If that is the only alternative case to cut quixotic attendance expenses
specially in today's financial situations, then why not let everybody be
the speaker? Let everyone deliver their speeches of good tidings and
change that we can believe in about OBSD from newbies to not newbies.
Maybe we'll
And so I've heard from a very extremely reliable assets not parasites that
the following will also gawk at the gathering:
1. Borat
2. Mr. Bean
3. James Bond
:wq!
hmm, on Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:21:16PM +0200, ropers said that
Please don't require me to submit myself to facefuck in order to
Oh why can't this versus this versus that never dies? There had been
raging debate about which OSes is much better compared to the others since
time immemorial. Sure, each one has its own merits over the others and
vice versa. So why feeding this issue up since up to this very moment,
there is no
Hi this is bob. really.
I can haz Ur Passwordz plz?
ohai, and Ur bank accountz and sinz too?
Hi sure why not. Here are mine:
Username: lowboot
Password: oten
Bank Account: xxx-007
Will it be likely possible and feasible to add MPLS feature on OpenBGPd?
I'll be looking for that day wherein those Cisco guys can boost no more
that they are the only ones in the planet that has the MPLS skills. Whew,
maybe somebody knows where to start on how to add this MPLS feature so as
to answer the question like where do I begin?
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at
I encountered this kind of situation before. From what I experienced, it was
some sort of a thing that the memory suddenly freezes all the running
processes. I can
even remember that I saw something like db
I did tried changing a different machine with the same hard disk still there
was a
Absolutely, there is nothing hard about it and in fact it is very stupidly
simple.
Preaching about reverse lookups for these purposes is a sort of masochistic
ignorance.
I don't do reverse dns and most people get my email just fine. If you
don't I probably don't care enough to hear about it.
Reliably? I been running it for 3 years already without single incident that
those damn
e-mails I'd sent reached their destinations at all.
At 04:43 PM 2/7/2008 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can absolutely run a mail server at home. This is not rocket science
and in fact, it
is dumb easy
Either you want to send or receive mail from anyone and from anywhere in
cyberspace,
that is irrefutably possible. Like I said, consider this site:
www.no-ip.com
I am not working for them but I had used their affordable services and it works
well.
One thing, if your ADSL router at home has
If your ISP is blocking port 25, port 110, and port 143 both ways maybe it is
high-time
you consider changing internet service provider. There is no point paying them
good
money when what they are doing is basically blocking ports here and there.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:38:30AM -0600, L. V.
You can absolutely run a mail server at home. This is not rocket science and in
fact, it
is dumb easy to do. Try to follow these steps:
1. Get a domain name and look for registrars that can host it for you. For
example,
check this kind of services at www.no-ip.com.
2. Configure your ADSL
Spreading misinformation? Look, I subscribe to an ISP with ADSL that provided
me with
public dynamic IP address. I register it to a registrar that offers dynamic
hosting
courtesy of www.no-ip.com and I am sending this email to you because of it. And
you tell
me that I am preaching something not
WTF this has to do with being in misc@openbsd.org mailing lists?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I am trying to get information about the SMDR port on the S8700. I am
attempting to run dual outputs from this IP system. Can you comment on
this or direct me to where I can obtain additional
Physically, Itojun has gone from this temporal earthly life. But, IMHO, it
won't be too
long that his legacy in the IPV6 arena will be of immense adaptations and
benefits to
the internet community. Hence, the legend of the great gentle samurai hacker
will always
be honored forevermore.
Hi!
Perhaps, its better to remember the life and legacy of this samurai hacker. His
website
maybe of interest as shown below:
http://www.itojun.org/itojun.html
.*,
DI Bendano
Thats sad man. He was still active 10/25
$Id: index.html,v 1.32 2007/10/25 06:28:10 itojun Exp $
(ntfs) -- no changes.
/dev/hda2 - freebsd (a5)
/dev/hda3 - linux (81)
/dev/hda4 - openbsd (A6)
3. Use a boot manager. I highly recommend LILO as it is much easier to use.
You will be fine if you follow that procedure. Ok?
Best Regards,
Demuel
Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1
What will you be doing here in UK?
Hi,
I have to come to U.K from 6th July to 15th July.
It would be great if I can find a few OpenBSD users there and see how
your implementations are :-)
Please let me know your contact details off list.
Also let me know if you need something from India
Hmm, are there no competent OpenBSD user/programmer/administrator/whatever in
the UK?
They should inform me, I been into OpenBSD since 2.6 and now they have to
import someone
from a different timezone just to do that while I am here basically several
hours by
train -).
That is not classified
what is 192.168.1.10 then?
Hello.
I have machine with one interface pcn0 and ip 192.168.1.7 and I was
trying to redirect outgoing traffic from it with no success.
My pf rule:
rdr on pcn0 inet proto tcp from pcn0 to 192.168.1.1 port 80 - 192.168.1.10
When I do telnet 192.168.1.1 80 it
Maybe try to check and possibly replace the interfaces involve as well as the
cables and
let us know if this issue still occur.
pfctl -x loud tail -f /var/log/messages
~BAS
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Geraerts Andy wrote:
We have an OpenBSD firewall running for a while now. Since a few days
that.
Demuel
Hi,
I am trying to setup a DHCP server on a multi-homed firewall. One of the
interfaces is vr0 and should supply addresses 172.16.255.x/24. The other
is sk0 and should supply 200.232.140.x/24.
My /etc/dhcpd.interfaces looks like
sk0
vr0
My /etc/dhcpd.conf looks like
shared
This must be another troll wandering in the Docklands area.
Signal to Noise ratio high in your last post.
You think you trim some of the fat from your e-mails in your future posts?
In your last e-mail you had a 4 line replay and 30 lines telling me how to
locate you, get in touch with you
Maybe he is trying to impress anyone, specially UK-based openbsd misc
subscribers, in a
meditative way possible that he works for a company in the Docklands?
Saying that configuring this is better and easier than Redhat Linux has no
place in
the OpenBSD mailing lists.
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at
Hmm, a googlemail account. This message must perhaps be coming from a typical
illiterate
British idiot who thinks that Glory is to Britain and Grandeur is still again to
Britain.
I wonder what operating system does the British maintained and develop
nowadays? And oh
yeah, no doubt why he is a
Hi,
Just a taught. If there is proxying of FTP, is there any in existence what they
called
MEDIA proxying in OpenBSD?
Regards,
Demuel
In my opinion, if you could install asterisk+zaptel+libpri in openbsd, then I
could not see any
reason why you cannot get SIP running on it.
Did anyone succeed in installing any SIP client on OpenBSD?
CL
If zaptel won't work in openbsd, there is no way for asterisk be installed.
Hence, no chance for
any SIP protocol to work. But in case you want to get SIP running on the BSDs,
I suggest you go
over to FreeBSD.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:57:20AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my opinion,
Unless zaptel is supported under the OpenbSD platform, then there is no way you
can get sip
protocol run on OpenBSD platform. I have read in the digium mailing lists that
work is on the way
in transferring the success of digium-based cards to either the NetBSD/OpenBSD.
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On
I don't know for sure how you did it. But I been working with
Asterisk+Zaptel+Libpri here in UK
both for personnal and commercial VOIP applications. My success so far on the
BSDs is with FreeBSD
and never had any single damn problem. I have and reviewed the specs of digium
over and over again
Well we have different experience and approaches. I want a VOIP PABX and I find
it easier to play
with voip telephony system if I have all what is listed as requirements on the
asterisk website.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless zaptel is supported under the OpenbSD platform, then there is no
I would rather design a PABX that could interface with existing non VOIP PABX
at all. Again, this
is about preference not advocacy.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that zaptel is the device driver for the NIC card that talks to the kernel.
No, it's the device driver/API for telephony (Digium and
If one's intention is to run just purely VOIP softphones and hardphones, the
asterisk software
alone is enough to do the job. Whereas, if you want to interface you machine to
an existing old
pabx or if you want your openbsd machine to work with pstn at your location
then you need to get
It works if you intend that machine as VOIP only. But I don't think without
zaptel/libpri, you can
connect it to existing PABX or PSTN.
It seems that you are not understanding * architecture well.
As I know zaptel is required for analog FXO/FXS cards from digium and
libpri for T1/E1 cards.
whatever!
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 12:35:56PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If one's intention is to run just purely VOIP softphones and hardphones, the
asterisk software
alone is enough to do the job. Whereas, if you want to interface you machine
to an existing old
pabx or if you want
bloody rubbish...
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 12:35:56PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If one's intention is to run just purely VOIP softphones and hardphones, the
asterisk software
alone is enough to do the job. Whereas, if you want to interface you machine
to an existing old
pabx or if
and an entry /etc/sysctl.conf has
been commented
out. Yet still not working. Any tips for this? I
Regards,
Demuel
in /etc/sysctl.conf, the net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 and in /etc/resolv.conf i
added a valid public
ip address as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a icrit :
Anyone,
I have one OpenBGP machine running OpenBGPd that is currently connected to
the Internet running
OpenBGPd. Furthermore, it has two NIC
192.168.111.254 in /etc/mygate, I
could get internet.
Is this BGP?
Side comments?
Regards,
demuel
$sudo bgpctl -n show summary
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 01:37:28PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone,
I have one OpenBGP machine running OpenBGPd that is currently connected
ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.435/0.435/0.435/0.000 ms
$
Any comments?
Regards,
demuel
OpenBSD With Internet And OpenBGP Running
Does this one announce a default route into bgp to the other machine
Even with the correction, still I cannot reach location A from location vice
versa. For
inet 192.168.111.1 255.255.255.0 192.168.111.255
it did not tell us if it is autoselect. I believe it could be looking like
inet 192.168.111.1 255.255.255.0 NONE
Tips?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody,
/etc/hostname.bge0
inet 192.168.111.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 NONE
What stumbled me is that I cannot ping location A from location B vice-versa.
Any
tips to sort this out is equally appreciated.
Regards,
Demuel
in RouterC.
Any tips to sort this out?
Regards,
Demuel
the internet. The
loopback
addressess for both Router A and Router A can ping each other though.
Tips?
Regards,
Demuel
Have a look at bgpctl show rib. I guess all your routes on B and C are
invalid because your using iBGP (same AS on all routers) and in that case
the nexthops need
Hi,
As I read the openbgpd documentation, there is not a single point wherein in
the examples a dummy
interface is being used. Is a dummy interface supported in OpenBGP?
Regards,
Demuel
Does that categorically mean there is no way, as of the moment, in openbgp to
use a dummy
interface just like in Quagga?
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-07 12:31]:
As I read the openbgpd documentation, there is not a single point wherein in
the examples a
dummy
interface is
I have 4 machines running OpenBSD-stable and it used some AS in the 64512-65535
range. Now, two of
these machines will be eventually connected to two different AS, say obsd1 to
AS 64512 and obsd2
to 64513, while these four machines fall under one AS, say 64513.
From my readings in the published
Can this looback interface be used as a sort of router-id just like in Quagga?
Do I need to add
routes for this IP address reachable elsewhere in my network?
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 12:07:56PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does that categorically mean there is no way, as of the moment, in
What i want to accomplish and wanted to do is to be able to use such an
interface when all the NIC
on my machines are alloted for BGP.
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-07 14:08]:
I want to experiment with creating dummy interfaces under such topology just
like in Quagga.
this
The thing is, after I creatd /etc/hostname.lo1 as stated and I tring to ping it
from other devices
within that network, it is not reachable. I put network 10.83.66.128/32 in my
/etc/bgpd.conf but
still I can only ping this interface from that host it is put in but not from
the other host.
Some
in Up/Down as well as in State/PrefixRcvd in my result, it is in
contrast with the
result reflected in his paper.
Please advise if I did missed something down here.
Regards,
Demuel
multiple processor. The FAQ deals with the GENERIC processor and
I cannot get anything under it that tells what to do if one will compile
from the source code with a GENERIC.SMP kernel.
Any tips and sidecomments are welcome.
Regards,
Demuel
Hi,
As you can see, there are only few entries in the GENERIC.MP and if it
compiles indeed how about the device drivers usually found in the GENERIC?
Would it be included when GENERIC.MP compiles?
Regards,
Demuel
Josh Grosse
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:24:17PM +0800, Demuel I. Bendano, R.E.E
with SMP support as a contrast to the example which is obviously on
compiling a GENERIC kernel.
Side comments?
Regards,
Demuel
Jim Razmus
* Demuel I. Bendano, R.E.E [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070124 10:35]:
All,
I have a machine, Dell 1855, that has one SATA hard disk drive but with
two Pentium Xeon
All,
Has anyone did a successful implementation of L2TP+FreeRadius in OpenBSD?
It appears to me that the FAQ and googling produced an almost absence of
references related to OpenBSD.
Demuel
In this kind of discussion, it is pretty safe to assume that the VOIP PABX
used is an asterisk running either SIP/IAX2/H323/RTP protocols. Googling
will provide us with the corresponding range of ports in each of them
either in UDP or in TCP.
Now, it is easy to get this working. In the IP phones,
localhost
$
What went wrong with my configuration?
Regards,
Demuel
platform?
Thanks,
Demuel
Their development operating system is DOS with no remote hole in the
default install, in more than 20 years and counting! The one remote whole
in the default install happened only when they created OpenBSD.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:48:27PM -0600, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
Hi OpenBSD
can u draw a ASCII rough sketch of what you are trying to do?
guys i want to hear some comments / suggestions from you. we are planning
to network a company. using a cat5e, the 2 pairs(4 wires) will be using
for LAN and the remaining 2 pairs(4 wires) will be use for pabx.
I wonder why your question end up here in the OpenBSD mailing list. Anyways,
for the PC-to-Server, do a cross-over(1236-6321) at both ends. If you want
still, from PC-Switch-Server, two straight(1236-1236) wound do. For the
PABX to your telephone, please be specific if these are Asterisk and VOIP
All,
I cannot still see the logic as to why Quagga is part of the OpenBSD ports
tree when it has OpenBGP at all in the default install? The documentation
of OpenBGP tells us that it is far superior in design as compared to
Zebra/Quagga.
Side comments?
dems
From what I read of, they might be using some sort of machine language.
Hi OpenBSD developers,
Which are your preferred tools for develop? (For C, C++, Java,
etcno matter the language)
It is good to know which tools and why...
Thanks,
Alvaro
63 matches
Mail list logo
