 4.9 are not always upgradeable to those in 5.0 and
most packages in 5.0 fail to install due to library dependencies.
This sounds suspicously like
On 2011-12-19, Richard Thornton thornton.rich...@gmail.com wrote:
Do a simple clean 5.0 install. One would assume any browser package in the
packages folder would install. None do for me on sparc, but with a clean
4.9 install all 4.9 packages install. I am not a Unix specialist by any
means
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
On 19 December 2011 16:20, Richard Thornton thornton.rich...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do a simple clean 5.0 install. One would assume any browser package in the
packages folder would install. None do for me on sparc, but with a clean
4.9 install all
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 18:50 -0800, James A. Peltier wrote:
- Original Message -
| Hi All,
|
| Today is our semester maintenance day and we've upgraded our backup
| bridge firewall to the Dec. 15, 2011 snapshot available from
| ftp.openbsd.org and I'm getting this odd error when I
Hi list,
the OpenBSD upgrade pages carry a warning at the top Note: Upgrades are only
supported from one release to the release immediately following it. Do not skip
releases.
What's the reason for this warning? I've had a look at the upgrade steps and the
only thing that seems to assume a
I ran into an error trying to install Firefox (I think the latest
version in Ports is 8.0.1) so I thought I might be updating
incorrectly.
First, this is the error I get when I try to install Firefox:
# cd /usr/ports/www/mozilla-firefox/
# /home/jay/ports/install.sh
/*
the contents of
James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com writes:
I ran into an error trying to install Firefox (I think the latest
version in Ports is 8.0.1) so I thought I might be updating
incorrectly.
If you want such a recent firefox, use -current, not -stable.
First, this is the error I get when I try to
On 12/19/11 15:55, Lars Kotthoff wrote:
Hi list,
the OpenBSD upgrade pages carry a warning at the top Note: Upgrades are only
supported from one release to the release immediately following it. Do not skip
releases.
What's the reason for this warning? I've had a look at the upgrade steps and
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 21:46 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 18:50 -0800, James A. Peltier wrote:
- Original Message -
| Hi All,
|
| Today is our semester maintenance day and we've upgraded our backup
| bridge firewall to the Dec. 15, 2011 snapshot
--- On Mon, 12/19/11, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas jca+m...@wxcvbn.org wrote:
From: Jeremie Courreges-Anglas jca+m...@wxcvbn.org
Subject: Re: Proper way to update system + ports?
To: misc@openbsd.org
Date: Monday, December 19, 2011, 10:16 PM
James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com
writes:
I ran
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:25 PM, James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Mon, 12/19/11, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas jca+m...@wxcvbn.org
wrote:
So -current Ports are not compatible with -stable Ports, right?
Or am I wrong in presuming this?
Per FAQ 15.4.1:
Do NOT check out a -current
* Lars Kotthoff li...@larsko.org [2011-12-19 21:57]:
the OpenBSD upgrade pages carry a warning at the top Note: Upgrades are only
supported from one release to the release immediately following it. Do not
skip
releases.
What's the reason for this warning?
That's simple: from the previous
--- On Mon, 12/19/11, James Hartley jjhart...@gmail.com wrote:
From: James Hartley jjhart...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Proper way to update system + ports?
To: James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Date: Monday, December 19, 2011, 11:44 PM
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:25 PM,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:19 PM, James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Mon, 12/19/11, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
jca+m...@wxcvbn.org
wrote:
So -current Ports are not compatible with -stable
Ports, right?
Or am I wrong in presuming this?
Per FAQ 15.4.1:
Do NOT
Hi,
James Hartley wrote on Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 04:36:24PM -0800:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:19 PM, James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com wrote:
How do I know if I have checked out the -current ports tree or
the -stable ports tree?
Study FAQ 5.3.3. If no tagname was explicitly provided in the
--- On Tue, 12/20/11, James Hartley jjhart...@gmail.com wrote:
From: James Hartley jjhart...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Proper way to update system + ports?
To: James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Date: Tuesday, December 20, 2011, 12:36 AM
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:19 PM,
Also, would it be a bad idea to use both Ports and Packages? For
example since the mozilla-firefox Port isn't working, and I use
Packages to install Firefox, would it conflict with other Ports
that I use, or the dependencies the softwares might share?
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:17 PM, James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Tue, 12/20/11, James Hartley jjhart...@gmail.com wrote:
From: James Hartley jjhart...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Proper way to update system + ports?
To: James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Good day, friend,Muhammad IMRAN
I am not sure your esteemed name, just know your company do business with
China before.
I am jolie ,manager of overseas Dept of Harvest logistics CHINA. If
possible, Let us support to you at China.
We are good at transportation by sea/by air/by train from China
On 12/19/11 15:55, Lars Kotthoff wrote:
Hi list,
the OpenBSD upgrade pages carry a warning at the top Note: Upgrades are only
supported from one release to the release immediately following it. Do not
skip
releases.
What's the reason for this warning? I've had a look at the upgrade
On 12/19/11 14:39, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-12-19, Richard Thornton thornton.rich...@gmail.com wrote:
Do a simple clean 5.0 install. One would assume any browser package in the
packages folder would install. None do for me on sparc, but with a clean
4.9 install all 4.9 packages
I have an Iomega Prestige 1TB disk, USB 3.0 up to 5Gbit/s,
OpenBSD 4.9 (GENERIC.MP) #794: Wed Mar 2 07:19:02 MST 2011
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
...snip...
Dec 17 09:53:54 len /bsd: port 2 configuration 1 interface 0 iomega
LDHD-UP3
rev 2.10/0.04 addr
49 matches
Mail list logo
