i didnt want to spam, apologies.
i just tried opening the new portal.
sorry, i not gonna spam you again.
Kryptolus wrote:
> Lancer wrote:
>
>> A new sidebar is avaliable for mozilla funs!!!, you can find it here:
>> Una nueva Sidebar esta disponible para los Fanaticos de Mozilla!!!,
>> puedes e
Blake Ross wrote:
>
> > It's not a presumption. XUL. That's a _big_ effort in making Mozilla
> > skinnable.
>
> Sorry, my bad. It's total misinformation, then. XUL has nothing to do
> with skinability.
>
My sweet Lord, this is really too much. XUL has NO OTHER REASON TO
EXIST other than skinna
If you want the ability to:
* Add and remove toolbar buttons
* Add and remove menus and menu items
* Change the look of the browser toolbars and toolbar buttons
* Have "native" language menus
Then you should be looking at K-Meleon:
http://kmeleon.sourceforge.net/
Gecko engine, whatever interfa
Lancer wrote:
> A new sidebar is avaliable for mozilla funs!!!, you can find it here:
> Una nueva Sidebar esta disponible para los Fanaticos de Mozilla!!!,
> puedes encontrarla aqui:
> http://www.geocities.com/charadew/
>
Why do you spam these newsgroups so often?
A new sidebar is avaliable for mozilla funs!!!, you can find it here:
Una nueva Sidebar esta disponible para los Fanaticos de Mozilla!!!,
puedes encontrarla aqui:
http://www.geocities.com/charadew/
> It's not a presumption. XUL. That's a _big_ effort in making Mozilla
> skinnable.
Sorry, my bad. It's total misinformation, then. XUL has nothing to do
with skinability.
> This article is actually written by a staff member of Mozilla, so this
> is serious stuff. If you doubt people wants to
In other words, the only way to get a feature implemented is to keep on
posting it as a bug, which will lead to more overhead work for the poor
guys who have to wade through the duplicates every day.
Surely there must be more than one guy back in -98 who wants to have
better filtering options
Pratik wrote:
> On 02/15/2002 05:17 PM, JTK wrote:
>
>
>> Save your breath Mozillapologists, these aren't my words, they're from
>> the guy who's in charge of the UI design himself. Talk to him if you
>> have problems faceing reality.
>
>
> Another reality - His no.1 usability problem is bei
I didn't see this message until now, although this was posted before
other message I've already replied to. This is because of a strange bug
that was hiding two unread messages. I'm unsure how I could report this
bug. The only way would be to send in the 4MB newsgroup file
"netscape.public.moz
Blake Ross wrote:
>> If not, why put so much effort in supporting skins in Mozilla? Truth
>> is, most of the users doesn't care much of skin support in a browser.
>
>
> Who is putting "so much effort"? No one that I can see. You admitted
> you're new here, why are you making such presumptio
Tim Wunder wrote:
> David Tenser wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>> I just find it weird having to select each and every Inbox and press
>> Get Msgs. Why would I only want to check one account at a time, and if
>> I wanted to, I could click on the little arrow next to the button and
>> select that
Matt Williams wrote:
> David Tenser wrote:
>>> As an average user who subscribes to 15 "birding" listservs with 200+
>>> messages arriving every day, I would find your suggested enhancement
>>> extremely painful. I would hate to have to sift through all my
>>> Birding e-mails to get to my bus
> The two programs I use for screen capture the Mac are SnapZ Pro, and
> Screen Catcher both can handle png. But Mac people tend to use jpeg/jpg,
> and gif. I have PhotoShop Lite Adobe recently named to it to something else.
Why do you need a screen capture program? It's it just apple+shift+f3?
Hi Neil and Raj,
Thanks. protozilla workaround works great. I can now finally ditch netscape
4.7 for good :)
"Neil M." wrote:
> Seo Boon NG wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've look through the archive but couldn't find an answer. I'm on Linux
> > with Netscape 4.77 and decided to switch over to Mozilla 0.9
And it came to pass that Stewart hector wrote:
> And it became to pass that on the Friday 15 Feb 2002 1:36
> am, Christopher Jahn did write as thus:
>
>> And it came to pass that Stewart hector wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I'm using Mozilla (.98) under Linux. How can I make it so
>>> when I click
And it came to pass that A Martinez wrote:
>>>And about the format, I always use png for screen captures.
>>>You can use .gif as well, but please don't use jpg as it
>>>introduces noise and can meke the capture useless.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> WHAT??!?! jpg is the most widely supported format - GIF
>
And it came to pass that Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
>
>
> Christopher Jahn wrote:
>>
>> And it came to pass that Travis Crump wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Christopher Jahn wrote:
>> >> up too much bandwidth, and few programs support .PNG.
>> >
>> > Isn't that sort of a mute point if you are
For some reason I am unable to retrive newsgroup listing using Mozilla.
When I attempt to download it, I either get a quick done, or please wait
message.
Please advice.
Sören Kuklau wrote:
>
> Peter Lairo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > when i need to make a screenshot, I am always unsure as to which
> > fileformat to save it to (gif, jpeg, png, etc.).
> >
> > Since screenshots are usually only a few colors (no photos in the
> > shots), there must be some fileformat tha
Christopher Jahn wrote:
>
> And it came to pass that Travis Crump wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Christopher Jahn wrote:
> >> up too much bandwidth, and few programs support .PNG.
> >
> > Isn't that sort of a mute point if you are planing to post
> > the screen shot to bugzilla where your target audience
Well then discontinue the mail list gateway.
Should be exclusively newgroups only anyway.
david avery wrote:
>
> "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
>
> > Just moving to a secure server would get rid of most it.
> >
> > Kryptolus wrote:
> > >
> > > Robert Davies wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Is no one
Title: Sex2go.com
Want to have sex tonight?
HORNY HOUSEWIVES
NAUGHTY NEIGHBORS
THE GIRL NEXT DOOR
They're all here!!!
Over 100,000 REAL WOMEN are
looking for men for REAL SEX at Sex2go.
Email them!
Meet them!
FUCK THEM TONIGHT!!!
NOTE: This is not SPAM!
JTK wrote:
>> Read here http://mpt.phrasewise.com/stories/storyReader$35
>> Interesting reading about the lack of usability in Mozilla. At least I
>> agree with the author.
>
> Oh man, THANK YOU for that link. Here, suck this down all you
> Mozillapologists; this is from "the owner of the User
Scott wrote:
> Where is user.js/prefs.js?
> Thanks
>
> Travis Crump wrote:
>
>>
>> user_pref("addressbook.throbber.url", "http://www.somedomain.org";);
>> user_pref("compose.throbber.url", "http://www.somedomain.org";);
>> user_pref("editor.throbber.url", "http://www.somedomain.org";);
>> user_p
Pascal Chevrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> This is precisely why he should file a *Tech Evangelism* bug.
>
> Bugzilla definition of Tech Evangelism bugs : "For reporting web pages
> that must be upgraded to support web standards and Mozilla"
Ahhh
On 02/15/2002 05:17 PM, JTK wrote:
> Save your breath Mozillapologists, these aren't my words, they're from
> the guy who's in charge of the UI design himself. Talk to him if you
> have problems faceing reality.
Another reality - His no.1 usability problem is being attacked.
His page also says
Where is user.js/prefs.js?
Thanks
Travis Crump wrote:
>
> user_pref("addressbook.throbber.url", "http://www.somedomain.org";);
> user_pref("compose.throbber.url", "http://www.somedomain.org";);
> user_pref("editor.throbber.url", "http://www.somedomain.org";);
> user_pref("messenger.throbber.url"
Christian Biesinger wrote:
>
> Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
> > Precisely. And out of those 2200 bugs, approx 1000 of them are already
> > closed, 600 of them as duplicates (and there are many duplicates among
> > the rest which just hasn't been marked as such yet).
>
> Sorry but this is wrong.
> Look
One way to check if KDE is running is to see if one of: KDesktop or kwin
is running - this should be enough to test if KDE under normal
circumstances. You could test if kicker is running, but some people do
stop this from running. No doubt there is a better way than these
methods.. though
Christian Biesinger wrote:
>
> David Tenser wrote:
> > Matt Williams wrote:
>
> >> One quick question . . . how does having a skin make your life easier
> >> or more productive?>
> >
> >
> > If not, why put so much effort in supporting skins in Mozilla? Truth is,
> > most of the users doesn't ca
David Tenser wrote:
>
[snip]
> Read here http://mpt.phrasewise.com/stories/storyReader$35
> Interesting reading about the lack of usability in Mozilla. At least I
> agree with the author.
>
Oh man, THANK YOU for that link. Here, suck this down all you
Mozillapologists; this is from "the owne
Christian Biesinger wrote:
>> Precisely. And out of those 2200 bugs, approx 1000 of them are already
>> closed, 600 of them as duplicates (and there are many duplicates among
>> the rest which just hasn't been marked as such yet).
>
> Sorry but this is wrong.
> Look at this URL:
>
>http://bug
Very much semantic ;-)
another example: FMMV a window manager, KDE an environment.
Many people now do use VM == environment
Actually, I did run GNOME without a WM behind it. accidentally once... it
was, as you'd expect, pointless!
And it became to pass that on the Friday 15 Feb 2002 9:31 pm
Stewart hector wrote:
>>I suppose it couldn't be done.
>>
>
> Why is that then?There is no reason why Mozilla couldn't be made aware
> of KDE
Yes, but how can it know if the user is using KDE, and if he is, what
mailer he's using?
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
David Tenser wrote:
>
[snip]
> >
> > Five days later, I'd confirm it if I could reproduce it. It may be
> > WinXP only, which narrows down the field of testers somewhat. Thanks
> > for a sane-and-sensible bugreport though.
>
> You're welcome. It's funny, after mentioning the bug report here,
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
> Precisely. And out of those 2200 bugs, approx 1000 of them are already
> closed, 600 of them as duplicates (and there are many duplicates among
> the rest which just hasn't been marked as such yet).
Sorry but this is wrong.
Look at this URL:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/
Stewart hector wrote:
> A suitable plug in could be written for the major linux WM - GNOME and KDE
> to allow this. Unfortunately the users of other WM would be moaning
This is probably semantic, but I just thought I'd point it out anyway.
Gnome is not a Window Manager. Just try runnin
David Tenser wrote:
>
>
> Matt Williams wrote:
>
>> David Tenser wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Matt Williams wrote:
>>>
David, for those of us who are novice users what are the things you
would like to see added/changed/fixed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Various things. Some examples (please let me know if som
> Does this mean that they haven't had the time to add this feature in
> four years?
No, it means that few of Mozilla's distributor's customers have been
clamoring for it, and thus it's not a priority. Why would a feature be
added because a bug filer wanted it? Do you think that's how things
user_pref("addressbook.throbber.url", "http://www.somedomain.org";);
user_pref("compose.throbber.url", "http://www.somedomain.org";);
user_pref("editor.throbber.url", "http://www.somedomain.org";);
user_pref("messenger.throbber.url", "http://www.somedomain.org";);
user_pref("browser.throbber.url",
Well, the oldest comment for that "bug" is from 1998!!
Does this mean that they haven't had the time to add this feature in
four years?
/ David
Christian Biesinger wrote:
> David Tenser wrote:
>
>> I've been using Mozilla for a week now and I was thinking of
>> completely switch to it starti
> If not, why put so much effort in supporting skins in Mozilla? Truth is,
> most of the users doesn't care much of skin support in a browser.
Who is putting "so much effort"? No one that I can see. You admitted
you're new here, why are you making such presumptions?
> My initial point was th
Holger Metzger wrote:
> gavin long wrote:
>
>> David Tenser wrote:
>>
>>> That's what I'm trying to ask. On my Mozilla, it underlines words
>>> starting and ending with _underscores_ ... My question is where that
>>> is specified! Are there any CSS file that holds these formatting rules?
>>
>
David Tenser wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I just find it weird having to select each and every Inbox and press Get
> Msgs. Why would I only want to check one account at a time, and if I
> wanted to, I could click on the little arrow next to the button and
> select that account. I guess I'm used to this
David Tenser wrote:
> Matt Williams wrote:
>> One quick question . . . how does having a skin make your life easier
>> or more productive?>
>
>
> If not, why put so much effort in supporting skins in Mozilla? Truth is,
> most of the users doesn't care much of skin support in a browser.
Truth
Is there a way to change the url of the throbber? I would assume it
wouldn't be too tough to do. I've been using Netscape 6.2.1 for quite a
while as my default browser, but some of the little things that haven't
been fixed it that ver have been fixed in the latest Mozilla, and I was
just getti
David Tenser wrote:
>> [1] anyone who wants to help thin THEM out, please do
>> [2] "mozilla needs to make my bed in the morning", "mozilla needs a
>> kitchen sink", Mozilla needs to make coffee". At least one of those
>> is really in bugzilla.
>
> The kitchen sink, right? :)
That, and th
Pratik wrote:
> Good point David. The very same point is also made by mpt. Its his no.1
> usability problem in Mozilla
>
> http://mpt.phrasewise.com/stories/storyReader$35
Interesting reading!
> fyi, this problem is being addresed. Look at the following 2 bugs
>
> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org
> Read here http://mpt.phrasewise.com/stories/storyReader$35
> Interesting reading about the lack of usability in Mozilla. At least I
> agree with the author.
That's good news. MPT is the owner of the User Interface Design
component. He's well placed to get these fixed.
--
gav
> I suppose it couldn't be done.
Why is that then?There is no reason why Mozilla couldn't be made aware
of KDE, but it would be a kludge though - Mozilla being made aware of a
specific WM - especially when its meant to be platform independant.
Something IMO, shouldn't be done...
>
>> i
I'm glad to hear that.
gavin long wrote:
> David Tenser wrote:
>
>> One thing that I've always thought of as a very simple, yet very
>> useful feature that Mozilla lacks: The ability to add/remove buttons
>> to the toolbar(s) and to drag/move toolbars, address fields, menus, etc.
>>
>> Even si
Is support for being able to use 3rd party emailers going to be implemented
in non windows versions?
>> In fact, for Mozilla to know that I use KMail, it would have to know
>> about KDE... I suppose it could do...
A suitable plug in could be written for the major linux WM - GNOME and KDE
to
gav 'n' cal wrote:
> David Tenser wrote:
> >> Any color as long as it's black. BUT YOU CAN USE ALL KINDS OF
> >> DIFFERENT SKINS!
> >>
> >> Oh, well, not really, something like a grand total of SIX at last
> >> count [snip]
> >
> > Yeah, I was amazed by the fact that Mozilla have been aro
Matt Williams wrote:
> David Tenser wrote:
>
>> Exactly my point. You can customize Mozilla to be a totally different
>> browser if you really want and have the time. On the other hand, you
>> could also make your own web browser from scratch if you had the time
>> and knowledge, so that does
Thanks!
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
> David Tenser wrote:
>
>> I can't find userConcent.css! Where is it located?
>
>
> In a folder called "chrome" which is located in your profile directory.
> Your profile directory is usually located here:
>
> C:\Documents and Settings\your-windows-user-name\Ap
David Tenser wrote:
> I can't find userConcent.css! Where is it located?
In a folder called "chrome" which is located in your profile directory.
Your profile directory is usually located here:
C:\Documents and Settings\your-windows-user-name\Application
Data\Mozilla\Profiles\your-mozilla-user-
I can't find userConcent.css! Where is it located?
Holger Metzger wrote:
> gavin long wrote:
>
>> David Tenser wrote:
>>
>>> That's what I'm trying to ask. On my Mozilla, it underlines words
>>> starting and ending with _underscores_ ... My question is where that
>>> is specified! Are there
Matt Williams wrote:
> David Tenser wrote:
>
>>
>> Matt Williams wrote:
>>
>>> David, for those of us who are novice users what are the things you
>>> would like to see added/changed/fixed.
>>
>> Various things. Some examples (please let me know if something
>> requested here is already in the
Stuart Ballard wrote:
>> > "mozilla needs to make my bed in the morning", "mozilla needs a
>> > kitchen sink", Mozilla needs to make coffee". At least one of those is
>> > really in bugzilla.
>>
>> I've seen two of them...
>
> You mean like http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122411 ?
Travis Crump wrote:
>
>
> David Tenser wrote:
>
>> * General: Ability to change keyboard shortcuts. This is something
>> that many programs lacks, including IE. If you use a particular
>> feature often, you should be able to assign a keyboard shortcut to it.
>
>
> The funny part is that on
David Tenser wrote:
> You can customize Mozilla to be a totally different
> browser if you really want and have the time. On the other hand, you
> could also make your own web browser from scratch if you had the time
> and knowledge, so that doesn't help the average user. It seems for me
> th
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
>
> gav 'n' cal wrote:
>
> > "mozilla needs to make my bed in the morning", "mozilla needs a
> > kitchen sink", Mozilla needs to make coffee". At least one of those is
> > really in bugzilla.
>
> I've seen two of them...
You mean like http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bu
gav 'n' cal wrote:
> "mozilla needs to make my bed in the morning", "mozilla needs a
> kitchen sink", Mozilla needs to make coffee". At least one of those is
> really in bugzilla.
I've seen two of them...
--
Hvis svaret er Anders Fogh så er spørgsmålet dumt.
cw wrote:
> Pascal Chevrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:3C6D42C1.1000101
> @free.fr:
>
>
>>Sorry for writing in French, I am just explaining that this page uses
>>proprietary NS4 tags and that he should file a Tech Evangelism bug in
>>bugzilla.
>>
>
> Not really, the script is designed
Pascal Chevrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:3C6D42C1.1000101
@free.fr:
> Sorry for writing in French, I am just explaining that this page uses
> proprietary NS4 tags and that he should file a Tech Evangelism bug in
> bugzilla.
Not really, the script is designed to detect Internet Explorer
Arnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Pratik,
> sorry, but I do not understand we you wanted to show me.
>
> I indeed have this error in the javascript consol. Thus, I suppose this
> is a
>
> javascript problem. But why this page display correctly wi
Felix Kater wrote:
> Hi,
> I created a netscape free email account. With Netscape 6.2.1 I can
> access it - with Mozilla 0.9.8 I can't ... Does anyone know if accessing
> netscape freemail (imap) does ONLY work with Netscape 6.2.1 instead of
> Mozilla ?
Yes it only works in netscape (It may be
a wrote:
> This page does not display correctly:
> http://www.client.bouygtel.com/forfait.html
>
> I have no such problem with IE6.
I believe the problem lies in the sites use of JavaScript. Just looking
at the first chunk of code they have this:
NS4 = (document.layers);
IE4 = (document.all)
Craig Tataryn wrote:
> Everytime I install a plug-in (for instance Java2 plugin) it says it has
> installed correctly, but then the plugin never works (even after browser
> shutdown/startup).
>
> Anyway I can manually install the plugin?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig.
>
Most plugin installers do no
Seo Boon NG wrote:
> Hi,
> I've look through the archive but couldn't find an answer. I'm on Linux
> with Netscape 4.77 and decided to switch over to Mozilla 0.9.8. But upon
> running the new upgraded broswer, I realize the URL assiocation such as
> telnet://hostname is no longer supported as in n
Kryptolus wrote:
> JTK wrote:
>> [Who the fuck cares what he wrote]
>
ROFLMAO!
JTK == Just Talks Krap ??
--
Software is like sex, it's better when it's free - Linus Torvalds
Anti-spam e-mail address, change _AT_, sorry for the inconvenience
Sorry for writing in French, I am just explaining that this page uses
proprietary NS4 tags and that he should file a Tech Evangelism bug in
bugzilla.
Salut Arnaud,
La page que tu viens d'indiquer est codée avec les pieds, il y a un
script débile de détection de navigateur au départ qui dédui
Pratik,
sorry, but I do not understand we you wanted to show me.
I indeed have this error in the javascript consol. Thus, I suppose this is a
javascript problem. But why this page display correctly with IE6?
Is it an already known bug of mozilla, or do I miss something?
Regards,
Arnaud.
Prati
Everytime I install a plug-in (for instance Java2 plugin) it says it has
installed correctly, but then the plugin never works (even after browser
shutdown/startup).
Anyway I can manually install the plugin?
Thanks,
Craig.
Open up Tasks->Tools->javascript Console and you'll see the problem
Error: MT is not defined
Source File: http://www.client.bouygtel.com/forfait.html
Line: 70
Pratik.
On 02/15/2002 09:21 AM, a wrote:
> This page does not display correctly:
> http://www.client.bouygtel.com/forfait.html
>
> I ha
Good point David. The very same point is also made by mpt. Its his no.1
usability problem in Mozilla
http://mpt.phrasewise.com/stories/storyReader$35
fyi, this problem is being addresed. Look at the following 2 bugs
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15144
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/
> I've look through the archive but couldn't find an answer. I'm on Linux
> with Netscape 4.77 and decided to switch over to Mozilla 0.9.8. But upon
> running the new upgraded broswer, I realize the URL assiocation such as
> telnet://hostname is no longer supported as in netscape 4.7. As I've
> qu
Stewart hector wrote:
> In fact, for Mozilla to know that I use KMail, it would have to know about
> KDE... I suppose it could do...
I suppose it couldn't be done.
> is there a environmental variable that it
> uses?
No. Launching the default mailer only works on Windows.
--
"They that ca
> 2. "Standards-compliant", which translates, "Standards-compliant web
> browser, when it's convenient for AOL, and at the expense of
> 'defacto-standards compliant'".
>
> I completely support 100%, 1000% standards compliance, but not when it
> means that I can't view web pages that already exis
ng wrote:
> In moz 0.9.8, RH7.1, KDE2.2. On URL: www.smh.com.au
>
> Can anyone confirm a crash in mozilla when clicking anywhere on the page.
> This happens every time. I don't recall this in previous moz releases.
Works for me. mozilla-0.9.8-3mdk, Gecko/20020204 under Mandrake 8.2b1.
Have you
Hi,
I created a netscape free email account. With Netscape 6.2.1 I can
access it - with Mozilla 0.9.8 I can't ... Does anyone know if accessing
netscape freemail (imap) does ONLY work with Netscape 6.2.1 instead of
Mozilla ?
Thank You for any help
Felix
This page does not display correctly:
http://www.client.bouygtel.com/forfait.html
I have no such problem with IE6.
Regards,
Arnaud.
--
--
Arnaud Legout, Ph.D.
Castify NetworksPhone : 00.33.4.92.94.20.91
2229, r
Reach your investment goals faster!
Make your money work for you!
Optimize your investment return!
We offer a highly specialized investment
that offers a great return; almost three times better than short term CDs; and
it's guaranteed!
Individuals are constantly looking for
effective ways to r
Peter Lairo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when i need to make a screenshot, I am always unsure as to which
> fileformat to save it to (gif, jpeg, png, etc.).
>
> Since screenshots are usually only a few colors (no photos in the
> shots), there must be some fileformat that keeps the filesize very small.
>
>>And about the format, I always use png for screen captures.
>>You can use .gif as well, but please don't use jpg as it
>>introduces noise and can meke the capture useless.
>>
>>
>>
>
> WHAT??!?! jpg is the most widely supported format - GIF takes
> up too much bandwidth, and few programs supp
Works for me on 0.9.8/Win2k.
ng wrote:
> In moz 0.9.8, RH7.1, KDE2.2. On URL: www.smh.com.au
>
> Can anyone confirm a crash in mozilla when clicking anywhere on the page.
> This happens every time. I don't recall this in previous moz releases.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> ng
>
Lancer wrote:
> Please take a look, to see the progress of the site / Porfa, hecha un
> vistazo para ver el progreso del sitio
>
> http://www.geocities.com/charadew/
>
> gracias / thanx
>
¿Qué quieres decir con *escritura MIME*. Me parece que no es español
correcto. ¿Quieres decir *estructur
Te esta quedadando una pagina muy guapa, felicidades.
Me parece un proyecto muy interesante, pues no he encontrado ninguna
pagina en español sobre mozilla, menos la del proyecto nave pero parece
que esta parado(el ultimo paquete lo sacaron para mozilla 0.9.5).
Por ultimo, un asugerencia; podias
I have done a custom install, and moz doesn't use system defaults...
In fact, for Mozilla to know that I use KMail, it would have to know about
KDE... I suppose it could do... is there a environmental variable that it
uses?
And it became to pass that on the Friday 15 Feb 2002 1:36 am, Christo
JTK wrote:
> Pascal Chevrel wrote:
>
>>David Tenser wrote:
>>
>>>Yes, it's obvious that Mozilla's aim is to make a near-perfect, secure
>>>webpage renderer. Gecko is the heart of it all.
>>>
>>>The problem is, too few real people are actually using Mozilla, so no
>>>one knows just how many secur
Please take a look, to see the progress of the site / Porfa, hecha un
vistazo para ver el progreso del sitio
http://www.geocities.com/charadew/
gracias / thanx
In moz 0.9.8, RH7.1, KDE2.2. On URL: www.smh.com.au
Can anyone confirm a crash in mozilla when clicking anywhere on the page.
This happens every time. I don't recall this in previous moz releases.
Regards,
ng
In the location object and also in the location bar URIs related to a
javascript file do not execute that script in the context of the actual
document like implemented in Netscape 4.x but does destroy the actual
document an display the source text.
This happens independet from the Content-Type
Christopher Jahn wrote:
> And it came to pass that Stewart hector wrote:
>
>
>>Hi
>>
>>I'm using Mozilla (.98) under Linux. How can I make it so
>>when I click on an email link, Mozilla brings up another
>>email program (in my case, KMail)?
>>
>>If this has not been implemented, I suggest that
>> What OS are you using?
>
> His email did say:
>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90;...
>
> So I am guessing Windoze.
Win9x 4.9 is WinME, I believe
--
gav
David Tenser wrote:
>> Any color as long as it's black. BUT YOU CAN USE ALL KINDS OF
>> DIFFERENT SKINS!
>>
>> Oh, well, not really, something like a grand total of SIX at last
>> count [snip]
>
> Yeah, I was amazed by the fact that Mozilla have been around for several
> (?) years, and th
Mike Hatz (Remove the SPAM) wrote:
>
> One of the problems with that is
> that Mozilla (Dunno if NS6 will stomp on it) is that it keeps
> 'unsetting' the default MAPI checkbox for Netscape 4.79 which means that
> I need to check it manually from time to time, if I want to send e-mail
> from m
david avery wrote:
>
> not really - since most of the spam is coming in thru the maillist gateway
> not thru the newsserver
>
>
but the maillist gateway can be filtered, cant it?
for example, kernel.org filters html email.
from http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/lkml/#s3-9:
"Some structur
Hi,
I've look through the archive but couldn't find an answer. I'm on Linux
with Netscape 4.77 and decided to switch over to Mozilla 0.9.8. But upon
running the new upgraded broswer, I realize the URL assiocation such as
telnet://hostname is no longer supported as in netscape 4.7. As I've
quite a
gavin long wrote:
> David Tenser wrote:
>> That's what I'm trying to ask. On my Mozilla, it underlines words
>> starting and ending with _underscores_ ... My question is where that is
>> specified! Are there any CSS file that holds these formatting rules?
>
> I don't know, but this page : http
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
