On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 05:45:25PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> On 11/30/15 4:58 PM, Joerg Jung wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:48:05PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> >> Even removed the table password?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> >> NO way anymore to have difference password for emails then the
On 11/30/15 4:58 PM, Joerg Jung wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:48:05PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>> Even removed the table password?
>
> Yes.
>
>> NO way anymore to have difference password for emails then the system
>> password without smtp-extra install?
>
> You may want to read table
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:48:05PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Even removed the table password?
Yes.
> NO way anymore to have difference password for emails then the system
> password without smtp-extra install?
You may want to read table(5) the section about credentials tables.
> I can un
Even removed the table password?
NO way anymore to have difference password for emails then the system
password without smtp-extra install?
I can understand may be sqlite and ldap, but as a base system having
different password from the system was and is very useful and I do it on
all systems.
O
A heads up on this commit: if you're following -current and using any
perl modules that pull in threaded libraries from packages, such as
mysql/mariadb integration via DBD::mysql, then you may want to wait
the day or so until the ports package builds have caught up with the
change. The perl in bas
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Jason Tubnor wrote:
On 2 June 2014 10:23, Ted Unangst wrote:
Part of the deprecation / migration process is identifying the weird
ways people use vnd and finding solutions for them. But as we've seen,
people never move forward without the occasional push.
So the most
On 2 June 2014 10:23, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> Part of the deprecation / migration process is identifying the weird
> ways people use vnd and finding solutions for them. But as we've seen,
> people never move forward without the occasional push.
>
So the most appropriate way to use vnd(4) as an en
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:37, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> Could you please provide a little bit more information? What causes
>> encrypted vnd to be insecure
>
> Ted went a bit far; it is unusual for him to be melodratic.
>
> Basically -- less than state of the art crypto.
You would never use blow
> Could you please provide a little bit more information? What causes
> encrypted vnd to be insecure
Ted went a bit far; it is unusual for him to be melodratic.
Basically -- less than state of the art crypto.
> and what will happen to vnd(4) before 5.7 if it isn't removal of crypto?
You persis
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Robert [info...@die-optimisten.net] wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 12:19:35 -0400
Ted Unangst wrote:
WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
Will 5.6 softraid support block sizes other than 512 byte?
marc.info/?l=o
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 19:45, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
> What will be the "right" way to achieve such a nested-encryption setup
> once encrypted vnd goes away? Is/will it be safe (i.e., free from
> data corruption, deadlock, or other kernel badness) to nest softraid
> crypto volumes?
Short answ
In message < http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=140146687910205&w=1>,
Ted Unangst wrote:
> If you are using encrypted vnd (vnconfig -k or -K) you will want to
> begin planning your migration strategy.
[[...]]
> WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
> Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
Once th
> > Robert [info...@die-optimisten.net] wrote:
> > > On Fri, 30 May 2014 12:19:35 -0400
> > > Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > > WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
> > > > Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
> > >
> > > Will 5.6 softraid support block sizes other than 512 byte?
> > >
> > > marc.i
On Fri, 30 May 2014 11:14:40 -0700
Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Robert [info...@die-optimisten.net] wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 May 2014 12:19:35 -0400
> > Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
> > > Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
> >
> > Will 5.6 softraid support block
Robert [info...@die-optimisten.net] wrote:
> On Fri, 30 May 2014 12:19:35 -0400
> Ted Unangst wrote:
> > WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
> > Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
>
> Will 5.6 softraid support block sizes other than 512 byte?
>
> marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=13952454370637
On Fri, 30 May 2014 12:19:35 -0400
Ted Unangst wrote:
> WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
> Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
Will 5.6 softraid support block sizes other than 512 byte?
marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=139524543706370
kind regards,
Robert
If you are using encrypted vnd (vnconfig -k or -K) you will want to
begin planning your migration strategy.
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Ted Unangst"
Date: Fri 2014/05/30 10:14 -06:00
Subject: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src
To: source-chan...@cvs.openbsd.org
CVSROOT:/cvs
Mo
17 matches
Mail list logo