GNU's fpemul was removed some time ago, so this two line of manual can be
romoved too.
--
best regards
q#
--- files.conf.5.orig Fri Aug 11 13:47:50 2006
+++ files.conf.5Mon Aug 14 07:17:06 2006
@@ -373,8 +373,6 @@
Rules for the
.Dq class
class of devices.
-.It Pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sorry i ment drafst :o, ur right, but think, if youre going to manage
a big project, just writing your class files, i think you run in big
troubles. I agree with you, head devs arent gods. therefor are
meetings, where you have a blackboard, and
On 11 aug 2006, at 22.59, Steve Glaus wrote:
...
I'm mostly asking questions now for my own curiousity so feel free
everyone to ignore these ramblings.
- Is PFS something that's negotiated only during phase 2? Could
this be why it was passing phase one but not passing phase two?
Yup. PFS
are you sure the hardware is ok? I know you said FreeBSD installs ok, but
you could still have a memory problem. The FreeBSD installation might use
memory in such a way that the bad memory address is not touched...
I suggest, if you haven't already, running memtest86 or memtest86+
on this
Will Twomey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is /etc/network/interfaces file on OpenBSD as well? If not, how do I
set up static IPs?
OpenBSD /etc configuration files are somewhat different from the typical
Linux, and no, /etc/network/interfaces does not normally exist on OPenBSD.
Is iptables
-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeff Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: 09.08.06 02:37:53
An: misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: sshd question
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:04:03AM +0200, holger glaess wrote:
i hope this list is the right one for my question .
i look for an funktion to limit
Hi,
is there a simple way to efficiently mirror packages solely based on
package filenames in order to reduce bandwidth overhead?
I've tried to do this with rsync but as packages are constantly rebuilt,
file size of packages changes regularly, and, therefore, the rsync
option '--size-only'
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 03:47:07PM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
I'd like to sync packages solely based on their file name. Is
there a way to do this with rsync or with another tool?
lftp (ports/net) has a mirror option who can be told to ignore
both sizes and times. this might yield an
Hello,
While trying to set up an IPSEC Bridge based on the IPSEC instructions given
on the BRCONFIG(8)man I keep getting this error on either side of the bridge.
# ipsecctl -f /etc/ipsec.conf
/etc/ipsec.conf: 3: syntax error
ipsecctl: Syntax error in config file: ipsec rules not loaded
This
Hello folks,
i am searching OpenBSD Users from Germany. I would, if possible, for
anyone from Germany that uses OpenBSD to respond privately to this
email.
thanks in advance.
Yes but not result either.
Here is the result of ifconfig after the command (mentionned below) is issued:
wpi0: flags=8847UP,BROADCAST,DEBUG,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
lladdr 00:13:02:16:27:0f
media: IEEE802.11 autoselect
status: no network
ieee80211: nwid
The card is the following:
wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG rev 0x02
ifconfig -M wpi0 debug returns nothing ?!
what and how should it return something ?
ifconfig -M wpi0 returns the following:
wpi0: flags=8847UP,BROADCAST,DEBUG,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
I have a lingering problem of a slow mbuf leak somewhere on my system that I
need help tracking down. After upgrading to 3.9 I've noticed an mbuf leak.
Haven't seen anything about this in the mailing lists so far.
It occurs somewhat slowly, but eventually leads to bigger problems with the
network
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 03:47:07PM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
is there a simple way to efficiently mirror packages solely based on
package filenames in order to reduce bandwidth overhead?
A bit of shell/Perl scripting could compare the index.txt on the FTP
mirror with what you have
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Michael C wrote:
Hi,
I am trying some porting examples to winscw and I have a question:
Why is it that the MetroWerks CodeWarrior 3.1 cannot handle the following?
in header file (pcb.h):
intin_baddynamic (u_int16_t, u_int16_t);
in c file (pcb.c)
int
On 8/14/06, Didier Wiroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The card is the following:
wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG rev 0x02
ifconfig -M wpi0 debug returns nothing ?!
what and how should it return something ?
ifconfig -M wpi0 returns the following:
wpi0:
On 8/14/06, Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lladdr 00:13:02:16:27:0f
media: IEEE802.11 autoselect (autoselect mode 11b)
status: no network
ieee80211: nwid wifi chan 11 bssid 00:09:5b:a3:32:90 67dB nwkey
0x0784c5c4fcafa91c537df07839 100dBm
Ok ... it looks like an authentication problem ...
config chan 11 flags 8025 cck f ofdm 15
wpi0: sending auth to 00:09:5b:xx:xx:xx on channel 11
wpi0: received auth from 00:09:5b:xx:xx:xx rssi 68
wpi0: open authentication failed (reason 13) for 00:09:5b:xx:xx:xx
I tried every possible combination
but I think the LPx000s were made by Asus, so they might use normal interfaces
I have some LP2000Rs here: no luck with sensors, unfortunately.
---
Peter Hamilton
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 05:31:41PM +, Didier Wiroth voiced:
Ok ... it looks like an authentication problem ...
config chan 11 flags 8025 cck f ofdm 15
wpi0: sending auth to 00:09:5b:xx:xx:xx on channel 11
wpi0: received auth from 00:09:5b:xx:xx:xx rssi 68
wpi0: open authentication failed
Yes, you are right!
That is the problem!
The system was configured with shared key, I changed that to open system
and now it works.
(sorry I'm a wireless novice)
Is that a known isssue that shared key doesn't work or is this normal?
thanks
didier
- Original Message -
From: John L.
On 8/14/06, Didier Wiroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, you are right!
That is the problem!
The system was configured with shared key, I changed that to open system
and now it works.
(sorry I'm a wireless novice)
Is that a known isssue that shared key doesn't work or is this normal?
Google
Didier Wiroth wrote:
Hello,
I'm using current (on a thinkpad x60s) with a netgear wg602v2 accesspoint.
The x60s has wpi wireless nic.
The configuration of the netgear accesspoint is the following:
ssid= wifi
ssid broadcast= disabled
channel= 11
mode=g and b
security type= wep
authentication
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 03:47:07PM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
Hi,
is there a simple way to efficiently mirror packages solely based on
package filenames in order to reduce bandwidth overhead?
I've tried to do this with rsync but as packages are constantly rebuilt,
file size of
Bank of America Higher Standards Home
Dear client of Bank of America,
Technical services of the Bank of America are carrying out a planned
software upgrade. We earnestly ask you to visit the following link to
start the procedure of confirmation on customers data.
To get started,
Hi All,
For a new machine I'm building I've acquired an ASUS A8R32-MVP Deluxe
motherboard. As I'm still waiting for the CPU, I figured this would be
a good (maybe not the best) time to check up on support for the
hardware found on this board.
The following hardware is available :
* ATI
On 8/14/06, Tobias Ulmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 03:47:07PM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
Hi,
is there a simple way to efficiently mirror packages solely based on
package filenames in order to reduce bandwidth overhead?
I've tried to do this with rsync but as
I was overjoyed when this chipset was supported in 3.8. At last, I
thought, consumer level DSL equipment which will show up as an interface
instead of some dodgy ppp tun0 nonsense.
Imagine my disappointment then when it failed miserably to work. It
never has, I've tried no end of variations
Hello,
I've read the ssh man and found the ssh-based virtual private networks
section.
I've set the sshd_config of the vpn server to PermitTunnel yes
I'm a little bit lost in my config ... and I tried for hours without success to
configure a tunnel.
My config is the following:
wireless lan
On 2006/08/14 17:59, Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
In which case, the patchlevel needs to be bumped (eg. foo-1.0.tgz -
foo-1.0p0.tgz).
No boom here, unless the maintaner was lazy.
No, /usr/lib changes don't bump patchlevels of every package.
Will Hoskins wrote:
I was overjoyed when this chipset was supported in 3.8. At last, I
thought, consumer level DSL equipment which will show up as an interface
instead of some dodgy ppp tun0 nonsense.
So then, my obsd sweethearts, do you ever drop support for vapourware
drivers or will this
Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
Will Hoskins wrote:
I was overjoyed when this chipset was supported in 3.8. At last, I
thought, consumer level DSL equipment which will show up as an
interface instead of some dodgy ppp tun0 nonsense.
So then, my obsd sweethearts, do you ever drop support for
Chris Zakelj wrote:
Why not just a plain old DSL/10BaseT bridge and pppoe(8)? I agree that
it'd be great to have hardware plugged comfortably inside the system and
one less piece hanging off the power strip, but canacar@ and crew have
done an incredible job on it, to the point where even my old
Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
Chris Zakelj wrote:
Why not just a plain old DSL/10BaseT bridge and pppoe(8)? I agree that
it'd be great to have hardware plugged comfortably inside the system and
one less piece hanging off the power strip, but canacar@ and crew have
done an incredible job on it,
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:48:55 -0400, Chris Zakelj wrote:
Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
Chris Zakelj wrote:
Why not just a plain old DSL/10BaseT bridge and pppoe(8)? I agree that
it'd be great to have hardware plugged comfortably inside the system and
one less piece hanging off the power strip,
does anyone on list have a nagios plugin that will check the status of isakmpd
on an openbsd machine? i had asked about this on the nagios-users mailing list a
while back and was told that i should write such a plugin. want to make sure i
don't do anything unnecessarily redundant.
cheers,
jake
Hi folks,
i am learning NIS and was wondering if i hostname nis database needs
to be the FQDN or just the single hostname?
PS: I am not native english, correct me if folks word is slang.
i am learning NIS and was wondering if i hostname nis database needs
to be the FQDN or just the single hostname?
It can be anything. In fact, you may feel that you gain a tiny security
advantage from making it a completely random string.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 11:35:59PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
Hi All,
For a new machine I'm building I've acquired an ASUS A8R32-MVP Deluxe
motherboard. As I'm still waiting for the CPU, I figured this would be
a good (maybe not the best) time to check up on support for the
hardware found
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:48:55PM -0400, Chris Zakelj wrote:
PPPoA is in some ways, preferable, since you don't have the MTU
issue of PPPoE.
Much better.
It is helpful to include such details ;) At the office where I worked
roughly three years ago, we had a setup where the external
40 matches
Mail list logo
