According to the man pages for at (or batch):
The working directory, the environment (except for the variables
TERM, TERMCAP, DISPLAY, and _), and the umask are retained from the
time of invocation.
But, oddly enough, at the time of actual invocation it seems not to know
this
Hi Austin,
Austin Hook wrote on Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 12:55:11PM -0700:
[ citations reordered ]
$ echo echo hello ee
$ batch -f ee
Cannot open input file: No such file or directory
That looks like a bug to me.
The function main() in at.c calls set_cron_cwd(), changing to /var/cron,
before
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 12:55 -0700, Austin Hook wrote:
According to the man pages for at (or batch):
The working directory, the environment (except for the variables
TERM, TERMCAP, DISPLAY, and _), and the umask are retained from the
time of invocation.
But, oddly enough, at
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Bernd Siggy Brentrup b...@free-it.org wrote:
AFAICT from at(1), the code is still mostly T-Rex's implementation.
You may want to have a look at https://launchpad.net/~at-ng for
a reimplementation from scratch, The client side is mostly done
I don't think one
Hi Ted,
better not wake up sleeping dogs :)
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 17:14 -0400, you wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Bernd Siggy Brentrup b...@free-it.org
wrote:
AFAICT from at(1), the code is still mostly T-Rex's implementation.
You may want to have a look at
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 02:48:59AM +0200, Bernd Siggy Brentrup wrote:
Hi Ted,
better not wake up sleeping dogs :)
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 17:14 -0400, you wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Bernd Siggy Brentrup b...@free-it.org
wrote:
AFAICT from at(1), the code is still mostly
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 17:14 -0400, you wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Bernd Siggy Brentrup b...@free-it.org
wrote:
AFAICT from at(1), the code is still mostly T-Rex's implementation.
You may want to have a look at https://launchpad.net/~at-ng for
a reimplementation from
Bernd Siggy Brentrup wrote:
The oldest sources by Thomas Koenig (aka T-Rex) I have at hand (3.1.8
iirc) definitely carry a GPL license statement. I'm curious in how
far openBSD's source code for at differs to warrant a different
license if at all possible. Up to now I only checked the
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:30 +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 02:48:59AM +0200, Bernd Siggy Brentrup wrote:
Hi Ted,
better not wake up sleeping dogs :)
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 17:14 -0400, you wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Bernd Siggy Brentrup
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 19:35 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 17:14 -0400, you wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Bernd Siggy Brentrup b...@free-it.org
wrote:
AFAICT from at(1), the code is still mostly T-Rex's implementation.
You may want to have a look
The word goes Theo de Raadt himself is driving away ppl from using
openBSD by pissing them of publicly.
I am more than happy to drive away people who come to our mailing list
trying to sell their wares.
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 20:47 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
The word goes Theo de Raadt himself is driving away ppl from using
openBSD by pissing them of publicly.
I am more than happy to drive away people who come to our mailing
list trying to sell their wares.
What exactly makes you think
12 matches
Mail list logo
