As far as I can tell, if a commented line on ipsec.conf ends with \
then the following line will also be considered a comment (if the next
line also ends with \ the commenting is propagated). For example
#ike esp from A.A.A.A to C.C.C.C \
ike esp from A.A.A.A to B.B.B.B \
srcid
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:22:43AM +, Zé Loff wrote:
As far as I can tell, if a commented line on ipsec.conf ends with \
then the following line will also be considered a comment (if the next
line also ends with \ the commenting is propagated). For example
#ike esp from A.A.A.A to
On 19 March 2014 01:56, marst mario@videotron.ca wrote:
Really, nothing out of the ordinary...
Been working lately on a simple OpenBSD package browser. No extensive
graphics, works from the terminal with navigation similar to vim. I do this
for fun. I find it convenient for exploring
On 2014-03-18, Giancarlo Razzolini grazzol...@gmail.com wrote:
But, with a very small ttl on
the dns record (I use 60 seconds), this risk can be reduced.
you have more trust in ISP DNS servers honouring TTLs than I do.
if you can only get a dynamic IP
On 2014-03-19, Zé Loff zel...@zeloff.org wrote:
As far as I can tell, if a commented line on ipsec.conf ends with \
then the following line will also be considered a comment (if the next
line also ends with \ the commenting is propagated). For example
#ike esp from A.A.A.A to C.C.C.C \
On 2014-03-18, Marko Cupać marko.cu...@mimar.rs wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 01:15:16 + (UTC)
Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
The ruleset is now traversed in order, changes made in match rules
are sticky and affect rules lower down in the ruleset. More
predictable, no more oh
On 3/19/14 6:22 AM, Zé Loff wrote:
As far as I can tell, if a commented line on ipsec.conf ends with \
then the following line will also be considered a comment (if the next
line also ends with \ the commenting is propagated). For example
#ike esp from A.A.A.A to C.C.C.C \
ike esp from
Hi!
Have a 5.4 currently installed in sd0 and want to build a softraid1 to use
the disk in conjunction with a secondary sd1.
I know a way to build the raid at installation point, but not sure how to
do it after the installation without reinstalling. Is possible?
Thanks,
Matias.-
On 03/19/14 09:30, Matias Moreno Meringer wrote:
Hi!
Have a 5.4 currently installed in sd0 and want to build a softraid1 to use
the disk in conjunction with a secondary sd1.
I know a way to build the raid at installation point, but not sure how to
do it after the installation without
On 2014-03-19 09:31, Matias Moreno Meringer wrote:
Hi!
Have a 5.4 currently installed in sd0 and want to build a softraid1 to
use
the disk in conjunction with a secondary sd1.
I know a way to build the raid at installation point, but not sure how
to
do it after the installation without
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Josh Grosse j...@jggimi.homeip.netwrote:
On 2014-03-19 09:31, Matias Moreno Meringer wrote:
Hi!
Have a 5.4 currently installed in sd0 and want to build a softraid1 to use
the disk in conjunction with a secondary sd1.
I know a way to build the raid at
Hi folks,
I can`t connect to www.aeroflot.ru from lynx on openbsd 5.4. I can connect
from gentoo, windows. Anybody can connect to wwe.aeroflot.ru from openbsd 5.4?
-- Aleksey Leonov
gimliandcomp...@gmail.com (Leonov Aleksey), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 15:07 (CET):
I can`t connect to www.aeroflot.ru from lynx on openbsd 5.4. I can
connect from gentoo, windows. Anybody can connect to wwe.aeroflot.ru
from openbsd 5.4?
OpenBSD 5.5-beta (GENERIC.MP) #284: Mon Feb 3 07:57:32 MST 2014
On 19.03.2014 20:32, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
gimliandcomp...@gmail.com (Leonov Aleksey), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 15:07 (CET):
I can`t connect to www.aeroflot.ru from lynx on openbsd 5.4. I can
connect from gentoo, windows. Anybody can connect to wwe.aeroflot.ru
from openbsd 5.4?
OpenBSD 5.5-beta
Reference:
``Softraid 3TB Problems''
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=136225193931620
Difference:
My HDDs show up as 4096 bytes/sector in dmesg.
Short:
Are there any options for disks that come with 4096 bytes/sector to use
with softraid(4)/bioctl(8)?
Long:
So I got these lovely large disks:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014, at 09:07 AM, Leonov Aleksey wrote:
Hi folks,
I can`t connect to www.aeroflot.ru from lynx on openbsd 5.4. I can
connect from gentoo, windows. Anybody can connect to wwe.aeroflot.ru from
openbsd 5.4?
Right now according to http://isup.me/aeroflot.ru it's down for
gimliandcomp...@gmail.com (Leonov Aleksey), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 16:18 (CET):
On 19.03.2014 20:32, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
gimliandcomp...@gmail.com (Leonov Aleksey), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 15:07 (CET):
I can`t connect to www.aeroflot.ru from lynx on openbsd 5.4. I can
connect from gentoo, windows.
Odd. Just tried it. Works on Linux, doesn't on OpenBSD.
Not related to user agent; it seems to not respond to SYN. Perhaps
their running PF and filtering us!
On 19.03.2014 21:52, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
gimliandcomp...@gmail.com (Leonov Aleksey), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 16:18 (CET):
On 19.03.2014 20:32, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
gimliandcomp...@gmail.com (Leonov Aleksey), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 15:07 (CET):
I can`t connect to www.aeroflot.ru from lynx on openbsd
Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
gimliandcomp...@gmail.com (Leonov Aleksey), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 16:18 (CET):
On 19.03.2014 20:32, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
gimliandcomp...@gmail.com (Leonov Aleksey), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 15:07 (CET):
I can`t connect to www.aeroflot.ru from lynx on openbsd 5.4. I can
connect from
Em 19-03-2014 09:41, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
you have more trust in ISP DNS servers honouring TTLs than I do. if
you can only get a dynamic IP at home and would like to host mail
there yourself, in a machine which only you have physical access to,
etc. (i.e. do *not* want to keep your email
Alas, softraid only supports 512 byte block devices at the moment.
Ken
On Mar 19, 2014 11:36 AM, Marcus MERIGHI mcmer-open...@tor.at wrote:
Reference:
``Softraid 3TB Problems''
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=136225193931620
Difference:
My HDDs show up as 4096 bytes/sector in dmesg.
On 16/03/2014 4:24 AM, Friedrich Locke wrote:
Hi folks,
i wonder what are the limitations on main memory and file system sizes !
Thanks a lot.
gustavo.
How long is a piece of string?
I set up an L2TP VPN with npppd recently using pppx, and other than some
routing issues with ospfd it works great. I'm trying to add a second VPN
connection, but that doesn't seem to work using pppx.
With this config:
interface pppx0 address 10.128.120.1 ipcp IPCP_admin
interface pppx1 address
Hello guys,
It says in the man ciss:
CAVEATS
For purposes of status monitoring, the current code only supports one
logical volume per controller.
Is this still true? If I make more than one array with one controller and
type bioctl ciss0 - what will it show me?
--
Best regards,
D'oh, I finally realized I needed to go to /dev and MAKEDEV pppx1 8-/.
Now it's working fine. I had thought pppx was one of those magic
clonable devices that you didn't need to explicitly create, I guess I
was mistaken. When I was testing the vpn, there were pppx1 and pppx2
interfaces that showed
Great to see Unbound in base, thanks.
But what about ldns? I still have that installed as a package -
removed the unbound package as per the -current instructions, but
shouldn't the ldns package package be removed as well as I believe
unbound requires it and therefore it would have to be built by
On 19 March 2014 18:09, Chris Smith obsd_m...@chrissmith.org wrote:
Great to see Unbound in base, thanks.
But what about ldns? I still have that installed as a package -
removed the unbound package as per the -current instructions, but
shouldn't the ldns package package be removed as well as
Hi,
I was running PPTP client pptp-1.7.2p4 with userland ppp(8). It was a basic
setup from pptp(8) manual page and specifically PPTP on a router example.
What are my alternatives to run PPTP to connect to Microsoft VPN server?
May I use ppp(4) and pppd(8) and if so can you point me to the right
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Kenneth Westerback
kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote:
The unbound in base has it's own cut down version of ldns. No need for
the package.
Can I just uninstall the package after the fact or do some files need
to be replaced?
Thanks,
Chris
Hi,
Sorry for Off-topic, but when you enable DNSSEC validation and fetch a root
key with unbound-anchor(8) (needs root) the following error shows up in
/var/log/messages:
unbound: [0:0] error: could not open autotrust file for writing,
/etc/root.key.29136-0: Permission denied
May be this is
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:39:50AM +0200, Атанас Владимиров wrote:
Hi,
I was running PPTP client pptp-1.7.2p4 with userland ppp(8). It was a basic
setup from pptp(8) manual page and specifically PPTP on a router example.
What are my alternatives to run PPTP to connect to Microsoft VPN server?
See the thread unbound dnssec revisited I started on 12/30/2013 for
some hints. Looks like creating a new directory with the proper
permissions is the best way to go.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Атанас Владимиров don.na...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for Off-topic, but when you enable
After successfully setting up an L2TP VPN with npppd and pppx, I tried
to add a second VPN subnet with a different authentication base. I was
working remotely, and after starting npppd in debug mode:
bash-4.2# npppd -d
2014-03-19 14:41:50:NOTICE: Starting npppd pid=32407 version=5.0.0
2014-03-19
On 3/19/2014 12:22 PM, Leonov Aleksey wrote:
I think what they filtered traffic from non windows or linux machine.
I think this is the case. I'm behind a transparent http proxy (Squid)
on OpenBSD, and from Windows http://www.aeroflot.ru times out, and
https://www.aeroflot.ru (which bypasses
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:39:50 +0200
Атанас Владимиров don.na...@gmail.com wrote:
I was running PPTP client pptp-1.7.2p4 with userland ppp(8). It was a basic
setup from pptp(8) manual page and specifically PPTP on a router example.
What are my alternatives to run PPTP to connect to Microsoft VPN
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:45:46 -0700
Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote:
After successfully setting up an L2TP VPN with npppd and pppx, I tried
to add a second VPN subnet with a different authentication base. I was
working remotely, and after starting npppd in debug mode:
pppx will be fixed.
Claus Assmann wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014, Steve Shockley wrote:
On 3/19/2014 12:22 PM, Leonov Aleksey wrote:
I think what they filtered traffic from non windows or linux machine.
I think this is the case. I'm behind a transparent http proxy (Squid) on
Just for the fun of it: it works
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:22:51AM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
pppx will be fixed.
Great :). This is a known bug then? Should I just keep an eye on the
changelog for mention of pppx changes to tell when it's safe to try
again?
You can use tun(4) instead if you want to use multiple
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:05:35 -0700
Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:22:51AM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
pppx will be fixed.
Great :). This is a known bug then?
It's new for me. I had not even try MAKEDEV pppx1 yet.
Should I just keep an eye on the
40 matches
Mail list logo
