newsfetch

2000-05-24 Thread jgh
Has anyone tried a program called newsfectch. newsfetch is a powerfull utility to fetch news from an NNTP server and stores in the mailbox format. The files created by newsfetch can be used with any mail reader Could this be used as a standard news mailing program in cooperation with mutt? --

Re: newsfetch

2000-05-24 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that: Has anyone tried a program called newsfectch. url, please newsfetch is a powerfull utility to fetch news from an NNTP server and stores in the mailbox format. The files created by newsfetch can be used with any mail reader sounds like a

Re: threading problem

2000-05-24 Thread Gary Johnson
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 08:37:25AM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote: On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 03:18:07 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: When Mutt does threading, it pays attention to the message times. Right, and that is indeed the problem. 1003: Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 12:56:48 +0100

Re: I want a different sort of macro

2000-05-24 Thread Greg Matheson
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 08:52:07PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Byrial Jensen proclaimed on mutt-users that: But macros work! Just what the doctor ordered. So we can use editor macros to change mailboxes to those folders with long names that are so hard to type, rather than

Re: Location of signature in replies

2000-05-24 Thread Hall Stevenson
By the way, where are you finding netiquette rules for email? I am curious. The standard reference is RFC 1855. (One place you can find this is http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html .) As with most RFCs, this is A much better reference is any standard book on good writing. Just

Re: threading problem

2000-05-24 Thread Michael Tatge
Gary Johnson muttered: All the times in the Received: headers and the From header are consistent, but the original poster's clock seems to be fast by an hour. Gary -- Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] | RF Communications Product Generation

pgp

2000-05-24 Thread Michael Soulier
Hi guys. I figure that PGP is probably a separate issue, but I'd like to learn about how to use it with mutt. Now, there's a little on it in the manual, but I guess it assumes that you already know what you're doing with PGP, and have some kind of software already installed. I've seen

Re: pgp

2000-05-24 Thread Antoine Martin
Hello ! just get gpg on http://www.gnupg.org read the README file and create your pair of keys to use gpg with mutt, just add this line in your muttrc : source ~/.mutt/gpg.rc you can find gpg.rc in $PREFIX/doc/mutt/samples Antoine On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 10:37:55AM -0400, Michael Soulier

Re: pgp

2000-05-24 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-05-24 10:37:55 -0400, Michael Soulier wrote: Hi guys. I figure that PGP is probably a separate issue, but I'd like to learn about how to use it with mutt. Now, there's a little on it in the manual, but I guess it assumes that you already know what

Re: threading problem

2000-05-24 Thread clemensF
Michael Tatge: So, to get the threading in the way to want it just set the Date: header of that message to a reasonable value and you'll be fine. that's cool! whenever you suspect something's fishy, you just wade thru your email to check the sequence of dates? or did you already write the

[OT] on quoting

2000-05-24 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Corey G. wrote: new text full quote Mutt should print a warning if a user wants to send mail and has quoted the way Corey did :) IMHO this quoting style is extremly annoying. Does anyone have a link to good documentation where I might point people using this style to?

Re: pgp

2000-05-24 Thread Lars Hecking
clemensF writes: Thomas Roessler: Just in case your system has a /dev/random device, you should most likely NOT use pgp 5.0i. pgp 2.6 might be a why's that? PGP 5.0ii's reading of random data from /dev/random does not work. Instead of random numbers, a stream of bytes with the

corrupt mail

2000-05-24 Thread Michael Soulier
Hey guys. I'm using mutt 1.2 on HP/UX 10.20, and I keep running into problems with corrupt mailboxes. My inbox is having problems. It's like an incoming mail is overwriting portions of a previous mail. At first I thought it might be Netscape attempting to access the files, so I've

Re: Idea: saving vs. deleting

2000-05-24 Thread Rob Reid
At 2:34 PM EDT on May 24 Marius Gedminas sent off: I suggest adding a new status flag: `d' to indicate that the deletion of this message resulted from decode-save, save-message, or decrypt-save. I like the idea, but d is already used to indicate messages with deleted attachments. How about

Re: Idea: saving vs. deleting

2000-05-24 Thread Myrddin
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 08:34:24PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote: I suggest adding a new status flag: `d' to indicate that the deletion of this message resulted from decode-save, save-message, or decrypt-save. What do you think? Sounds like a great idea to me. =) - Myrddin

Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance.

2000-05-24 Thread David DeSimone
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One way might be to have mutt ship with no bindings and let you roll all of your own ;-) This tongue-in-cheek comment is actually not a bad idea: Do not hard-code any of the keybindings in the Mutt source, but instead set the defaults in the system Muttrc.

Re: pgp

2000-05-24 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-05-24 19:53:03 +0200, clemensF wrote: Just in case your system has a /dev/random device, you should most likely NOT use pgp 5.0i. pgp 2.6 might be a why's that? In short: The keys generated are more or less bad. See also http://cryptome.org/cipn052400.htm#pgp. --

Re: 1.2 older than 1.0.1?

2000-05-24 Thread Myrddin
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 04:08:55PM -0300, Richard Spencer wrote: Hello all! I wasn't able to install latest mutt rpm. According to the error message, I _already_have_ the newest package :-( # rpm -U /home/rks/ftp/mutt-1.2i-1.cfp.rhl6.i386.rpm error: package mutt-1.0.1i-8 (which is

set print

2000-05-24 Thread Michael Soulier
Ok, according to my manual, the $print variable, if set... print Type: quadoption Default: ask-no Controls whether or not Mutt asks for confirmation before printing. This is useful for people (like me) who accidentally hit ``p'' often. I have "set print" in my .muttrc file,

Re: 1.2 older than 1.0.1?

2000-05-24 Thread Hall Stevenson
I wasn't able to install latest mutt rpm. According to the error message, I _already_have_ the newest package :-( # rpm -U /home/rks/ftp/mutt-1.2i-1.cfp.rhl6.i386.rpm error: package mutt-1.0.1i-8 (which is newer then mutt-1.2i-1.cfp.rhl6) is already installed I do use RPMs, but have

Re: Idea: saving vs. deleting

2000-05-24 Thread Rob Reid
At 3:51 PM EDT on May 24 Marius Gedminas sent off: On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 01:50:29PM -0400, Rob Reid wrote: At 2:34 PM EDT on May 24 Marius Gedminas sent off: I suggest adding a new status flag: `d' to indicate that the deletion of this message resulted from decode-save, save-message,

Re: set print

2000-05-24 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 03:54:23PM -0400, Michael Soulier wrote: Ok, according to my manual, the $print variable, if set... print Type: quadoption Default: ask-no Controls whether or not Mutt asks for confirmation before printing. This is useful for people (like me) who

Re: Idea: saving vs. deleting

2000-05-24 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 03:36:09PM -0400, Rob Reid wrote: I like the idea, but d is already used to indicate messages with deleted attachments. How about s? That's too already used for PGP signed but unverified messages. Maybe `w' (written)? I only see (capital) S whether or not

Re: Location of signature in replies

2000-05-24 Thread Corey G.
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 07:36:06AM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote: By the way, where are you finding netiquette rules for email? I am curious. The standard reference is RFC 1855. (One place you can find this is http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html .) As with most RFCs, this is A

Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance.

2000-05-24 Thread Mikko Hänninen
David DeSimone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 24 May 2000: This tongue-in-cheek comment is actually not a bad idea: Do not hard-code any of the keybindings in the Mutt source, but instead set the defaults in the system Muttrc. This way, it is possible for a site to implement their

bounced messages

2000-05-24 Thread jgh
Do bounced messages include attachments? -- /helfman "At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always been in your possession." Fingerprint: 2F76 2856 776A 3E07 9F3E 452A 17D9 9B28 D75E 0A36 GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private! 1024D/D75E0A36

Re: threading problem

2000-05-24 Thread Michael Tatge
clemensF muttered: Michael Tatge: So, to get the threading in the way to want it just set the Date: header of that message to a reasonable value and you'll be fine. that's cool! whenever you suspect something's fishy, you just wade thru your email to check the sequence of dates? or

deleting and undeleting

2000-05-24 Thread Manuel Arriaga
Hi everyone, Once again proving myself a total newbie :-), I would like to know whether there is anyway in which I can undelete a message which "sits" in the middle of 10 other deleted messages, without having to undelete the first four - does this make any kind of sense to you? Thank you

Re: bounced messages

2000-05-24 Thread Michael Tatge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered: Do bounced messages include attachments? Yepp! HTH, Michael -- Usage: fortune -P [] -a [xsz] [Q: [file]] [rKe9] -v6[+] dataspec ... inputdir PGP-fingerprint: DECA E9D2 EBDD 0FE0 0A65 40FA 5967 ACA1 0B57 7C13

Re: deleting and undeleting

2000-05-24 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Manuel Arriaga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 25 May 2000: Once again proving myself a total newbie :-), I would like to know whether there is anyway in which I can undelete a message which "sits" in the middle of 10 other deleted messages, without having to undelete the first four - does

Re: deleting and undeleting

2000-05-24 Thread Hall Stevenson
* Manuel Arriaga ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000524 09:57]: Once again proving myself a total newbie :-), I would like to know whether there is anyway in which I can undelete a message which "sits" in the middle of 10 other deleted messages, without having to undelete the first four - does this make

Exclusive matching

2000-05-24 Thread David Champion
Alice, Bob, and Carol want to find all email that was sent from any one of them to BOTH of the others, but that was not sent to ANY fourth person. I can make mutt match all messages that include Alice, Bob, and Carol: ~L alice ~L bob ~L carol My mailbox has a message from Carol to Alice,

Re: Exclusive matching

2000-05-24 Thread David Champion
On 2000.05.24, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], "David Champion" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I attached a mailbox that contains 8 messages: 6 that I want matched, 1 that is from Carol to Alice, Bob, and Dave, and 1 that does not include Bob. (The last two should not be matched.) Oops. *Now* I

Re: deleting and undeleting

2000-05-24 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Manuel Arriaga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 25 May 2000: But in my computer j and k jump messages marked for deletion. Yes, they do on my computer too. Use capital J and K (shift+j, shift+k) instead. Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] //

Re: deleting and undeleting

2000-05-24 Thread Neelakanth
Sometime ago, Manuel Arriaga said: Once again proving myself a total newbie :-), I would like to know whether there is anyway in which I can undelete a message which "sits" in the middle of 10 other deleted messages, without having to undelete the first four - does this make any kind of sense

Re: threading problem

2000-05-24 Thread Gary Johnson
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 09:14:17PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: I didn't do that, it was the original poster, that already did it. If he for God's sake can't live with the wrong threading, editing the header seems to be the easiest workaround. If you find this cool, buy a coat. You'll be

Re: Location of signature in replies

2000-05-24 Thread David T-G
Corey -- ...and then Corey G. said... % On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 07:36:06AM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote: %By the way, where are you finding netiquette rules for email? I am ... % http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html .) As with most RFCs, this is ... % You're exactly right though.

Re: deleting and undeleting

2000-05-24 Thread Gary Johnson
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 03:21:13AM +0100, Manuel Arriaga wrote: Hi, Neelakanth and Mikko, Thank you both for the tips, but only Neelakanth's works with my: pressing a numeric key brings up the "jump to message:" minibuffer and allows me to reach any message (del/undel). But in my computer j

Re: deleting and undeleting

2000-05-24 Thread clemensF
Manuel Arriaga: allows me to reach any message (del/undel). But in my computer j and k jump messages marked for deletion. he specifically told you to use capital letters, which work. -- clemens [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exclusive matching

2000-05-24 Thread David Champion
On 2000.05.24, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], "David Champion" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A look at the source code suggests that this is a misread, though, and that "^" goes before any pattern component. Well, this pattern: ^~L alice | ^~L bob | ^~L carol doesn't match anything at all.