Re: Filters and rctp-to rewrite.

On 9/9/19 7:16 PM, Reio Remma wrote: > On 09.09.2019 20:03, Giovanni Bechis wrote: >>> I'm currently using amavisd-new with the quarantine feature, but I'm >>> itching to switch to Rspamd (greylisting here I come!). >>> >> amavisd-new 2.12 has rspamd support, have you tried it ? > > Curious! I

Re: Filters and rctp-to rewrite.

On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 07:48:16PM +0300, Reio Remma wrote: > On 09.09.2019 18:13, Martijn van Duren wrote: > On 9/9/19 3:37 PM, Reio Remma wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Slowly digging into filters. >> >> Now I'm curious if it's possible to modify the recipient after say spam >> check in data-line? I

Re: Filters and rctp-to rewrite.

On 09.09.2019 20:03, Giovanni Bechis wrote: I'm currently using amavisd-new with the quarantine feature, but I'm itching to switch to Rspamd (greylisting here I come!). amavisd-new 2.12 has rspamd support, have you tried it ? Curious! I see the project has again switched hands, if you mean

Re: Filters and rctp-to rewrite.

On 9/9/19 6:48 PM, Reio Remma wrote: > On 09.09.2019 18:13, Martijn van Duren wrote: >> On 9/9/19 3:37 PM, Reio Remma wrote: >>> Hello! >>> >>> Slowly digging into filters. >>> >>> Now I'm curious if it's possible to modify the recipient after say spam >>> check in data-line? I get the impression

Re: Filters and rctp-to rewrite.

On 09.09.2019 18:13, Martijn van Duren wrote: On 9/9/19 3:37 PM, Reio Remma wrote: Hello! Slowly digging into filters. Now I'm curious if it's possible to modify the recipient after say spam check in data-line? I get the impression that rewriting rcpt-to at that stage is impossible, but my

Re: Filters and rctp-to rewrite.

September 9, 2019 3:37 PM, "Reio Remma" wrote: > Hello! > Hello, > Slowly digging into filters. > > Now I'm curious if it's possible to modify the recipient after say spam check > in data-line? I get > the impression that rewriting rcpt-to at that stage is impossible, but my > goal would

Re: Filters guidance request

Yes to clarify further, I bought myself another release cycle ;-) The filter code in 6.5 is voluntarily undocumented as both grammar and protocol didn't have enough time to "rest" for us to spot things which would appear better after a few months of being in use. Now that the stable release is

Re: [Filters] share data between callbacks

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 09:49:24AM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:21:03AM +0100, Joerg Jung wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:57:00PM +0100, frit...@alokat.org wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > is it possible to share data between callback functions in a python-based >

Re: [Filters] share data between callbacks

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:57:00PM +0100, frit...@alokat.org wrote: > Hi, > > is it possible to share data between callback functions in a python-based > filter? > I'm looking for something like this one (from the clamav filter): > - filter_api_set_udata > - filter_api_get_udata I think you

Re: Filters

On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Sunil Nimmagadda wrote: Filters require you to be -current. On OpenBSD the simplest way to test... Thanks. That's extremely very useful. That was never mentioned anywhere. I'll wait until 5.9 comes out. We never run '-current' to protect sites. Regards - Damian Pacific

Re: Filters

On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 04:44:09PM +1100, Damian McGuckin wrote: > > I would like to read something before 'playing' is done. Old, but still mostly valid: https://poolp.org/0xa871/The-state-of-filters Also, all you need can be found in man pages and the most recent opensmtpd-extras comes with

Re: Filters

Il 1 gennaio 2016 08:09:17 CET, Damian McGuckin ha scritto: > >Hi everybody, > >New to this list although I have been using OpenBSD thought since 2.1. >Contributed hardware (long ago) to the OpenBSD project. > >I am trying to figure out how to use DNS BLs with OpenSMTPD. Until