On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 05:51:42PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012/09/25 18:24, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:11:19AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012-09-25, Christoph Leser le...@sup-logistik.de wrote:
Thank you for this hint.
I indeed have ike.c
. September 2012 13:45
An: misc@openbsd.org
Cc: Christoph Leser
Betreff: Re: Router project on OpenBSD questions
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 05:51:42PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012/09/25 18:24, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:11:19AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote
: Stuart Henderson; misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: Router project on OpenBSD questions
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 06:57:26PM +, Christoph Leser wrote:
Thanks for clarification.
I disabled NAT-T with isakmpd -K -T.
A few of my VPNs came to life with this setting, but were instable
On 2012-09-25, Christoph Leser le...@sup-logistik.de wrote:
Thank you for this hint.
I indeed have ike.c r=1.76.
So why did you say you were running 5.2?
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:11:19AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012-09-25, Christoph Leser le...@sup-logistik.de wrote:
Thank you for this hint.
I indeed have ike.c r=1.76.
So why did you say you were running 5.2?
The art of problem reporting is much underappreciated, sadly.
On 2012/09/25 18:24, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:11:19AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012-09-25, Christoph Leser le...@sup-logistik.de wrote:
Thank you for this hint.
I indeed have ike.c r=1.76.
So why did you say you were running 5.2?
The art of
Henderson [mailto:s...@spacehopper.org]
Gesendet: Samstag, 22. September 2012 16:52
An: Christoph Leser; misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: Router project on OpenBSD questions
Search the archives for the cisco nat-t problem, I sent a mail with more
details and I think there was a patch
It seems that the patch from Stuart Henderson, proposed on Aug.4 2012 on tech@
has not made it into âcurrent yet.
Von: Stuart Henderson [mailto:s...@spacehopper.org]
Gesendet: Samstag, 22. September 2012 16:52
An: Christoph Leser; misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: Router project on OpenBSD
On 2012/09/24 13:24, Christoph Leser wrote:
It seems that the patch from Stuart Henderson, proposed on Aug.4 2012
on tech@ has not made it into –current yet.
I only forwarded it, the patch is from hshoexer. Also it is only a partial
diff, not suitable to be committed, the encap mode value
: Montag, 24. September 2012 16:41
An: Christoph Leser
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: Router project on OpenBSD questions
On 2012/09/24 13:24, Christoph Leser wrote:
It seems that the patch from Stuart Henderson, proposed on Aug.4 2012
on tech@ has not made it into –current yet.
I
...@spacehopper.org]
Gesendet: Montag, 24. September 2012 16:41
An: Christoph Leser
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: Router project on OpenBSD questions
On 2012/09/24 13:24, Christoph Leser wrote:
It seems that the patch from Stuart Henderson, proposed on Aug.4 2012
on tech@ has not made
On Feb 28, 2012, Stuart Henderson wrote:
List: openbsd-mischttp://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscr=1w=2
Subject:Re: Router project on OpenBSD
questionshttp://marc.info/?t=13303717306r=1w=2
From: Stuart Henderson stu () spacehopper !
orghttp://marc.info/?a=10397134052r=1w=2
Search the archives for the cisco nat-t problem, I sent a mail with more
details and I think there was a patch with it. Pretty sure that would have
affected older OpenBSD versions too though.
Christoph Leser le...@sup-logistik.de wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, Stuart Henderson wrote:
List:
On 2012-02-28, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
I was planning on getting a 2901 with VDSL2/ADSL2/2+ Annex M card and 8
port Gb switch card. But after careful consideration I decided against
it as it would issue the same problems for me and be more expensive then
going down the OpenBSD
Le Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:38:45 +,
Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com a icrit :
Hello,
I have currently only used OpenBSD as a test vector setup on
VirtualBox and 2x Sun Fire V240's as a DNS server (master/slave)
using Bind9. So basically in short am an OpenBSD newbee :-)
Ok so here goes;
Le Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:58:05 -0300,
Christiano F. Haesbaert haesba...@haesbaert.org a icrit :
Hello,
With a decent hardware, I think you can reach 1mpps (that's million
packets per second).
I don't think.
As far I can see here with a rate of 50K packets through the system, it
already spents
On 2012 Feb 29 (Wed) at 11:54:13 +0100 (+0100), Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
:OpenBSD is not perfect too, it would be nice that pflow handles ipv6
pflow now handles ipv6 (in 5.1)
:and the support of one year is a bit short. But nothing is perfect.
If you need support for longer than a year, you
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere
patf...@davenulle.org wrote:
Le Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:58:05 -0300,
Christiano F. Haesbaert haesba...@haesbaert.org a icrit :
Hello,
With a decent hardware, I think you can reach 1mpps (that's million
packets per second).
I don't think.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:10:27PM +0100, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:58:05 -0300,
Christiano F. Haesbaert haesba...@haesbaert.org a icrit :
Hello,
With a decent hardware, I think you can reach 1mpps (that's million
packets per second).
I don't think.
As far
Le Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:13:30 +0100,
Peter Hessler phess...@theapt.org a icrit :
Hello,
On 2012 Feb 29 (Wed) at 11:54:13 +0100 (+0100), Patrick Lamaiziere
wrote: :OpenBSD is not perfect too, it would be nice that pflow
handles ipv6
pflow now handles ipv6 (in 5.1)
That's cool! Thanks.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere
patf...@davenulle.org wrote:
Le Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:13:30 +0100,
Peter Hessler phess...@theapt.org a icrit :
Hello,
On 2012 Feb 29 (Wed) at 11:54:13 +0100 (+0100), Patrick Lamaiziere
wrote: :OpenBSD is not perfect too, it would be nice
* Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org [2012-02-29 13:12]:
I don't think.
it is very tempting to comment on that :)
As far I can see here with a rate of 50K packets through the system, it
already spents 50% in interrupt.
oh, really! that applies to each and every box and usage scenario
Brauer spewed:
* Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org [2012-02-29 13:12]:
I don't think.
it is very tempting to comment on that :)
As far I can see here with a rate of 50K packets through the system, it
already spents 50% in interrupt.
oh, really! that applies to each and every
On 29 February 2012 14:15, Anonymous Remailer (austria)
mixmas...@remailer.privacy.at wrote:
Brauer spewed:
* Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org [2012-02-29 13:12]:
I don't think.
it is very tempting to comment on that :)
As far I can see here with a rate of 50K packets through the
I also would like to know if anyone knows of any ADSL2+ Annex M standard
PCI (/x/) based modem card that I can use to connect to my ISP with
instead of using an external device?
So far in my search I came across this:
http://linitx.com/viewcategory.php?catid=47
This is basically an ADSL
On 02/28/2012 01:57 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I also would like to know if anyone knows of any ADSL2+ Annex M standard
PCI (/x/) based modem card that I can use to connect to my ISP with
instead of using an external device?
So far in my search I came across this:
On 27 February 2012 16:38, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
this is my first posting here :-)
I have currently only used OpenBSD as a test vector setup on VirtualBox
and 2x Sun Fire V240's as a DNS server (master/slave) using Bind9. So
basically in short am an OpenBSD newbee :-)
snip
Good luck
Many thanks Christiano for such a quick and comprehensive response :-)
Regards,
Kaya
So I would like to build a router out of a Quad Core Xeon system. I've
selected the hardware for it already and the software barring the base OS.
You want the highest cache and highest frequency cpu you can find.
MP will not help you with routing performance at all.
Something like this:
On 27 February 2012 17:12, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
So I would like to build a router out of a Quad Core Xeon system. I've
selected the hardware for it already and the software barring the base OS.
You want the highest cache and highest frequency cpu you can find.
MP will not
With this though I'm betting that a Core2Quad Q8400s CPU (which I currently
run on a FreeBSD based Mini-NAS mainframe) will be more powerful then any
Cisco SMB based router? - I can see it being more powerful then my 8xx or
18xx series in anycase!
I don't know cisco, it's all about how much
31 matches
Mail list logo
