I've seen those and many others, and of course you can't please
everyone. There are a lot of opinions out there, but we have
professional designers and usability engineers who analyze aggregated
statistical feedback, usability tests, and other hard data, and try to
improve the product
Gervase Markham wrote:
Peter - in your mental model of a good UI process for Mozilla, is there
any circumstance in which the UI decision taken would be one not
corresponding to the view of Netscape's UI team?
That is an EXCELLENT question (and well phrased - wow). I don't want to
say
Peter Trudelle wrote:
Most of the rest are either performance
or usability improvements to existing features
The problem with usability improvements is that people have different
options on good usability (see bugs about going back with backspace,
default for save page is complete web
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Peter Trudelle wrote:
Most of the rest are either performance or usability improvements to
existing features
The problem with usability improvements is that people have different
options on good usability (see bugs about going back with backspace,
default
Daniel Veditz wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Well makes me wonder what's about all those MachV new features though then.
Will they be in Mozilla?! Doesn't this disagree to the Mozilla 1.0 Manifest?
Yes, it does.
Well, nothing like airing dirty laundry, eh Dan? ;-)
In fact, when you guys get
Daniel Veditz wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Well makes me wonder what's about all those MachV new features though then.
Will they be in Mozilla?! Doesn't this disagree to the Mozilla 1.0 Manifest?
Yes, it does.
Unfortunately, I think that these things will be checked into mozilla
anyway.
I have to disagree about the unfortunately part. Have you looked at those
MachV notes? Download Manager, for instance? Sounds pretty cool to me.
Christian Biesinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Daniel Veditz wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
In article 9vqh2h$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sören Kuklau wrote:
I have to disagree about the unfortunately part. Have you looked at those
MachV notes? Download Manager, for instance? Sounds pretty cool to me.
[TOFU quoting snipped]
Unfortunately, features do not spring from programmer's heads
Chris Hoess [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In article 9vqh2h$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sören Kuklau wrote:
I have to disagree about the unfortunately part. Have you looked at
those
MachV notes? Download Manager, for instance? Sounds pretty cool
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrea Monni wrote:
Chris Hoess wrote:
In article 9vqh2h$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sören Kuklau wrote:
I have to disagree about the unfortunately part. Have you looked at those
MachV notes? Download Manager, for instance? Sounds pretty cool to me.
[TOFU quoting
jesus X wrote:
DeMoN LaG wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:3C1D8357.9A8FC357
@hgdjaggd.com, on 17 Dec 2001:
Then shouldn't it be WalkV?
Making IE6 CrawlV?
No, IE6 is the CrashVI (airbags optional, security holes standard).
No, both you guys are WackedV. You're
And it came to pass that JTK wrote:
jesus X wrote:
DeMoN LaG wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:3C1D8357.9A8FC357 @hgdjaggd.com, on 17 Dec 2001:
Then shouldn't it be WalkV?
Making IE6 CrawlV?
No, IE6 is the CrashVI (airbags optional, security holes
standard).
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 17 Dec 2001:
No, both you guys are WackedV. You're going to make fun of IE6
in the areas of speed and stability, two metrics by which IE6
inarguably beats the living crappola out of Mozilla? CUC-KOO!
CUC-KOO!
DeMoN LaG wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 17 Dec 2001:
No, both you guys are WackedV. You're going to make fun of IE6
in the areas of speed and stability, two metrics by which IE6
inarguably beats the living crappola out of Mozilla?
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Just (very) curious ... What is MachV to Mozilla/Netscape???
for instance mentioned here:
http://mozilla.org/xpapps/MachVPlan/MachV_NavPlan.html
I think it's the code name for Netscape 6.5.
On which milestone will it be based on?
Andrea
--
Andrea Monni
In article 9vl90q$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sören Kuklau wrote:
Probably then one which is recent around one and a half months before the
release. (ex.: Netscape 6.5 / MachV gets released in April = Mozilla
0.9.8 was released in February = Netscape 6.5 is based on
open-source-only-release Mozilla
st (very) curious ... What is MachV to Mozilla/Netscape???
for instance mentioned here:
http://mozilla.org/xpapps/MachVPlan/MachV_NavPlan.html
I think it's the code name for Netscape 6.5.
On which milestone will it be based on?
Andrea
--
Andrea Monni [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is our choice
Well makes me wonder what's about all those MachV new features though then.
Will they be in Mozilla?! Doesn't this disagree to the Mozilla 1.0 Manifest?
Chris Hoess [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In article 9vl90q$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sören
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Well makes me wonder what's about all those MachV new features though then.
Will they be in Mozilla?! Doesn't this disagree to the Mozilla 1.0 Manifest?
Yes, it does.
Just (very) curious ... What is MachV to Mozilla/Netscape???
for instance mentioned here:
http://mozilla.org/xpapps/MachVPlan/MachV_NavPlan.html
--
Regards,
Peter Lairo
Peter Lairo wrote:
Just (very) curious ... What is MachV to Mozilla/Netscape???
for instance mentioned here:
http://mozilla.org/xpapps/MachVPlan/MachV_NavPlan.html
I think it's the code name for Netscape 6.5.
--
/Jonas
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Peter Lairo wrote:
Just (very) curious ... What is MachV to Mozilla/Netscape???
for instance mentioned here:
http://mozilla.org/xpapps/MachVPlan/MachV_NavPlan.html
I think it's the code name for Netscape 6.5.
Then shouldn't it be WalkV?
Hehhehe, I still
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:3C1D8357.9A8FC357
@hgdjaggd.com, on 17 Dec 2001:
Then shouldn't it be WalkV?
Making IE6 CrawlV?
--
ICQ: N/A (temporarily)
AIM: FlyersR1 9
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ = m
23 matches
Mail list logo
