On 2022-05-09, Riccardo Giuntoli wrote:
> I've found a distfiles on the fr openbsd mirror:
>
> https://ftp.fr.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/distfiles/ndpi-4.2.tar.gz
>
> Someone try it?
This is used by ntopng, we don't have anything to use this to make
packet forwarding decisions (anyway, by the time
On 2022/05/09 10:46, Riccardo Giuntoli wrote:
> Yes I know. With rdomains and pair it would be nice to write a daemon
> that inspect L7 search for bittorrent identification and take action
> above those packets.
> Yes. DMCA is a complete overkill. Vultr applies it. When business will
It doesn't
On 2022-05-09, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>>
>>> That doesn't seem like correct behavior (the ISC version certainly
>>> offers both). Both options should be sent if configured, it's up to
>>> the client to properly handle this.
>>> Clients that are rfc3442 compliant will install the option 121
jeanfrancois writes:
Specifically the multiline work is very helpful that ought to be
enough. Have I missed other editors with this ?
There are extensions for both Vim and Emacs for this, e.g.:
https://github.com/mg979/vim-visual-multi
https://github.com/magnars/multiple-cursors.el
Yes I know. With rdomains and pair it would be nice to write a daemon that
inspect L7 search for bittorrent identification and take action above those
packets.
Yes. DMCA is a complete overkill. Vultr applies it. When business will grow
I will host in some data center a pair of servers and do vmd
On Monday, May 9, 2022, Alexis wrote:
>
> jeanfrancois writes:
>
> Specifically the multiline work is very helpful that ought to be
>> enough. Have I missed other editors with this ?
>>
>
> There are extensions for both Vim and Emacs for this, e.g.:
>
> https://github.com/mg979/vim-visual-multi
On 2022-05-06, Florian Obser wrote:
> On 2022-05-06 10:28 -04, Sonic wrote:
>> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 7:18 AM Florian Obser wrote:
>>> Also, dhcpd(8) does not even hand out option 3 when option 121 is
>>> configured.
>>
>> That doesn't seem like correct behavior (the ISC version certainly
>>
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 6:03 AM Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2022-05-09, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> ...so the correct configuration is clear: list both a 0.0.0.0/0
> classless route and "option routers", and it should work for all
> cases.
Yes. The server sends both, the clients that handle
Correct it simple pass through interfaces:
root@arnuwanda:/etc# ipsecctl -sa | grep 94.72.143.163
flow esp in proto gre from 94.72.143.163 to 65.20.98.172 peer 94.72.143.163
srcid ASN1_DN//C=ES/ST=Madrid/L=Madrid/O=Telecom Lobby/OU=VPNC/CN=
choopa.telecomlobby.com dstid
I'm not able to use WhatsApp Web in Chromium under OpenBSD 7.1 (amd64),
no login page appears.
Is there something bad in my configuration or is this a known problem?
Thanks.
At home, once I reconnected to my own wifi the whatsapp QR reader
login came up. After that the linking of Chrome on OpenBSD device went
as expected.
Before the reconnection to wifi there was no login whatsoever.
Good Luck.
Hi Guys,
I'm running -current.
Recently I noticed (not sure when it changed) that my CPU is not
throttling anymore. The `hw.perfpolicy` is set to auto and `hw.setperf`
is always at 100%. I red that there was a change in 7.1:
- Changed the power management sysctl(8) hw.perfpolicy to "auto" at
On 2022-05-09, Atanas Vladimirov wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I'm running -current.
> Recently I noticed (not sure when it changed) that my CPU is not
> throttling anymore. The `hw.perfpolicy` is set to auto and `hw.setperf`
> is always at 100%. I red that there was a change in 7.1:
>
> - Changed the
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 01:16:15PM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
> I'm not able to use WhatsApp Web in Chromium under OpenBSD 7.1 (amd64), no
> login page appears.
> Is there something bad in my configuration or is this a known problem?
> Thanks.
That's because by default WebAssembly is not
On 5/9/22 18:40, Caspar Schutijser wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 01:16:15PM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
I'm not able to use WhatsApp Web in Chromium under OpenBSD 7.1 (amd64), no
login page appears.
Is there something bad in my configuration or is this a known problem?
Thanks.
That's
On 2022-05-09 20:17, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Currently, you can either set it manually to low speed
(hw.perfpolicy=manual,
hw.setperf=0), modify the kernel (e.g. with the diff below), or use
obsdfreqd from
packages. The latter is only in -current packages not 7.1, but it could
be built
from
> Now the question is: why WebAssembly is disabled by default under OpenBSD?
> Is there any contraindication to activate it?
do you want to run someone else's binary on your browser?
by disabling WebAssembly, the browser will have less shit running to handle
therefore decreases
the attack
Dealing with broken clients can be handled with separate groups or
even "deny booting;" instead of breaking the dhcp server.
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 06:50:16PM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
> On 5/9/22 18:40, Caspar Schutijser wrote:
> > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 01:16:15PM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
> > > I'm not able to use WhatsApp Web in Chromium under OpenBSD 7.1 (amd64), no
> > > login page appears.
> > > Is
The people who do the work make the decisions.
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Just a rant, not for ports@.
> I am installing OpenBSD 7.1 right now; this is only a VM, and
> i want to create / manage ports there.
> Until now whenever i wanted to do this i had to install xbase,
> otherwise
I looked very closely, it started like this
"Just a rant"
And I knew the email was coming from a self-centered individual who is
unhappy with the entirely volunteer work done by others, yet not unhappy
enough to quit OpenBSD and switch to another operating sytem where
there will be similar
On 5/6/22 10:29, Courtney wrote:
Hello all,
[snip]
* Setting dom.ipc.processCount to a lower number in about:config
* Muddled with sndiod -b and -z flags
* Set softdep,noatime for my different partitions in fstab (NVMe drive)
* Tried with/without SMT (Intel 10700k)
* Set some sysctl flags:
On 2022-05-09, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> Until now whenever i wanted to do this i had to install xbase,
> otherwise the port makefile complained some. (I am afraid i have
> forgotten the details.) Is this still true?
Yes. We don't particularly want to deal with reports of build failures
or
Hello.
Just a rant, not for ports@.
I am installing OpenBSD 7.1 right now; this is only a VM, and
i want to create / manage ports there.
Until now whenever i wanted to do this i had to install xbase,
otherwise the port makefile complained some. (I am afraid i have
forgotten the details.) Is
Stuart Henderson wrote in
:
|On 2022/04/15 22:02, Tom Smyth wrote:
...
|Thanks for the suggestions - since the change I made in the last mail
|("I've changed mine to acpihpet0 and it seems much happier", i.e. setting
|the kern.timecounter.hardware sysctl to acpihpet0, based on Stefan's
Theo de Raadt wrote in
<36104.1652132...@cvs.openbsd.org>:
|The people who do the work make the decisions.
Ok i will at least look what i was talking about.
|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|
|> Hello.
|>
|> Just a rant, not for ports@.
|> I am installing OpenBSD 7.1 right now; this is only a
On May 9, 2022 2:16:51 AM MDT, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
>
SNIP
> (anyway, by the time you have used DPI
>to detect the protocol, it is too late to make a decision on packet
>routing).
SNIP
Well, not necessarily true, imagine GCHQ ...
Just saying
Hope you are doing well,
diana
I know. But yes it is to not get provider fees or shutdown. When I'll have
more fees from my service, a rural wireless service provider, I'll
acquire space in some IXP and then mount a vmd based host.
>Hope you are doing well,
Fighting hard because I'm a victim of human trade.
Kindly regards,
28 matches
Mail list logo
