dman84 wrote:
dman84 wrote:
dman84 wrote:
I'm curious how many talkback reports were generated from this myself,
but it appears to potentially affect anybody running Windows. That's
probably a sizable number. If there's more to it than just the O/S,
like a particular graphics card
dman84 wrote:
this thread has several links for developers to find the crash data
listed.. have a look.
This is the only link you need:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/data/crash-data/
What I find interesting is that the #1 top crasher for the past week is
a bug that was fixed 10 days ago.
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Sören Kuklau wrote:
I wonder why you're still posting in here if you don't want to use
Mozilla
anyways.
On the absolute contrary my Deutchlander friend,
Oh you guessed right, I'm from Germany. Now what?
I
Jonas Jørgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 16 Dec 2001:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Oh look, I just right-clicked in 4.7x's email composer. Guess
what I saw - yep, a CONTEXT MENU! Undo, copy, cut, paste...
they're all there!
Well... there's the
barney wrote:
I'm curious why mozilla is branching with a top crasher bug not yet fixed?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114377
IMO, leaving this bug in 0.9.7 will make it pretty unusable, definitely
degraded, for a lot of Windows users. It's hard to imagine anyone using
a release
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Context menu for HTML message compose window (bug 98608) is
targeted at Mozilla 1.0. It has the nsbeta1+ keyword, meaning that
it has been accepted as a must-fix for the next Netscape release.
Oh my god, you mean, *gasp*, that if they are marked nsbeta1+ that, and
let me try
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Someone has been reading too many Mike Angelo articles.
Don't you mean someone has been reading Mike Angelo's article too many
times?
Ian
Ian Thomas wrote:
topcrash is totally relative - you will always have topcrashers. If you
have a single crasher, then that is a topcrasher.
barney wrote:
I'm not sure I follow you on this, at least in this case. Somebody even
commented in the bug This is a topcrasher with recent MozillaTrunk
Ian Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Btw, this news message was written on Microsoft Outlook Express 6.0 on a
Microsoft Windows XP Professional system. And not with MozillaNews. Why
not?
Because in my opinion,
Am 16.12.2001 19:20 schrieb Sören Kuklau:
I know that they're improving a lot, and I tried it, but it's still not
enough for me to switch. I think I will at Mozilla 1.0.
Outlook Express has so many bugs, especially in the editor... even
Mozillas old Mailstones were superior in that area.
Holger Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Am 16.12.2001 19:20 schrieb Sören Kuklau:
I know that they're improving a lot, and I tried it, but it's still not
enough for me to switch. I think I will at Mozilla 1.0.
Outlook Express has
Ian Thomas wrote:
Someone has been reading too many Mike Angelo articles.
Don't you mean someone has been reading Mike Angelo's article too many
times?
Whatever. Someone has been reading too many of Mike Angelo's articles
too many times :-)
--
/Jonas
DeMoN LaG wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 15 Dec 2001:
Did you ever try Netscape 6.0? That abomination was more bug than
burger, and they let it out the door. If you're asking AOL And
Company how serious a bug has to be to block release,
I'm curious how many talkback reports were generated from this myself,
but it appears to potentially affect anybody running Windows. That's
probably a sizable number. If there's more to it than just the O/S,
like a particular graphics card or something, there's no info on it.
2) How
dman84 wrote:
I'm curious how many talkback reports were generated from this myself,
but it appears to potentially affect anybody running Windows. That's
probably a sizable number. If there's more to it than just the O/S,
like a particular graphics card or something, there's no info on
dman84 wrote:
dman84 wrote:
I'm curious how many talkback reports were generated from this myself,
but it appears to potentially affect anybody running Windows. That's
probably a sizable number. If there's more to it than just the O/S,
like a particular graphics card or something,
AOL and Netscape would be perfectly happy releasing a bitmap image and
calling it a browser.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
barney wrote:
I'm curious why mozilla is branching with a top crasher bug not yet fixed?
bug not yet fixed?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114377
IMO, leaving this bug in 0.9.7 will make it pretty
unusable, definitely degraded, for a lot of Windows users.
It's hard to imagine anyone using a release where you
can't right-click on images or you'll crash.
I wonder why you're still posting in here if you don't want to use Mozilla
anyways.
Your comments are uncalled for, not helping, and just plainly annoying. To
put it shortly, shut up.
(and btw, i know more and more people _using_ Mozilla _on_Win32_, so there
_are_ quite many out there)
JTK
barney wrote:
I'm curious why mozilla is branching with a top crasher bug not yet fixed?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114377
IMO, leaving this bug in 0.9.7 will make it pretty unusable, definitely
degraded, for a lot of Windows users. It's hard to imagine anyone using
a
Christopher Jahn wrote:
Windows 98SE, Mozilla 0.9.6, build 2001112009
I can't make it crash by right-clicking any of the images on the
pages referenced by Bugzilla - I simply get the expected context
menu.
Perhaps it's a flaw in the nightlies?
Absolutely. You're on an old build, so of
Ian Thomas wrote:
barney wrote:
I'm curious why mozilla is branching with a top crasher bug not yet fixed?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114377
That argument about it being a topcrasher doesn't really carry any weight.
topcrash is totally relative - you will always
barney wrote:
barney wrote:
I'm curious why mozilla is branching with a top crasher bug not yet fixed?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114377
Branching doesn't mean they are releasing the 0.97. It means developers
are allowed to keep working on the trunk, adding fixes, features
I'm curious why mozilla is branching with a top crasher bug not yet fixed?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114377
IMO, leaving this bug in 0.9.7 will make it pretty unusable, definitely
degraded, for a lot of Windows users. It's hard to imagine anyone using
a release where you
And it came to pass that barney wrote:
I'm curious why mozilla is branching with a top crasher bug
not yet fixed?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114377
IMO, leaving this bug in 0.9.7 will make it pretty unusable,
definitely degraded, for a lot of Windows users. It's hard
Christopher Jahn wrote:
And it came to pass that barney wrote:
I'm curious why mozilla is branching with a top crasher bug
not yet fixed?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114377
IMO, leaving this bug in 0.9.7 will make it pretty unusable,
definitely degraded, for a lot of
And it came to pass that barney wrote:
Christopher Jahn wrote:
And it came to pass that barney wrote:
I'm curious why mozilla is branching with a top crasher
bug not yet fixed?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114377
IMO, leaving this bug in 0.9.7 will make it pretty
Christopher Jahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 14 Dec 2001:
Until this message pointing to it, I was unaware of the bug. I
use this function a lot with no problems. If it's as endemic
as you say, I would have expected to have heard a lot more
barney wrote:
I'm curious why mozilla is branching with a top crasher bug not yet fixed?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114377
IMO, leaving this bug in 0.9.7 will make it pretty unusable, definitely
degraded, for a lot of Windows users.
Yeah, but how many of them are out
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 15 Dec 2001:
Did you ever try Netscape 6.0? That abomination was more bug than
burger, and they let it out the door. If you're asking AOL And
Company how serious a bug has to be to block release, you couldn't
be
30 matches
Mail list logo
