Re: [Mpls] Bad Bet

2005-10-06 Thread wmmarks

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Wizard Marks bets:

My bet is that four or five days before the November election, the FBI
will put an indictment on the table. Any takers?

I'd take that bet, but since the FBI never brings indictments, I'll give 
Wizard a break. This one is pretty much up to the US Attorney to do.
 


Off line, one person weighed in with two weeks. Any other suggestions?


WizardMarks, Central


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

 



REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Stone Arch Bridge for Rent

2005-10-06 Thread Shawne FitzGerald
I only caught part of the MPRB meeting tonight but that section 
included, incredibly, a committee considering shutting down the Stone 
Arch Bridge and W River Road (the plank road), just south of the old 
Whitney Hotel, to the public for private rentals at a rate of 
$1000-$1500.  Not sure how much time the fee covers.  Also, from what I 
saw, rental of these spaces would not be available to local residents, 
especially not for weddings, nor local businesses, unions or clubs 
except for the Mill City Museum (MHS).  Rental of these sites would be 
open to conventions - and staff was working with GMVCA.  During rentals, 
a pedestrian path would remain open for bikers, runners, walkers, 
tourists, guided tours, trolleys?, etc.


Staff has already chosen a private caterer to initially receive an 
exclusive three year trial contract to cater all events on the Stone 
Arch Bridge and the Plank/W River Road.  When asked if this was a no-bid 
contract, staff sort of dodged the answer but said that staff prefers 
that only a single caterer receive the contract.


Comm. Young sought to clarify and amend the staff proposal.  She was 
shut down with an accusation of micromanagement.  Comm. Erwin opposed 
the proposal. 

This proposal passed out of committee with Young and Erwin opposed and 
Berry Graves, Dziedzic, and Hauser in favor.  I believe the proposal 
will go before full MPRB board at the next meeting.


Some commissioner suggested contacting immediate neighbors about this 
proposal.  That suggestion went nowhere.  I don't recall any 
commissioners insisting that the proposal be submitted to local 
neighborhood groups, or advertised, or to be reviewed by a CAC.  (I 
suggest that changing these sites from transportation and/or historic 
preservation/interpretation to shutting out the general public so as to 
assist the GMVCA with recruiting conventions is a major shift in use - 
one that requires reviews of earlier contracts with grantors who 
provided development funds for the Stone Arch and West River Road, so a 
citizen study/review committee seems in order.) 

Since I only saw a portion of the MPRB meeting without my full 
attention, I welcome corrections and clarification.


Shawne FitzGerald
Powderhorn






REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Stone Arch Bridge for Rent

2005-10-06 Thread Christine Viken
I'm glad to hear someone else's comments on the Oct. 5 Park Board Meeting. 
It all seemed so incredible that I was beginning to doubt my senses.

Yes, they were talking about renting out the STONE ARCH BRIDGE for maybe 
$1000 - $1500!

Now, being in the business of renting out spaces for events (Van Dusen 
Center, 1900 La Salle in Mpls.), I know at least something about the 
subject. Any of our three buildings rent for $1200 on a Friday or Saturday.

I believe they said an event would require the time of two Park Police. And 
then there's clean-up. Plus the area would likely be shut down for 24 hour 
periods.

In other words, they'd be hardpressed to break even at those prices. 

Of course it's the public's resources that they'd be renting out, and likely 
only for big special events like those of the GMVCC that promote Minneapolis.

I didn't realize that the Minneapolis Park System is a service to underwrite 
the efforts of the Convention Center. Silly deluded me.

CM Berry Graves questioned the whole thing, also pointing out that they were 
moving ahead without citizen input. In this case, it affects all the city's 
citizens, plus very specifically the residents along W. River Parkway.

Don't tell me that ..., she asked repeatedly, as they proceeded with the 
usual modus operandi: staff comes forward with a proposal that presents 
shallow information that only supports a pre-selected course of action.

It's unclear if the staff is running the show by presenting such selective 
info. or whether there are those on the board who are working with them 
and advisors from private enterprise.

Staff said one caterer was chosen who offered the largest percentage of 
proceeds. However, that info. is really meaningless without the entire 
context, as 15% of a low cost caterer's proceeds may net significantly lower 
amounts than 10% from a high-end caterer.

Just what criteria and what business analysis is being offered here?

In this day of budget shortfalls, privatization must be considered out of 
necessity. But this rush to privatize our public park resources is being 
handled without any real cost/return analysis, let alone an opportunity for 
the impacted public to weigh in.

I'm so glad that there are these public broadcasts. It means I don't have to 
buy movie tickets to experience incredible chills and absolutely frightening 
scenarios.

Christine Viken
Loring Heights-Stevens Square
 
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 02:35:55 -0500, Shawne FitzGerald wrote
 I only caught part of the MPRB meeting tonight but that section 
 included, incredibly, a committee considering shutting down the 
 Stone Arch Bridge and W River Road (the plank road), just south of 
 the old Whitney Hotel, to the public for private rentals at a rate 
 of $1000-$1500.  Not sure how much time the fee covers.  Also, from 
 what I saw, rental of these spaces would not be available to local 
 residents, especially not for weddings, nor local businesses, unions 
 or clubs except for the Mill City Museum (MHS).  Rental of these 
 sites would be open to conventions - and staff was working with 
 GMVCA.  During rentals, a pedestrian path would remain open for 
 bikers, runners, walkers, tourists, guided tours, trolleys?, etc.
 
 Staff has already chosen a private caterer to initially receive an 
 exclusive three year trial contract to cater all events on the Stone 
 Arch Bridge and the Plank/W River Road.  When asked if this was a no-
 bid contract, staff sort of dodged the answer but said that staff 
 prefers that only a single caterer receive the contract.
 
 Comm. Young sought to clarify and amend the staff proposal.  She was 
 shut down with an accusation of micromanagement.  Comm. Erwin 
 opposed the proposal.
 
 This proposal passed out of committee with Young and Erwin opposed 
 and Berry Graves, Dziedzic, and Hauser in favor.  I believe the 
 proposal will go before full MPRB board at the next meeting.
 
 Some commissioner suggested contacting immediate neighbors about 
 this proposal.  That suggestion went nowhere.  I don't recall any 
 commissioners insisting that the proposal be submitted to local 
 neighborhood groups, or advertised, or to be reviewed by a CAC.  (I 
 suggest that changing these sites from transportation and/or 
 historic preservation/interpretation to shutting out the general 
 public so as to assist the GMVCA with recruiting conventions is a 
 major shift in use - one that requires reviews of earlier contracts 
 with grantors who provided development funds for the Stone Arch and 
 West River Road, so a citizen study/review committee seems in order.)
 
 Since I only saw a portion of the MPRB meeting without my full 
 attention, I welcome corrections and clarification.
 
 Shawne FitzGerald
 Powderhorn
 
 
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the 

Re: [Mpls] Stone Arch Bridge for Rent

2005-10-06 Thread WLDJ36
Would the Park Board candidates (or their supporters) for specific  districts 
and at-large comment on this proposal and the discussion/proposal for  a 
mini-mall on the South end of Lake Calhoun. 
 
Bill Dooley
Kenny
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re[Mpls]: Stone Arch Bridge for rent.

2005-10-06 Thread Fredric Markus
Good for you, Shawne and Christine, for giving us more news on the shock and
dismay front in re the outlandish Parks situation. 

There's precedent for renting facilities in the parks but IMHO this is a
special case because the bridge links major sections of the Historic
District.  

Should the Library Board rent out the facilities that they oversee? Not just
a room or an auditorium, but whole locations? Might not the City of
Minneapolis find creative ways to justify renting out City Hall from time to
time?  

What else have we got in the public's hands that can be used to turn a dime
here and there? 

Somebody should reel these guys in before we have nothing left for the
public's use and enjoyment! 
 
Fred Markus, Phillips West

REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: Re[Mpls]: Stone Arch Bridge for rent.

2005-10-06 Thread David Brauer

On Oct 6, 2005, at 8:40 AM, Fredric Markus wrote:



Should the Library Board rent out the facilities that they oversee?  
Not just

a room or an auditorium, but whole locations? Might not the City of
Minneapolis find creative ways to justify renting out City Hall  
from time to

time?


They just started renting out City Hall for weddings last month. I  
don't think you get the whole building, though.


Frankly, doing wedding rental seems like a good idea to me. Of  
course, you wouldn't want it to shut off parts of the building the  
public needs access to. As described, the Stone Arch and Plank Road  
projects sound like they would shut off such access.


David Brauer
Kingfield 
REMINDERS:

1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Dyna Sluter posts: Long before we heard of E85, over a decade ago, under

2005-10-06 Thread Steve Brandt
Dyna Sluter posts:  Long before we heard of E85, over a decade ago, under 
Peter's leadership Hennepin County trucks were testbeds for ethanol. 

Brandt: Credit, or blame depending on your point of view, for getting the 
Hennepin County fleet on ethanol should go to the incomparable John Derus, who 
served on the County Board through 1992.  

Here's an excerpt from a story I wrote in 1990, the year that Peter was elected 
a commissioner:   Since Derus persuaded Hennepin County in 1983 to convert its 
gasoline-powered vehicles to an ethanol blend, it has consumed 1.5 million 
gallons of the fuel and put more than 20 million miles on a fleet of 280 
vehicles.   Or as the Mankato Free Press once famously put it: Wherever two 
or more people gather in the name of ethanol, Derus is there among them.  

Peter may have expanded this, but it was Derus who got the fleet going on 
ethanol.

Steve Brandt
Kingfield


REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] addendum to Steve Brandt

2005-10-06 Thread Ed Felien
Steve might have further added that it was the incomparable John Derus who
perpetually touted light rail to the point of tedium, and credit for
engineering the partnerships that inevitably produced the Hiawatha Line
should go to him.

Ed Felien
Powderhorn

REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Commissioner Hauser joins park reform movemenet

2005-10-06 Thread Jason C Stone

http://swjournal.com/articles/2005/09/23/opinion/opinion02.txt

Letters

'No' vote on Fort

I appreciated the article on the proposed Fort development at Ft. Snelling 
(Aug. 15-28). I voted
against this project. Though the project seemed to fill a recreational need, I 
was concerned that
the developer appeared to be a shell company, without assets to provide 
security.

Further, the contract's length was too great for the uncertain nature of the 
project and renewable
at the option of the developer.

My concerns have, unfortunately, been substantiated. I am disappointed that 
The Fort has been
such a problem.

Marie Hauser, Park Commissioner, District 3, City Council candidate, 8th Ward





Jason Stone
Diamond Lake
Candidate for Park District 5
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Bad Bet

2005-10-06 Thread WJKAHN
Wizard Marks posted this bet on Monday (exchange pasted below); I'm uncertain 
what she means by this two weeks statement unless someone suggested that 
the FBI would indict Dean Zimmerman two weeks before the election. Now 
hopefully 
when one practices brevity in posts, it results in some bit of clarity; but I 
guess I gotta blather on a bit. My brief point was that the FBI has nothing 
to do with indictments other than provide the evidence needed for the US 
Attorney to make them; one can assume that Tom Heffelfinger will act in a 
partisan 
way (I don't understand such an assumption) and bring in an indictment days 
before an election: that is what Wizard may have meant to bet and did not. 

Certainly if a US Attorney indicted Zimmerman, in any Administration but 
Dubya's, he would be handing in his resignation letter afterwards should it be 
based on what has been publicized to date. Hefflefinger is either going to make 
a 
better case and indict, or let this thing ferment a while before he attempts 
to dispose of the matter in the quietest possible way. I'd bet on the latter, 
if I were that sort of a gambler (I play MN State Lottery numbers games a bit 
and if I'm near a casino, I might pop in and drop a few bucks here and there 
on my way to the buffet). A safer bet might be that the matter fizzles after 
being bounced back to 'whatever' local authority, (Fair Campaign Practices 
Committee or something; I profess my ignorance of it for the moment), for some 
minor infraction of campaign law resulting in a fine and/or warning before or 
after the election, but I'm hoping that US Attorneys have better things to do 
in 
this time of War and other calamities and that Wizard loses the bet that she 
meant to make.

A progressive can only hope that if Dubya's Dept. of Justice is throwing the 
legal equivalent of flaming bags of dog doo on local elections around the 
country, Republicans will go down in elections to come for a long, long time.

Bill Kahn
holding tightly to my money in Prospect Park

In a message dated 10/6/05 1:31:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Wizard Marks bets:
 
 My bet is that four or five days before the November election, the FBI
 will put an indictment on the table. Any takers?
 
 I'd take that bet, but since the FBI never brings indictments, I'll give
 Wizard a break. This one is pretty much up to the US Attorney to do.
  
 
 Off line, one person weighed in with two weeks. Any other suggestions?
 
 WizardMarks, Central
 

REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] addendum to Steve Brandt

2005-10-06 Thread Steve Brandt
Steve might have further added that it was the incomparable John Derus who
perpetually touted light rail to the point of tedium, and credit for
engineering the partnerships that inevitably produced the Hiawatha Line
should go to him.

Ed Felien
Powderhorn

Good point, Ed.  I did.  See below:


Paper: STAR TRIBUNE (Mpls.-St. Paul) Newspaper of the Twin Cities
Headline: Derus' drive helped put light rail on the map // Working at the 
county level, he set the stage for today's Hiawatha groundbreaking.
Date: 01/17/01
Section: NEWS
Page: 01A
Edition: METRO
Byline: Steve Brandt; Staff Writer
Graphic: PHOTO
Length: 18.0
Subject: article;history;government;mass transit;building;profile
Keys: john derus
Slug: LRT17X

 
   When the speeches are made today to mark the groundbreaking of 
the Twin Cities area's first light-rail project, John Derus doesn't 
plan to be there. Nobody invited him.   But it's arguable that no other public 
official did more in the 
long run to put urban rail transit on the radar of policymakers and 
the populace.   Derus' efforts started when he became a Minneapolis alderman in 
1971 and continued informally even after he left the Hennepin 
County Board 21 1/2 years later. He'd speak three or four times in 
some weeks to service clubs like the Kiwanis, extolling the virtues 
of rail transit.   Walk into his office during the heyday of the county's 
light-rail 
planning, and he'd peddle it like a kid beseeching Santa for an 
electric train. If there was a map handy, he'd extemporize routes 
through the metro area and beyond, with trains linking Duluth and 
Mankato or St. Cloud and Rochester.   He and his County Board allies forced the 
issue onto the metro 
agenda, lobbying with rural counties for a 1981 law that allowed 
counties to preserve abandoned rail lines. Hennepin County snapped 
up such lines, leading other metro counties into a lobbying effort 
that metro and state officials had to co-opt to control.   The irony is that 
Derus won the war even though he lost his 
biggest battle. Light-rail transit is getting built. But counties 
are no longer in the driver's seat. Counties by themselves couldn't 
persuade the Legislature to appropriate the money.   Some legislators said the 
obstacle was Derus himself. He had 
statewide political ambitions, and he made no secret of his scorn 
for those he viewed as too small-minded to see rail's virtues. Some 
legislators opposed rail as long as Derus was its prime force.   Some people 
would manipulate the law, he said recently. They'd 
say you need another feasibility study, another 
environmental-impact statement.   The tide began to turn five years years 
after Derus left office 
in 1993. First, Curt Johnson, a longtime rail skeptic who was then 
Metropolitan Council chairman, reversed his position. Then Gov. 
Arne Carlson softened his stance. And Carlson's successor, Jesse 
Ventura, became a cheerleader for running light-rail through his 
old south Minneapolis neighborhood.   .   A long interest   The love affair 
between Derus and urban rail transit began early. 
During World War II, with men overseas, his mother, Josephine, 
became one of the first motorettes, women who drove streetcars 
for the Twin City Rapid Transit Co. When her baby-sitters fell 
through, she'd tote along preschooler John and his siblings to ride 
with her. The smell of coal burning in the potbellied stoves that 
heated streetcars, the whoosh of the cars' air doors and the hours 
with his mother loom large in Derus' memory.   Later, she helped him find work 
at a diner near the northeast 
Minneapolis streetcar barn. Starting at 4 a.m., he mopped floors 
and served eye-opening coffee to his mother and her fellow drivers 
before he headed off to school.   Years later, when Gov. Rudy Perpich signed a 
light-rail bill at 
the Lake Harriet streetcar, Derus made sure his mother was on hand. 
She gave Perpich lessons in driving a streetcar. He almost put us 
through the window, Derus recalled.   The rail system that will be built won't 
have the downtown 
Minneapolis tunnel Derus long sought as a means of making it 
faster. But the imminent driving of spikes for his cherished 
public-works project, one he describes as an idea that's come and 
gone and come again, makes him a happy man. A lot of people have 
worked hard on it, he said.   And he has no hard feelings about not being 
invited today. I'm 
not in that loop anymore, he said.


Steve Brandt
Star Tribune
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post 

[Mpls] In Ballot Box: Random notes on last night's mayoral debate

2005-10-06 Thread Craig Cox

In Ballot Box: Random notes on last night's mayoral debate

Go to: http://www.mplsobserver.com/ballot_box
--
Craig Cox
Founder/Editor
The Minneapolis Observer
www.mplsobserver.com
612/721-0285

Support the independent media! Pick up your neighborhood newspaper!
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: Re[Mpls]: Stone Arch Bridge for rent.

2005-10-06 Thread David Shove
Their next project is to rent out all the air in Minneapolis, but only for
60 to 90 minutes at a time, and only now and then, so not to worry.

Think of all the money the private sector could make selling oxygen masks!
Clearly, having air as a public commons resource is a direct affront to
the spirit of capitalism, free enterprise, individual inititative, and all
that has made America what it is today!

Or would you rather get your inferior air from the nanny city? Hmm? Hmm?

I won't feel good until I'm dropping a quarter into the meter for the next
10 minutes of air. As for what happens to the poor people and the animals,
who needs them?

--David Shove
Roseville


On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, David Brauer wrote:

 On Oct 6, 2005, at 8:40 AM, Fredric Markus wrote:
 
 
  Should the Library Board rent out the facilities that they oversee?
  Not just
  a room or an auditorium, but whole locations? Might not the City of
  Minneapolis find creative ways to justify renting out City Hall
  from time to
  time?

 They just started renting out City Hall for weddings last month. I
 don't think you get the whole building, though.

 Frankly, doing wedding rental seems like a good idea to me. Of
 course, you wouldn't want it to shut off parts of the building the
 public needs access to. As described, the Stone Arch and Plank Road
 projects sound like they would shut off such access.

 David Brauer
 Kingfield
 REMINDERS:
 1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. 
 If you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

 For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
 For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
 

 Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
 E-Democracy
 Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
 Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Dyna Sluter posts: Long before we heard of E85, over a decade ago, under

2005-10-06 Thread Matty Lang

While experiencing this thread I'll urge list members to make sure to think 
about the example it uses:  E85 and Hybrid automobiles.  

 

I'm not the first to pose the question, but is the road to Hell paved with 
Hybrid automobiles?  I believe it was John Tierney writing in the NY Times a 
couple of months ago about California opening up HOV lanes to Hybrid vehicles 
who worded the thought so well.  

 

Automobiles have dominated human lives for such a short period of time.  Let's 
not fall into the trap of thinking that bettering a wrong-headed infrastructure 
switch (away from rail to automobiles) is the answer.  E85 and Hybrid vehicles 
could just prolong the use of fossil fuels alowing the fossil fuel and auto 
industries to eek out a lot more profit and a bit more life before their 
inevitable collapse.  All resulting in the same amount of fuel burned and 
emmissions emitted just over a longer period of time.  

 

Let's stop the building of freeways to nowhere and continue building trains to 
nowhere (except high levels of ridership).  Then we can focus on that pesky 
electric grid--it's really not that complicated.  Maybe Minneapolis should add 
a municiple power grid along side a municiple Wi-Fi network.  I realize this is 
in stark contrast to the direction our State leaders are currently pointing us. 
 Will our potential city leaders chart a similar course?  

 

Matty Lang, Central 



-
Yahoo! for Good
 Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. 
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Dirty tricks...

2005-10-06 Thread George Janssen
Anyone betting there will be dirty tricks shortly before the November election 
could not be charged with gambling.  It's a sure thing.  A lock.

  

For 40 years, since that upstart Charles Stenvig an independent, defeated the 
powerful DFL candidate for mayor, any Independent, Green, Republican or minor 
DFL'r who became too powerful or close to the money, has been squashed by any 
means necessary to assure his/her defeat.

 

Does anyone really believe it was necessary or even prudent to exercise a 
federal search warrant of a sitting council person five days before a primary 
election?  If evidence and justice were truly being sought, a search AFTER the 
election would most certainly result in more incriminating evidence.  If the 
council person was the primary winner and he was influenced by bribes, those 
seeking favors would be lined up with cash in hand.  Indisputable proof of his 
guilt.  This was not the case.  Why would professional, experienced 
investigators jeopardize their case with premature public knowledge of their 
investigation?

  

Look to those who would gain by eliminating a Green candidate.  His opponent? 
Sure.  All other candidates being opposed by Greens, by implication?  Sure.  
The sitting mayor's opponent, again by implication?  Sure.   Would any of these 
be privy to the FBI's investigation, doughtful?  Would any of these be powerful 
enough to influence the timing of the execution of a Federal search warrant?  
No...who would?

 

As a professional courtesy, many times when a Federal investigation is 
underway, the local law enforcement agencies are advised.  Would the 
Minneapolis police chief be advised?  Not likely.  Too close to the mayor.  Too 
close to the subject.  Would the Hennepin County sheriff be advised?  Possibly, 
but what would he, with a job for life, gain by suggesting the timing of the 
execution of a search warrant on a Minneapolis politician?   How about the 
Hennepin County Attorney?  What would she gain?  Nothing, as the HC Attorney 
but how about in running for a higher, federal office?  It would be far more 
helpful to her to be guaranteed the endorsement of a newly elected Minneapolis 
mayor and former Hennepin County Commissioner than a possible, lukewarm, 
endorsement by the incumbent mayor who fell in disfavor with the DFL machine 
when he upset their darling, Sharon.

I merely offer this scenario as a topic for discussion.  It certainly makes 
more sense than believing two FBI agents sat around saying to each other, 
let's have a little fun with the Minneapolis primary election and execute this 
search warrant just before the election.   

 

George Janssen

Longfellow
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Bad Bet

2005-10-06 Thread wmmarks

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Wizard Marks posted this bet on Monday (exchange pasted below); I'm uncertain 
what she means by this two weeks statement unless someone suggested that 
the FBI would indict Dean Zimmerman two weeks before the election. 

OK. My bet was that five days (the Thursday) before the election, the US 
Atty, Heffelfinger, would indict Zimmermann. Another person, off list, 
said the indictment would come down two weeks before the November 
election. You say you're taking the bet because you expect Heffelfinger 
to let an indictment slide into oblivion, based on the affidavit 
presented on Tilsen's blog. OK.
I'll add to that that if the US Atty does indict, Zimmermann will win 
handily.



WizardMarks, Central


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

 



REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] No Special Session for Twins Stadium

2005-10-06 Thread WLDJ36
Political reporter Pat Kessler is reporting the governor and legislative  
leaders have agreed to a one-day special session: Gophers Stadium and Maple  
Grove Hospital only. No Twins or Vikings Stadium. I guess the Twins are very  
upset since they claim their proposal has no state money. Could it be the Las  
Vegas or Monterrey Twins?
 
Bill Dooley
Kenny
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Minneapolis election links and important online discussions - Invite others today

2005-10-06 Thread Steven Clift

This is a short message to pass on about the Minneapolis Issues Forum 
and the Mpls2005 election information directory.  Pass it on today. 

As a forum member, your recommendation to your friends to join this 
forum and visit the election links web site is key to engaging more 
Minneapolitans in this important election season.


Join the Minneapolis Issues Forum
-
** http://e-democracy.org/mpls **

The forum is an active discussion of local issues this election 
season and beyond. Launched in 1998 and facilitated for civility, 
this forum is the world's largest city-wide online public issues 
forum.

To subscribe, visit:

http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Or e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Cast an Informed Vote, Visit Candidate and Civic Election Websites
--
** http://e-democracy.org/mpls2005 **

With the help of scores of Minneapolis Issues Forum members, the most 
comprehensive collection of local election links we've ever collected 
is now online.  

Who is running for the Minneapolis Dog Catcher?

It includes links right down the ballot to races you often don't know 
exist until you are in the voting booth:

- Minneapolis candidates for Mayor 
- Minneapolis City Council candidates 
- Minneapolis Park, Library, and Estimate board candidates 

... as well as other non-partisan, government, and media links and an 
election calendar you can edit.

Visit Mpls2005 today:

   http://e-democracy.org/mpls2005



Spread the word about the forum and election information website by 
sharing this message with friends, by passing it on to e-mail lists, 
and by linking to it from other election-related websites.

Thanks,

Steven Clift
Board Chair, E-Democracy.Org

^   ^   ^^
Steven L. Clift-   -  -  W: http://publicus.net
Minneapolis-   -   -  -   E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota  -   -   -   -   -   - T: +1.612.822.8667
USA-   -   -   - Skype/MSN/Y!/AIM: netclift

Join Democracies Online: http://dowire.org
Start an Issues Forum: http://e-democracy.org/if

REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Re: Minneapolis election links and important online discussions - Invite others today

2005-10-06 Thread Steven Clift

Hey campaigns, 

Please add a link to http://e-democracy.org/mpls2005 to help your 
site visitors navigate all the online election resources available.  
You'll get kudos for not being a dead end site. And while you could 
boldly link directly to your opponents website, with a link to our 
non-partisan starting point you'll demonstrate the confidence to 
allow voters to compare your message with others.

Also, candidates are encouraged to mention the Minneapolis Issues 
Forum http://e-democracy.org/mpls and the election web site via their 
e-mail newsletters.  The more of your supporters who participate in 
the forum the better.  And when the election is over, whether you've 
won or lost, you can take credit for helping expand the voice of 
citizens in our community's agenda-setting process!

Thanks,
Steven Clift
E-Democracy.Org

P.S. Please let me know when you campaign adds a link and/or mentions 
the forum to your supporters.  I'll put together a list of small d 
democracy thank you's down the road for the forum.


^   ^   ^^
Steven L. Clift-   -  -  W: http://publicus.net
Minneapolis-   -   -  -   E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota  -   -   -   -   -   - T: +1.612.822.8667
USA-   -   -   - Skype/MSN/Y!/AIM: netclift

Join Democracies Online: http://dowire.org
Start an Issues Forum: http://e-democracy.org/if

REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Dyna Sluter posts: Long before we heard of E85, over a decade ago, under

2005-10-06 Thread WJKAHN
Rybak or McLaughlin: both will see that new unsustainable boondoggles 
(sports stadia and lots more roads) are built while vital sustainable 
infrastructure, education,, shelter and health issues are neglected. We 
need to go in a radically different direction than we are. Neither of the 
DFL endorsed candidates understand this. Neither will set a new course for 
Minneapolis. Same old same old, says Gary Hoover.

For example, our local politicians dutifully refuse, says Hoover, and 
our local politicians carefully refuse., he says again and again and 
again that they refuse.

I suspect that every human culture on earth has been unsustainable right up 
to the present day; it has been one resource after another exhausted as we 
adopt newer technologies to exploit and exhaust the next. Native Americans 
wiped 
out an older and larger species of American Bison thousands of years before 
European immigrants came and nearly wiped out the current species; the record 
for 
similar patterns on other continents is clear. Population blooms as Hoover 
calls them, are not limited to the last few centuries we have been using 
fossil fuels, but they did used to resemble the predator/prey population graphs 
of 
scientists studying animals other than humans more; except that after periods 
of starving following depletion of a given resource with a studied MO or the 
occassional draught, humans eventually figure out how to move on to the next 
instead of dying out.

The idea that sustainable technologies and sustainable lifeways are the 
exclusive domain of the American Green Party is ludicrous. We have been moving 
in 
that direction with Two Party domination in the last half century in this 
country long before there was an active US Green Party; but I believe it began 
to 
fall apart with the appearance of the Greens. The dismantling of our 
environmental protections by the Dubya Administration paralleled by Pawlenty at 
our 
state level would not have been possible without the rants of Greens helping to 
oust the moderate and progressive politicians of both Democratic and Republican 
Parties who made them possible (not to discount God, Guns, and Gays rhetoric 
of the Right). Greens, as the Palestinians were want to do, are snatching 
defeat from the jaws of victory.

While it is true in the many posts of this thread that neither the mayor nor 
Peter McLaughlin can claim all the credit for every good environmental policy 
of Minneapolis or Hennepin County government (but RT tries all the same), the 
same is also true in assigning blame for the failures of our government. 
Hybrids are not the future. Both hybrid technology and biofuels are stop gap 
measures to reach cleaner and more sustainable transportation technology on the 
horizon; the laws of thermodynamics don't change 'cause you burn ethanol 
fermented 
from corn and distilled, or oil from soy. You probably can't manufacture and 
maintain bicycles without fossil fuels right now, same for planes, trains, and 
autombiles. And I wish I knew just what sustainable urban infrastructure, 
as Hoover calls it, looked like. I know I've been involved with efforts in 
Minneapolis to use recycled materials and energy effiecient technology and 
solar 
where it makes sense in new construction and plans to recycle that construction 
when the time comes, as it always does unless it becomes historically 
significant for some reason. 

Let Greens like Hoover peddle peace and sustainable urban infrastructure, but 
the people who need to buy the former are not interested, the latter is 
gobbledegook, and I refuse to listen anymore.

Bill Kahn
taking my turn to rant in Prospect Park
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] No Special Session for Twins Stadium

2005-10-06 Thread Eva Young

At 04:18 PM 10/6/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Political reporter Pat Kessler is reporting the governor and legislative
leaders have agreed to a one-day special session: Gophers Stadium and Maple
Grove Hospital only. No Twins or Vikings Stadium. I guess the Twins are very
upset since they claim their proposal has no state money. Could it be the 
Las

Vegas or Monterrey Twins?



Yup, the Twins proposal consists of sticking it to Hennepin County 
Taxpayers.  It really torks me off when outstate legislators feel that it's 
a nice free vote to raise Hennepin County sales taxes.  If the Twins are a 
statewide resource, the state should be stepping up to the plate on this.


Why can't the Twins spend the $ they are spending on lobbying the 
legislature to do a full court press of business - if this is such a good 
deal, the business community would be the appropriate folks to step up to 
the plate - rather than the taxpayers.


Former legislator John Jordan on his blog talks about wanting to tar and 
feather stadium opponent John Knight.



Eva Young
Near North
Minneapolis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Lloydletta's Nooz
http://lloydletta.blogspot.com
Dump Michele Bachmann
http://dumpbachmann.blogspot.com

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.

Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759,
US author, diplomat, inventor, physicist, politician,  printer (1706 - 1790)
http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/1381.html  



REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Out of Office auto-reply Re: Mpls Digest, Vol 22, Issue 11

2005-10-06 Thread matthew
I am out of the office until Monday 10/10/05.  I will receive your message then 
and reply as soon as I can.  Thanks.  

Matthew


REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Commissioner Hauser joins park reform movemenet

2005-10-06 Thread Eva Young

At 10:19 AM 10/6/2005, Jason C Stone wrote:


http://swjournal.com/articles/2005/09/23/opinion/opinion02.txt

Letters

'No' vote on Fort

I appreciated the article on the proposed Fort development at Ft. 
Snelling (Aug. 15-28). I voted
against this project. Though the project seemed to fill a recreational 
need, I was concerned that
the developer appeared to be a shell company, without assets to provide 
security.


Further, the contract's length was too great for the uncertain nature of 
the project and renewable

at the option of the developer.

My concerns have, unfortunately, been substantiated. I am disappointed 
that The Fort has been

such a problem.

Marie Hauser, Park Commissioner, District 3, City Council candidate, 8th Ward


Marie Hauser is VERY defensive about her appalling Park Board record.  That 
was evident at the SW Journal/Southside Pride forum before the primary.



Eva Young
Near North
Minneapolis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Lloydletta's Nooz
http://lloydletta.blogspot.com
Dump Michele Bachmann
http://dumpbachmann.blogspot.com

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.

Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759,
US author, diplomat, inventor, physicist, politician,  printer (1706 - 1790)
http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/1381.html  



REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] The Twins Deserve a Special Session most of all

2005-10-06 Thread athmpsn77
It doesnt sound dead yet.  The original poster jumped the gun... Hopefully they 
can come to some agreement on this and get a deal done, its not the state, what 
do they care?  It sounds like the only way its ever going to happen...saying 
the Twins should do it themselves is all well and good, its just never going to 
happen.
 
The Hennepin County Commissioners voted to raise the sales tax (if they 
Legislature will permit)...out-state legislators have nothing to do with it.  I 
support the Commissioners who passed the measure.
 
I look forward to going to a new downtown Mpls ballpark.
Anthony Thompson
Standish
 

-Original Message-
From: Eva Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mpls@mnforum.org
Sent: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 23:09:54 -0500
Subject: Re: [Mpls] No Special Session for Twins Stadium


At 04:18 PM 10/6/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
Political reporter Pat Kessler is reporting the governor and legislative 
leaders have agreed to a one-day special session: Gophers Stadium and Maple 
Grove Hospital only. No Twins or Vikings Stadium. I guess the Twins are very 
upset since they claim their proposal has no state money. Could it be the Las 
Vegas or Monterrey Twins? 
 
 
Yup, the Twins proposal consists of sticking it to Hennepin County Taxpayers. 
It really torks me off when outstate legislators feel that it's a nice free 
vote to raise Hennepin County sales taxes. If the Twins are a statewide 
resource, the state should be stepping up to the plate on this. 
 
Why can't the Twins spend the $ they are spending on lobbying the legislature 
to do a full court press of business - if this is such a good deal, the 
business community would be the appropriate folks to step up to the plate - 
rather than the taxpayers. 
 
Former legislator John Jordan on his blog talks about wanting to tar and 
feather stadium opponent John Knight. 
 
Eva Young 
Near North 
Minneapolis 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
Lloydletta's Nooz 
http://lloydletta.blogspot.com 
Dump Michele Bachmann 
http://dumpbachmann.blogspot.com 
 
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety 
deserve neither liberty nor safety. 
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759, 
US author, diplomat, inventor, physicist, politician,  printer (1706 - 1790) 
http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/1381.html  
REMINDERS: 
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. 
 
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html 
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract 
 
 
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy 
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org 
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls 
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Wirth Hiouse -Free Public Tours - YOUR INVITATION

2005-10-06 Thread Joan Berthiaume
Please join Theodore J. Wirth (Grandson) and the Minneapolis Parks Legacy 
Society for a free public tour 
of the historic Theodore Wirth Home and Administration Building 
Saturday, October 8
Noon to 4 PM (arrive by 3 PM if you want a complete tour)
3954 Bryant Avenue South in Lyndale Farmstead Park

 Theodore Wirth's home, office and drafting room will come alive again from 
noon to 4 PM, on Saturday, October 8.  You will be greeted by Wirth's grandson 
and namesake, Theodore J. Wirth and the Minneapolis Parks Legacy Society. 

Located in Lyndale Farmstead Park, at 3954 Bryant Avenue South, the home was 
built for Wirth by the Minneapolis Board of Park Commissioners as a result of 
negotiations that lured Theodore Wirth from his comfortable position as 
Superintendent of Hartford Connecticut Parks in 1906.  Wirth asked for a home 
of his own design, to be located in a park, with offices where he could be 
inspired by watching people, especially children, using the park   

 Just like in Field of Dreams, if they would build it, he would come. And so 
Charles Loring agreed. 

Wirth raised his family in the home and dedicated the rest of his life  to the 
expansion, design and development of the Minneapolis Park System. 

The home includes Wirth's design office and a drafting room.  Within those 
walls and on those drafting tables Theodore Wirth implemented his DREAM ...
That Minneapolis should be known as a Garden City and become the Number One 
Rated Park System in the Nation.

 Those rooms will be recreated with period furnishings, maps and drawings - 
replicating their earlier visual character.

The Society has accomplished recognition for the Theodore Wirth Home and 
Administration Building to be placed on the National Register of Historic 
Places and has asked the Minneapolis Park Board for permission to create an 
interpretive learning center within the building - as a service to the public  
- at no cost to the Park Board.
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Dirty tricks...

2005-10-06 Thread Eric Mitchell


--- George Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Anyone betting there will be dirty tricks shortly
 before the November election could not be charged
 with gambling.  It's a sure thing.  A lock.
 

It's called an October Surprise in politics and its
usually something that comes at the very end. No
particular party owns this tactic as all use it on
every level and have done so for decades. Its not
Minneapolis specific.
   
 
 For 40 years, since that upstart Charles Stenvig an
 independent, defeated the powerful DFL candidate for
 mayor, any Independent, Green, Republican or minor
 DFL'r who became too powerful or close to the money,
 has been squashed by any means necessary to assure
 his/her defeat.

Upstart Charles Stenvig? He was a conservative old
school law and order cop that brought some very
controversal and failed police policies that
introduced even more divide to changing times.
In 1971 his DFL opponent happened to be one of the
most honorable and honored citizens of Minneapolis, an
African American  named Harry Davies. I don't know
what the DFL did to try and squash Stenvig's campaign,
but Davis' family had to have FBI protection and
escort everywhere they went. Senators Humphrey and
Mondale chose to campaign wth him in Northeast Mpls
neighborhoods where the opposition was physical and
potentially deadly. 

That 'upstart' Stenvig really had to dodge the
powerful DFL squashing machine. Poor guy.

 
 Does anyone really believe it was necessary or even
 prudent to exercise a federal search warrant of a
 sitting council person five days before a primary
 election?  If evidence and justice were truly being
 sought, a search AFTER the election would most
 certainly result in more incriminating evidence.  If
 the council person was the primary winner and he was
 influenced by bribes, those seeking favors would be
 lined up with cash in hand.  Indisputable proof of
 his guilt.  This was not the case.  Why would
 professional, experienced investigators jeopardize
 their case with premature public knowledge of their
 investigation?

Does anybody think the FBI gives a hoot about local
politics? Or, federal code violations?
I would gander that they went public with the
information they have because they're pretty sure of
their case. Considering that as you put it, they are
professional and experienced investigators.
Is there proof otherwise? 
They say they have video and plenty of audio along
with sworn witnesses.

   
 
 Look to those who would gain by eliminating a Green
 candidate.  His opponent? Sure.  All other
 candidates being opposed by Greens, by implication? 
 Sure.  The sitting mayor's opponent, again by
 implication?  Sure.   Would any of these be privy to
 the FBI's investigation, doughtful?  Would any of
 these be powerful enough to influence the timing of
 the execution of a Federal search warrant?  No...who
 would?

The only ones to gain by eliminating a Green candidate
would be the candidates opponent. In this case, the
opponent was never really an entrenched insider to the
DFL.
Let me be clear on what you are suggesting. 
Are you saying the Robert Lilligren and Peter
Mclaughlin are the one who gain? They are ones you are
leading us to look at. 
I suggest that you ask Zimmerman did he really get
caught doing it.
 
  
 
 As a professional courtesy, many times when a
 Federal investigation is underway, the local law
 enforcement agencies are advised. 

Since when? Not if that 'heads up' could affect their
case. I would think when it involves city officials
and federal charges, that until the depth of the case
is known, they wouldn't contact city cops. Maybe the
cheif will get a heads up.
 
I noticed you used the qualifier 'many times'. That's
not all the time and doesn't indicate standard policy.

 Would the
 Minneapolis police chief be advised?  Not likely. 
 Too close to the mayor.  Too close to the subject. 
 Would the Hennepin County sheriff be advised? 
 Possibly, but what would he, with a job for life,
 gain by suggesting the timing of the execution of a
 search warrant on a Minneapolis politician?   

The Cheif probably knew. 

The sheriff is not a life time job, he's up for
re-election next year.

Federal charges. Federal judge signs the warrant for
federal law enforcement agents to follow through,
under the watchful eye of the federal attornies. So
its a federal judge working with the U.S. Attorneys
office and the FBI. Where does the city jurisdiction
come in? Or county?

 How
 about the Hennepin County Attorney?  What would she
 gain?  Nothing, as the HC Attorney but how about in
 running for a higher, federal office?  It would be
 far more helpful to her to be guaranteed the
 endorsement of a newly elected Minneapolis mayor and
 former Hennepin County Commissioner than a possible,
 lukewarm, endorsement by the incumbent mayor who
 fell in disfavor with the DFL machine when he upset
 their darling, Sharon.

And eight years before that Sharon upset DFL uber
player John Derus. Its 

Re: [Mpls] In Ballot Box: Fifth Ward fireworks

2005-10-06 Thread Eric Mitchell


--- Tamir Nolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Bringing NJ L's husband in to the debate and calling
 him a pornographer adds a nasty, disgusting personal
 tone to this debate.  
  (snip)
  
 To those of us who had had the doors of city hall
 repeatedly slammed in our faces and were threatened
 with lawsuits (as happened to a list member) when
 Jackie Cherryhomes didn't like what we had to
say,...

After all the things that were/are constantly said
about Jackie on this list, the only time she stepped
in  was to set that person straight that you are
speaking of is when he brought her husband into this
and accused him of representing massage parlors and
strip joints and possibly owning stake in them. 
As you put it, it not only brought a 'disgusting
personal tone' but, it was a complete lie.  So I'm
sure you can understand, afterall four years later you
find that almost exact thing nasty and disgusting.

Eric Mitchell
Saint Paul(5th Ward last go round)





__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls