I have setup a bridge following the faq
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Bridge
(no filtering)
$ cat /etc/bridgename.bridge0
add sis0
add sis2
up
$ cat /etc/hostname.sis0
192.168.x.x 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.255 description LAN
$ cat /etc/hostname.sis2
up
$ brconfig bridge0
bridge0:
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 10:00:23AM +0100, jul wrote:
I have setup a bridge following the faq
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Bridge
(no filtering)
$ cat /etc/bridgename.bridge0
add sis0
add sis2
up
$ cat /etc/hostname.sis0
192.168.x.x 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.255 description LAN
$
Update:
So at least I'm able to display text with Czech characters written in UTF-8.
Just start uxterm and in it :
$ luit -encoding 'UTF-8' emacs index.html
then you can see text in Czech without problems (vi,vim,gvim have problems).
But until I can use cz keyboard it's half solution.
Hello misc,
I am getting this message mpi0: can't get RAID vol cfg page 0
every 10 seconds on console and /var/log/messages.
The system is DELL PowerEdge 1655MC with PERC4/mi LSI logic hardware
raid controller, RAID1 (mirror) enabled, hard drives synced, OpenBSD 4.5
-stable as of December 3
Hi,
I am using the -M option of spamd and I am seeing a lot good servers
being
trapped because they tried the secondary MX first. What I am assuming is
that they tried the primary MX, which created a greylist entry. But this
entry expired, and after that, they tried to connect to the 2nd MX.
If
With recent snapshots, the touchpad on my HP Mini netbook stopped
working. Here is a dmesg for a few months back when the touchpad
worked followed by one from the most recent snapshot:
http://16systems.com/hp/hp-mini-110-1020NR.txt
http://16systems.com/hp/hp_mini_broken_touchpad.txt
I certainly do not see this behaviour. sounds to me very likely that your
primary is not reachable for some reason and they are trying the secondary.
2009/12/5 inet_use...@samerica.com:
Hi,
I am using the -M option of spamd and I am seeing a lot good servers
being
trapped because they
With recent snapshots, the touchpad on my HP Mini netbook stopped
working. Here is a dmesg for a few months back when the touchpad
worked followed by one from the most recent snapshot:
http://16systems.com/hp/hp-mini-110-1020NR.txt
http://16systems.com/hp/hp_mini_broken_touchpad.txt
I have disabled IPv6 in the kernel (via top-level GENERIC) but I can't
see what other places it needs to be disabled for other applications.
Is it enabled per-application or is there some magic in a top-level
Makefile somewhere? This IPv6 is like Whak-A-Mole. Or is it just so
pervasive now that it
On Saturday 05 December 2009 14:25:02 rhubbell wrote:
I have disabled IPv6 in the kernel (via top-level GENERIC) but I can't
see what other places it needs to be disabled for other applications.
Is it enabled per-application or is there some magic in a top-level
Makefile somewhere? This IPv6
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote:
With recent snapshots, the touchpad on my HP Mini netbook stopped
working. Here is a dmesg for a few months back when the touchpad
worked followed by one from the most recent snapshot:
I updated my local source tree Tuesday. Rebuilding the kernel went fine,
but building userland failed at sbin/route with the following messages:
=== sbin/route
cc -02 -pipe -nostdinc -idirafter /usr/dest/usr/include -c
/usr/src/sbin/route/route.c
cc -02 -pipe -nostdinc -idirafter
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:33:22 -0200
Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 08:20:16AM +, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Peter Miller feu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have 4.6 amd64 installed and can't get X to work at 1280x800.
--snip--
Stay away from
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:39:39 -0500
STeve Andre' wrote:
You are free of course to make mods, but please understand that you
are on your own for them. I suppose it could also be said that if
Ha, yeah, I feel so alone.
you need help in turning ipv6 off, you shouldn't--learn first how
So you
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
Yes, I'd like to see some pointers also. I recall that there was
discussion (might've been on linux kernel) a while ago about a
partially-open video card. Why doesn't the community support that?
You mean
On Saturday 05 December 2009 15:07:43 rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:39:39 -0500
STeve Andre' wrote:
You are free of course to make mods, but please understand that you
are on your own for them. I suppose it could also be said that if
Ha, yeah, I feel so alone.
you need
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote:
With recent snapshots, the touchpad on my HP Mini netbook stopped
working. Here is a dmesg for a few months back when the touchpad
worked followed by one from
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:28:09 -0500
STeve Andre' wrote:
mostly a waste of time, except for the educational aspects of what not
to do.
Thanks for the nice story. I get a kick out of how far folks here go out
of their way not to help people out. Instead offering up non-sequitars,
etc.
Come on
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 12:44:42PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:28:09 -0500
STeve Andre' wrote:
mostly a waste of time, except for the educational aspects of what not
to do.
Thanks for the nice story. I get a kick out of how far folks here go out
of their way not to
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:28:09 -0500
STeve Andre' wrote:
mostly a waste of time, except for the educational aspects of what not
to do.
Thanks for the nice story. I get a kick out of how far folks here go out
of their way
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Jussi Peltola pe...@pelzi.net wrote:
At least some developers hang on misc@ and surely know how to disable
ipv6. The question is: do they care?
In my experience, no.
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 21:30 +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Making hardware is a lot more difficult than writing software. So it takes
more resources and more skills.
Sorry Matthieu, but I have to say that this is utter bullshit, and I
believe such underestimation is the underlying reason that
A Friend has sent you an E-Card -- an online greeting card from
E-Cards.com. You can pickup your card at this website.
- If your e-mail is hot-link enabled, click here to download the E-card:
http://www.e-cards.com/pickup/?code=ca3407-vo-Cristmas1,
- You may also click on http://www.e-cards.com,
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 08:31:07PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
The interrupt handling in ral(4) for RT2661 has a couple of problems,
which causes the interface to get stuck under heavy load with OACTIVE
set (the problems are likely especially severe on slow systems such as
my 600MHz VIA
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Jussi Peltola pe...@pelzi.net wrote:
Come on admit it, you don't know how to disable IPv6. Why does everyone
place so much trust in OpenBSD when the kernel seems to be a mystery to
most here with constant warnings about not fiddling with it
At least some
man ifconfig...is a quick and easy way to disable inet6 on any
interface. Beyond that I'm thinking sysctl, did you peruse around before
posting ?
Johan Beisser wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:28:09 -0500
STeve Andre' wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Soner Tari so...@comixwall.org wrote:
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 21:30 +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Making hardware is a lot more difficult than writing software. So it takes
more resources and more skills.
Sorry Matthieu, but I have to say that this is utter
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:57:58 -0800
Johan Beisser wrote:
You could also do more digging around yourself.
I'd say that applies to you, not me. (^:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:01:34 -0500
Ted Unangst wrote:
Other than adding rhubbell to the list of people who probably broke
it themselves, not really.
Nothing's broken here. Hope you didn't strain a muscle jumping to
conclusions. (^: Well nothing other than the pervasiveness of IPv6 into
every
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:52:35 +0200
Jussi Peltola wrote:
ipv6. The question is: do they care?
Not sure how care plays into this. A simple question that the folks here
would rather not answer but instead would rather meander about.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:25 AM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
I have disabled IPv6 in the kernel (via top-level GENERIC) but I can't
see what other places it needs to be disabled for other applications.
Needs to be disabled ...to accomplish what goal? Saving of disk
space?
Feeding the troll, sorry.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 2:45 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
Not sure how care plays into this. A simple question that the folks here
would rather not answer but instead would rather meander about.
I gave you the file where GENERIC for all kernels is
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:08:36 -0500
Ted Unangst wrote:
More than I've ever spent on all the computers I've ever written
software with.
How much would that be? Ballpark. Doesn't seem like it would be very much.
Seems like you're just hand-waving without real numbers.
Wikipedia has a money-raised
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:30:28 +0100
Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
Yes, I'd like to see some pointers also. I recall that there was
discussion (might've been on linux kernel) a while ago about a
partially-open video card. Why
Not sure how care plays into this. A simple question that the folks here
would rather not answer but instead would rather meander about.
Well you're especially chipper, now instead of whining on mailing
lists.. how about you try helping yourself?
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:55 AM, James Hartley jjhart...@gmail.com wrote:
I updated my local source tree Tuesday. Rebuilding the kernel went fine,
but building userland failed at sbin/route with the following messages:
=== sbin/route
cc -02 -pipe -nostdinc -idirafter /usr/dest/usr/include -c
Come back and talk when you've bought one for yourself, and donated
another to the project.
KTHX HAND
On 12/5/09, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:08:36 -0500
Ted Unangst wrote:
More than I've ever spent on all the computers I've ever written
software with.
How
User: there's a knob I want to twiddle, but don't know how...
Community: Don't
User: but I wanna, I wanna.
Developers: don't, really
User: I know what I'm doing, so there
Community: .
User: why is everyone ignoring me? Where's the love?
Everyone: it's hard to love the village idiot
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 02:43:32PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:01:34 -0500
Ted Unangst wrote:
Other than adding rhubbell to the list of people who probably broke
it themselves, not really.
Nothing's broken here. Hope you didn't strain a muscle jumping to
blah blah blah
go away troll
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 02:59:19PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:30:28 +0100
Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
Yes, I'd like to see some pointers also. I recall that there was
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:14:00 -0500
bofh wrote:
Come back and talk when you've bought one for yourself, and donated
another to the project.
Gee, ok. What have you contributed to it?
You don't want to converse. Fine by me.
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:01:06 -0800
Johan Beisser wrote:
Feeding the troll, sorry.
Hi, fresh from high school?
I gave you the file where GENERIC for all kernels is configured.
Apparently you don't care enough to even read the thread. But it's ok,
I don't care if you care or not. But thanks at
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:26:36 -0600
Marco Peereboom wrote:
You are a sphincter of epic proportions.
Sphincter's pretty important. So thanks!
Le me turn on my care meter, oh look at that -10 on the 0 to 1 scale.
Also looking back I see the question was ignored before.
I can figure it
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:10:27 -0800
Allie Daneman wrote:
man ifconfig...is a quick and easy way to disable inet6 on any
interface. Beyond that I'm thinking sysctl, did you peruse around before
posting ?
It's not that simple. Applications still try IPv6 even when it's disabled
in the kernel
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:54 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:14:00 -0500
bofh wrote:
Come back and talk when you've bought one for yourself, and donated
another to the project.
Gee, ok. What have you contributed to it?
You don't want to converse. Fine by me.
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:59:53 -0800
Philip Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:25 AM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
I have disabled IPv6 in the kernel (via top-level GENERIC) but I can't
see what other places it needs to be disabled for other applications.
Needs to be disabled
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:08:30 -0500
Brynet wrote:
Not sure how care plays into this. A simple question that the folks
here would rather not answer but instead would rather meander about.
Well you're especially chipper, now instead of whining on mailing
lists.. how about you try helping
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:10:19 -0500
bofh wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:54 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:14:00 -0500
bofh wrote:
Come back and talk when you've bought one for yourself, and donated
another to the project.
Gee, ok. What have you
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote:
With recent snapshots, the touchpad on my HP Mini netbook stopped
working. Here is a dmesg for a few months back when the touchpad
worked followed by one from the most recent snapshot:
Has the NAT rule syntax changed in 4.6 current from 3-dec? - (GENERIC.MP)
#340
I dont see any change in the webpages:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/nat.html
A rule that worked in 4.6 release:
nat pass on $ext_if proto tcp from 192.168.0.2 to any port 80 - $ext_if_IP
now generates an error:
It changed awhile ago...check out the man page of pf.conf, there are a
few examples.
Quentin Merton wrote:
Has the NAT rule syntax changed in 4.6 current from 3-dec? - (GENERIC.MP)
#340
I dont see any change in the webpages:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/nat.html
A rule that worked in 4.6
We have 2 internet lines with 2 different and equally unreliable Internet
providers.
We have 2 PF firewalls running 4.6 RELEASE arranged in a failover
configuration
using CARP/pfsync. Each firewall is therefore connected to each router and
to our
internal network as well as a crossover cable
On 15:59, Sat 05 Dec 09, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:26:36 -0600
Marco Peereboom wrote:
You are a sphincter of epic proportions.
Sphincter's pretty important. So thanks!
Le me turn on my care meter, oh look at that -10 on the 0 to 1 scale.
Also looking back I
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 01:00:50 +
Quentin Merton quentin.mer...@googlemail.com wrote:
Has the NAT rule syntax changed in 4.6 current from 3-dec? -
(GENERIC.MP) #340
I dont see any change in the webpages:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/nat.html
A rule that worked in 4.6 release:
nat pass
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 03:59:28PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
And please just ignore my posts
if you care that much.
finally you say something that I can relate to.
--
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
On 16:02, Sat 05 Dec 09, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:10:27 -0800
Allie Daneman wrote:
man ifconfig...is a quick and easy way to disable inet6 on any
interface. Beyond that I'm thinking sysctl, did you peruse around before
posting ?
It's not that simple. Applications still
On 16:16, Sat 05 Dec 09, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:59:53 -0800
Philip Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:25 AM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
I have disabled IPv6 in the kernel (via top-level GENERIC) but I can't
see what other places it needs to be disabled
This is an old issue and not new, but I tried the latest snapshot in
case the situation have changed to no avail.
I git a little bit more details however after letting it reboot
constantly may be 40 times or so.
Then it jam and was able to get a screen shut of the remote console
before
Yeah you said that already.
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:17:28 -0600
Marco Peereboom wrote:
fuck off troll
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:24:42PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:08:30 -0500
Brynet wrote:
Not sure how care plays into this. A simple question that the folks
Another sensitive type. Guess there are always a few on every list.
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:17:14 -0600
Marco Peereboom wrote:
fuck off troll
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:26:49PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:10:19 -0500
bofh wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:54 PM,
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 03:07:03 +0100
Michiel van Baak wrote:
Did you even bother to look at a tcpdump when you are running on a
kernel without ipv6 support? Is there any ipv6 traffic when running on a
kernel without ipv6 ?
Again re-read the thread if you need to. Can read the reply to P.
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 02:07:00 +
Jacob Meuser wrote:
finally you say something that I can relate to.
But couldn't resist, eh? (^:
rhubbell wrote:
Another sensitive type. Guess there are always a few on every list.
As distinguished from insensitive twerps like yourself.
Mind sharing your hostname.ral0 and the tools you use to trigger this
situation? I've tried hping, tcpbench, ping -f, rsync, etc to no avail.
max ~8000 intr/s with hping
2.5MB/s with scp
hostname.ral0 is:
inet 10.2.0.1 255.255.0.0 NONE \
mode 11g \
mediaopt
rhubbell the top posting troll wrote:
Yeah you said that already.
Marco Peereboom wrote:
fuck off troll
You have asked your questions, quite impolitely.. many have responded
regardless of this.
Marco has kindly given you some further direction, the 'off' in 'fuck
off' would indicate that
rhubbell wrote:
Another sensitive type. Guess there are always a few on every list.
It has nothing to do with sensitivity, we just have an aversion toward
idiots.
-Bryan.
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 07:55:11PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 02:07:00 +
Jacob Meuser wrote:
finally you say something that I can relate to.
But couldn't resist, eh? (^:
no, it was a test to see if you could take your own advice. since you
won't, I am now sure you're
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:55 AM, James Hartley jjhart...@gmail.com
wrote:
I updated my local source tree Tuesday. Rebuilding the kernel went fine,
but building userland failed at sbin/route with the following
Which apps? I have secret for you ;-) Most of the apps from packages/ports
is not from OpenBSD project, but from people/communities around the world.
So please ask them what to do. In OpenBSD there are at least two ways how
to disable IPv6 for whole system. And in case of problems with app there
You are missing whole point of philosophy of OpenBSD. Snippet from one
good book :
The OpenBSD community generally expects users to be advanced computer
users. They have
written extensive documentation about OpenBSD, and expect people to be
willing to read it.
They're not interested in coddling
wow now I have point. You are like kid on sand. Look they have thermometer
and you haven't :-P :-D You don't have even any respect for long time OpenBSD
developers or users which know a LOT more then you. Just because you are
unqualified user doesn't mean that you can shout around on everyone.
71 matches
Mail list logo
