Dear All,
I was wondering if I could get some feed back about running Skype on the
OpenBSD 4.2. (i386 with the generic kernel)
I read wonderful article about installation of Skype on OpenBSD
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.bsd.india/352
and I have couple of questions.
I checked the
Ant feedback on this part?
So, is it possible based on the logs I sent that it is in the DMA part
of the mp kernel here?
Still digging, but wanted to get some feedback as if it was possible or
am I looking totally in the wrong direction.
Fine if you tell me I am full of sh*t too. (;
Just
Hello,
I have pfsync setup between two servers and they're connected to each
other through a cross over cable just as suggested in the faq. Now how
do I test to make sure its working probably and rules and states are
being synced up? I have ftp-proxy setup so if I connect to an a ftp
server
i've got a similar issue with virtual machines running within qemu.
i get terribly high ping times as high with huge variation between
guest and host. between guest an any other machine in the lan is ok.
probably the combination of tun and lo which triggers this behavior?
//llx
On Saturday
A suspend/resume cycle kills all active network connections, but
'sh /etc/netstart' restores things fine.
that's funny... in my case this is not needed... the connection is
there after resuming...
Is it possible that there's such a difference between the thinkpad T41
and T41p??
2007/12/2, Pau
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 10:25:14AM +0100, christian widmer wrote:
i've got a similar issue with virtual machines running within qemu.
i get terribly high ping times as high with huge variation between
guest and host. between guest an any other machine in the lan is ok.
probably the
Predrag Punosevac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I checked the Skype website I see that the current version 1.4
is for Fedora Core 6.0 There is also Skype Static OSS.
You should try static OSS.
Can anyone share hers/his experience in running Skype on OpenBSD.
I tried it a long time ago, when
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 03:54:42PM +0100, Ted Unangst wrote:
[Mark Thomas]
If I close the lid on this laptop ( Thinkpad T41 ) the machine goes into a
deep sleep but will not recover with OpenBSD 4.2. With 4.1 this worked
flawlessly. xorg is not running during these tests.
it will often come
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
I was wondering if I could get some feed back about running Skype on the
OpenBSD 4.2. (i386 with the generic kernel) ...
If you read up on Skype, you'll find that the theoretical shortcomings
of not having the source code are more than theoretical. Here's *one*
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
I was wondering if I could get some feed back about running Skype on
the OpenBSD 4.2. (i386 with the generic kernel)
I read wonderful article about installation of Skype on OpenBSD
Howdy,
If you're interested in VoIP, then you might want to look at wengophone,
(
In message http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=119655219201385w=1,
I wrote
I have a more favorable experience to report, albeit on a T41p:
With 4.2 (both -release and now -stable), suspend works perfectly.
[[...]]
Addendum:
I have ampd running. Here's my /etc/rc.conf.local:
--- begin
Lars NoodC)n [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://forum.skype.com/index.php?showtopic=95261
That's why you run it in a chroot (or a vm).
--
Jonathan
Jake Conk P=P0P?P8QP0:
Hello,
I have pfsync setup between two servers and they're connected to each
other through a cross over cable just as suggested in the faq. Now how
do I test to make sure its working probably and rules and states are
being synced up? I have ftp-proxy setup so if I
David Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're interested in VoIP, then you might want to look at
wengophone, ( http://www.openwengo.com ), it seems to be basically
the same thing, but it's GPL'd and the linux version is kept up to
date. It might be easier to get working than Skype. Please
Lars NoodC)n wrote:
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
I was wondering if I could get some feed back about running Skype on the
OpenBSD 4.2. (i386 with the generic kernel) ...
If you read up on Skype, you'll find that the theoretical shortcomings
of not having the source code are more than
On Nov 25, 2007 5:22 PM, David Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this possibly the same memory leak mentioned below?
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=119572453509542w=2
Thanks for your pointer! Indeed, this patch/errata appears to have
sqashed the memory leak. A patched kernel did not loose
When I run the command
pfctl -sr
a list of the rules is displayed, a sample line is below.
pass in log quick on fxp0 inet proto tcp from 226.174.167.164 to
(fxp0) port = smtp flags S/FSRA keep state
Is there a way for me to tell pfctl that I want to see
port = 25
instead of
port =
On Dec 2, 2007, at 4:14 AM, Jake Conk wrote:
Hello,
I have pfsync setup between two servers and they're connected to each
other through a cross over cable just as suggested in the faq. Now how
do I test to make sure its working probably and rules and states are
being synced up? I have
--- Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Lars NoodC)n wrote:
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
I was wondering if I could get some feed back
about running Skype on the
OpenBSD 4.2. (i386 with the generic kernel) ...
If you read up on Skype, you'll find that the
theoretical
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
David Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're interested in VoIP, then you might want to look at
wengophone, ( http://www.openwengo.com ), it seems to be basically
the same thing, but it's GPL'd and the linux version is kept up to
date. It might be easier to get
VoIP applications generally require full-duplex audio operation (or
two soundcards, but that gets icky as far as configuration goes).
you'll have much more luck with full-duplex audio in -current
(or when 4.3 is released).
also see ports/telephony/pjsua in -current.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SDF
Hi Aaron,
The problem is that you pass base on src not destination:
pass in on fxp3 inet proto tcp from $lan_net port { ssh www ntp https
smtp imap imaps domain } to any
it should be
pass in on fxp3 inet proto tcp from $lan_net to port { ssh www ntp https
smtp imap imaps domain }
Also be
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 16:48:14 +
Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VoIP applications generally require full-duplex audio operation (or
two soundcards, but that gets icky as far as configuration goes).
you'll have much more luck with full-duplex audio in -current
(or when 4.3 is
L wrote:
When I reply to the group.. it puts the person's address and the groups
address in TO/CC fields.
Is it possible for the server to just send mail to the TO field to the
group only, and not have a CC ?
anything is possible...
Not going to happen, however. :)
Is this on purpose, so
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 01:14 -0800, Jake Conk wrote:
Hello,
I have pfsync setup between two servers and they're connected to each
The command that you're look for is:
$ sudo netstat -s state | grep -A 17 pfsync
pfsync:
0 packets received (IPv4)
0 packets received (IPv6)
On Dec 2, 2007 12:48 PM, David Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiya.
I have asked this before and so far noone has helped me.
Perhaps it is too simple. Unfortunately I can't figure out a solution.
Here it is again.
I have 2 interfaces (fxp0 and wi0) which get their ip's from dhcp.
wi0,
hi
machines involved:
host running OpenBSD 4.1 GENERIC.MP#2 i386 / qemu-0.8.2p4 (dmesg see below)
guest running OpenBSD 4.2 GENERIC#1 i386
some running OpenBSD 4.0 GENERIC#12 i386
guest runs on host
some another machine on the same lan
1. ping guest on host
36 packets transmitted, 36
Hiya.
I have asked this before and so far noone has helped me.
Perhaps it is too simple. Unfortunately I can't figure out a solution.
Here it is again.
I have 2 interfaces (fxp0 and wi0) which get their ip's from dhcp.
wi0, being wireless, is prone to lose it's connection.
I want to change the
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 08:07:35PM +0200, Lars Nood?n wrote:
Twinkle might (or might not) be an option
http://www.twinklephone.com/
twinkle is being worked on. hopefully it will be imported before 4.3
is cut, assuming I quit slacking (sorry brad :().
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SDF Public
I'm not much for VoIP, but commented on Skype because I had been
following the problems this summer. The main two strikes against Skype
are its closed (BLOB) nature and its proprietary protocol. To bring up
the security track record of Skype would be to just kick it while it's
already down.
hi
machines involved:
host running OpenBSD 4.1 GENERIC.MP#2 i386 / qemu-0.8.2p4 (dmesg see below)
guest running OpenBSD 4.2 GENERIC#1 i386
some running OpenBSD 4.0 GENERIC#12 i386
guest runs on host
some another machine on the same lan
1. ping guest on host
36 packets transmitted, 36
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 06:04:50PM +0100, Daniel wrote:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 16:48:14 +
Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VoIP applications generally require full-duplex audio operation (or
two soundcards, but that gets icky as far as configuration goes).
you'll have much more luck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find this to be an interesting statement here. I hope I miss
understood it.
You totally misunderstood it.
So, you may run OpenBSD, I assume this as you are on
OpenBSD list, so your
Hi All,
I've got a recent, default install of 4.4 that doesn't seem to be able to send
email locally. /var/log/maillog is full of the (somewhat sanitized, [[]]
indicates replaced text) message below:
Dec 2 13:34:47 melanie sm-mta[23205]: lAS6U6nI026028:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], delay=4+12:04:41,
I did some more testing on this. I managed to configure OpenVPN in
routing mode but using tap instead of tun. This eliminates the bridge
entirely. I know this is probably not a normal config, but traffic flows
and routes properly.
However, I am *still* seeing the high ping times, and now
Hello,
Someone on IRC just posted this link http://www.delilinux.de/oksh/ , seems
like someone ported OpenBSD ksh to Linux and licensed it under GPLv3. Isn't
this a license violation?
What other sip clients are there which will work on
OpenBSD?
I'm using icewm and don't consider Ekiga an option.
As was mentioned earlier, pjsua, a command-line sip user agent,
is in ports. It's the definition of nothing fancy, but it
does demonstrate that the MI audio layer and various
Jacob Meuser wrote:
VoIP applications generally require full-duplex audio operation (or
two soundcards, but that gets icky as far as configuration goes).
you'll have much more luck with full-duplex audio in -current
(or when 4.3 is released).
also see ports/telephony/pjsua in -current.
I
Jacob Meuser wrote:
VoIP applications generally require full-duplex audio operation (or
two soundcards, but that gets icky as far as configuration goes).
you'll have much more luck with full-duplex audio in -current
(or when 4.3 is released).
also see ports/telephony/pjsua in -current.
I
I have seen several installations of Postfix go catatonic due to spam
overload, large messages, mailing list expansions, and other undiagnosed
problems. These were run by Postfix lovers, so I have always assumed
that the installation was correct. In the one case I saw tested
replacing Postfix
Thanks Nick.
quote---
The timeout is set by the DHCP server when it provides the IP. You
have to change the server's settings (or hack dhclient I guess) to
give you this ability.
Hello,
Someone on IRC just posted this link http://www.delilinux.de/oksh/ , seems
like someone ported OpenBSD ksh to Linux and licensed it under GPLv3. Isn't
this a license violation?
See /usr/src/bin/ksh/LEGAL.
People can do just about whatever they want with public domain code,
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
...
It seems that SIP phones and in particularly Ekiga that I am the most
familiar with have poor support for Windows and OS X. As most of people
that I talk to (family and friends) run those operating systems it seems
to me logical that I try to accommodate them ...
[quotes rearranged (but not changed) for easier parsing]
On 02/12/2007, Jonathan Schleifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I neither use Skype, nor do I promote it.
(...)
Again: I never said it's ok to run it.
(...)
I've recommended not running it outside of a chroot.
(...)
I care about security
I did this as an exercise some time ago... when I was learning how obsd works:
www.aei.mpg.de/~pau/skype.png
Now that I know that there is pjsua in ports waiting for us (it's only
-current), which seems to be compatible for windows and MacOSX and
linux, I'm looking forward to it! (I'm the only
Pedro de Oliveira writes:
Hello,
Someone on IRC just posted this link http://www.delilinux.de/oksh/ , seems
like someone ported OpenBSD ksh to Linux and licensed it under GPLv3. Isn't
this a license violation?
See /usr/src/bin/ksh/LEGAL.
People can do just about whatever they want with
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:30:02PM -, Pedro de Oliveira wrote:
Hello,
Someone on IRC just posted this link http://www.delilinux.de/oksh/ , seems
like someone ported OpenBSD ksh to Linux and licensed it under GPLv3. Isn't
this a license violation?
It seems that this is not a violation
Miod Vallat writes:
But some parts of OpenBSD's ksh are BSD-licensed files, which did not
come from pdksh initially.
That's not what /usr/src/bin/ksh/LEGAL states, but I didn't look
further. OK, looking I see that alloc.c and mknod.c have copyrights.
Relicensing these files under GPLv3 is
* MikeM [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-02 15:35]:
When I run the command
pfctl -sr
a list of the rules is displayed, a sample line is below.
pass in log quick on fxp0 inet proto tcp from 226.174.167.164 to
(fxp0) port = smtp flags S/FSRA keep state
Is there a way for me to tell
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 10:59:14PM -0700, L wrote:
But later when I get a clue and admit reality, I'll throw it on a
pentium 600mhz box with 500MB of ram.
Well, when you get a clue and don't want the laptops anymore, be sure to
advertise them here. One with 32 MB ram would do me just fine
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
I apologize to everyone for my first message as it seems stirred high
unintended emotions. I was merely interested in the technical
possibility to run the Skype on the OpenBSD box. As of this moment
I do not have even a Linux emulator turned on as I have strong
Pedro de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Someone on IRC just posted this link http://www.delilinux.de/oksh/ ,
seems
like someone ported OpenBSD ksh to Linux and licensed it under GPLv3.
Isn't this a license violation?
Marco S Hyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you DO use Skype, after all. You said above that you didn't. Which
is it?
No, not anymore. I used it in the past but now I use the normal
telephone since I got a flatrate.
Well, it's untrue that
Do not pretend that you have no choice.
quite
This is indeed the point. It's hard, it hurts, but it's the point.
After one year of migration, I am now using exclusively obsd on this
laptop, without any kind of blob, and all hardware is supported.
I have learnt to be patient. If you support your
On Dec 2, 2007 7:53 AM, Jonathan Thornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have ampd running. Here's my /etc/rc.conf.local:
Thanks for that little piece of information. I added that to my
rc.conf.local and suspend/resume now works from X too.
For the record this is on 4.1 using the ati driver in my
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 12:56:11PM -0700, Anthony Roberts wrote:
I have seen several installations of Postfix go catatonic due to spam
overload, large messages, mailing list expansions, and other undiagnosed
problems. These were run by Postfix lovers, so I have always assumed
that the
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 06:14:09PM -0300, Andr?s wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 5:42 PM, Marco S Hyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miod Vallat writes:
But some parts of OpenBSD's ksh are BSD-licensed files, which did not
come from pdksh initially.
That's not what /usr/src/bin/ksh/LEGAL states,
Marco S Hyman wrote:
Miod Vallat writes:
But some parts of OpenBSD's ksh are BSD-licensed files, which did not
come from pdksh initially.
That's not what /usr/src/bin/ksh/LEGAL states, but I didn't look
further. OK, looking I see that alloc.c and mknod.c have copyrights.
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 09:45:37PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* MikeM [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-02 15:35]:
short of hacking pfctl source, no.
Moving /etc/services elsewhere worked for me. Unforeseen consequences
are the reader's responsibility...
--
Jussi Peltola
There are other sources as well:
http://www.peereboom.us/ksh_linux.html
http://www.wormhole.hu/~ice/ksh/
Don't know why that dude went through the trouble of putting gplv3 shit
on it.
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:30:02PM -, Pedro de Oliveira wrote:
Hello,
Someone on IRC just posted this link
On Dec 2, 2007 2:21 PM, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 12:56:11PM -0700, Anthony Roberts wrote:
I have seen several installations of Postfix go catatonic due to spam
overload, large messages, mailing list expansions, and other undiagnosed
problems.
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 11:05:57PM +0200, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
I apologize to everyone for my first message as it seems stirred high
unintended emotions. I was merely interested in the technical
possibility to run the Skype on the OpenBSD box. As of this moment
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 04:05:10PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
There are other sources as well:
http://www.peereboom.us/ksh_linux.html
http://www.wormhole.hu/~ice/ksh/
Don't know why that dude went through the trouble of putting gplv3 shit
on it.
fear, misunderstanding, and confusion
On 02/12/2007, Jonathan Schleifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it's untrue that you have a choice. For example, in Germany the
tax computation program that companies need runs only on Windows and
they *HAVE* to use it and to send it over the internet using it.
I'm pretty sure that the state
Having a bit of a time trying to find some info on what I need to pass and on
what interface ( i.e. gif0 ?). The IPSEC bridge works fine with pf disabled.
Would like to use my current pf configuration and add the use of the IPSEC
bridge to that set up.
Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello folks,
anyone in the Munich area interested in a PA-Risc 712/100 machine? it's got
onboard video, a working disk (at least, the last time I powered it on),
some memory, etc.
Rob Urban
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 12:30:16AM +0100, ropers wrote:
On 02/12/2007, Jonathan Schleifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of my mainboards has a UniChrome Pro onboard graphics chip, and
there is a fully free and open source Linux driver for that (
http://www.openchrome.org/ ) and with it,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 03:48:14PM -0700, Darren Spruell wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 2:21 PM, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 12:56:11PM -0700, Anthony Roberts wrote:
I have seen several installations of Postfix go catatonic due to spam
overload, large
On 21:45:37 Dec 02, Henning Brauer wrote:
* MikeM [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-02 15:35]:
When I run the command
pfctl -sr
a list of the rules is displayed, a sample line is below.
pass in log quick on fxp0 inet proto tcp from 226.174.167.164 to
(fxp0) port = smtp flags S/FSRA
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 20:48:42 -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 03:48:14PM -0700, Darren Spruell wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 2:21 PM, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 12:56:11PM -0700, Anthony Roberts wrote:
I have seen several installations of
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 19:08 -0500, tim wrote:
my current pf configuration and add the use of the IPSEC bridge to
that set up.
Just check tcpdump -vvv -n -s 192 -i pflog0. Probably pass quick
proto ipencap all etc.
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Why is everyone trying to come up with a solution to a problem that
doesn't exist?
The 'problem' is a piece of software installed on the box that some of
us don't use. It takes up space (how much?). Each MTA has its
champions and its
Nick Holland wrote:
L wrote:
On my mailing lists that I manage I always turn this option off.. so
that anyone who replies to the list only replies to the list but not the
actual person too.
Not a big deal, just wondering if this is by design and on purpose
Sometimes, people WISH to
On 13:31:27 Dec 03, RW wrote:
Forget it.
No, I'm not ordering you to. It's a tip.
Given that the developers are ignoring this thread, my guess is that
nothing is going to happen. It's all been said before.
Not true.
They just don't have the time.
BTW I run or admin several mailservers. I
Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 04:05:10PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
There are other sources as well:
http://www.peereboom.us/ksh_linux.html
http://www.wormhole.hu/~ice/ksh/
Don't know why that dude went through the trouble of putting gplv3 shit
on it.
fear,
On Nov 30, 2007 4:32 PM, Liviu Daia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 November 2007, Amarendra Godbole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please note that postfix does not undergo the rigorous code scrub that
sendmail goes through.
[...]
Will you please cut the crap? Thank you.
Unlike
On Nov 28, 2007 5:16 PM, Heinrich Rebehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
the 26-NOV-2007 snapshot seems to be missing xorgcfg(1).
I installed all distribution sets.
Has it been deprecated?
Yes. It has been deprecated in xserver 1.4. No one has maintained and
updated it for the various
77 matches
Mail list logo
