-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
ropers
Sent: 10 October 2006 12:22 AM
To: Greg Thomas
Cc: OpenBSD
Subject: Re: Version 4.0 release
Would you like some cheese?
Greg
Venezuelan Beaver Cheese?
The Cat's eaten it!
Ray Garza wrote:
Hello folks,
/snipped
Question 1:
I would like to either place kids playing Runescape at the bottom of the
queue or reduce bandwidth. How do I get people using the web for other
than Runescape to have higher priority? Should I scrap this and go a
different route? Any
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 11:23, Ray Garza wrote:
---
Question 1:
I would like to either place kids playing Runescape at the bottom of the
queue or reduce bandwidth. How do I get people using the web for other
than Runescape to have higher priority? Should I scrap this and go a
I will be out of office on 9th - 12th Oct 2006. Pls leave me a voice mail +65
68728771 as i have limited email access till i am back.For any urgent type
approval issue, pls contact Xiaoming Feng at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/10/06 4:46 AM, Kian Mohageri wrote:
On 10/9/06, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess you didn't understand; OpenBSD does not exist for you or me, it
exists for the developers.
This is a truth everybody should have to read before submitting their
complaint/feature
Hi Misc
Will the new built in SAS controller Perc 5/i in the Dell servers (LSI SAS
megaraid driver) work in OpenBSD 3.9? Will it work in the upcoming 4.0
release? We will eventually buy a bunch of Dell 1950 servers. And of course
we will have the firewalls on OpenBSD
Tried to search for
On 2006/10/09 22:23, Ray Garza wrote:
I would like to either place kids playing Runescape at the bottom of the
queue or reduce bandwidth. How do I get people using the web for other
than Runescape to have higher priority? Should I scrap this and go a
different route? Any suggestions?
Hi,
On Oct 10, 2006, at 1:56 AM, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
did you read the man page ?
$ man motd
$ grep motd /etc/rc
The manpage would have solved my question. Thanks! :-) I guess I
didn't realise that there even was a manpage for /etc/motd. I should
check first in the future...
There is already open bug report about this: 5105, and I read some
about it on misc@ I believe. Anyway, ral card drops me to ddb when
swotching it from 11g mode to 11b, I had that happen to me yesterday
on a two weeks old snapshot. Would it be of any use providing the
trace and ps and maybe some
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 11:14:25AM +0200, Per-Olov Sj?holm wrote:
Hi Misc
Will the new built in SAS controller Perc 5/i in the Dell servers (LSI SAS
megaraid driver) work in OpenBSD 3.9? Will it work in the upcoming 4.0
release? We will eventually buy a bunch of Dell 1950 servers. And of
Hi,
I am trying to get OpenBSD (up to -current) to run on a AMD Geode LX-800.
It seems that OpenBSD has problems to recognize the fpu and it panics with
npxdna vector not initialized upon the first df issued on the shell.
NetBSD works fine on this machine.
Any suggestions ?
Thanks
Stefan
On 10/10/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
runescape played from the website is a java program, it connects
on ports 43594-43595 and 8010, those are the ports you would need to
throttle and are unlikely to affect standard web traffic.
Good info!
And ports 43594-43595 and 8010 are
On 10/10/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And ports 43594-43595 and 8010 are unlikely to affect *anything* else
-- IANA's well-known ports list shows them as unassigned. Odds are no
one else is using 'em.
I'd like to take back that last sentence. On second thought, it' a
stupid assumption
On 2006/10/10 12:54, ropers wrote:
On 10/10/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
runescape played from the website is a java program, it connects
on ports 43594-43595 and 8010, those are the ports you would need to
throttle and are unlikely to affect standard web traffic.
Since the
I assume you meant mfi(4).
Yes it is supported through mfi(4), the NICs are supported though bnx(4) and
kettenis fixed interrupt routing. All these goodies made the 4.0 release.
Nice OpenBSD box, I run several.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 12:15:49PM +0200, Przemyslaw Nowaczyk wrote:
On Tue, Oct
Hi list,
I got a panic (2nd time) in 2 month now since I upgraded to 3.9 on one
of our servers: a sunfire v120 (openBSD 3.9 with latest patches,
sparc64) . Since the server does not have a display, only a serial
console I am not aware what was shown on the console before I connected.
All I
Yesterday a bge diff has been reverted that was causing ami(4) to misbehave.
This could be related and is being investigated.
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 05:51:51PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A recent upgrade from a Sept 01 to Oct 08 snap disabled one of two NICs
on a Supermicro H8DA8/H8DAR
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Jason George wrote:
Nevermind the sex toy, what beer is that?
Big Rock Traditional Ale.
http://www.bigrockbeer.com
It's what we normally drink, along with Guinness and Wild Rose Brown.
It usually gives me a headache in large quanitities... but then again, it
might be
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, chefren wrote:
SNIP
+++chefren
p.s. Really nothing wrong with getting the E450 in the spotlight so
more people know of a lack of code and really nothing wrong with
knowing the project has a lack of money.
An e440, what a room heater. If a developer feels like getting
Hi,
The broadcom 5823 chipset is listed as supported in OpenBSD's supported
hardware list. I found a card from broadcom, the ips500a, has anybody run
that card, I'd like a fast (as in 500mpbs or faster when doing IPSEC) card
that would work with OpenBSD, and its the only one I've found that
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
[..]
Let me put it better then. I use their GPL part here ONLY to show how
more ridiculous the answer was and oppose to what you say, they wrote
and quote A GPL Linux device driver for the Marvell wireless chip...
and then at the same time, they say they can't release
* Tobias Weisserth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-09 16:39]:
AIDE keeps reporting a change in the SHA1 checksum of /etc/motd. Even
...
I did a thorough check of the system and didn't notice any funny
Well, you may not have noticed anything funny, but what
you're seeing is normal.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 06:55:54AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
I assume you meant mfi(4).
Yes it is supported through mfi(4), the NICs are supported though bnx(4) and
kettenis fixed interrupt routing. All these goodies made the 4.0 release.
Nice OpenBSD box, I run several.
On Tue, Oct
Some of you may have been following the OLPC discussion. Here is
one place you can read more about it:
http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/286/
Finally it has been made more clear what this is about. The
discussion is being discussed at a variety of other sites.
However, a
On 10/10/06, chefren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/06 4:46 AM, Kian Mohageri wrote:
On 10/9/06, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess you didn't understand; OpenBSD does not exist for you or me, it
exists for the developers.
This is a truth everybody should have to
On Oct 10, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Some of you may have been following the OLPC discussion. Here is
one place you can read more about it:
http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/286/
The differences of opinion between Theo and RMS are at least as
interesting
as
Good morning all
I've gotten a few replies with people interested in
parting with E450s, 250s, 280s, and 220s (I have an
Ultra 2 to throw onto the pile, for what its worth).
So far, every reply has been, It's yours if you pay
to ship it.
If any devs would find any of these useful, or know of
a
I've gotten a few replies with people interested in
parting with E450s, 250s, 280s, and 220s (I have an
Ultra 2 to throw onto the pile, for what its worth).
So far, every reply has been, It's yours if you pay
to ship it.
If any devs would find any of these useful, or know of
a dev who would find
Stefan Castille wrote:
Hi list,
I got a panic (2nd time) in 2 month now since I upgraded to 3.9 on one
of our servers: a sunfire v120 (openBSD 3.9 with latest patches,
sparc64) . Since the server does not have a display, only a serial
console I am not aware what was shown on the console
On 10/9/06, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to find a compiler that supports variable length arrays.
I'm currently taking a computer science class and noticed that gcc's
support for variable lenght arrays is broken [0].
i think you'll be hard pressed to come up with an example that
Hello,
I have an OSPF enabled backbone and want to insert two firewalls.
Each firewall will be connected to one different core router.
My idea is to setup OSPFd on the interfaces plugged to the core, and
CARP on the interfaces plugged to the other side (servers network). I
have no routing
On 10/10/06, Jack J. Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 10, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Some of you may have been following the OLPC discussion. Here is
one place you can read more about it:
http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/286/
The differences of
We currently have a Cisco PIX firewall that we are using for our office
firewall and our VOIP phones. The guy who was here before me only gave
the office computers 32 available DHCP addresses, and set all the VOIP
phones (Cisco 7960 and Grandstream phones) on static ips.
What other
Well, by putting the swap partition at the end of the disk rather than the
beginning, you make it slow, much slower. openbsd/i386 allows you to start
the swap partition at the very beginning of the disk, before the / partition.
As far as why this is happening, I remember persistent errors like
Ronnie Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will pfsync just handle the split sessions happily ? Will it handle the
load for, say, 10k pps ?
with a soekris net4501? no
with a 500mhz celeron or higher? yes
--
Do you even send e-mails?
I told you, I'm from the Wild West. I write by hand. --
On Oct 10, 2006, at 12:14 PM, bofh wrote:
On 10/10/06, Jack J. Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The differences of opinion between Theo and RMS are at least as
interesting
as the differences between either one and OLPC / the chip vendors!
How so? They've both been clear about what they
How so? They've both been clear about what they want and what they
stand
for.
Every book is new until one has read it. It's interesting to see the
different take
these two crusaders have on the firmware.
How so? that RMS is ranting about another undoable unmaintainable
* Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061008 19:22]:
With the help of my ISP I'm trying to get native IPv6 over ADSL (PPPoE).
This isn't a regular offer and I'm the first customer who tries it out.
Which ISP is this, I would love to add them to
On Oct 10, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Bob Beck wrote:
Every book is new until one has read it. It's interesting to see the
different take
these two crusaders have on the firmware.
How so?
Because they're both very strong personalities, both of whom I've met
personally and whom I've
On 10/10/06, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of you may have been following the OLPC discussion. Here is
one place you can read more about it:
http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/286/
from the above link:
Technically end-users are not Marvell's customers because it
I ran into a problem when rebooting to a current kernel (i386 GENERIC)
due to a secondary disk without an 'a' partition. Disk sd0 checked out
fine, but all the partitions on sd1 had bad magic numbers and failed
fsck:
/dev/rsd1d: BAD SUPER BLOCK: MAGIC NUMBER WRONG
/dev/rsd1d: UNEXPECTED
At 09:38 10-10-2006, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Some of you may have been following the OLPC discussion. Here is
one place you can read more about it:
http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/286/
Since Jim repeatedly mistates our views, I am making the controversial
move of publishing
What other information can I provide you to help me come up with a solution?
A quick ASCII diagram of the PIX and the subnets in front and back
might help (I'm the visual type).
The only subnet you mention with public IPs in your first e-mail is
216.139.44.142/26, in which the IPs mentioned in
Hello everybody,
I got my new Laptop (a ThinkPad R51) and now everything just works [tm]. :)
So even the build in WLAN (Atheros now) works and I wanted to get some
practical experience with WLAN-Security (in Fact Attacks against WEP).
I set up a little WLAN at home, secured it with a WEP-Key and
Diana Eichert wrote:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, chefren wrote:
SNIP
+++chefren
p.s. Really nothing wrong with getting the E450 in the spotlight so
more people know of a lack of code and really nothing wrong with
knowing the project has a lack of money.
An e440, what a room heater. If a developer
Steve Williams wrote:
Stefan Castille wrote:
Hi list,
I got a panic (2nd time) in 2 month now since I upgraded to 3.9 on one
of our servers: a sunfire v120 (openBSD 3.9 with latest patches,
sparc64) . Since the server does not have a display, only a serial
Hi,
I am having the exact
I'm building -current right now. I'm looking forward to improvements
between vlan(4) and carp(4) post 3.7.
I'm curious: Are there any new debugging mechanisms for carp(4) in
-current/4.x ? I was looking at ip_carp.{c,h} changelog. It doesn't seem
obvious if there are.
I.e., does
Ted Unangst wrote:
On 10/9/06, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to find a compiler that supports variable length arrays.
I'm currently taking a computer science class and noticed that gcc's
support for variable lenght arrays is broken [0].
i think you'll be hard pressed to come up with
On 10/10/06, Edward A. Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In reading these it seemed obvious that the encumbered IP or microkernel
that JG talks about is almost certainly ThreadX, produced by Express Logic
(expresslogic.com or rtos.com). I might mention that I have a lot of
experience with
On 10/10/06, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, if anyone has any pointers (no pun intended) for a CS
newbie, any help and recommendations are always appeciated. I like the
OpenBSD development community and hope to contribute some code and
patches in the future.
Read the source tree. No
Emilio Perea wrote:
I ran into a problem when rebooting to a current kernel (i386 GENERIC)
due to a secondary disk without an 'a' partition.
I don't think the lack of an 'a' partition is your problem. Goodness
knows, I've got a lot of machines with no 'a' partition on the second
and later
On 2006/10/10 12:44, Edward A. Gardner wrote:
In reading these it seemed obvious that the encumbered IP or microkernel
that JG talks about is almost certainly ThreadX, produced by Express Logic
(expresslogic.com or rtos.com).
http://www.rtos.com/news/detail/?prid=104
Product Category
Hi Folks,
I am having the extremely annoying, and probably simple problem of not
being able to list the rules in my authpf anchors, and its close to
keeping me up all night.
I had this issue when I configured this the first time, but I just cant
remember what kind of simple syntax problem I
I would think that there would be some sense of urgency to get the new
rthreads implementation up-an-running (at least for the i386 and AMD64
platforms) otherwise OpenBSD will become less and less viable as a
general purpose server platform (I like OpenBSD a lot) and really hate
to see this
I have an old HP Pavilion (not sure of the model, but it has an ASUS
MEB-VM motherboard, floppy drive, 30gb hdd, Kingston EtheRx nic, Celeron
366mhz cpu, 256mb of ram) that I am intent on turning into a
firewall/bastion host using OpenBSD. I do not have access to a cd
burner, so I plan on
Hello all,
We are using VLAN-tagging to aggregate multiple subnets onto our firewall.
We don't trust all of the networks that we're filtering, so we want to
explicitly forbid traffic from VLAN1 to VLAN0 unless there's a rule
that allows it.
Normally, we put our block in/out rules on the
Nick Holland wrote:
Otherwise..I'm confused...which isn't to
say I'm not missing something.
I've been informed that I *was* missing something, that this is a
problem which is being dealt with, beatings are being applied (including
to me, for missing it...). Disregard my comments...things will
On 2006/10/05 15:47, Bob Beck wrote:
It is completely shameful. One Laptop Per Citizen - controlled by
the cabal.
The cabal with their bios-signing keys. I guess heretics need not apply.
http://www.olpcnews.com/software/operating_system/a_secure_2b1_bios_up.html
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 07:01:21PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
Emilio Perea wrote:
I ran into a problem when rebooting to a current kernel (i386 GENERIC)
due to a secondary disk without an 'a' partition.
I don't think the lack of an 'a' partition is your problem. Goodness
knows, I've
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 05:50:50PM -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
Certainly a way to log events (interfaces, etc.) and the resulting actions
taken by the code would be useful in mission critical environments.
Anything beats tcpdump 'proto carp' and making guesses from there.
Nothing new to
2006/10/10, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That archive contains a jpg in base64 format. Here it is in decoded form:
http://ropersonline.com/static/nigerian-classroom.jpg
If you actually want to help 3rd world children:
http://www.vim.org/htmldoc/uganda.html
Laptops are the least of their
On 2006/10/10 19:23, David Sampson wrote:
However, when I boot with the floppy in it, I get some standard dialog,
followed by a hang. After a minute or so, it reboots itself, and tries again.
What should I do? It boots the fedora core 4 install on the hard drive
fine, but I don't want the
On 10/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think that there would be some sense of urgency to get the new
rthreads implementation up-an-running (at least for the i386 and AMD64
platforms) otherwise OpenBSD will become less and less viable as a
general purpose server
Hello Jack,
On 11/10/2006, at 5:35 AM, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
Because they're both very strong personalities, both of whom I've met
personally and whom I've interviewed for Dr. Dobb's Journal, and I
find
the contrast between them ... um ... interesting.
By interesting, you mean one is well
[flamebait alert, sorry, but i really cannot resist]
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 11:12:32PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And hell kismet works fine except the fact that it can`t crack WEP.
Since *you* were the first person on earth that had the kismet port
available (remember?), and I did
On 10/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think that there would be some sense of urgency to get the new
rthreads implementation up-an-running (at least for the i386 and AMD64
platforms) otherwise OpenBSD will become less and less viable as a
general purpose server
Matthias,
for what is it worth I would like to say thank you for porting kismet,
I use it all the time, because I do not know of another tool to scan
for available AP's
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 10/10/06, Matthias Kilian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[flamebait alert, sorry, but i really cannot resist]
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:31:25PM -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
for what is it worth I would like to say thank you for porting kismet,
I use it all the time, because I do not know of another tool to scan
for available AP's
ifconfig -M
dstumbler (in security/bsd-airtools)
On 10/10/06, Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias,
for what is it worth I would like to say thank you for porting kismet,
I use it all the time, because I do not know of another tool to scan
for available AP's
I thought that's what ifconfig -M was for?
Greg
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 09:26:48PM -0400, Sam Chill wrote:
On 10/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think that there would be some sense of urgency to get the new
rthreads implementation up-an-running (at least for the i386 and AMD64
platforms) otherwise OpenBSD will
Original message
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 01:37:01 +0100
From: Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Letter to OLPC
To: OpenBSD misc@openbsd.org
On 2006/10/05 15:47, Bob Beck wrote:
It is completely shameful. One Laptop Per Citizen - controlled by
the cabal.
The
I'm trying to install a Linksys G (WMP54G) wireless pci adapter. I've
checked the man pages for the ral driver and this is one of the cards
listed as being supported.
Here are the appropriate dmesg lines:
ral0 at pci1 dev 9 function 0 Ralink RT2561S rev 0x00: irq 12, address
00:16:b6:98:85:1f
Thanks for the response Martin. Maybe I wasn't clear enough. Let me
rephrase everything in this email:
We currently have a firewall using a Cisco PIX server. Everything on
this firewall is using a static ip of some sort. There is a range of IP
addresses inside the PIX firewall that are
Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
Thanks. I'm a student and just getting started and my instructor was
telling the class how the schools version copies of MS Visual C 6.0 is
not C99 compliant and that some of the examples in the book[0] fail to
compile. I read up on GCC 3.3.5 and it appears
Hello,
I have few accounts that are allowed to connect with
sftp only. I have password fields set to * and the users
have transferred their ssh public keys to enable public
key auth. Everything is working just fine except that
I get this annoying warning from /etc/security:
Checking the
On 10/10/06, Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
advantage between children who have laptops and those who don't. it is no
different than the One Magnifying Glass Per Child or the One Knife Per
Child
I'm here by starting the One Slap Upside the Head for Morons (OSUHM) project
for all
We currently have a firewall using a Cisco PIX server. Everything on
this firewall is using a static ip of some sort. There is a range of IP
addresses inside the PIX firewall that are being used for DHCP.
Just to make sure: you say everything on this firewall is using a
static IP of some
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/53928
:-)
78 matches
Mail list logo
