* Stephen Schaff wrote:
So, I thought I would post my dmesg here and see if it grabs the
attention of anyone who knows better than I do. Any insight would be
much appreciated. It turns my stomach to think I'd have to reinstall
with a different OS.
If this system is critical for you,
Hi,
I have a Atheros AR5BMB5, and I run openbsd 4.0, and atheros don`t work.
Can anyone help me?
--
Serrano Neves - a.k.a eth0 / www.eth0.eti.br
Realmente Seguro? http://secure.eth0.eti.br
Talk is cheap. Show me the code. - Linus Torvalds
You do not have to set the ulimit. The port does it for you from
know on in the build environment.
If you want to compile OOo on stable, you are on your own.
OOo needs a couple of things that are in current.
On (16/12/06 22:42), Travers Buda wrote:
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:35:24 -0600
Travers
Is this even possilbe? I've done some more homework and as I understand it
right now I have to add one configuration per client.
On Saturday 16 December 2006 18:33, Chris C. wrote:
Hi,
We're currently (since 4 hours :() building a new wlan for my home network.
My confuguration is as
Denny White wrote:
There are actually 2 problems. First one is, when using
ctrl-alt-f1 so forth, it goes to the other console fine,
but when I try to switch back, all I see on the screen is
the output from the underlying x rather than the desktop.
If you use xdm to start X, your custom
Yes, again... I am trying to set up VPN using IPSec, right now very
basic setup, and it doesn't work as expected.
Hosts being involved are keibi that acts as server, and trying to
connect to it laptop sentan.
ipsec.conf on keibi:
ike passive esp from any to any \
srcid [EMAIL PROTECTED] dstid
On 17/12/06, Chris C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this even possilbe? I've done some more homework and as I understand it
right now I have to add one configuration per client.
No, at least from that message:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=116436607912261w=2
But you will need to
I apologize. I incorrectly reported that I am using stable. I did
upgrade ports to -current on 12/16 before make install.
Robert Nagy wrote:
You do not have to set the ulimit. The port does it for you from
know on in the build environment.
If you want to compile OOo on stable, you are on
Original message
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 14:00:14 +0100
From: Chris C. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: don't beat me... IPSec and wlan
To: misc@openbsd.org
Is this even possilbe? I've done some more homework and as I understand it
right now I have to add one configuration per client.
Original message
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 02:57:56 +0100
From: Dimitry Andric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 4.0 frozen
To: Stephen Schaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Stephen Schaff wrote:
Yesterday it inexplicably went dark.
...
wd0(pciide1:0:0): timeout
type: ata
i've had this panic occur 6-8 times since i replaced wi cards, one on an openbsd
client, the other on an openbsd AP running in hostap mode, with ral cards. it
seems to be related to my brother using his winxp laptop to pull 200 KBps
through the ral AP.
the AP is running a snapshot from Dec 8 that
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 02:16:48PM +0100, viq wrote:
Yes, again... I am trying to set up VPN using IPSec, right now very
basic setup, and it doesn't work as expected.
Hosts being involved are keibi that acts as server, and trying to
connect to it laptop sentan.
there's an error in ipsecctl in
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 08:41:31AM -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
i've had this panic occur 6-8 times since i replaced wi cards, one on an
openbsd
client, the other on an openbsd AP running in hostap mode, with ral cards. it
seems to be related to my brother using his winxp laptop to pull
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 08:22:05AM -0500, Jim Michael wrote:
I apologize. I incorrectly reported that I am using stable. I
did upgrade ports to -current on 12/16 before make install.
Did you also upgrade your base system to -current?
--
o--{ Will Maier
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
wd0d: device timeout reading fsbn 234162112 of 234162112-234162239 (wd0
bn 235334857; cn 14648 tn 233 sn 58), retrying
wd0: soft error (corrected)
Maybe dying disks?
i must second this suggestion. almost every time i've seen these IDE timeout
messages, it means that
Hi all,
Somebody knows if exists some option to put on rc.conf file like
FreeBSD does with ipv6_enable=NO option to disable IPv6 support on
OpenBSD 4.0? Or do I need to recompile kernel, modify sendmail.cf, etc,
etc, etc ...?? In other owrds, do I need to reconfigure all process that
need ipv6
Original message
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 02:57:56 +0100
From: Dimitry Andric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 4.0 frozen
To: Stephen Schaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Stephen Schaff wrote:
Yesterday it inexplicably went dark.
...
wd0(pciide1:0:0): timeout
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 04:29:31PM -0800, Ben Calvert wrote:
using the current snapshot from 12/14 on Macppc, using a Tibook 400,
using mixerctl to set the output volumes to 0 results in low volume,
instead of no volume.
$ mixerctl -a
outputs.select=speaker
outputs.speaker=0,0
Hi,
I am running OpenBSD 4.0 and when the system booting up the following
message was printed on the screen
brconfig: bridge0 Operation not permitted
May i know what causes the error message?
It seems the bridge is running ok? even though with the error message
The following is the output
On Sunday 17 December 2006 14:41, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
Original message
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 14:00:14 +0100
From: Chris C. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: don't beat me... IPSec and wlan
To: misc@openbsd.org
Is this even possilbe? I've done some more homework and as I
only today have i tried out hostapd, it is quite neat. while adding a 2nd AP to
my network a thought occurred to me: if you had 3 APs that were sufficiently
spread out and had tightly synced clocks you could likely triangulate the source
of a wifi signal with a fair deal of accuracy.
is this
On 12/17/06, carlopmart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somebody knows if exists some option to put on rc.conf file like
FreeBSD does with ipv6_enable=NO option to disable IPv6 support on
OpenBSD 4.0?
Nope. No such option exists in OpenBSD.
Or do I need to recompile kernel, modify sendmail.cf,
** Reply to message from carlopmart [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 17
Dec 2006 17:31:03 +0100
Somebody knows if exists some option to put on rc.conf file like
FreeBSD does with ipv6_enable=NO option to disable IPv6 support on
OpenBSD 4.0? Or do I need to recompile kernel, modify sendmail.cf, etc,
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
only today have i tried out hostapd, it is quite neat. while adding a 2nd AP
to
my network a thought occurred to me: if you had 3 APs that were sufficiently
spread out and had tightly synced clocks you could likely triangulate the
source
of a wifi signal with a
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 17:19:02 +0100
Alexandre Ratchov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 04:29:31PM -0800, Ben Calvert wrote:
using the current snapshot from 12/14 on Macppc, using a Tibook 400,
using mixerctl to set the output volumes to 0 results in low volume,
instead of no
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 07:37:11PM -0600, Vijay Sankar wrote:
Good day,
I am trying out the package dspam-3.6.8p1-mysql and ran into the
following problem -- not able to get any answers after days of searching
the dspam lists, various archives, etc. Apologize in advance for sending
this to
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 03:10:55PM -0600, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
helllo misc@
I was wondering if someone out there has a wine port newer than the
one in the ports tree
I am looking for wine 0.9.24 or better
I am assuming there is some technical issue as to why there is not a
updated wine
On 12/17/06, Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
only today have i tried out hostapd, it is quite neat. while adding a 2nd AP to
my network a thought occurred to me: if you had 3 APs that were sufficiently
spread out and had tightly synced clocks you could likely triangulate the source
of
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 09:32:23PM -0500, Jim Razmus wrote:
* Sideris Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061214 20:50]:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:29:58PM -0500, Jim Razmus wrote:
On both 4.0 release and -current (13/12/2006) I find vim -y does not
work as it did on 3.9. Likely a question for
Philip Guenther wrote:
On 12/17/06, carlopmart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somebody knows if exists some option to put on rc.conf file like
FreeBSD does with ipv6_enable=NO option to disable IPv6 support on
OpenBSD 4.0?
Nope. No such option exists in OpenBSD.
Or do I need to recompile
Yeah. I did some testing last night - to know avail. When it bailed
today, I restarted it, expecting the raid to rebuild as it always
does. This time it didn't! It booted right up using wd1 and failed
wd0 in raid0.
Kinda makes me happy I built it that way (special thanks to this
page:
On Dec 17, 2006, at 2:51 PM, carlopmart wrote:
Philip Guenther wrote:
On 12/17/06, carlopmart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somebody knows if exists some option to put on rc.conf file like
FreeBSD does with ipv6_enable=NO option to disable IPv6 support on
OpenBSD 4.0?
Nope. No such option
hi misc,
i just want to start using altq with simply priorizing the tcp acks (and
the other lowdelay stuff as it's stated in jaceks great firewallbook). i
looked in /usr/share/pf/ackpri and added the rules there to my pf.conf.
i don't know why it doesn't work, maybe i am too blind to see what
On 17/12/06, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 02:16:48PM +0100, viq wrote:
Yes, again... I am trying to set up VPN using IPSec, right now very
basic setup, and it doesn't work as expected.
Hosts being involved are keibi that acts as server, and trying to
** Reply to message from Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 17
Dec 2006 15:17:01 -0500
On Dec 17, 2006, at 2:51 PM, carlopmart wrote:
Yes, my security staff orders to disable IPv6 protocol on all our
firewalls ...
Your security staff is clueless. I bet they like to block icmp echo-
Hello,
after using OpenBSD on some routers since 3.5, I installe OpenBSD 4.0 on
one of my laptops (an IBM Thinkpad A30p). Everything is working fine, no
real problem with X configuration, sound is working and so on.
I use xfce as window-manager from ports. Xfce has been my standard
On 17/12/06, viq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17/12/06, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 02:16:48PM +0100, viq wrote:
Yes, again... I am trying to set up VPN using IPSec, right now very
basic setup, and it doesn't work as expected.
Hosts being involved
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today Neil E. Sprinlan wrote:
Denny White wrote:
There are actually 2 problems. First one is, when using
ctrl-alt-f1 so forth, it goes to the other console fine,
but when I try to switch back, all I see on the screen is
the output from the
* carlopmart [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-12-17 21:14]:
Yes, my security staff orders to disable IPv6 protocol on all our firewalls
...
block quick inet6
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS
Jason Dixon wrote on Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:17:01PM -0500:
On Dec 17, 2006, at 2:51 PM, carlopmart wrote:
Yes, my security staff orders to disable IPv6 protocol
on all our firewalls ...
Your security staff is clueless.
I bet they like to block icmp echo-request too.
If they really force
Dave Anderson wrote:
** Reply to message from Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 17
Dec 2006 15:17:01 -0500
On Dec 17, 2006, at 2:51 PM, carlopmart wrote:
Yes, my security staff orders to disable IPv6 protocol on all our
firewalls ...
Your security staff is clueless. I bet they like
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Dec 17, 2006, at 2:51 PM, carlopmart wrote:
Philip Guenther wrote:
On 12/17/06, carlopmart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somebody knows if exists some option to put on rc.conf file like
FreeBSD does with ipv6_enable=NO option to disable IPv6 support on
OpenBSD 4.0?
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:04:16 - (GMT)
Neil E. Sprinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Denny White wrote:
The other problem is, when I'm on the desktop in an xterm
window, it's as though the settings in .profile like my
aliases I have setup, aren't recognized, like they're not
in the
I'm running dnsmasq as a caching dns and as such it seems to do its job
and it is easy to configure. The idea was to run it as dhcp+dns but I
later found out that the version in the ports-tree[1] is known not to
work on 4.0[2].
[1] dnsmasq-2.31 http://ports.openbsd.nu/net/dnsmasq
[2] release
Original message
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 02:07:31 +1100
From: Jonathan Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: recurring ral-related panic
To: misc@openbsd.org
kernel: integer divide fault trap, code = 0
stopped at rt2661_setup_tx_desc+0xc5: idivl 0x1c(%ebp), %eax
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Dec 17, 2006, at 2:51 PM, carlopmart wrote:
Philip Guenther wrote:
On 12/17/06, carlopmart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somebody knows if exists some option to put on rc.conf file like
FreeBSD does with ipv6_enable=NO option to disable IPv6 support on
OpenBSD 4.0?
Hi!
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:56:08PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
** Reply to message from Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 17
Dec 2006 15:17:01 -0500
On Dec 17, 2006, at 2:51 PM, carlopmart wrote:
Yes, my security staff orders to disable IPv6 protocol on all our
firewalls ...
Your
Clique na figura ou no link abaixo para ver o cartco por inteiro.
WebCard enviado por Quem te admira muito!
ver
O Terra nco se responsabiliza pelo contezdo das mensagens enviadas.
Cartco enviado pelo sistema Terra.
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
On Sunday 17 December 2006 08:22, Jim Michael wrote:
I apologize. I incorrectly reported that I am using stable. I did
upgrade ports to -current on 12/16 before make install.
[snip]
You can't mix 4.0-stable with a 4.0-current ports tree. Well, you
can, sorta, but you are on your own for this
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 12:00:19 +0100
Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the WINE developers, according to their site, `do not currently
understand how threads work on OpenBSD' or something along those lines.
IIRC, they have used some Linux-specific implementation ever since the
last
On Dec 17, 2006, at 6:28 PM, Dag Richards wrote:
Jason Dixon wrote:
Your security staff is clueless. I bet they like to block icmp
echo- request too.
Erm, I am don't think I am clueless, often a sign of cluelessness I
am sure ... However. I block inbound icmp, well actually inbound
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 12:09:12 -0600 (CST)
Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
only today have i tried out hostapd, it is quite neat. while adding a 2nd AP
to
my network a thought occurred to me: if you had 3 APs that were sufficiently
spread out and had tightly synced clocks you could
On Friday 15 December 2006 09:51, you wrote:
So far for all you people who have complained about lousy ral(4)
range or reception, only one of you has posted a dmesg (and even it was
incomplete) and none of you have posted your interface config.
Irrelevant.
Don't let this interrupt your
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:02:00AM +, pedro la peu wrote:
Don't let this interrupt your complain-fest, but if you want to move
beyond whinging and start trying to figure out what the bad performing
cards have in common then you know what you have to do...
Don't let this interrupt your
|.
. |L /|
_ . |\ _| \--+._/| .
/ ||\| Y J ) / |/| ./
J |)'( |` F`.'/ ,.
-| F __ .- f Merry Christmas Y
| / .-'. `. /-. L___ | and a |
On Monday 18 December 2006 00:31, carlopmart wrote:
Somebody knows if exists some option to put on rc.conf file like
FreeBSD does with ipv6_enable=NO option to disable IPv6 support on
OpenBSD 4.0? Or do I need to recompile kernel, modify sendmail.cf, etc,
etc, etc ...??
Depends on what you
On Monday 18 December 2006 07:28, Dag Richards wrote:
What about this is cluelez? I ask in a tone not of belligerence, but a
desire to be informed by my betters.
Blocking icmp is a) totally pointless, and b) makes troubleshooting much more
difficult.
---
Lars Hansson
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, pedro la peu wrote:
On Friday 15 December 2006 09:51, you wrote:
So far for all you people who have complained about lousy ral(4)
range or reception, only one of you has posted a dmesg (and even it was
incomplete) and none of you have posted your interface config.
Good day,
Thank you very much for taking the time to think about this and for your
detailed reply.
Yes, /var/dspam/data was already there after I installed the package (I
am not using -current, just OpenBSD 4.0 from the CD and packages from
mirror.arcticnet.ca. I am not sure whether the way I
On Monday 18 December 2006 03:05, Damien Miller wrote:
Knowing the MAC and RF versions of the affected cards is irrelevant?
Yes.
I guess ral(4) that works fine over 20m through several double-brick
walls is a figment of my imagination then...
No.
A sensitive ral radio would be.
Would you happen to have a link where the WINEdevlopers state that? it
would be a interesting read.There is still much more I must learn
about the differences between FreeBSD and OpenBSD.
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 12/17/06, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 03:10:55PM
- Original Message -
From: Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: limiting outbound throughput from an IP using altq
On 2006/12/14 16:33, rootrider wrote:
Traffic is being assigned to the nick_int queue, and inbound
(from the
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Dec 17, 2006, at 6:28 PM, Dag Richards wrote:
Jason Dixon wrote:
Your security staff is clueless. I bet they like to block icmp
echo- request too.
Erm, I am don't think I am clueless, often a sign of cluelessness I
am sure ... However. I block inbound icmp, well
On Dec 17, 2006, at 11:03 PM, Dag Richards wrote:
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Dec 17, 2006, at 6:28 PM, Dag Richards wrote:
Erm, I am don't think I am clueless, often a sign of cluelessness
I am sure ... However. I block inbound icmp, well actually
inbound anything not shown to be required
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:09:15 -0600
Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you happen to have a link where the WINEdevlopers state that? it
would be a interesting read.There is still much more I must learn
about the differences between FreeBSD and OpenBSD.
The difference is linux, and
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:34:20 -0500
Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't use icmp echo-request for your network operations? Do you
think you're gaining something by filtering ping on your firewall?
Amen... obey RFC 1122.
3.2.2.6 Echo Request/Reply: RFC-792
Every
servers with services running we want public. Why should I allow
someone to ping my dns server?
If I'm having problems resolving a host address that is supposed
to be handled by your server one of the first things I'll do is
see if I have general connectivity to your server. I'll ping it.
Marco S Hyman wrote:
snip
To me (and I'll be the first to
admit that this is nothing but opinion and I won't pretend that my opinion
is any better than yours) I see more harm than good in blocking icmp.
I like it when other people tell me I've screwed something up because I
can find it and
One of the guys is saying that he gave Anna the house thinking that she was
going to pay him for it.
Sal wondered why he has to be the one who Beth doesn't like. He went through
just a couple and said that he had gotten a ton of feedback about that and
everyone seems to have loved it.
Captain
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:03:08 -0800, Dag Richards wrote
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Dec 17, 2006, at 6:28 PM, Dag Richards wrote:
Jason Dixon wrote:
Your security staff is clueless. I bet they like to block icmp
echo- request too.
Erm, I am don't think I am clueless, often a sign
70 matches
Mail list logo
