Nm...
-Original Message-
From: Ged Haywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 4:59 PM
To: Ryan Farrington
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Apache, Mod_PERL, and PERL
Hi there,
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Ryan Farrington wrote:
> It was my assumption that apa
Hi there,
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Ryan Farrington wrote:
> It was my assumption that apache allowed for the perl executable to be
> loaded into memory and called from then on without having to worry about
> creating the external process
Well that sort of sounds right, but instead of making assumpti
Serguei Trouchelle wrote:
error.log says following:
[error]
proxy:http://naive1.isd.dp.ua/cgi-bin/system-select-isd-request.pl not
found or unable to stat
But request to
http://naive1.isd.dp.ua/cgi-bin/system-select-isd-request.pl was
successful.
What's up?
I found what is up.
Apache::Regi
What is subrequests?
It is HTTP POST request, and that invokes some perl
CGI script. No matter what CGI script it is invoking,
this problem is always there for a 200 response...
Fang
--- darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Fang Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-13
> 23:06]:
> > I
* Fang Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-13 23:06]:
> If you do an apache code trace, set the breakpoint at
> apache_src/main/http_protocol.c function
> ap_finalize_request_protocol, you will see the
> r->chunked == 0 even though it was set to be 1. You
> can also use snoop to see that the trai
Dinesh Patel wrote:
> I'm trying upgrade my mod_perl version from 1.27 to 1.99.02 for
> apache-2.0.39.
>
> version 1.27 of mod_perl was compiled using :
>
> CC=cc OPTIM=-O $INET_TOP/bin/$OPSYS/perl Makefile.PL \
> DO_HTTPD=1 PERL_AUTHEN=1 PERL_SECTIONS=1
>
> make
>
Thanks a lot. That "really" does help.
regards,
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 6:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: apache mod_perl + suid question
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to write a password changing program.
this article by Lincoln Stein should resolve most of your problems:
http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1286/sam03020006/
and no, don't try to disable the taint mode,
instead read the perlsec manpage to learn
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 26 de julho de 2002 20:13
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: RE: apache mod_perl + suid question
Thanks Vitor...
I have something very similar to what you mention below..only
tha
ration (running apache as
root).
Regards,
Vitor
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 26 de julho de 2002 20:13
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: RE: apache mod_perl + suid question
Thanks Vitor...
I have some
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 06:40:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1: The usermod command doesn't get executed. I have tried debugging
> this...by having a log file(/usr/local/apache/logs) and the mod_perl
> process does open the wrapper script..but then does nothing. It does
> not execute the
6:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: apache mod_perl + suid question
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 06:40:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1: The usermod command doesn't get executed. I have tried debugging
> this...by having a log file(/usr/local/apache/lo
Thanks Vitor...
I have something very similar to what you mention below..only
that I am taking the username and passwd from the apache gui.
Then I encrypt the passwd and send that to wrapper(i.e. suid_file)
script.
So I have something like system($wrapper), where $wrapper =
suid_file.pl "encrupte
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: apache mod_perl + suid question
Thanks Vitor...
I have something very similar to what you mention below..only
that I am taking the username and passwd from the apache gui.
Then I encrypt the passwd and send that to wrapper(i.e. suid_file)
script.
So I have something
On 6/8/02 3:21 PM, "Bas A. Schulte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> claimed:
> Hi,
>
> I've been postponing to move my Linux Apache/mod_perl development to my
> highly appreciated iBook running Mac OS X due to all the required tweaks
> until now. I would imagine things have been sorted out by now so I
> dow
nd Doug makes it
all possible.
Chuck
- Original Message -
From: "Per Einar Ellefsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Arul, Rex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: Apache/Mod_Perl in Production Env--
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Arul, Rex wrote:
> Thanks Per. But should the stoic silence for this poser of
> mine, be construed as there are NO takers out there who have
> their Web Sites in Production, running out of Apache 1.XX and
> Mod-Perl 1.XX on Windows NT/2000?
>From private correspondence I kno
At 16:57 18.04.2002, Arul, Rex wrote:
>Thanks Per. But should the stoic silence for this poser of mine, be
>construed as there are NO takers out there who have their Web Sites in
>Production, running out of Apache 1.XX and Mod-Perl 1.XX on Windows NT/2000?
>
>Primarily we are a Microsoft shop, a
Thanks Per. But should the stoic silence for this poser of mine, be construed as there
are NO takers out there who have their Web Sites in Production, running out of Apache
1.XX and Mod-Perl 1.XX on Windows NT/2000?
Primarily we are a Microsoft shop, and I would like to answer this question to
At 03:48 18.04.2002, Arul, Rex wrote:
>Friends,
>
>I know Apache/Mod_Perl on OS other than Windows to be the trend du juor.
>However, I am in jitters seeing this explicit warning given in
>http://www.perl.com web-portal.
>
>"NOTE: it is not recommended to use Windows for production Apache/mod_pe
:: > I have set up several Windows / Apache / mod_perl servers without any
:: > problems whatsoever. I would recommend the following (in order):
::
:: Alternately: http://savage.net.au/Perl.html#Configuring-Apache
Nice one Ron. That's excellent documentation. Cheers.
Jonathan M. Hollin - WY
Folks
See below.
Cheers
Ron Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://savage.net.au/index.html
> :: My question is:
> :: 1. is there a way to get a precompiled windows version running (I don't
> :: want to reset my Apache server to some ancient version!)
>
> I have set up several Windows / Apache / mod_
Greetings.
You may be in need of
AddModule mod_perl.c
After the ClearModuleList somewhere around line 207 of httpd.conf as
distributed.
(What's ClearModuleList's used for anyway? I never really understood it -
but then again, I never really read its documentation...)
As for mod_perl on win32,
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Albrecht Fortenbacher wrote:
> I tried to install precompiled mod_perl within an Apache 1.3.22 server
> on Windows 2000 as indicated on http://perl.apache.org, and this failed
> (error message below).
[ .. ]
> --
:: sorry for bothering you with a question concerning mod_perl under
:: windows (it's not that I like windows so much, it's just because I have
:: to use a windows system ...)
Same here - I'm forced to use Windows because we're a Windows only shop.
Additionally, I don't know Unix so that kind of
That error is simply saying that your subroutines, &my_start and &p, aren't
defined in the current scope. The "Apache::ROOT::vswap..." is the package
name that Apache::Registry (or similar module, sounds like maybe EmbPerl in
your case) generated when it compiled your script.
Check to make sure
Avi Ben-Harush wrote:
>
> it seems that apache/mod_perl have a problem with sockets on win32. after the socket
>has been opened successfully (I double check to
> see if the socket handler is defined with "fileno($socket)") the print to the socket
>is failing due to an "invalid argument" error
>
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, H Jayakumar wrote:
> I have mod_perl and apache on NT.
>
> I want to add mod_perl as a module to apache, I built mod_perl and
> got mod_perl.so.
> I have copied it to the modules directory in apache source tree.
>
> When I start apache, it says :
>
> Syntax error on line 10
This message has confused many people including me. It usually means that
the mod_perl binary is incompatible with your version of Apache. Most people
compile the whole lot together. Randy Kobes has kindly compiled mod_perl
binaries for recent Apache versions at
ftp://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/pub/oth
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, ëÏÎÓÔÁÎÔÉÎ íÉÈÁÊÌÏ× wrote:
> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:51:49 +0500
> From: ëÏÎÓÔÁÎÔÉÎ íÉÈÁÊÌÏ× <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: modperl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Apache+mod_perl+JServ
>
> Hi mod_perlers !
>
> I'm not sure, may be my question is off topic. If it is did you poi
Hello list members,
I was looking at various options to monitor applications running on my
server and was wondering what is the usual practice in such situations.
I am looking at data collection in the lines of sysstat. It collects
data of various resources in real time and saves it in a binary
Hi there,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, [koi8-r] ëÏÎÓÔÁÎÔÉÎ íÉÈÁÊÌÏ× wrote:
> I'm not sure, may be my question is off topic.
Only parts of it! There's an Embperl List too, check out the mod_perl
home page for the URL.
> Currently we are developing entirely mod_perl end user application using
> Embperl
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Michael Turley wrote:
> Hello, anyone come across a problem where they get
> "exit signal Segmentation fault (11)" when they try to
> connect to mysql via mod_perl?
This is a known issue IIRC. Simply re-compile PHP without the built-in
MySQL support (you can still connect to
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Folks,
>
> any of you in a position to grab the current Apache tree from CVS and build
> Apache plus mod_perl, and see if the gpfault is gone, here is the 'unpatch' for
> John Sterling's quick hack:
my 'quick hack' doesn't work anymore anyway
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Andrew Ho wrote:
> Sporaically (perhaps 1 in 100 requests) and unpredictatably, requests seem
> to be getting dropped without being logged. In a browser, this would be
> indicated by a "document contains no data" error. Absolutely no headers or
> content are sent.
Hello,
GED>It sounds a little like a crash which happens before the logging routines
GED>get a chance to do any logging.
Yup. But if the child dies, doesn't Apache catch the SIGCHLD and report
something to the global error log? I'm not seeing any messages to this
effect (and I haven't been able
Hi Joerg,
I have essentially the same mix functioning for several months on Digital
Unix. The assembly order was:
openssl
mod_ssl
mod_perl
frontpage
apply frontpage patch to apache
apache
I guess the order of the patches affects the result if a 'following' patch
is made after a line that was a
> Carl,
> Thanks a lot! I finally got everything setup and to work. Of course, I
> didn't even attempt 'make test' again, but I know for sure that things are
> working fine, at least the initial few things.
> Thanks again!
Carl, Pramod
Sorry for popping up late, I'm overwhelmed with emails and w
Carl,
Thanks a lot! I finally got everything setup and to work. Of course, I
didn't even attempt 'make test' again, but I know for sure that things are
working fine, at least the initial few things.
Thanks again!
-Pramod
At 03:02 PM 7/27/00 -0700, Carl Hansen wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 02:05
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 02:05:22PM -0700, Carl Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 12:02:42PM -0700, Pramod Sokke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to install mod_perl 1.24 with Stronghold 3. I know stronghold
> > comes with mod_perl 1.22, but I want to use 1.24
>
> same here. I don't kn
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 12:02:42PM -0700, Pramod Sokke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install mod_perl 1.24 with Stronghold 3. I know stronghold
> comes with mod_perl 1.22, but I want to use 1.24
same here. I don't know why stronghold can't get up to date, or give better
instructions on doin
Hi,
I'm trying to install mod_perl 1.24 with Stronghold 3. I know stronghold
comes with mod_perl 1.22, but I want to use 1.24. So I'm trying to follow
Stas Bekman's instructions for installing mod_perl with Stronghold. He says
"edit /ServerRoot/src/modules/perl/Makefile and uncomment APACHE_SSL
d
The issue has less to do with the cost of the whole thing, then with
Strong hold having horrible support as well as a laundry list of other
problems.
Our as we convert our code base into completely mod_perl
modules, the stronghold 2.4.2 has to be replaced by either 3.x or
going to some othe
The problem is cost. If licensing were cheap, Stronghold, Raven, and
others would have a somewhat hard time staying in business (an issue
they'll all have to address soon enough). The SSL vendors have an OEM
license of some sort and so what you pay for a right-to-use license is a
much smalle
> "GK" == Gerd Knops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GK> includes a RSA license, you could just put it into a corner and use
GK> mod_ssl. But I am not sure if that kind of 'license transfer' is really
GK> legal.
Buying a licensed RSA implementation doesn't give you a license to use
RSA, it g
> "SA" == Scott Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SA> So if i didn't want to wait, how would I go about getting an RSA
SA> liscense? to have a mod_ssl server before then.
You don't get a license from RSA cheaply. This is why you buy
Stronghold or Raven or some equivalent. The cost of
> "PS" == Pramod Sokke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PS> Has anybody used stronghold? I'm considering using stronghold for SSL
PS> support since ours is a commercial application. Would mod_perl and all
PS> related modules work as fine with Stronghold as with plain Apache?
Yes. There's even a
Scott Alexander wrote:
> So if i didn't want to wait, how would I go about getting an RSA
> liscense? to have a mod_ssl server before then.
>
> Also, are the CA's willing to sign for this time of server?
>
When I checked into this Raven SSL seemed to be the solution. It is
basically mod_ssl wi
So if i didn't want to wait, how would I go about getting an RSA
liscense? to have a mod_ssl server before then.
Also, are the CA's willing to sign for this time of server?
Scott
On 7 Jul 2000, at 11:34, Rob Tanner wrote:
> If you can patiently wait till September 21 when the RSA patents expi
On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Paul wrote:
> Stronghold would give you professional tech support, but if all you
> want is SSL, check out Ralph Engelschall's mod_ssl (www.modssl.org)
> based on the OpenSSL protocol (www.openssl.org). It works well with
> vanilla Apache, and it's *free* -- thanks again, Ra
Stronghold would give you professional tech support, but if all you
want is SSL, check out Ralph Engelschall's mod_ssl (www.modssl.org)
based on the OpenSSL protocol (www.openssl.org). It works well with
vanilla Apache, and it's *free* -- thanks again, Ralph. =o)
--- Pramod Sokke <[EMAIL PROTEC
--On Friday, July 07, 2000 11:09 AM -0700 Alan Sparks
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can't speak much to Stronghold, got a copy and ultimately put it on the
> shelf. I rather like Raven (covalent.com), works like a peach with
> mod_perl etc.
> Just wish Apache didn't have to be patched to insta
We use stronghold here and its great. Our configuration handles like this :
Stronghold : Handles Port 80 and 443 requests. It then Reverse
Proxies dynamic content back to the mod perl servers.
I've used stronghold in 3 or 4 high demand apps and its a fantastic
low cost solution. However, we ar
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, July 07, 2000 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: Apache/mod_perl
>Has anybody used stronghold? I'm considering using stronghold for SSL
>support since ours is a commercial appli
Has anybody used stronghold? I'm considering using stronghold for SSL
support since ours is a commercial application. Would mod_perl and all
related modules work as fine with Stronghold as with plain Apache?
Thanks,
Pramod
At 10:24 AM 7/7/00 -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
>> "PS" == Pramod Sokke
>
Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "PS" == Pramod Sokke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> PS> We are running Netscape Enterprise server with cgis written in perl and C.
> PS> I'm looking at moving over to Apache and start using mod_perl. How
> [ .. ]
> PS> over to Apache/mod_perl g
> "PS" == Pramod Sokke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PS> We are running Netscape Enterprise server with cgis written in perl and C.
PS> I'm looking at moving over to Apache and start using mod_perl. How
[ .. ]
PS> over to Apache/mod_perl going to be a simple plug-in or would it involve
PS> re-
In addition, you can read the CGI.pm documentation on the use of
Perl/CGI.pm with FastCGI and you'll be good to go with that get next
request technique.
At 08:14 AM 7/7/00 +0100, David Hodgkinson wrote:
>Dana Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > FastCGI with perl may or may not be that fas
Dana Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FastCGI with perl may or may not be that fast. I could be totally wrong here
> but I believe that FastCGI will be able to cache the perl runtime, but perl
> will still have to reload and recompile any scripts during every hit.
Not true.
You put some co
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Richard Dice wrote:
> > >(Another aspect of how it's
> > >slower is that you won't be able to take advantage of Apache::DBI persistent
> > >database connections with Apache::PerlRun.)
> >
> > I *think* this is incorrect. PerlRun modules can take advantage of other
> > precach
> >(Another aspect of how it's
> >slower is that you won't be able to take advantage of Apache::DBI persistent
> >database connections with Apache::PerlRun.)
>
> I *think* this is incorrect. PerlRun modules can take advantage of other
> precached module resources including Apache::DBI.
You may b
At 03:24 PM 7/6/00 -0400, Richard Dice wrote:
>Frank Wiles wrote:
> >
> > .--[ Pramod Sokke wrote (2000/07/06 at 12:03:02) ]--
> > |
> > | We are running Netscape Enterprise server with cgis written in perl
> and C.
> > | I'm looking at moving over to Apache and start using mod_perl
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Pramod Sokke wrote:
> >1) I installed apache with mod_perl - the speed increased.But I didn't
> >understand HOW mod_perl optimizes use of resources and increases speed ?
> >Does it share perl interpreter, script or anything else?
>
> The Perl runtime library is linked into th
>1) I installed apache with mod_perl - the speed increased.But I didn't
>understand HOW mod_perl optimizes use of resources and increases speed ?
>Does it share perl interpreter, script or anything else?
The Perl runtime library is linked into the server. The persistent
interpreter embedded in th
Any obvious advantages of FastCGI over mod_perl? I mean, in either case,
moving over to Apache is imminent. And while I do that, I'd like to go in
for a longer term and better solution rather than time-saving or quicker
solution. So which one of the above is recommended?
>From my previous experien
Pramod Sokke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> We are running Netscape Enterprise server with cgis written in perl and C.
> I'm looking at moving over to Apache and start using mod_perl. How
> simple/complex do you think the process is going to be?
> There are tons of scripts distributed al
Frank Wiles wrote:
>
> .--[ Pramod Sokke wrote (2000/07/06 at 12:03:02) ]--
> |
> | We are running Netscape Enterprise server with cgis written in perl and C.
> | I'm looking at moving over to Apache and start using mod_perl. How
> | simple/complex do you think the process is goin
.--[ Pramod Sokke wrote (2000/07/06 at 12:03:02) ]--
|
| We are running Netscape Enterprise server with cgis written in perl and C.
| I'm looking at moving over to Apache and start using mod_perl. How
| simple/complex do you think the process is going to be?
| There are tons of
Steffers wrote:
> okay okayi seem to be calling the Cookie once...i dont
> +believe+ this. An old piece of code that I wrote in the cgi
> many many moons ago is also doing a redirect
> to a place which is 'locked down' so no one can get access
> (it has a different reason for living ;).
>
>
Good morning Drew.
> > On the downside, i +still+ cant get the cookies to work,
> > although after faking a session via telnet it seems to work
> > jst fine. Set-Cookie and everything. It +seems+ to be setting
> > the cookie, but Apache is claiming that the browser doesnt
> > like them (and yes,
Vegard Vesterheim wrote:
>
> When dealing with cookie problems, it can be helpful to use a 'HTTP
> protocol sniffer'. You configure your browser to use the sniffer as a
> proxy, which will be sitting between the server and The client and
> allows you to 'listen in' on the HTTP conversation.
>
>
Steffers wrote:
>
> On the downside, i +still+ cant get the cookies to work,
> although after faking a session via telnet it seems to work
> jst fine. Set-Cookie and everything. It +seems+ to be setting
> the cookie, but Apache is claiming that the browser doesnt
> like them (and yes, i have doub
"Steffers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Drew wrote:
> > Well, it's the end of a long day on a long week - does that get me off
> > the hook? Note to self: double check your memory next time. :-)
>
> yup, its been a long long week alright.
>
> On the downside, i +still+ cant get the cookies to
Drew wrote:
> Well, it's the end of a long day on a long week - does that get me off
> the hook? Note to self: double check your memory next time. :-)
yup, its been a long long week alright.
On the downside, i +still+ cant get the cookies to work,
although after faking a session via telnet it s
Jerrad Pierce wrote:
>
> A server issues Set-Cookie: a client replies with Cookie:
It makes sense now that I think about it. I always use CGI.pm or
Apache::Cookie to get the cookies so I never had to look at the incoming
cookie headers. Live and learn eh?
Well, it's the end of a long day on a l
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 18:11
> To: Paul
> Cc: modperl
> Subject: Re: Apache, Mod_Perl and Custom Access/Authentication
>
>
> Paul wrote:
> >
> > > Drew wrote:
> > > > Going by your previous example, you should use
&g
Paul wrote:
>
> > Drew wrote:
> > > Going by your previous example, you should use
> > > $cookie = $r->header_in('Set-Cookie');
>
> Quick reality check here -- I'm easy to confuse. =o)
>
> Shouldn't that be
>
>$cookie = $r->header_in('Cookie')
>
> to get cookies the browser sends, and the
> Drew wrote:
> > Going by your previous example, you should use
> > $cookie = $r->header_in('Set-Cookie');
Quick reality check here -- I'm easy to confuse. =o)
Shouldn't that be
$cookie = $r->header_in('Cookie')
to get cookies the browser sends, and then something like
$r->headers_out
Steffers wrote:
>
> you know, its really funny. We have the book right on our
> shelf, but we are more a 'perl cookbook' sort (need an answer
> then heres sample code).
Use the tool that best fits the situation. I have both books on my
shelf. ;-)
> When I run the Ticket code from chapter 6 i +a
Drew wrote:
> Going by your previous example, you should use
> $cookie = $r->header_in('Set-Cookie');
i actually prefer the headers_in after reading about it.
(personal preference and lazy to boot ;)
> You might also want to take a look at headers_in() (that's PLURAL). It
> is a little more fle
Steffers wrote:
>
> Drew wrote:
> > Steffers wrote:
> > > my $header_ID=$r->header_in('sessionID');
> > If you're trying to get at the cookie, this is not the way. Either use
> > Apache::Cookie or CGI.pm to get the cookie contents.
> >
>
> okay. I have changd the line to the usual
>
> m
Drew wrote:
> Steffers wrote:
> > my $header_ID=$r->header_in('sessionID');
> If you're trying to get at the cookie, this is not the way. Either use
> Apache::Cookie or CGI.pm to get the cookie contents.
>
okay. I have changd the line to the usual
my $header_ID=cookie(-name=>'sessionID
Steffers wrote:
>
> hello,
> first let me apologise for jst jumping straight into asking
> questions on the mailing list, but this is really puzzling me. First
> some background.
>
> I have been using perl for the past 3 years. I think (note
> +think+) that I understand perl quit
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 01:27:39PM -0600, J. Meltzer wrote:
> How do I make sure that I use xlc to compile apache and mod_perl? Is there
> a command-line option for it?
You need to have xlc installed, it is an extra cost option since AIX 4.
If you have both gcc and xlc in your path, I think so
Thank you! I have one other question, then I will leave you alone:
How do I make sure that I use xlc to compile apache and mod_perl? Is there
a command-line option for it?
I apologize for the HTML formatting...I thought using color would help, but
I won't do it again.
Thank you again for yo
>I am attempting to install mod_perl 1.21 for Apache 1.3.11 on AIX
>4.3.3. I am repeatedly running into the following problem when I do
>the configuration of Apache with mod_perl, whether attempting it as a DSO
>or including mod_perl in the original Apache configuration. I have
>checked out the
Thanx Stas,
> Doesn't it print the reason for the failure? Is your code looking like:
>
> man DBI:
> $dbh = DBI->connect($data_source, $username, $password)
>|| die $DBI::errstr;
>
> I mean, do you use $DBI::errstr?
>
> It can be a permission problem, your
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Volker Hess wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use to servers with nearly the same configuration:
>
> host 1:
>
>Embedded Perl version 5.00503 for Apache/1.3.9 (Unix) Debian/GNU
>AuthPostgreSQL/0.7.1 mod_perl/1.21 process 255,
>running since Mon Dec 13 10:57:03 1999
>
>co
88 matches
Mail list logo
