https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=148587723122194&w=2
— gonzalo
> On 31. Jan 2020, at 18:46, Allan Streib wrote:
>
> I used to use xxxterm, then xombrero, and really liked the minimal
> approach and keyboard driven navigation.
>
> Any other former users of this browser, what are you using
On 2020-02-01, Fabian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying to get BackupPC 3.3.2 running on a Debian 10/Buster
> server to back up my OpenBSD 6.6 router. It works fine with the GNU
> rsync port on the OpenBSD box but when I try to use the native
> openrsync instead, it just seems to not get started
On 2020-02-01, aisha wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had a request for updating the calibre port to the newer versions as
> I am running a small calibre library server.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
It's not likely to happen anytime soon. Updating to new calibre,
including all the required dependencies (which i
Hi all,
I had a request for updating the calibre port to the newer versions as
I am running a small calibre library server.
Thanks a lot!
--
Aisha
blog.aisha.cc
Hi,
I have been trying to get BackupPC 3.3.2 running on a Debian 10/Buster
server to back up my OpenBSD 6.6 router. It works fine with the GNU
rsync port on the OpenBSD box but when I try to use the native
openrsync instead, it just seems to not get started properly and hangs.
On the Debian side,
On February 1, 2020 12:27:40 AM GMT+02:00, "Luke A. Call"
wrote:
>Cancel the cancellation.
>I am still seeing this problem, even after logging out/in and ulimit -u
>shows 712. Running "ps -U myusername|less" yields about 180 lines and
>the system becomes unable to start even another xterm, or i
On February 1, 2020 2:20:12 AM GMT+02:00, Jan Stary wrote:
>On Jan 31 18:25:45, int1...@airmail.cc wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Recently my 6.6-stable machine lost power while on, which aparently
>> corrupted a softraid crypto partition (not a boot partition) that was
>> mounted. Trying to decrypt it with
February 1, 2020 2:01 PM, "Uwe Werler" wrote:
> Thank you very much Gilles for the insights.
>
> It's not really your fault because it's how our brain works. If we want to
> get things working we
> are concentrating to get them working - not how to break them. It's amazing
> that the code work
Am 31. Januar 2020 18:48:51 GMT+00:00 schrieb gil...@poolp.org:
>January 30, 2020 4:44 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
>
>> It depends on your configuration, not all setups are vulnerable.
>>
>> I think I recall your name from the comments on my tutorial and this
>is a
>> setup that would not be vu
On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 09:29:16AM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> February 1, 2020 9:11 AM, "Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri"
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > With the latest snapshot on amd64 (6.6 GENERIC.MP#627), using a "|"-line
> > in one's ~/.forward makes delivery of mail fail with
> >
> > Feb 1
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 03:33:00PM -0800, Alexander Merritt wrote:
> On 2017-04-12 Stefan Sperling wrote
> > ath10k devices are not supported. They need a new driver because Atheros
> > has changed the driver<->hardware interface with this generation of devices.
>
> Is there any update? A brief lo
misc@ is really not the right place for bug reports. Use bugs@, or opensmtpd
has its own lists: https://opensmtpd.org/list.html
On 2020-02-01, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the latest snapshot on amd64 (6.6 GENERIC.MP#627), using a "|"-line
> in one's ~/.forward makes delivery
February 1, 2020 9:11 AM, "Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the latest snapshot on amd64 (6.6 GENERIC.MP#627), using a "|"-line
> in one's ~/.forward makes delivery of mail fail with
>
> Feb 1 08:53:53 pooh smtpd[72575]: d9abac6b3d904e13 smtp connected
> address=local
> host=
Hi,
With the latest snapshot on amd64 (6.6 GENERIC.MP#627), using a "|"-line
in one's ~/.forward makes delivery of mail fail with
Feb 1 08:53:53 pooh smtpd[72575]: d9abac6b3d904e13 smtp connected
address=local host=pooh.prefix.duckdns.org
Feb 1 08:53:54 pooh smtpd[72575]: d9abac6b3d904e13 smtp
14 matches
Mail list logo