Re: Do mp3 concatenation programs exist?

2006-07-15 Thread Timo Schoeler
this thread into the canditate list of the dumbest threads ever ;) -- Timo Schoeler | http://riscworks.net/~tis | [EMAIL PROTECTED] RISCworks -- Perfection is a powerful message ISP | POWER PowerPC afficinados | Networking, Security, BSD services GPG Key fingerprint = B5F6 68A4 EC45 C309 6770

Re: Do mp3 concatenation programs exist?

2006-07-16 Thread Timo Schoeler
thus Jonathan Schleifer spake: Peter Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh did I say I change my MAC? Since it takes so long for the modem to learn it, I only do this on a daily basis. But I don't expect you to copy my behaviour or anything... That won't change anything. The provider keeps

Re: Do mp3 concatenation programs exist?

2006-07-17 Thread Timo Schoeler
thus Pawel S. Veselov spake: On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 04:26:55PM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: [ skipped ] All you achieve with this idiotic idea is that you get the providers attention because you spam their logs and they'll propably cancel the contract because of abuse. Heh, have you

Re: OT hardware IDE RAID cards

2006-08-17 Thread Timo Schoeler
thus Greg Thomas spake: On 8/16/06, Ioan Nemes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jaye Mathisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/17 9:25 am We switched from SCSI to SATA, and have seen no significant difference in reliability You didn't looked hard enugh! and a whole lot of savings in $'s. Not on

Re: OT: BSDi 4.0 - 4.1

2006-08-17 Thread Timo Schoeler
thus Jack J. Woehr spake: On Aug 17, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Nick Guenther wrote: - the relationship of the OS Formerly Known as BSDi to modern BSD's? - where I might be able to obtain reliable cuts of BSDi 4.0 | 4.1? Search the archives. This came across recently. Hmm, don't

Re: Dual-core and Dual Dual-core servers.

2006-08-27 Thread Timo Schoeler
(...) HTH, timo -- Timo Schoeler | http://riscworks.net/~tis | [EMAIL PROTECTED] RISCworks -- Perfection is a powerful message ISP | POWER PowerPC afficinados | Networking, Security, BSD services GPG Key fingerprint = B5F6 68A4 EC45 C309 6770 38C4 50E8 2740 9E0C F20A Frankie says: Relax

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-09-02 Thread Timo Schoeler
that it 'dies', well, then it be so. i appreciate the OpenBSDs community efforts in building and maintaining a *real* open source OS very much. thank you! cheers, -- Timo Schoeler | http://riscworks.net/~tis | [EMAIL PROTECTED] RISCworks -- Perfection is a powerful message ISP | POWER PowerPC

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-09-02 Thread Timo Schoeler
thus Brett Lymn spake: On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 01:47:59PM +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote: it's one of the most important issues that ever came up in the recent months on NetBSD MLs, and it's being ignored. No, Timo, it's not being ignored. not any longer, yes, as there come replies that back

Re: network cards - which one is the best ;

2006-09-04 Thread Timo Schoeler
thus Marcus Popp spake: On 2006-09-03T23:16, Bill Marquette wrote: On 9/3/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/3/06, Sylwester S. Biernacki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use Intel cards for several years and was happy of them almost all the time. However, after I've read about them

followup: Re: network cards - which one is the best ;

2006-09-04 Thread Timo Schoeler
thus Marcus Popp spake: On 2006-09-03T23:16, Bill Marquette wrote: On 9/3/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/3/06, Sylwester S. Biernacki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use Intel cards for several years and was happy of them almost all the time. However, after I've read about them

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-09-06 Thread Timo Schoeler
thus Joseph A. Dacuma spake: I don't think that binary only drivers are well enough. Surely better than nothing but ... No fucking way. No support is FAR FAR better than a blob. Yes, really! Don't forget that an open source team sometimes makes api changes that might break a binary only

OpenBSD in the news in germany

2006-12-11 Thread Timo Schoeler
://www.heise.de/ix/ -- Timo Schoeler | http://riscworks.net/~tis | [EMAIL PROTECTED] What are you gonna do? Release the dogs?! Or the bees?! Or dogs with bees in their mouth so that when they bark they shoot bees at you? (Homer J. Simpson)

Re: OT Was: Gigabit NICs for Soekris hardware

2006-12-28 Thread Timo Schoeler
rather have a Daihatsu G11R Charade hm, i had a Porsche 993 Turbo engine (around 450 BHP) built in an 1968 VW Beetle. very nice ;) -- Timo Schoeler | http://riscworks.net/~tis | [EMAIL PROTECTED] RISCworks -- Perfection is a powerful message Ex-ISP | RISC aficinados | Networking, Security

ThinkPad A22p -- getting max performance w/o battery built in?

2007-01-10 Thread Timo Schoeler
(698 MHz) with the battery built in, i get 1 GHz. trying to set the speed manually (apm -C or -H) is 'ignored' without error message -- it keeps running on ~700MHz. any ideas? thanks wbr, timo schoeler --- OpenBSD 4.0 (GENERIC) #1107: Sat Sep 16 19:15:58 MDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr

Re: ThinkPad A22p -- getting max performance w/o battery built in?

2007-01-10 Thread Timo Schoeler
thus Clint Pachl spake: Timo Schoeler wrote: hi misc@, having OpenBSD 4.0 installed on my ThinkPad A22p (dmesg below) and wearing the appropriate oBSD shirt i'd like to ask whether it's possible to get max speed from this notebook without having the battery built in. i booted without

Re: macppc SMP fundraising

2007-02-01 Thread Timo Schoeler
howdy, Good morning misc@ In some private emails with gwk@, he has said that he'd like to work on getting SMP on the macppc platform working, but lacks a good, fast machine with which to do the work. what is 'fast' here? That's where we come in. I'm looking around, and we can get a useful

Re: Sun Fire X2100 M2

2007-02-05 Thread Timo Schoeler
In epistula a [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:02:44 +0200: Hi, Does anyone have any experience with this HW on OpenBSD. I can't find specifics on the NICs used on Suns webpage. What are they and are they well supported? This seems like the perfect package for my purposes.

how does RAIDframe on macppc perform 'in the real world'?

2007-02-08 Thread Timo Schoeler
hi list, i'm about to build a RAID1 using RAIDframe (OpenBSD 4.0) on a good, old Power Mac G4. i'll be using two WD Caviar RE hard discs as well as a Promise TX4 300 HBA. are there any issues known for RAID1/RAIDframe on macppc or does it run as intended? thanks, timo

Re: Broadcom Gigabit NIC Interface Translation From Debian/Linux To OpenBSD

2007-02-11 Thread Timo Schoeler
In epistula a Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:57:42 +0100: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-11 02:15]: I have two OpenBSD machines connected with 2Mbps thru a leased-lines in different locations, A B. Both machines colocated at location A and

Re: web sites not accessible

2007-02-11 Thread Timo Schoeler
In epistula a Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:55:14 -0200: Thanks, but i am using kernel pppoe! How can it be changed? i'm not top-posting ;) might be of help http://www.mynetwatchman.com/kb/adsl/pppoemtu.htm /i'm not top-posting ;) HTH, timo On 2/11/07,

Re: bsd.mp on sparc64?

2007-02-11 Thread Timo Schoeler
In epistula a [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason George) die horaque Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:11:44 GMT: Somebady knows will bsd.mp be (when) on sparc64 prcessors? Since no developer is currently working on multiprocessor sparc64 code, it could be a while. It's been almost 2 years since I gave Theo the

Re: bsd.mp on sparc64?

2007-02-11 Thread Timo Schoeler
In epistula a [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason George) die horaque Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:05:02 GMT: Somebady knows will bsd.mp be (when) on sparc64 prcessors? Since no developer is currently working on multiprocessor sparc64 code, it could be a while. It's been almost 2 years since I gave

Re: web sites not accessible

2007-02-12 Thread Timo Schoeler
, it's perfect. HTH, timo On 2/11/07, Timo Schoeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In epistula a Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:55:14 -0200: Thanks, but i am using kernel pppoe! How can it be changed? i'm not top-posting ;) might be of help http

Programming Ada on OpenBSD?

2007-02-25 Thread Timo Schoeler
hi list, does anybody use OpenBSD as Ada programming platform? i'd love to, but it seems to require tweaking of GCC. any hints? tia, timo

Re: Programming Ada on OpenBSD?

2007-02-25 Thread Timo Schoeler
In epistula a Markus Hennecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Sun, 25 Feb 2007 19:14:14 +0100: Trond Danielsen wrote: 2007/2/25, Timo Schoeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hi list, does anybody use OpenBSD as Ada programming platform? Take a look at the list of availble packages - http

Re: will Tandberg StorageLoader play nice?

2007-02-28 Thread Timo Schoeler
In epistula a [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Thu, 01 Mar 2007 09:43:35 +1300: Henrik Hellerstedt wrote: According to ch(4) virtually any tape changer / scsi juke box will work, but before I order one it would be nice if the community could recommend a juke box they know works well.

Re: Seeking opinion about OpenBSD

2007-03-18 Thread Timo Schoeler
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 07:08:16 -0700 (PDT) satimis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, CPU - AMD Athlon64 X2 AM2 512Kx2 3,800 Mobo - ASUS M2N-E with onboard NIC, nVidia chipsets Vedio Card - ASUS EN7600 with nVidia chipsets I have been searching around for a 64 bit OS to run as server.

Re: Seeking opinion about OpenBSD

2007-03-18 Thread Timo Schoeler
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 23:20:08 +0800 (CST) Stephen Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Timo, Tks for your advice. you're welcome :) - snip - i have a similar setup here serving me as a low energy personal file, email server and misc task machine (i have an Athlon64 AM2 3800+ EE SFF

Re: OpenBSD speed on desktops

2007-03-19 Thread Timo Schoeler
In epistula a Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:53:00 +0100: On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 10:06:43PM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote: On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:36:00PM -0500, R. Fumione wrote: (...) I would like to point out here that the idea of optimization is

Re: OpenBSD speed on desktops

2007-03-19 Thread Timo Schoeler
Karel Kulhavy wrote: On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:36:00PM -0500, R. Fumione wrote: Hello, I am using OpenBSD on server since few years now, and I am very happy with it's easy maintenance and it's stability. I want to try on desktop, and I am having trouble. Everything is much slower than

Re: OpenBSD speed on desktops

2007-03-19 Thread Timo Schoeler
In epistula a Manuel Ravasio [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:47:46 -0700 (PDT): Really? I have a completely different experience: I never managed to completely loose a filesystem, except by on OpenBSD... I've been using slackware linux on reiserfs and xfs for many years

Re: No Blob without Puffy

2007-03-19 Thread Timo Schoeler
In epistula a Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:54:24 -0500: Jason George wrote: This was sabre-rattling. Daniel made a pre-emptive tactical strike. There's a big difference. No, there's not a difference. Theo said he was willing to take the emails

Re: No Blob without Puffy

2007-03-19 Thread Timo Schoeler
In epistula a Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:02:47 +0100: On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:38:05PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: So isn't it rather hypocritical to have a anti-Blob campaign, backed by projects which embrace the Blob? So isn't it rather

Re: OpenBSD speed on desktops

2007-03-19 Thread Timo Schoeler
In epistula a Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:59:06 +0100: On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:15:16AM -0400, Jason Beaudoin wrote: snip Everything is much slower than existing Linux system. For example, Firefox takes 3-5 seconds to start on Linux but ~10

Re: No Blob without Puffy

2007-03-19 Thread Timo Schoeler
In epistula a Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:27:29 +0100: On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:35:14AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: * SW [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-19 03:21]: Free as in FreeBSD ahh, I finally get it. dry like water hot like ice free like

Re: OpenBSD speed on desktops

2007-03-19 Thread Timo Schoeler
In epistula a Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:00:49 +0100: On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:26:56AM -0400, Nick ! wrote: On 3/19/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 10:06:43PM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote: Aggressive compiler

Re: No Blob without Puffy

2007-03-19 Thread Timo Schoeler
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:26:18 -0500 Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Timo Schoeler wrote: people with a total lack of so called 'soft skills' won't see them, tho, but that is neither Theo's problem nor anyone else's. Give me a break. If anyone posted here saying that they would

Theo's new compiler and etiquette both in cyberspace and the 'real world' (was: Re: OT: Re: version info )

2007-11-04 Thread Timo Schoeler
to be.) Thus Coleman Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake on Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:03:05 -0400: Timo Schoeler wrote: Thus Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake on Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:04:31 -0600: Perfect. You were the last person I suspected to post an answer like this. However

Re: Theo's new compiler and etiquette both in cyberspace and the 'real world' (was: Re: OT: Re: version info )

2007-11-04 Thread Timo Schoeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thus ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:36:24 +0100: I know I shouldn't feed the trolls, but Sorry, Could Not Resist: Timo-- There are two ways to read your email: 1. You are trying to make a point about how to best lead

Re: Theo's new compiler and etiquette both in cyberspace and the 'real world' (was: Re: OT: Re: version info )

2007-11-04 Thread Timo Schoeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thus Graham Gower [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake Sun, 4 Nov 2007 20:29:06 +1030: On 04/11/2007, Timo Schoeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Hi Timo, Could you please stop spamming the mailing lists I subscribe to. Your list? Or have something

Re: Theo's new compiler and etiquette both in cyberspace and the 'real world' (was: Re: OT: Re: version info )

2007-11-04 Thread Timo Schoeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thus vivek khurana [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:40:35 +: On 11/4/07, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know I shouldn't feed the trolls, but Sorry, Could Not Resist: Not feeding a troll is better than posting childish

Re: OT: Re: Theo's new compiler and etiquette both in cyberspace and the 'real world'

2007-11-04 Thread Timo Schoeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thus Simon 'corecode' Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:15:27 +0100: Timo Schoeler wrote: Thus Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake Thu, 01 Nov 2007 05:43:06 -0600: Where's the diffs Timo? Are you going

Re: Theo's new compiler and etiquette both in cyberspace and the 'real world' (was: Re: OT: Re: version info )

2007-11-04 Thread Timo Schoeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thus ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake Sun, 4 Nov 2007 14:22:43 +0100: On 04/11/2007, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know I shouldn't feed the trolls, but Sorry, Could Not Resist: (...) If you really believe that your way works better,

Re: OT: Re: Theo's new compiler and etiquette both in cyberspace and the 'real world'

2007-11-04 Thread Timo Schoeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thus William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake Sun, 04 Nov 2007 09:17:53 -0600: On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 13:39 +0100, Timo Schoeler wrote: What part of my email did *you* read _and_ understand? Obviously _not_ the part that I _like_ OpenBSD, but I

<    1   2