Certificado Energetico online

certificado energC)tico online http://www.lojaurbana.pt orC'amento automC!tico pedido e marcaC'C#o emediata os melhores preC'os em todo o paC-s se precisa de certificado energC)tico, simplifique! -

ftp-proxy problem on OpenBSD 4.6 with illegal port number errors on NATed FTPing machines

I upgraded an OpenBSD firewall from 4.4 -> 4.5 -> 4.6 in one go, and am noticing that the ftp-proxy is only working sporadically. I keep getting "Can't build data connection: illegal port number" errors when attempting to ftp from a machine inside a NAT to a machine outside the NAT. I thought thi

Re: Relayd relayctl reload error on 4.6

--- On Thu, 11/12/09, Brent Jones wrote: > From: Brent Jones > Subject: Relayd relayctl reload error on 4.6 > To: misc@openbsd.org > Received: Thursday, November 12, 2009, 6:55 PM > It seems the 'relayctl' command > returns an error code when used on > several systems of mine (all i386 4.6) > >

Re: machdep.allowaperture=1 setting is safer?

Brynet wrote: >> I know this is unrelated, Matthieu.. but are you and Owain working on >> getting DRI/DRM working on other supported architectures? and fixing >> the other drivers (..ragedrm/mgadrm/machdrm/etc have been broken since >> 4.5). Matthieu Herrb wrote: > It's on the TODO list, but no on

Perca 10 Quilos em 15 dias!

Caso nco visualize correctamente este e-mail, por favor clique AQUI. NOTA INFORMATIVA: O presente email destina-se znica e exclusivamente a informar potenciais utilizadores e nco pode ser considerado SPAM. De acordo com a legislagco internacional que regulamenta o correio electrsnico, "o

Re: Adding 3Com CardBus card

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:11 PM, rhubbell wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:52:48 -0800 > J.C. Roberts wrote: > >> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:45:24 -0800 rhubbell >> wrote: >> >> > I'm new to OpenBSD and so far so good. >> > One thing I am floundering around on is that I cannot get my 3Com >> > card wo

Re: iPhone sold for $3.40 .. gonna test them tonight

Hi, at www.uniqueBidWin.com. auction prices go down. lowest unique bid wins..not like at ebay ... get free credits to win nice stuff http://iphonesale.yolasite.com/ Walter

Re: Adding 3Com CardBus card

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:52:48 -0800 J.C. Roberts wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:45:24 -0800 rhubbell > wrote: > > > I'm new to OpenBSD and so far so good. > > One thing I am floundering around on is that I cannot get my 3Com > > card working. > > You're new, so you might want to read the follow

Re: parfait

Theo de Raadt wrote: This is the second time they have sent us a log. For me, it is a game to see how quickly we can go through the entire dump of errors they give us, fixing all of them. Almost done. Very nice for you to play the game Theo! And I for one, wants to thank you and all the othe

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

Why choose? If you're not going both ways you're missing half the action. Bob Beck wrote: this was absolutely disturbing to read. misc@ is always disturbing. most of the time it's just disturbing in the i-want-a-belt-fed-weapon-to-make-the-stupid-stop-burning kind of way... You can either be

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

Alpha was the best. Which, of course, is why it's dead now. RIP DEC :( On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:31 +0100, "Daniel Gracia Garallar" wrote: > Hi there! > > Now that I have to change my little server farm and I'm able to choose a > new platform, I would like to choose wisely. > > It's a matter of f

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:15:37 -0700 Bob Beck wrote: > > this was absolutely disturbing to read. > > misc@ is always disturbing. most of the time it's just disturbing in > the i-want-a-belt-fed-weapon-to-make-the-stupid-stop-burning kind of > way... > > You can either be a disturber or a disturb

ftp-proxy with pf tagging breaks inbound FTP data connection in -current

I'm converting a pf ruleset to work with the new nat/rdr changes in 4.6 -current and I came across an issue that seems like a problem in the way "tagged" rules are handled. It's breaking ftp-proxy with tagging when I try to apply additional rules to the tagged packets. The result is that I can lo

Re: parfait

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote: >> I noticea tool called parfait is being used by some OpenBSD developers >> to check code for problems. Is parfait available to average people? >> Can't find a download for it. >> >> http://research.sun.com/projects/parfait > > We aren't "usin

Relayd relayctl reload error on 4.6

It seems the 'relayctl' command returns an error code when used on several systems of mine (all i386 4.6) # relayctl reload command failed Found this bug files in January with similar issue with relayctl: http://cvs.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-wrapper?full=yes&numbers=6046 If I can provide any

Re: parfait

> I noticea tool called parfait is being used by some OpenBSD developers > to check code for problems. Is parfait available to average people? > Can't find a download for it. > > http://research.sun.com/projects/parfait We aren't "using" it. The people who work there ran it against our entire co

parfait

I noticea tool called parfait is being used by some OpenBSD developers to check code for problems. Is parfait available to average people? Can't find a download for it. http://research.sun.com/projects/parfait

Re: Problem with kernel-level pppoe

Andre Keller scrivere: > My config (OpenBSD 4.6): > /etc/hostname.pppoe0 >inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 NONE \ > pppoedev vr0 authproto chap \ > authname 'user' authkey 'pass' up > dest 0.0.0.1 > /sbin/route add default 0.0.0.1 Totally unrelated to your issue but I have noticed o

Re: Adding 3Com CardBus card

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:45:24 -0800 rhubbell wrote: > I'm new to OpenBSD and so far so good. > One thing I am floundering around on is that I cannot get my 3Com > card working. You're new, so you might want to read the following: http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html [quote] "Include important inform

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Michael Burk wrote: > I'm curious - I've heard a lot of negative things about Intel/AMD > platforms. What about other architectures like PowerPC or ARM from a > technical design standpoint? Well, as everybody knows, using a RISC architecture allows them to make mu

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

I'm curious - I've heard a lot of negative things about Intel/AMD platforms. What about other architectures like PowerPC or ARM from a technical design standpoint? -- Michael On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Bob Beck wrote: > i386/amd64. Nothing else is realistic these days. > > Sparc64 is won

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

> this was absolutely disturbing to read. misc@ is always disturbing. most of the time it's just disturbing in the i-want-a-belt-fed-weapon-to-make-the-stupid-stop-burning kind of way... You can either be a disturber or a disturbee.. decide which

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Bob Beck wrote: > 2009/11/12 Lars Nooden : > >> Stupid business decisions aside, you can get if you try Sparc from Sun >> or Fujitsu for server work > > Kind of, but I don't really think it's got a future. It's kind of like > advocating necrophila with a fresh corp

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Bob Beck wrote: > 2009/11/12 Lars Nooden : > >> Stupid business decisions aside, you can get if you try Sparc from Sun >> or Fujitsu for server work > > Kind of, but I don't really think it's got a future. It's kind of like > advocating necrophila with a fresh cor

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

On Thursday 12 November 2009 12:11:35 Bob Beck wrote: > i386/amd64. Nothing else is realistic these days. > > Sparc64 is wonderful but is basically legacy - it's great for finding > bugs and I use it for hacking but is not something I run in > production. > > All my production gear is i386 or am

Adding 3Com CardBus card

I'm new to OpenBSD and so far so good. One thing I am floundering around on is that I cannot get my 3Com card working. cbb1 at pci1 dev 4 function 0 "TI PCI1620 CardBus" rev 0x01: apic 2 int 16 (irq 11), CardBus support disabled cbb2 at pci1 dev 4 function 1 "TI PCI1620 CardBus" rev 0x01: apic 2

Re: readline wrapper like rlfe ?

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:10:31PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > I used to call programs not supporting libreadline with the rlfe > wrapper which added history and commandline editing. > Is there such a thing for OpenBSD? Information for inst:rlwrap-0.28 Comment: generic readline wrapper

Re: readline wrapper like rlfe ?

Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > I used to call programs not supporting libreadline with the rlfe > wrapper which added history and commandline editing. > Is there such a thing for OpenBSD? Try rlwrap in ports. -- Simon Nicolussi, http://homepage.uibk.ac.at/~csag9583/

readline wrapper like rlfe ?

Hi, I used to call programs not supporting libreadline with the rlfe wrapper which added history and commandline editing. Is there such a thing for OpenBSD? Christopher

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:41:35AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote: > 2009/11/12 Bob Beck : > > > Kind of, but I don't really think it's got a future. It's kind of like > > advocating necrophila with a fresh corpse.. or maybe just doing it > > with a really hot coma patient. It might be really good for a s

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

> > We have people like that.. > > Take an ice bath and lie real still... I resent that webcam you installed in my bathroom. Please remove it, I like to be alone in my ice baths. Miod

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:41:35AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote: > 2009/11/12 Bob Beck : > > > Kind of, but I don't really think it's got a future. It's kind of like > > advocating necrophila with a fresh corpse.. or maybe just doing it > > with a really hot coma patient. It might be really good for a s

Re: [OT] integer overflows

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Mark Bucciarelli wrote: > The file holds a number of structs each of size size_t. I stat > the file, compute records_n, then make sure the product of > records_n and struct size is exactly equal to the file size. The size of size_t is variable, so you need to de

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

Bob Beck wrote: > 2009/11/12 Bob Beck : > >> Kind of, but I don't really think it's got a future. It's kind of like >> advocating necrophila with a fresh corpse.. or maybe just doing it >> with a really hot coma patient. It might be really good for a short >> time but you know there isn't much po

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

2009/11/12 Bob Beck : > Kind of, but I don't really think it's got a future. It's kind of like > advocating necrophila with a fresh corpse.. or maybe just doing it > with a really hot coma patient. It might be really good for a short > time but you know there isn't much potential there for a long

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

2009/11/12 Lars Nooden : > Stupid business decisions aside, you can get if you try Sparc from Sun > or Fujitsu for server work Kind of, but I don't really think it's got a future. It's kind of like advocating necrophila with a fresh corpse.. or maybe just doing it with a really hot coma patient.

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

Bob Beck wrote: > There might have been if Sun > hadn't been so determined to turn itself from a good hardware company > into a company trying to compete in Microsoft's product space Ah! The benefits of hiring employees 'away' from Microsoft and putting them in your own company. Funny how the res

Re: OpenBSD platform of choice?

i386/amd64. Nothing else is realistic these days. Sparc64 is wonderful but is basically legacy - it's great for finding bugs and I use it for hacking but is not something I run in production. All my production gear is i386 or amd64 - with a few exceptions. Yes, the hardware sucks and the biosen

Re: [OT] integer overflows

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:46:47AM -0500, Mark Bucciarelli wrote: > Hi, > > Part 1: > > How can I tell if casting a off_t (e.g, sb.st_size) to size_t risks > an overflow? > You have to check for overflows: if (sb.st_size > SIZE_MAX) { /* error */ ...

Re: [OT] integer overflows

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Ted Unangst wrote: > > The harder way: Why are you casting an off_t to a size_t? > I want to verify a file's size before mmap'ing it. The file holds a number of structs each of size size_t. I stat the file, compute records_n, then make sure the product of recor

Re: [OT] integer overflows

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Mark Bucciarelli wrote: > How can I tell if casting a off_t (e.g, sb.st_size) to size_t risks > an overflow? > > What about casting ptrdiff_to to a uint64_t or a long? > > The full table of all such possible integer type casts must be large > (and full of dragons?

[OT] integer overflows

Hi, Part 1: How can I tell if casting a off_t (e.g, sb.st_size) to size_t risks an overflow? What about casting ptrdiff_to to a uint64_t or a long? The full table of all such possible integer type casts must be large (and full of dragons?). How do you all keep it straight? Part 2: Can someon

Re: OOo2 build failure

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:17:25 +0900, msf wrote > removal of large cromulent bags of dead code is always a good thing > doowit "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." :) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/cromulent

Re: perf problems with 4.6/i386 bsd.sp & squid-2.7.STABLE6 from packages

Hi, Well earlier I got the filedescriptor shortage squid warning, so I progressively increased it the max_filedescriptors to 2048, and the warning no longer occurs, also I can see in the squid diagnostics that it's not using more than 1700. So I'm pretty sure it's not that. However I uppe

Re: mailgraph in obsd 4.6

On 2009-11-12, sonjaya wrote: > i try implementions mailgraphs in obsd 4.6 , we know basic chroot mode > and i have copy all file need to /var/www you missed some libraries. ldd /usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/i386-openbsd/auto/RRDs/RRDs.so will show you what to copy. alternatively install

Re: 802.11 Monitor Mode in 4.6-Release

On 2009-11-11, Tom Smith wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Nick Guenther wrote: > > >> Well if you were using monitor mode on some other card I would say >> it's because as a 'security measure' the firmware is blocking it, but >> it's a Ralink and they're the open ones so hmm. Sorry, I th

Re: POOR support for layer 7 security in OBSD. Options or another OS?

On 2009-11-12, David Taveras wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Jason Dixon wrote: >> There are plenty of L7 tools in OpenBSD base and ports/packages to help >> you reach your goals. It's up to you to deploy and configure them >> properly for your environment. Just a few off the

Re: perf problems with 4.6/i386 bsd.sp & squid-2.7.STABLE6 from packages

Hi, i had a similar problem with our configuration, and i resolved this by setting this in /etc/squid/squid.conf max_filedescriptors 4096 Very good performances now ;) Pete Vickers a icrit : Hi, I have performance problems on the above platform. After some time the proxy runs very slowly,

perf problems with 4.6/i386 bsd.sp & squid-2.7.STABLE6 from packages

Hi, I have performance problems on the above platform. After some time the proxy runs very slowly, and console becomes slow to respond. No observable difference between bsd.sp or bsd.mp See tweaks applied below. Since I've tried without them first, but e.g. squid exhausted filedescriptors,

Re: Package dependencies size estimate script

On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 12:09:05PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > No really, what is the right way to recursively list the > dependencies of a given package? pkg_info doesn't seem to > do that natively (and the above attempt only works for > installed packages indeed). Is that a design decision, > say b

Problem with kernel-level pppoe

Hi guys I use pppoe on my openbsd based router some time now, but always using user space ppp. I read on several posts / blogs / etc. that kernel-level pppoe (pppoe(4)) would have better performance and I decided to bring up a test device. My config (OpenBSD 4.6): /etc/hostname.pppoe0 inet 0.

Re: tmux as an educational facilitator

On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:21:12AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote: > thanks everyone on/off-list for pointing out > that screen can do this as well. > > it was not the point of my mail though. > it was not a pissing contest what screen and tmux > can/can't do. How about you go off this list for a w

Re: tmux as an educational facilitator

On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 02:15:30PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote: > as an old time screen user i was perplexed to see that when i > attached to an already attached tmux session, both clients were > updated real time and accepted input as well. the ascii art with > the differing terminal window size

Re: E17 wiki page for OpenBSD

Thank you Dmitry for your great work in supporting E17 on OpenBSD! 2009/11/11 sda : > hello, > > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/OpenBSD > > welcome to correct, improve, advise, etc... > > regards, > sda > > [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] > > -- The

mailgraph in obsd 4.6

dear all i try implementions mailgraphs in obsd 4.6 , we know basic chroot mode and i have copy all file need to /var/www and i try in client browse to mailgraph.cgi get errro like this : # tail -f /var/www/logs/error_log Can't load '/usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/i386-openbsd/auto/RRDs/R

Re: tcpdump dhcp6 interpretation out of date

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:30:00PM +1000, Philip Higgins wrote: > I noticed while doing some debugging on an ipv6 connection that the > included version of tcpdump uses an old draft version of dhcp6 for > its output. > > src/usr.sbin/tcpdump/dhcp6.h was last edited almost 10 years, and > is based

Re: amavisd-new broken?

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Fernando Quintero wrote: > Hi all, > Im trying to install amavisd-new on release 4.6 / 386, and i got an > error with the freeze-2.5p0 package. > Im looking for it in the packages list on the openbsd's mirrors and > can't find it. Its licence doesn't permit to dis