Re: HPPA 720/60 and PS/2 Keyboard

On Mon, 21 May 2018, Markus Hennecke wrote: > I tried updating my HPPA box from 6.2 to 6.3, but when booting the release > or -current bsd.rd kernel the keyboard repeats the last key pressed. The > 6.2 release did not show this behaviour. Is there anyone out there running > 6.3 or -current on

Re: ikev2 All incoming/outgoing traffic over IPsec?

I can successful ping both sides of IPsec tunnel: server$ ping -I 192.168.5.1 192.168.6.1 64 bytes from 192.168.6.1 icpm_seq... client$ ping -I 192.158.6.1 192.168.5.1 64 bytes from 192.168.6.1 icpm_seq...\ tcpdump -en -i pflog0 shows nothing about blocked traffic while connecting by "external

Re: HPPA 720/60 and PS/2 Keyboard

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:29:13PM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote: > I tried updating my HPPA box from 6.2 to 6.3, but when booting the release > or -current bsd.rd kernel the keyboard repeats the last key pressed. The > 6.2 release did not show this behaviour. Is there anyone out there running

HPPA 720/60 and PS/2 Keyboard

I tried updating my HPPA box from 6.2 to 6.3, but when booting the release or -current bsd.rd kernel the keyboard repeats the last key pressed. The 6.2 release did not show this behaviour. Is there anyone out there running 6.3 or -current on hppa? Markus

Re: Intranet routing with dynamic IPs

On 2018-05-21 01:22, Solene Rapenne wrote: hello I'm not sure to understand your need. You don't need BGP for this. Adding a route on router A, accessing network B through router B is all you need. Computers on the dhcp client of A will use router A as a default gateway and then will be able

Building OpenBSD and ports VS installing from packages

Hi, I have this question in my mind for a time now, if I download OpenBSD and install all the applications from packages do OpenBSD and the apps use for example AVX512 ? I mean, if I understand correctly, the compiler should optimize the code for a given set of instructions, given that, for

Re: Building OpenBSD and ports VS installing from packages

Hi, I understand that about the builds and packages. I will re write my question in another form: If I build, say, firefox on a i386 machine I get a package, and another if I build firefox on amd64, they differ. If I build firefox on an amd64 machine WITHOUT AVX support I get a package, if now I

Re: Building OpenBSD and ports VS installing from packages

>> do I still get the same package ? Yes. cc(1) does not use microarchitecture-specific features unless you provide "-march" explicitly. Other BSDs do it, but OpenBSD does not. So, cc(1) only knows that you are building something for amd64. There should not be any difference between nehalem and

Re: Building OpenBSD and ports VS installing from packages

Hello. OpenBSD team does not recommend to build anything that exists in packages. >>If so, building from ports would produce a different code? In most cases ports are not aware of your microarchitecture. See my question and Theo's answer.

Re: Building OpenBSD and ports VS installing from packages

i386 and amd64 are different platforms, so of course you get different packages. Within the same platform, all binaries that are built should run on all possible members of that platform. So, code will be compiled WITHOUT AVX support, unless it can be detected at runtime (e.g. mplayer/ffmpeg).

Re: Building OpenBSD and ports VS installing from packages

Okey, thanks both for the help! Elias.

Re: Intranet routing with dynamic IPs

I would try OpenOSPFD for this situation, instead of OpenBGPD. -- Raul On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 4:16 PM, wrote: > On 2018-05-21 01:22, Solene Rapenne wrote: > >> hello >> >> I'm not sure to understand your need. You don't need BGP for >> this. Adding a route on router A,

socket permissions inside /var/www chroot

I am trying to tighten down some of the permissions for the listening sockets for various web applications which are chrooted to /var/www. It appears that httpd (which runs as user www and group www) refuses to connect to a fastcgi socket unless the socket's user and group are also www:www. (I do

Re: socket permissions inside /var/www chroot

Hello, I am definitely not an expert in this field, but here are some thoughts: connect to a fastcgi socket unless the socket's user and group are also > www:www. > Should not unix domain sockets be treated as regular files in case permissions? If yes, then httpd should be able to access any

Re: Viewport for man.openbsd.org -- readability on phones

Fri, 18 May 2018 02:47:29 +0200 Ingo Schwarze > Hi Aner, > > Aner Perez wrote on Thu, May 17, 2018 at 06:32:44PM -0400: > > On 05/17/2018 05:22 PM, x...@dr.com wrote: > >> "Ingo Schwarze" wrote: > > >>> Absolutely not. > >>> Mandoc output is not

Re: 6.3 just died (not for the first time)

Hello, Anyone found an solution for this or is there more information required ? This night it happened 2 times in less then 3 hours time. Please let me know. Running 6.3 with all syspatches applied. Kind Regards, Peter van Oord van der Vlies On 15/05/2018, 23:30, "owner-m...@openbsd.org on

Re: sndio multiple interfaces

On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 06:49:25PM -0400, Ken M wrote: > Been looking around and can't find the answer to this question. If I missed it > in some obvious place please excuse me. > > Anyway I am curious if sndio can support multiple simultaneous cards, either > identical or different, particularly