On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 04:54:55PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Em 18-03-2014 15:56, Kevin Chadwick escreveu:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 11:23:12 -0300
Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
It's perfectly useful, mail is only dropped by some idiotic systems
(already mentioned) that don't understand
Em 21-03-2014 21:48, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
On 2014-03-19, Giancarlo Razzolini grazzol...@gmail.com wrote:
Em 19-03-2014 09:41, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
you have more trust in ISP DNS servers honouring TTLs than I do. if
you can only get a dynamic IP at home and would like to host mail
On 2014-03-19, Giancarlo Razzolini grazzol...@gmail.com wrote:
Em 19-03-2014 09:41, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
you have more trust in ISP DNS servers honouring TTLs than I do. if
you can only get a dynamic IP at home and would like to host mail
there yourself, in a machine which only you have
On 2014-03-18, Craig R. Skinner skin...@britvault.co.uk wrote:
On 2014-03-17 Mon 20:25 PM |, Jean-Francois Simon wrote:
Just to mention, I'm looking for a more private ESP. As I know that
OpenBSD conveys an idea of security, I tend to trust a provider
relying on this OS.
If you want to
On 2014-03-18, Giancarlo Razzolini grazzol...@gmail.com wrote:
But, with a very small ttl on
the dns record (I use 60 seconds), this risk can be reduced.
you have more trust in ISP DNS servers honouring TTLs than I do.
if you can only get a dynamic IP
Em 19-03-2014 09:41, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
you have more trust in ISP DNS servers honouring TTLs than I do. if
you can only get a dynamic IP at home and would like to host mail
there yourself, in a machine which only you have physical access to,
etc. (i.e. do *not* want to keep your email
If you are already using your own email server, use it with OpenBSD it will
be best and if you are looking into GUI for openbsd or simple solution
check out http://gayatri-hitech.com/all-products/mailpigeon/
Thanks,
Jay
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Jean-Francois Simon jfsimon1...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:02:00PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
The last time I checked (and it was a long time ago), GMail rewrote
either the sender or the reply-to address with the one you use to
authenticate the connection. Again, it might not be true now, but it
has happened to me in
On 2014-03-17, Jean-Francois Simon jfsimon1...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to mention, I'm looking for a more private ESP. As I know that
OpenBSD conveys an idea of security, I tend to trust a provider relying
on this OS.
conveys an idea of security won't help you if the provider uses bad
mail
previously on this list Jean-Philippe Ouellet contributed:
Also, absolutely sure privacy is totally respected???
Let me know when you find a jurisdiction in which you can reasonably
expect that to even be possible to begin with.
Yeah, I believe you have to pin STARTTLS for each host manually
On 2014-03-17 Mon 20:25 PM |, Jean-Francois Simon wrote:
Just to mention, I'm looking for a more private ESP. As I know that
OpenBSD conveys an idea of security, I tend to trust a provider
relying on this OS.
If you want to read documentation, become your own mail provider
using OpenBSD.
On 3/15/2014 11:54 AM, Jean-Francois Simon wrote:
Hello all,
I'm looking for a secure mail provider, i fpossible using OpenBSD, also
wondering if OpenBSD itself provides it for interested people.
If anybody has informations thanks would be interesting to share.
Regards
Jeff
Get an
Em 18-03-2014 09:44, Kevin Chadwick escreveu:
previously on this list Jean-Philippe Ouellet contributed:
Also, absolutely sure privacy is totally respected???
Let me know when you find a jurisdiction in which you can reasonably
expect that to even be possible to begin with.
Yeah, I believe
I'm looking for a more private ESP.
Personally, I am also fed up with people
interfering with my earthquake precognitions.
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 11:23:12 -0300
Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
A static IP address without a meaningful reverse name mapping such as
mail.myopenbsdhomeserver.com isn't very useful. Most ISP's wont do
reverse mappings or will charge your eyeballs for it.
It's perfectly useful, mail is only
Em 18-03-2014 15:56, Kevin Chadwick escreveu:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 11:23:12 -0300
Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
It's perfectly useful, mail is only dropped by some idiotic systems
(already mentioned) that don't understand or care about more effective
anti spam methods or the little guy and when
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:23, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
anything these days using dynamic ip addresses. If your IP address
changes you will stay a few seconds without receiving any mail, and also
may have some mail delayed, but you shouldn't lose anything. And you can
Unless of course the
Em 18-03-2014 18:18, Ted Unangst escreveu:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:23, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
anything these days using dynamic ip addresses. If your IP address
changes you will stay a few seconds without receiving any mail, and also
may have some mail delayed, but you shouldn't lose
Hello
Some answers in your mail. Thanks.
Just to mention, I'm looking for a more private ESP. As I know that
OpenBSD conveys an idea of security, I tend to trust a provider relying
on this OS.
Regards
Le 17/03/2014 02:51, Jean-Philippe Ouellet a écrit :
On 3/15/14 12:54 PM, Jean-Francois
[1] https://otr.cypherpunks.ca/
[2] https://github.com/agl/pond
If you want absolute privacy, don't use computers.
If you want to get things done, keep your gmail.
If you want to read documentation, become your own mail provider
using OpenBSD.
No I don't need absolute privacy about this
On 17/03/2014, at 20:21, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net wrote:
[1] https://otr.cypherpunks.ca/
[2] https://github.com/agl/pond
If you want absolute privacy, don't use computers.
If you want to get things done, keep your gmail.
If you want to read documentation, become your own mail
On 3/17/14 3:25 PM, Jean-Francois Simon wrote:
Just to mention, I'm looking for a more private ESP. As I know that
OpenBSD conveys an idea of security, I tend to trust a provider
relying on this OS.
Not necessarily a safe assumption.
I'm also using own server today, essentially, I have'nt
The last time I checked (and it was a long time ago), GMail rewrote either
the sender or the reply-to address with the one you use to authenticate the
connection. Again, it might not be true now, but it has happened to me in the
past.
Look to me that you should do some research before
I think this give you plenty of example to do what you are asking about:
https://www.google.com/search?q=gmail+relay+emailie=utf-8oe=utf-8aq=trls=org.mozilla:en-US:officialclient=firefox-achannel=sb
On 3/17/14, 10:02 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
The last time I checked (and it was a long time
On 3/15/14 12:54 PM, Jean-Francois Simon jfsimon1...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking for a secure mail provider, i fpossible using OpenBSD,
also wondering if OpenBSD itself provides it for interested people.
If anybody has informations thanks would be interesting to share.
2014-03-15 17:54 GMT+01:00 Jean-Francois Simon jfsimon1...@gmail.com:
Hello all,
also wondering if OpenBSD itself provides it for interested people.
No.
I haven’t used this provider, but they use OpenBSD.
http://www.neomailbox.net/
Mike
On Mar 15, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Jean-Francois Simon jfsimon1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I'm looking for a secure mail provider, i fpossible using OpenBSD, also
wondering if OpenBSD itself provides it
On Saturday 15 March 2014 15:56:00 Michael Cornwell wrote:
I haven’t used this provider, but they use OpenBSD.
http://www.neomailbox.net/
Mike
You might as well check out BSWS. http://www.bsws.de/en Available in English
and German, with a variety of services. Speaking from experience (MX
28 matches
Mail list logo
