BUT I WILL STILL GO ON SPREADING THE LIE THAT OpenBSD CONTAINS
NON-FREE SOFTWARE SO PEOPLE ARE MISLEAD
I never intentionally said such a thing. It was a misunderstanding,
because I chose words that were subject to misinterpretation.
I appreciate having been informed about the
On Jan 5, 2008 11:24 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was a bit curious about what would someone who reads web-sites by
using a wget daemon through e-mails whose own web-site looks like...
well...
Apache httpd 2.0.54 ((Debian GNU/Linux) DAV/2 SVN/1.2.0
On Jan 5, 2008 7:54 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache httpd 2.0.54 ((Debian GNU/Linux) DAV/2 SVN/1.2.0 PHP/4.3.10-22
mod_ssl/2.0.54 OpenSSL/0.9.7e)
I have nothing against running a web site.
you have *nothing* against a distribution that makes it easier to install
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 12:09:16 +0200, Denis Doroshenko wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 7:54 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache httpd 2.0.54 ((Debian GNU/Linux) DAV/2 SVN/1.2.0 PHP/4.3.10-22
mod_ssl/2.0.54 OpenSSL/0.9.7e)
I have nothing against running a web site.
you have
2008/1/5, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was a bit curious about what would someone who reads web-sites by
using a wget daemon through e-mails whose own web-site looks like...
well...
Apache httpd 2.0.54 ((Debian GNU/Linux) DAV/2 SVN/1.2.0 PHP/4.3.10-22
On Jan 5, 2008 11:24 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This continues the pattern of straw men. Over and over,
people on this list criticize me for doing something which
neither I nor anyone else here actually thinks is wrong.
Please list the names of so called straw men in your
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:00:55PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva is continually making you guys remove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the cc's of your messages.
FYI, I continually remove people from the CC on mailing-list posts.
Yet you have no idea whether these people are
03, 2008 12:48 PM
To: Openbsd Misc (E-mail)
Subject: Re: FW: Real men don't attack straw men
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:05:37PM -0500, Stuart VanZee wrote:
Wow... it is incredibly telling that you chose a game, a pretty
obscure one at that as far as I can tell, to base your
On Jan 4, 2008 9:14 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:00:55PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva is continually making you guys remove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the cc's of your messages.
FYI, I continually remove people from the CC
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:15:08PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 1:03 AM, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva is continually making you guys remove
from the cc's of your messages.
Who knows?
Perhaps He gets Paid for it, and for this violent defense of
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 07:08:12PM -0700, L wrote:
That is an insult! Why are you being so mean to Marco?
Right, his extreme insults are meaningless and unprovocative.
And why are you being so mean to me too? I read this list too!
You are insulting me!
Right, did the hat fit? Because I said
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:56:03AM +0100, Karl Sjodahl - dunceor wrote:
This is a unmoderated list and unsubscribed people can mail to it.
If one doesn't want to hear what outsiders want to say, then perhaps
posting should be restricted to list members.
Rui
--
This statement is false.
Today
On Jan 4, 2008 10:51 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:56:03AM +0100, Karl Sjodahl - dunceor wrote:
This is a unmoderated list and unsubscribed people can mail to it.
If one doesn't want to hear what outsiders want to say, then perhaps
posting
On Jan 4, 2008 2:52 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:15:08PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 1:03 AM, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva is continually making you guys remove
from the cc's of your messages.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 3:21 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: FW: Real men don't attack straw men
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:33:26PM -0700
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:44:59PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
:-) that was to the guy who called you a troll right?
I said perhaps you are a paid FSF mercenary or as you accused me
delusional :-)
I wish I was paid to only work on Free Software, I'd be much more
productive.
Rui
--
Today is
2008/1/4, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 07:08:12PM -0700, L wrote:
That is an insult! Why are you being so mean to Marco?
Right, his extreme insults are meaningless and unprovocative.
And why are you being so mean to me too? I read this list too!
You
Rui, I kindly ask you to not remove Richards's e-mail, since he is as
interested as everyone else who follows this thread.
Richard does not receive duplicated e-mail, since he is not in
misc@openbsd.org, so don't hesitate to add him.
Greetings.
FYI, I continually remove people from the CC on mailing-list posts.
Yet you have no idea whether these people are subscribed to these
mailing lists.
If they are not, why do their emails get into the mailing list?
Because they sent it to it.
Some moderator enjoys letting flames come
that's right, it's there!
eh, Richard, my mom told me once that it is the best thing to tell
truth, even when the truth is salty, as when you start to lie, you
cannot stop and eventually you get all your lies exposed.
Server: Apache/2.0.54 (Debian GNU/Linux) DAV/2 SVN/1.2.0 PHP/4.3.10-22
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:26:12PM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 1:22 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Otherwise why should he repeatedly say some thin that is not
proprietary as proprietary even after being informed by tedu and
others?
Because for me
On Jan 4, 2008 1:22 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Otherwise why should he repeatedly say some thin that is not
proprietary as proprietary even after being informed by tedu and
others?
Because for me it is proprietary when I can't run it in a commercial
context.
you
On Jan 4, 2008 2:31 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I find even more hysterical is your lack of english comprehension,
for what I said is that restrictions against commercial usage make it
proprietary, not that I need that piece of software.
you still don't get to
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:49:45PM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 2:31 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I find even more hysterical is your lack of english comprehension,
for what I said is that restrictions against commercial usage make it
proprietary,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
know what proprietary means. if you don't
understand the big words, stop using them. you also totally failed to
comprehend the license.
No, I understood it quite well.
Yes, no I did not understood it nor not quite never well.
what i find even more
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Neither do you
that's insulting.
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:49:45PM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 2:31 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I find even more hysterical is your lack of english comprehension,
for what I said is that restrictions against
I was a bit curious about what would someone who reads web-sites by
using a wget daemon through e-mails whose own web-site looks like...
well...
Apache httpd 2.0.54 ((Debian GNU/Linux) DAV/2 SVN/1.2.0 PHP/4.3.10-22
mod_ssl/2.0.54 OpenSSL/0.9.7e)
I use wget for personal
keeps objecting that he doesn't object.
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:05:37PM -0500, Stuart VanZee wrote:
Wow... it is incredibly telling that you chose a game, a pretty
obscure one at that as far as I can tell, to base your argument on.
The world will fall because OpenBSD recommends that people
install a game... a game that is free
nostromo:tobiasu$ for x in blahblah STFU. KTHXBYE; do banner $x; done
#
# # # #### # # ####
### ## # ## ## ## # ##
# # # ## ## # # ## ##
#
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:23:21PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
Richard Stallman referred to certain URLs in certain Makefiles
in the ports tree---not the collection of packages, after (in
the interview which indirectly prompted this thread) confusing
OpenBSD's ports tree with its
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 05:48:13PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:05:37PM -0500, Stuart VanZee wrote:
Wow... it is incredibly telling that you chose a game, a pretty
obscure one at that as far as I can tell, to base your argument on.
The world will fall
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 06:30:44PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:23:21PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
Richard Stallman referred to certain URLs in certain Makefiles
in the ports tree---not the collection of packages, after (in
the interview which
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 05:48:13PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:05:37PM -0500, Stuart VanZee wrote:
Wow... it is incredibly telling that you chose a game, a pretty
obscure one at that as far as I can tell, to base your argument on.
The world will fall
From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:48 PM
To: Openbsd Misc (E-mail)
Subject: Re: FW: Real men don't attack straw men
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:05:37PM -0500, Stuart VanZee wrote:
Wow... it is incredibly telling that you chose a game, a pretty
obscure one
Watch your blood pressure there Stuart.
-Original Message-
From: Stuart VanZee[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3-1-08 20:23:52
To: Openbsd Misc (E-mail)misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: FW: Real men don't attack straw men
From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:48 PM
Rui Miguel Silva is continually making you guys remove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the cc's of your messages.
If you are going to flame rms, it is best to keep him cc'd.
From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:48 PM
To: Openbsd Misc (E-mail)
Subject: Re: FW: Real men
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:33:26PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva is continually making you guys remove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the cc's of your messages.
FYI, I continually remove people from the CC on mailing-list posts.
I consider it rude to receive duplicate email.
If you
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:34:24PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
It would be nice if people would stop defending non defensible
hypocritical positions. His arguments are a misleading hyperbole.
Your attitude is also indefensible and ostentiously hypocritical, with a
rudeness that only adds
Re-adding RMS.
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:34:24PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 05:48:13PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:05:37PM -0500, Stuart VanZee wrote:
Wow... it is incredibly telling that you chose a game, a pretty
obscure
Rui Miguel Silva is continually making you guys remove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the cc's of your messages.
FYI, I continually remove people from the CC on mailing-list posts.
Yet you have no idea whether these people are subscribed to these
mailing lists.
I consider it rude to receive
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:34:24PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
It would be nice if people would stop defending non defensible
hypocritical positions. His arguments are a misleading hyperbole.
Your attitude is also indefensible and ostentiously
Hmmm Mr. Stallman is this your home page: stallman.org
I was a bit curious about what would someone who reads web-sites by
using a wget daemon through e-mails whose own web-site looks like...
well...
Apache httpd 2.0.54 ((Debian GNU/Linux) DAV/2 SVN/1.2.0 PHP/4.3.10-22
mod_ssl/2.0.54
44 matches
Mail list logo
