On Mon, 19 Jun 2000 17:01:42 +0300, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mikko_H=E4nninen?= wrote:
Brett Coon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 19 Jun 2000:
2. The feature I *really* want in a mailtool is the ability to
(conveniently) put various attributes on messages, such as
"answer within 1 week",
hi,
i've searched the archive but couldn't find anything related:
most of my correspondents use more than one address to write to me. i want to
reverse_alias them so the index looks uniformly. i don't want to setup aliases for
each address. is there a way to list them in a single place,
On 2000-06-19 22:20:11 -0400, Chris Conrad wrote:
Does anyone have any idea why things broke with the
upgrade ?
Did you update your configuration files? The pgp
interface changed a lot between 1.0 and 1.2.
Hello,
when I forward a mail with mime encapsulation,
I get a bad signature if I sign this mail.
Any idea ?
Antoine
I forgot something :
if the mail is just signed - bad signature
if the mail is encrypted/signed - good signature
Antoine
I'm afraid I can't reproduce this here with PGP.
On 2000-06-20 10:40:37 +0200, Antoine Martin wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:40:37 +0200
From: Antoine Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gpg/mime
Mail-Followup-To: Antoine Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On my home machine I finally got my mutt and qmail working
(and messages looking) right by adding the QMAILUSER, QMAILHOST,
and QMAILNAME variables to my ~/.bashrc. (Don't forget to EXPORT
these variables.) These settings will (AFAIK) override any settings in
your ~/.muttrc. Check out more in
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 07:49:50PM +0200, Norbert Steinl wrote:
If somebody finishes this, I would help to spread it by translating it into
German and put it on my realperformance website.
Need any help? (Or should I write this in German, too?)
Might be, I learn a little bit more about
Hello,
Before I give up and retire hurt to netscape can anyone tell me in words
of one syllable how to create mailboxes that work. I get the message
from mutt that every one of the "mailboxes" I have designated is not a
mailbox, even though I can see that procmail has delivered to them. I
have
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:35:39PM +1000, Dennis Robertson wrote:
Hello,
Before I give up and retire hurt to netscape can anyone tell me in words
of one syllable how to create mailboxes that work. I get the message
from mutt that every one of the "mailboxes" I have designated is not a
hi,
i have to use two pop servers. i switch between them using macros. i need mutt to
forget the pop password. any ideas?
thanks in advance,
baurjan.
Dennis Robertson proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Before I give up and retire hurt to netscape can anyone tell me in words
of one syllable how to create mailboxes that work. I get the message
from mutt that every one of the "mailboxes" I have designated is not a
mailbox, even though I can see
Baurjan Ismagulov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 20 Jun 2000:
i've searched the archive but couldn't find anything related:
most of my correspondents use more than one address to write to me. i
want to reverse_alias them so the index looks uniformly. i don't want to
setup aliases for each
Baurjan Ismagulov proclaimed on mutt-users that:
i have to use two pop servers. i switch between them using macros. i need mutt to
forget the pop password. any ideas?
Run fetchmail as a daemon to poll the two pop servers rather than using
mutt's builtin pop support.
-suresh
--
Suresh
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 04:05:32PM +0300, Baurjan Ismagulov wrote:
hi,
i have to use two pop servers. i switch between them using macros. i need mutt to
forget the pop password. any ideas?
Would it be an idea to use fetchmail for local delivery ? IMHO it's simpler ;)
--
How can a
Hi,
Dennis Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 20 Jun 2000:
Before I give up and retire hurt to netscape can anyone tell me in words
of one syllable how to create mailboxes that work.
Save an existing mail message to a non-existing mail folder (mailbox),
Mutt will automatically create
Dennis --
...and then Dennis Robertson said...
% Hello,
% Before I give up and retire hurt to netscape can anyone tell me in words
*gasp*
% of one syllable how to create mailboxes that work. I get the message
The simplest way to create a mailbox is to touch the file into existence.
Of
i have to use two pop servers. i switch between them using macros. i need mutt to
forget the pop password. any ideas?
Would it be an idea to use fetchmail for local delivery ? IMHO it's simpler ;)
yeah, seems that i'll have to do that... i never have time to do the things properly,
but i
Brett --
...and then Brett Coon said...
%
% So, it sounds like I could define my own set of fields and flags
% for X-Label, create some mutt macros to allow me to manipulate
...
% or "reply in N days", it should be a simple task to create a perl
% script to scan the X-Label headers for
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:32:38AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 2000-06-19 22:20:11 -0400, Chris Conrad wrote:
Does anyone have any idea why things broke with the
upgrade ?
Did you update your configuration files? The pgp
interface changed a lot between 1.0 and 1.2.
Yes, I made
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 03:49:33PM +0200, Nils Vogels wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 04:05:32PM +0300, Baurjan Ismagulov wrote:
hi,
i have to use two pop servers. i switch between them using macros. i need mutt to
forget the pop password. any ideas?
Would it be an idea to use
My company just installed a mail server that requires that mail be retrieved
via POP 3.
I have the following POP commands in my .muttrc
set pop_host = "mail.mydomain.com"
set pop_user = "my username"
set pop_pass = "mypassword"
set pop_port = "110"
My
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:35:39PM +1000, Dennis Robertson wrote:
Hello,
Before I give up and retire hurt to netscape can anyone tell me in words
Eeeps! :)
of one syllable how to create mailboxes that work. I get the message
from mutt that every one of the "mailboxes" I have designated is
Gauthier --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% On Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 05:49:47PM -0700, Brian D. Winters wrote:
%
% Never, never, never filter a mailing list like mutt-users based on
% To:, Cc:, From:, Subject:, Reply-To: or Mail-Followup-To: if you can
% possibly help it. What
Dirk --
Please don't just reply to some message and start a new thread; because
mutt threads so well, we get an unrelated message in the middle of
another thread. I may be assuming a lot, but the new Subject: and the
apparently completely unrelated text in the note really make it seem
like this
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 11:53:23PM -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
Hi there. I can't seem to figure this one out. It's like sendmail
is re-writing the Return-Path header and it's making my posts to some
mailing lists bounce for some reason.
[...]
Sounds like you need to fix your
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 07:49:49AM +0200, Frank Derichsweiler wrote:
I insert a my_hdr Return-Path:... statement into the .muttrc for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but when it bounced back for the second
time it showed the Return-Path as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (where
devel.danen.net is the hostname for
I just upgraded to 1.2i and the colors are all whacked out. Has this
happened to anyone else? I compiled with slang support instead of
ncurses and the colors worked ok in the 1.0.1 RPMs from Mandrake, but
the colors in this one are just horrible and nothing is coming out
right... any ideas?
Now that I've upgraded, mutt tells me my /var/spool/mail/vdanen
mailbox is readonly but with 1.0.1 it didn't. Did I mess something
up on the compile? Any ideas would be appreciated.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net
Freezer Burn BBS:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 09:52:55PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
Hi there. I can't seem to figure this one out. It's like sendmail
is re-writing the Return-Path header and it's making my posts to some
mailing lists bounce for some reason.
[...]
Sounds like you need to fix your
Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 20 Jun 2000:
I just upgraded and have run into a few problems (see other
messages). How would I use the envelope thing?
set envelope_from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
It's just:
set enveloper_from
Nothing else.
What it does is that it takes the
Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 20 Jun 2000:
Someone mentioned an envelope header
string that can be defined but I think I lost that message...
Can someone re-post that info? I seem to have lost that message...
I guess you mean the message I posted yesterday. Here's a better
* Kai Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [200600 17:33 CET]:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 07:49:50PM +0200, Norbert Steinl wrote:
If somebody finishes this, I would help to spread it by translating it into
German and put it on my realperformance website.
Need any help? (Or should I write this in
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:04:02PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 20 Jun 2000:
I just upgraded and have run into a few problems (see other
messages). How would I use the envelope thing?
set envelope_from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
It's just:
Is mutt_dotlock supposed to be setgid (sorry Mikko, I meant setgid
nor setuid in other message)? I changed it to 755 and I still get
read-only permission on /var/spool/mail/vdanen which has -rw-rw
permissions and is owned by vdanen.mail.
I can't delete any messages in my inbox with the new
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 11:12:32AM -0500, Scott A. Davis wrote:
My company just installed a mail server that requires that mail be retrieved
via POP 3.
I have the following POP commands in my .muttrc
set pop_host = "mail.mydomain.com"
set pop_user = "my username"
set
FYI, this may help track down the problems. I think it has something
to do with mutt_dotlock or else how I compiled it. This is how I
compiled mutt... maybe I need to add more stuff (like the locking
stuff?) to configure?
./configure --prefix=/usr --with-sharedir=/etc --sysconfdir=/etc
Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, 18 Jun 2000:
Hi there. I can't seem to figure this one out. It's like sendmail
is re-writing the Return-Path header and it's making my posts to some
mailing lists bounce for some reason.
I insert a my_hdr Return-Path:... statement into the
On 2000-06-20 12:59:13 -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
Is mutt_dotlock supposed to be setgid (sorry Mikko, I
meant setgid nor setuid in other message)?
Yes.
I changed it to 755 and I still get read-only
permission on /var/spool/mail/vdanen which has
-rw-rw permissions and is owned by
On 2000-06-20 13:08:25 -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
FYI, this may help track down the problems. I think it has something
to do with mutt_dotlock or else how I compiled it. This is how I
compiled mutt... maybe I need to add more stuff (like the locking
stuff?) to configure?
./configure
I wrote a moment ago:
Dotlocking will create a file /var/spool/mail/vdanen.lock.
In order to do this, mutt_dotlock needs write access to
that directory, which is normally enabled by making
mutt_dotlock setgid mail.
To illustrate things, here's an example from my system:
% ls -ld
Gerhard den Hollander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 19 Jun 2000:
Speaking of which,
how can I get my hands on the latest dev ?
There's just a new snapshot out on the ftp site (1.3.4).
If you want to live with the CVS, then read the info in
doc/devel-notes.txt.
Regards,
Mikko
--
// Mikko
At 16:02 +0200 19 Jun 2000, Dirk Ruediger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to process the entries of "subscribe" or "lists" to use
it for send-hook, e.g.:
Read section 4.2 of the manual. Especially the part about the ~l
pattern.
--
Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dirk Ruediger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 19 Jun 2000:
I want to define an implicite send-hook for all mailing lists I am
subscribed to and define a special attribution, use special signatures
and something like that.
Is it possible to process the entries of "subscribe" or "lists" to
Dennis Robertson proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Before I give up and retire hurt to netscape can anyone tell me in words
of one syllable how to create mailboxes that work. I get the message
from mutt that every one of the "mailboxes" I have designated is not a
mailbox, even though I can see
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:46:06PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
FYI, this may help track down the problems. I think it has something
to do with mutt_dotlock or else how I compiled it. This is how I
compiled mutt... maybe I need to add more stuff (like the locking
stuff?) to configure?
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000 20:59:23 +0200, Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
I've converted my mailboxes to maildir once, it turned out to be
slower than mbox, so I converted back to mbox now. Dunno about MH, but
I'm guessing it's about the same speed as maildir since it resembles
maildir.
are your
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:43:52PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Dotlocking will create a file /var/spool/mail/vdanen.lock.
In order to do this, mutt_dotlock needs write access to
that directory, which is normally enabled by making
mutt_dotlock setgid mail.
To illustrate things,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 03:08:14PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
Is mutt_dotlock supposed to be setgid (sorry Mikko, I meant setgid
Yes, it needs to be setgid to the group that owns the mail spool
directory. That's the whole point of it. Dotlocking in some
configurations needs to be
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:41:51PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
I changed it to 755 and I still get read-only
permission on /var/spool/mail/vdanen which has
-rw-rw permissions and is owned by vdanen.mail.
The important thing are the permissions of the
/var/spool/mail _directory_,
Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
* clemensF [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 07:49:56PM +0200)
Ronny Haryanto:
I've converted my mailboxes to maildir once, it turned out to be
slower than mbox, so I converted back to mbox now. Dunno about MH, but
I'm guessing it's about the same
Brett Coon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 20 Jun 2000:
So, in summary, MH format is slw in mutt. NFS makes it far
slower, no doubt due to NFS write behavior,
You could try also Maildir. It's NFS safe (no locking needed!), and
it might (ought to!) give you a better performance on
Mutt-1.2.2 is on its way to the FTP archive under
ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/,
and will soon propagate to the usual mirror sites, as
listed under http://www.mutt.org/download.html.
This version fixes a build problem present with 1.2.1.
Thus, if Mutt-1.2.1 is working for you,
Hi all!
I'm using gpg 1.0.0 with mutt to handle my PGP ... but for some reason I keep on
getting "key not found" messages .. I dont think noone has their keys on keyservers
nowadays, so I must be doing something wrong ..
I think you obviously need more info to be able to help me .. so here
On 2000.06.20, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"clemensF" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so, why in the world would one want to leave mh for mutt?
Are you asking why in the world would one want to leave:
next
spacespacespacenext
comp
...
send
spacespacenext
spacespacenext
spacespacespacespacenext
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:07:00 +0200, clemensF wrote:
well, i',m on the verge of converting to [nx]mh. but i stick to the
rules, i.e. i will answer each message to me in due time, so i can't
keep n*1000 messages, a few dozen are the utmost horror to me.
so, why in the world would one want to
Nils Vogels writes:
Hi all!
I'm using gpg 1.0.0 with mutt to handle my PGP ... but for some reason I keep on
getting "key not found" messages .. I dont think noone has their keys on keyservers
nowadays, so I must be doing something wrong ..
I think you obviously need more info to be
Nils Vogels wrote:
I'm using gpg 1.0.0 with mutt to handle my PGP ... but for some reason I keep on
getting "key not found" messages .. I dont think noone has their keys on keyservers
nowadays, so I
must be doing something wrong ..
you probably need the rsa/idea extensions. search the
I've started using emacs as editor for mutt. I'm specified it in the
muttrc file and also have setup a script file(e-lisp) in /home/me/.mutt called
post.el which is a package for running emacs as an email editor with
mutt. It seems to be working fine, but I have a couple of
questions.
1.) what
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 07:24:18PM -0700, Dale Morris wrote:
- I've started using emacs as editor for mutt. I'm specified it in the
- muttrc file and also have setup a script file(e-lisp) in /home/me/.mutt called
- post.el which is a package for running emacs as an email editor with
- mutt. It
TLR --
...and then Thomas Roessler said...
% Mutt-1.2.2 is on its way to the FTP archive under
Woo hoo! Thanks!
Um, when did 1.2.1 come out? I've had my eyes peeled for the
announcement for quite a while now...
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's
Daniel --
You may find everything you wanted for the pgpmimeuser setting in v1.2
and up (currently 1.2.2 AFAIK), since there is now a clearsign mode.
With a [few] send-hook[s], you should be able to define whatever settings
you wish for whatever recipients you have. You shouldn't have ever had
2000-06-21-01:17:34 Ronny Haryanto:
I'm still wondering why it's slower though (in general), maybe
because it fopen() more times than mbox? The mailbox is on ext2fs
if that makes any difference.
Ext2 is a nice quick FS, with many great features. One of my
favourites.
For any size mailbox,
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:33:31 EDT, Bennett Todd wrote:
Back to our muttons, the above performance discussion focused on
opening the folder. Once it's open, mutt has built an in-memory data
structure describing the messages, and either their offsets in the
mbox file, or the filenames where they
64 matches
Mail list logo
