Am 06.01.2002 07:11 schrieb Erik Harris:
Thanks Holger, this did it, though the Java applet on Half.com that I
discovered this bug on seems to load in about 10X the time that it loads on
Netscape 4.7. I waited a goof 45 seconds before the price comparison data
appeared in the window,
Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash on
preferences opening.
Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
This build really seems to be the best I've used so far, in every way.
In fact, come on, . . . pop the
dman84 wrote:
just create a new profile and start re-entering the settings from
scratch.. its like formatting your HD and doing a clean install. Its
painful, yes, but it will help you in the long run eventually!
-dman84
Hi dman84!
OK, I did that, when I moved the accounts but
i can only asume somone is taking on the role of mr rsole
Jens Schlatter wrote:
Why is it microsoft allowed to use the signature mozilla in their
internet explorer?
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)
Jens
Fup2 netscape.public.mozilla.license
Is there any chance that NewZilla gets updated again? (last updated June
14th, 2001) I considered it a useful ressource for Newbies to Netscape 6 and
Mozilla. I think a FAQ like that is needed. We have two news sites -
mozillazine and mozillanews - , but I think we also need sites with
Daniel Kies wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone else noted this problem: the font size of the numbers in an
ordered list does not change to reflect the font size of the list item
text. Moz renders the size consistently as the browser default font
size, although other browsers will render the
I typically use a variant of the auto-conf proxy file to weed out ad connections on
websites and block images from
advertisers. The method of entering file:///drive:/folder/filename.pac has worked
and does work in Netscape 4.xx and
IE 5.x; it doesn't work in Mozilla 0.97.
How can I get it to
builds. I used to daily, cut back now to once per week. (Mondays)
JS wrote:
I was just curious to see how often some of you update your Mozilla
builds. I used to daily, cut back now to once per week. (Mondays)
usually daily; recently about once every 3-5 days.
--
Regards,
Peter Lairo
WDA wrote:
daa wrote:
WDA wrote:
There is some validity to the cache problem complaint. It seems, that
when Mozilla crashes, it takes the cache with it. This is not a
catastrophic problem, but an annoyance the web browser community would
love to live without.
I have a lot of
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Anyone agree that such a site would be useful?
I totally agree :)
--
Regards,
Peter Lairo
Usually daily. Sometimes there are multiple nightlies a day; then it happens
that I updated several times that day.
Sometimes also switch back to branch or switch over to most recent
SVG/MathML experimental build.
JS [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
Am 06.01.2002 14:08 schrieb JS:
I was just curious to see how often some of you update your Mozilla
builds. I used to daily, cut back now to once per week. (Mondays)
Daily.
Holger
--
No matter how fast light travels it finds the darkness has always
got there first, and is waiting for
JS wrote:
I was just curious to see how often some of you update your Mozilla
builds. I used to daily, cut back now to once per week. (Mondays)
Whenever I see something in Asa's build comments that looks interesting.
I use nightlies for browsing, but unless there's some big changes I
I noticed this (pretty serious, imho) bug with today's and yesterday's
builds on Linux.
When the browser window is resized so that its width is smaller than the
width of all the icons and stuff on the personal toolbar, the scrollbar on
the right is not visible and the page doesn't wrap
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], JS ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I was just curious to see how often some of you update your Mozilla
builds. I used to daily, cut back now to once per week. (Mondays)
Used to daily, until 0.9.7 came out. Ever since 0.9.7, the mozilla linux
build is broken for me under
Joni K. wrote:
I noticed this (pretty serious, imho) bug with today's and yesterday's
builds on Linux.
When the browser window is resized so that its width is smaller than the
width of all the icons and stuff on the personal toolbar, the scrollbar on
the right is not visible and the page
Ever tried to un- and then re-install it?
Gregory Spath [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], JS ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I was just curious to see how often some of you update your Mozilla
builds. I used to daily, cut
That did happen for me on the 01-05 build which you also seem to be using
(on a different platform though).
As that build also crashed on preferences window opening, I went back to
01-04 and all was fine.
Joni K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
Peter Lairo [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Anyone agree that such a site would be useful?
I totally agree :)
That would be one person after four hours. Hmm (then again, what do I
expect - it's Sunday, and still
Erik Harris ehar$is1@$ocheste$.r$.com wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 06 Jan 2002 11:18:49 +1030, Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Came here to post a nearly identical message, though my experience
was on the java.sun.com site. I installed the plugin twice
JTK wrote:
Water under the proverbial bridge. What's AOL I mean the Mozilla
community doing *now* to get Mozilla more than 0.75% market share?
If you refer back to the source of that statistic, you'll find it's now
up to 0.85%. Also remember that it is nothing more than a statistic.
It
Microsoft has a monopoloy in several areas, but bad
HTML isn't one of them.
There are millions of people out there who can do it all on
their own in notepad (or vi, for that matter, this is
OS-agnostic) without any help from Frontpage whatsoever.
I am sure that there are, I just have never
Paul B. wrote:
Get an error message saying:
Setup has encountered a network problem and has paused the download. If
you have just lost your network connection, please click Resume once your
network has been established.
Trying to install on a Windows NT 4.0 workstation. Any help
From a user perspective, later releases of IE4 were
better than NS4.x
in several ways, primarily stability.
I couldn't stand IE4, which is why I went to Nestscape 4.
That's _your_ opinion. Many disagree with you. I abandoned NS4.x about
14 months ago, because Mozilla was more stable
Howard Hoyt wrote:
Paul B. wrote:
Get an error message saying:
Setup has encountered a network problem and has paused the download. If
you have just lost your network connection, please click Resume once your
network has been established.
Same problem here w/ Win98. Been trying all
Sören Kuklau wrote:
I totally agree :)
That would be one person after four hours. Hmm (then again, what do I
expect - it's Sunday, and still winter holidays for many). Thank you
anyways.
I didn't reply to your original post because I try to do as few I
agree postings as possible, but
Erik Harris wrote:
BTW, it might be worth noting that your profile directory is not located
within the Mozilla directory structure, which is the intuitive place for
those of us who have been using PC's for awhile. I looked around for it for
a little while before doing a search for these
Most stable? 0.9.4.1+, without a shadow of a doubt.
Gerv
Where could i get a binary (0.9.4.1+) from ftp ?
0.9.4.1 was a source-only release. You can find it at
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/mozilla0.9.4.1/
0.9.4.1+ is the continuation of that branch in CVS. You can either
Not the specs - back in September certain short-sighted developers
effectively told 3rd party theme designers to go forth and multiply,
with unsurprising results...
Which bit of it's not finished yet do you, or they, have trouble
understanding?
Either:
1) You try and keep up with XUL
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Is there any chance that NewZilla gets updated again? (last updated June
14th, 2001) I considered it a useful ressource for Newbies to Netscape 6 and
Mozilla.
I was in contact with Alex for a while about moving the FAQ to
mozilla.org, but he kept dropping out of sight.
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash on
preferences opening.
I had this same problem with 2002010508 (and can't find 11 for Win32).
I went back to 2002010403 with good results.
Maybe it was 2002-01-05-08... can't remember.
Dan Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash on
preferences opening.
I had this same problem with
Al Niven wrote:
[snip]
emails contacts
See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113157 for a description
how to migrate mail folders.
gavin long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42441
Thank you. It's comforting to see that some other folks
thought this was important too.
BTW: the ^a ^c paste sequence can present a bit of headache,
if the file size
On Sun, 06 Jan 2002 09:02:44 +0100, Holger Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Am 06.01.2002 07:11 schrieb Erik Harris:
Thanks Holger, this did it, though the Java applet on Half.com that I
discovered this bug on seems to load in about 10X the time that it loads on
Netscape 4.7. I waited a
Christian Biesinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Because this didn't work, the Text Selection was removed from the Save
Page dialog.
Umm, actually, I had figured *that* part out. I was hoping to find out
why it was removed ... and, hopefully, provide
Further Re:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42441
Well ... it doesn't look so good after all. They've
been talking about it for - what? - *two years*?!!
Dale
Once or twice a month. (Use nightlies only)
JS wrote:
I was just curious to see how often some of you update your Mozilla
builds. I used to daily, cut back now to once per week. (Mondays)
--
---
Phillip M. Jones, CET
Mozilla is an old name. It was taken from reference to Mosaic of which
Netscape Navigator, then Communicator was created from. (it was used as
a research code name.
Several years agi when it was decided to create an open Source New
replacement for Communicator; the Project was given the Name
Bill Lee wrote:
I've heard/read that someone is stalling this due to personal distaste
for the feature, even though it's done.
No that's not quite true. From reading the bugreport at
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16489 I get the impression
that the module owner, who has to
I use Communicator since 4.0.0 (mac) up to 4.7.9 And used Navigator
from 3.0.0 to 3.0.4.a Gold.
I currently have IE 5.1 (mac installed) but use it only to get into one
website for banking purposes Fedelity's AdvisorExpress.
https://AdvisorXpress.fidelity.com/cgi-bin/client
Communicator,
Christian Biesinger wrote:
currently done does not provide any protection at all.
Spoken like a true troll (inflammation via exaggeration).
You are aware that *0 profile passwords 128bit protection* is at
least some protection? And in fact, it is the amount and type of
protection many
JS wrote:
I was just curious to see how often some of you update your Mozilla
builds. I used to daily, cut back now to once per week. (Mondays)
Daily,but every other day on each of two computers.I never install them.I
download the .zip file,and unzip it. Then I copy an entire Plugins folder
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash on
preferences opening.
Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
This build really seems to be the best I've used
Mark
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But
Joni K. wrote:
I couldn't find this in bugzilla. Does anyone know a bug# or any other
relevant information..?
If you can't find an existing bug, please file one.
thanks,
Peter
On 01/06/2002 2:01 PM, Nigel L wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash on
preferences opening.
Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
This build really seems to be the best I've
Nigel L wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash on
preferences opening.
Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
This build really seems to be the best I've used
Mark
--
On 01/06/2002 2:10 PM, Peter Trudelle wrote:
Joni K. wrote:
I couldn't find this in bugzilla. Does anyone know a bug# or any other
relevant information..?
If you can't find an existing bug, please file one.
thanks,
Peter
Filed:
Gervase Markham wrote:
Which bit of it's not finished yet do you, or they, have trouble
understanding?
that's not the issue, Gerv. I don't design themes, BTW.
Either:
1) You try and keep up with XUL development, and accept that things will
break
This is exactly what theme
Peter Lairo wrote:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
currently done does not provide any protection at all.
Spoken like a true troll (inflammation via exaggeration).
You are aware that *0 profile passwords 128bit protection* is at
least some protection? And in fact, it is the amount and
I have been using msie for some time but recently I decided to switch to
Mozilla v0.97. I find it very nice and stable, however when I am to
download messages from newsgroups that contain a file split into several
different messages It simply downloads (the first) part of the
attatchment
On 01/06/2002 2:23 PM, Fulvio Perini wrote:
Nigel L wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash on
preferences opening.
Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
This build really seems
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 01/06/2002 2:10 PM, Peter Trudelle wrote:
Joni K. wrote:
I couldn't find this in bugzilla. Does anyone know a bug# or any other
relevant information..?
If you can't find an existing bug, please file one.
thanks,
Peter
Filed:
Steven wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C
I just dropped the contents of a _copy_ of the communicator mail folder
in a new folder in the the local files. What happened was that each
subfolder was converted when it was selected in Netscape Mail News.
This took some time for larger folders. It
Jay Garcia wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
On 01/06/2002 2:01 PM, Nigel L wrote:
Sren Kuklau wrote:
Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash onpreferences opening."Mark" [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/show-interview/v-p-anderlindeneter/ref=
pm_dp_ln_b_8/102-8890693-7488930
Is this for real?
- - --
Cat
http://www.ratrobot.com/people/people.htm If you only have 44% of eligible
voters participating in an election
Title: SnoreRX
The problem of snoring is more frequent in males and overweight persons, and it usually grows
Worked fine in Netscape 6.2, but does not in Mozilla 0.97.
Tried downloading the Windows/Netscape flash plugin, and it can't find
Netscape.exe (which is not suprising).
How can I get the flash plugin working?
Thanks.
--
+++
If knowledge is power,
On 01/06/2002 3:22 PM, Nigel L wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 01/06/2002 2:01 PM, Nigel L wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash on
preferences opening.
Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
I think the reason that, while its probobly easy to do, macromedia dont
change things so that flash detects mozilla and installs into it is that
that would then imply that macromedia are officially supporting mozilla
which is very hard to do since mozilla is constantly changing. They
would be
Title: Free Quote
Double Your Life Insurance For
FREE
$300,000 policy
for $3.50 per month
CLICK HERE FOR A FREE ONLINE QUOTE
Can Mozilla, Preferences, Helper Applications be used to tie in Java or
does a sym link have to be used? Running Mozilla 0.9.7 on Mandrake 8.1.
Thanks!
--
They told me I needed WIN95 or better
So I chose Linux!
ehar$is1@$ocheste$.r$.com (Erik Harris) wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BTW, it might be worth noting that your profile directory is not
located within the Mozilla directory structure, which is the
intuitive place for those of us who have been using PC's for
awhile. I looked around for it for a
Mark Gillespie wrote:
Worked fine in Netscape 6.2, but does not in Mozilla 0.97.
Tried downloading the Windows/Netscape flash plugin, and it can't find
Netscape.exe (which is not suprising).
How can I get the flash plugin working?
Thanks.
--
Try temporarily renaming mozilla.exe as netscape.exe so the installer
can find it. Or even make a copy of mozilla.exe named netscape.exe and
leave it there.
Mark Gillespie wrote:
Worked fine in Netscape 6.2, but does not in Mozilla 0.97.
Tried downloading the Windows/Netscape flash
And it came to pass that Ashtar wrote:
I have been using msie for some time but recently I decided
to switch to
Mozilla v0.97. I find it very nice and stable, however
when I am to
download messages from newsgroups that contain a file split
into several different messages It simply
On 1/6/2002 9:08 AM, Joni K. wrote:
I noticed this (pretty serious, imho) bug with today's and yesterday's
builds on Linux.
When the browser window is resized so that its width is smaller than the
width of all the icons and stuff on the personal toolbar, the scrollbar on
the right is
just email us at: REMOVE MY EMAIL ADDRESS
MetabolicGold
Formula
TM
Are You One Of The 70 Million Americans
SufferingThe
JS wrote:
I was just curious to see how often some of you update your Mozilla
builds. I used to daily, cut back now to once per week. (Mondays)
I vary quite a bit. For the last few weeks it's been pretty much every
day, just to see if the cache defect got fixed (jury's still out on that
gavin long wrote:
JTK wrote:
Water under the proverbial bridge. What's AOL I mean the Mozilla
community doing *now* to get Mozilla more than 0.75% market share?
If you refer back to the source of that statistic, you'll find it's now
up to 0.85%.
Wow! At this rate, it'll be near a
Dale wrote:
Further Re:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42441
Well ... it doesn't look so good after all. They've
been talking about it for - what? - *two years*?!!
Dale
Welcome to the Mozilla project.
Phil Anderton wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
[snip]
Either:
1) You try and keep up with XUL development, and accept that things will
break
This is exactly what theme designers were doing, until the fix for bug
99102 came along. Skins slowly degraded as XUL development proceeded,
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
Whats bugscape.mcom.com then?
It's the bugzilla instance used to track Netscape-specific issues, the inner
circle of hell to which not a Mozilla bug items are banished when marked
INVALID.
-Dan Veditz
Geoff wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2002 08:51:11 +, JTK wrote:
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
I've never had any problems at all with the cache - Moz has been
showing me the correct versions of pages ever day for 2 years or so -
with the exception of a few builds that wouldn't run properly
75 matches
Mail list logo
