[mssms] RE: Windows 10 1607 is now a Current Branch for Business (CBB) release

I meant under the Software Library --> Windows 10 Servicing --> all winnows 10 updates in SCCM 1606. Where we define servicing plans etc. Bhushan Kelkar Expert Systems Engineer O: +91.207.107.8404 M: +91.954.524.0543 allscripts.com | @allscripts Allscripts:

[mssms] RE: Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually worked?

Same here, we haven't had any issues with remote control, help desk, tier 2, tier 3, and other IT technical support staff all use it. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 4:48 PM To:

[mssms] RE: Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually worked?

Hmm. Config Mgr remote control is our primary tool for remoting into users' computers. No major issues with it here. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 2:40 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com;

[mssms] RE: Windows 10 1607 is now a Current Branch for Business (CBB) release

As indicated in the blog, you’ll see updated bits for Windows 10 1607 in January (replacing the current 1607 bits that you see today). The only difference is that the November Patch Tuesday update will be pre-injected into the bits. Thanks, -Michael From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

[mssms] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it actually worked?

How many of you would like to use ConfigMgr remote control however it's limited functionality prevents you from doing so? Worse still is that you are likely paying for some other remote control solution because remote control in ConfigMgr just doesn't meet your needs. If you agree and you'd

[mssms] Hyper-V Integration Services restarting VM during build & capture?

Anyone ever had Hyper-V Integration Services installation restarting the VM during a B? Server 2012 R2 Hyper-V Gen 1 VM OS: Windows 10 1511 DISM DISM.log attached. Accoding to the DISM.log, the restart should be suppressed, but no luck, the machine still gets restarted by TrustedInstaller.

RE: [mssms] Test

Ty. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Raymond Peng Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 3:35 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Test ***This is an EXTERNAL email. Please do not click on a link or open any attachments unless

[mssms] RE: CM pushing old revisions

Did the clients update policy after you made Rev2? Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Brian Illner Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 2:40 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] CM pushing old revisions Why is it so

[mssms] RE: CM pushing old revisions

They have to get the new policy that content has changed, so yes. Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Brian Illner Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 3:15 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: CM pushing old

Re: [mssms] RE: New site installation

I agree--have Management justify, in technical terms, why it makes more sense technically to have the database on the SQL cluster. Not political reasons of "because there's a different team that manages SQL". If they've really thought it out, then here's the docs:

[mssms] RE: Windows 10 1607 is now a Current Branch for Business (CBB) release

In the dashboard or as an actual feature update? The dashboard info comes down via the SCP (from memory) once the product group updates the info. J From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kelkar, Bhushan Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 2:12

[mssms] RE: New site installation

Agreed. Stay away from a remote SQL. We have our SQL hosted in a cluster and it has been a very unpleasant experience. I can get a test standalone SQL/SCCM box stood up and running in a few hours, it took 2 months to get everything up and running on our SQL cluster, but this also includes

RE: [mssms] BITS set via DCM off boundary, IP, or subnet

I did get something working with PS and a CI but then MS developers comeback and suggest not planning on what we used as it may not be available in future releases. I queried WMI and got the boundary group cache IDs. Made a boundary groups for BITS throttling and targeted that. Compliance

[mssms] Test

Not sure if my posts are showing up, so if someone could respond I'd appreciate it.

[mssms] RE: Windows 10 1607 is now a Current Branch for Business (CBB) release

Define “see it”? Where are you expecting to “see it”? CBB is simply a declaration of worthiness for business use. It doesn’t mean anything has changed technically anywhere. J From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kelkar, Bhushan Sent:

[mssms] RE: Windows 10 1607 is now a Current Branch for Business (CBB) release

Yeah that’s where my question was pointed to. If it’s just me who doesn’t see it or no one is. Bhushan Kelkar Expert Systems Engineer O: +91.207.107.8404 M: +91.954.524.0543 allscripts.com | @allscripts Allscripts: Building open, connected communities of health

[mssms] CM pushing old revisions

Why is it so difficult to get CM agents to pull down new revisions of applications? I make one small change to a Deployment Type which creates Rev2 of my application. But no matter how many times I try to rerun Application detection from the clients, it only sees and attempts to install Rev1.

[mssms] RE: CM pushing old revisions

So any time a chance is made to an Application, on the clients, I need to run the "Machine Policy Retrieval & Eval Cycle" before the "Application Deployment Eval Cycle" is run? BRIAN ILLNER | Canal Insurance Company 864.250.9227 864.679.2537 Fax [cid:image001.jpg@01D24A53.51CD3670] Visit

RE: [mssms] Test

Test received. Thank you, Ray [cid:9FE8CE67-4431-44CD-970D-6A632819929E] Raymond Peng Systems Engineer / IT Operations Direct: 650-577-5399 Email: raymond.p...@wageworks.com From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On

[mssms] Latest Surface Pro 3 Firmware MSI & ZIP download ???

Hi all, The "history" page shows latest is "November 7 release" "System Firmware Update - 11/7/2016" https://www.microsoft.com/surface/en-au/support/install-update-activate/pro-3-update-history?os=windows-10 Download page still shows much older from 9/1/2016

[mssms] RE: Deployment review process?

We have a robust software certification process. The operational teams basically have a rule, if it’s not certified, it doesn’t get installed. Some installs require our Security teams approval before each install. Some installs have special approvers like a license manager or the IT Owner of

[mssms] RE: New site installation

I'd say DON't do it if it isn't absolutely required. it's just creating a lot of extra dependencies and other issues. SCCM will treat that database instance as its own. IT will gladly restart the instance during SCCM patching for example and you will need an SA account to do the patching

RE: [mssms] RE: Deployment review process?

Well, in our case we start with a QA group that tests to ensure that the software does not affect our business critical, core applications. We're a hospital so we make sure that any application that will be going out does not break our key patient care applications. Once an application has

RE: [mssms] FW: Windows 10 upgrade question

With the 1607 build of Windows 10, you can install the Pro version (using your Pro key) and then use the Enterprise key to change/re-activate for Enterprise. I just ran a test of installing / activating W10 1607 Enterprise and then changing the product key to Pro and it re-activated as Pro. So

RE: [mssms] RE: Deployment review process?

What do you do for QA of the software deployed via SCCM? Thanks, Jeff Sent from my Windows 10 phone From: Daniel Ratliff Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 8:27 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Deployment review

[mssms] New site installation

We are setting up a new site with ConfigMan CB. Management wants to host the database on our SQL cluster. Does anyone know if using a CNAME is supported in the setup wizard when it prompts for database information? Are there any "gotchas" we should look out for in this kind of setup (SQL

[mssms] Windows Update Restart

All, I have a SU deployment setup to some servers (Windows 2012 R2/2008 R2 mix). The deployment was setup with the Deadline Behavior is set for Software Updates Installation to allow updates to be deployed outside of the maintenance window. However, I am also suppressing the reboot. One of

[mssms] Software Updates and Reporting

I am questioning the validity of some of my SSRS reports and hopefully someone can shed some light on what might be going on. I have been asked to produce some reports that show the install status of MS16-136. This patch was manually installed on a handful of devices, but yet none are

[mssms] RE: Windows 10 1607 is now a Current Branch for Business (CBB) release

Correction I meant CBB servicing ring. Bhushan Kelkar Expert Systems Engineer O: +91.207.107.8404 M: +91.954.524.0543 allscripts.com | @allscripts Allscripts: Building open, connected communities of health From: Kelkar, Bhushan Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016

RE: [mssms] RE: Deployment review process?

Verification of successful install is handled by the packaging team. This includes removing previous versions if necessary and trying to make it futureproof. Also setting up tracking, usually native, but sometimes dropping a .swidtag. EUAT is also performed for every certification. Usually

[mssms] RE: Windows Update Restart

Is Automatic Updates disabled via GPO? It should be. Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Brian McDonald Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:44 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Windows Update Restart All,

[mssms] RE: New site installation

Don't put SQL offbox unless you absolutely have to. Usually no pros and several cons in doing so. Mark Kent Manager, Client Systems Engineering Technology Support Services Resources for Information, Technology and Education (RITE) http://rite.buffalostate.edu

RE: [mssms] FW: Windows 10 upgrade question

Thanks for the replies, I will test with slmgr.vbs. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Fast, David D. Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 10:48 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] FW: Windows 10 upgrade question With the 1607