14-Nov-98 15:01 you wrote:
The last days I spent a lot of time to create the new User Manual for the
forthcoming 2.1.0 release. The current state is that all chapters except for
Chapter 4 (Compatibility) are now finished (at least IMHO ;-). So you now can
have a preview under
On Sat, Nov 14, 1998, Ronan-Yann Lorin wrote:
The last days I spent a lot of time to create the new User Manual for the
forthcoming 2.1.0 release. The current state is that all chapters except for
Chapter 4 (Compatibility) are now finished (at least IMHO ;-). So you now can
have a preview
On Sun, Nov 15, 1998, Khimenko Victor wrote:
1. Although it's a HTML/online document, it's prepared
to form a nice paper/offline document when printed
via Postscript from Netscape 4.x.
May be better to put .ps and .pdf files for download as well ?
Yes, I'll create PS files on
On Sun, 15 Nov 1998, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Yeah, it uses a width of 600 pixel. That's not to bother you. There are two
reasons for it: First this way I'm able to layout the various nested tables
more easily (where I sometimes had to specify fixed widths to avoid nasty
next wrappings)
On Sun, Nov 15, 1998, Mats Dufberg wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 1998, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Yeah, it uses a width of 600 pixel. That's not to bother you. There are two
reasons for it: First this way I'm able to layout the various nested tables
more easily (where I sometimes had to specify
I remember when gcache was introduced many people were claiming that it
was unstable and should be disabled. I have been running with it turned
off on my apache-ssl server, when I compiled the mod_ssl server (what a
pleasure it was to do I will add) I left it turned on to see how things
seemed.
On Sun, Nov 15, 1998, Dan Roscigno wrote:
I remember when gcache was introduced many people were claiming that it
was unstable and should be disabled. I have been running with it turned
off on my apache-ssl server, when I compiled the mod_ssl server (what a
pleasure it was to do I will add)
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
I've cleaned up and fixed the ssl_gcache program for mod_ssl and since
2.0.[678] I've never seen any more failures or segfaults of it.
Considering how uptight you are about attribution, I'm surprised you say
this, when in fact I fixed gcache and you (presumably)
Except for the final updates of the README files in the distribution and
Chapter 4 of the User Manual the mod_ssl 2.1 branch is now ready for release.
To make sure we don't have introduced new heavy bugs here is one more but
really last Beta version.
Test it now (again) and speak up for the
