> Am 03.07.2019 um 10:26 schrieb Gilles Chehade :
>> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 08:22:59AM +, mabi wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 9:39 AM, Giovanni Bechis
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think it could be possible to write a filter-spamassassin, that way smtpd
>>> could reject based on SpamAssass
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 08:22:59AM +, mabi wrote:
> ? Original Message ?
> On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 9:39 AM, Giovanni Bechis
> wrote:
>
> > I think it could be possible to write a filter-spamassassin, that way smtpd
> > could reject based on SpamAss
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 9:39 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> I think it could be possible to write a filter-spamassassin, that way smtpd
> could reject based on SpamAssassin tags.
Good idea, I might look at this alternative when I have a moment to write
somethi
On 7/2/19 10:31 PM, mabi wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Tuesday, July 2, 2019 11:44 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
>> if you configure rspamd to flag spam mail as reject, smtpd will reject them.
>
> Glad to hear that this is possible with rspamd! Because with SpamAssassin it
> is o
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, July 2, 2019 11:44 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> if you configure rspamd to flag spam mail as reject, smtpd will reject them.
Glad to hear that this is possible with rspamd! Because with SpamAssassin it is
only possible to tag the mail as spam but not
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 06:54:02AM +, mabi wrote:
> ? Original Message ?
> On Sunday, June 30, 2019 1:46 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> > I'm currently working on bringing a filter-rspamd to life, see:
> >
> > https://poolp.org/posts/2019-06-30/june-2019
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, June 30, 2019 1:46 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> I'm currently working on bringing a filter-rspamd to life, see:
>
> https://poolp.org/posts/2019-06-30/june-2019-report-fion-bpg-and-smtpd/
Fantastic Gilles, thanks for your great work! I am looking forwar
o avoid mails with a specific regexp in the subject
or body of the mail. Or synchronise with RBLs or ask opensmtpd to make some
checks."if IP of the sender is not a mx for the sender domain then reject" with
an opensmtpd rule."if subject of the domain is in table then reject"
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 01:03:46PM +, Mik J wrote:
> Hello,
Hello,
> I'm also interested in this topic. A lot of spam are still passing through.
> On my personal mailbox, I receive almost no spam.But on addresses that are
> visible on a website I receive spam, two/three per day many are bl
rote:
Hi,
I’ve been using a combination of OpenSMTPd and spamd on OpenBSD (currently at
6.5) for some time and with success. However, there are still some
false-negatives and I’m looking at ways of reducing those. One way is by making
use of RBLs.
(I’ve evaluated delivered spam and the majority
those. One way is by
> making use of RBLs.
>
> (I’ve evaluated delivered spam and the majority of it seems to be coming from
> IPs that are on various blacklists but aren’t being caught by greylisting.)
>
> spamd doesn’t support RBLs, at least that I’ve found, it can only use list
Hi
>Hi,
>
>I’ve been using a combination of OpenSMTPd and spamd on OpenBSD (currently at
>6.5) for some time and with success. However, there are still some
>false-negatives and I’m looking at ways of reducing those. One way is by
>making use of RBLs.
>
>(I’ve evaluate
Hi Tom,
Getting a filter to do this would be great. I had a similar discussion on
Mastodon the other day and there is an RBL which can be download and used with
spamd.
It already helps a lot on our setup.
I am using the following script to collect the RBLs and to make them usable for
spamd
Hi,
I’ve been using a combination of OpenSMTPd and spamd on OpenBSD (currently at
6.5) for some time and with success. However, there are still some
false-negatives and I’m looking at ways of reducing those. One way is by making
use of RBLs.
(I’ve evaluated delivered spam and the majority of
14 matches
Mail list logo
