Hi there,
I'm a mutt newbie and I have a basic problem:
It seems that no external program can be startet out of mutt.
I.e.:
1) The external editor is set to "vim".
When I try to compose a message, I get the following error in mutt: "Aborted
unmodified message." instead that vim opens up.
Netscape chokes on literal commas in URLs passed via openURL. I've patched
urlview 0.9 to escape them. Patch is available at:
http://ben.reser.org/projects/urlview-comma.patch
--
Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ben.reser.org
"Heuristics are bug ridden by definition. If they didn't
have
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 08:29:38PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] whacked out:
However, there is one problem, if the dreaded IMAP message is the
*only* one in the folder then mutt gives an error "No messages matched
criteria." and doesn't
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 01:08:32PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
Suresh, et al --
...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
% Using a large mallet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] whacked out:
%
% However, there is one problem, if the dreaded IMAP message is the
% *only* one in the folder then mutt gives
Hi there,
I solved the problem by myself.
I used the csh as a shell for --with-exec-shell command with configure script.
ksh instead works fine.
Daniel Kollar wrote:
Hi there,
I'm a mutt newbie and I have a basic problem:
It seems that no external program can be startet out of mutt.
I think the current implementation of directory browsing needs to be
changed somewhat. I've muttered about this before but now I have a
practical situation where it's a real pain.
I want to move some messages from an IMAP server to local folders
(though the same problems would apply moving IMAP
I have now built mutt 1.3.7 in four different places, two of the four
required that I get libiconv as the existing iconv wasn't good enough.
The two places that needed libiconv were Solaris 2.6 and Red Hat Linux
release 6.1.
I think this may cause problems when this gets to a general release
On Wednesday, 16 August 2000 at 05:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the current implementation of directory browsing needs to be
changed somewhat. I've muttered about this before but now I have a
practical situation where it's a real pain.
I want to move some messages from an IMAP
I have just encountered another problem when using multiple IMAP
accounts - how do I set the $imap_user and $imap_pass to different
values for each IMAP server?
When moving messages around I want to be able to stay logged in to
more than one IMAP account at the same time.
--
Chris Green
On Wednesday, 16 August 2000 at 06:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just encountered another problem when using multiple IMAP
accounts - how do I set the $imap_user and $imap_pass to different
values for each IMAP server?
For imap_user, you can embed the username in the account, as in
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 08:00:32AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 August 2000 at 06:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just encountered another problem when using multiple IMAP
accounts - how do I set the $imap_user and $imap_pass to different
values for each IMAP server?
Hi all,
I have a question which a quick read through the docs and archive
didn't answer:
I want to upgrade from 1.0.1i to the current 1.2.5i. What is the best
approach for this - installing patches in successive order or just
downloading the current tarball and installing it?
TIA, George
George --
...and then George Wright said...
%
% I want to upgrade from 1.0.1i to the current 1.2.5i. What is the best
% approach for this - installing patches in successive order or just
% downloading the current tarball and installing it?
My guess is that you ought to go for the 1.2.5
* George Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000816 14:22]:
I want to upgrade from 1.0.1i to the current 1.2.5i. What is the best
approach for this - installing patches in successive order or just
downloading the current tarball and installing it?
I guess it is a matter of taste and bandwidth. If you
Christian, et al --
...and then Christian Molls said...
% * George Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000816 14:22]:
%
% I want to upgrade from 1.0.1i to the current 1.2.5i. What is the best
%
% I guess it is a matter of taste and bandwidth. If you sit at home with
% a 14.4 modem connection and still
I just got struck (yet again) by the evil "I say I'm going to attach a
file in my email body but when I go to the send screen I forget to attach
it" bug.
Has anybody setup a vim keybind to prompt for a filename and add the
Attach: header for mutt to automagically attach a file? I'm looking for
I'm running mutt-1.3.7 on Solaris.
When I forward a message it doesn't forward any of the MIME parts except
the first text part.
It seems to operate this way whether I forward MIME-encoded or not.
Is this just the way it works or am I missing something?
Thank you,
Todd Goodman
Hi there,
I'm missing an incoming folders overview.
Procmail is spooling the incoming mail to different folders.
How do I detect, which folders content new mail without entering each?
Cu.
Daniel
Todd Goodman writes:
I'm running mutt-1.3.7 on Solaris.
When I forward a message it doesn't forward any of the MIME parts except
the first text part.
It seems to operate this way whether I forward MIME-encoded or not.
Is this just the way it works or am I missing something?
This is
* Daniel Kollar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000816 16:58]:
I'm missing an incoming folders overview.
Procmail is spooling the incoming mail to different folders.
How do I detect, which folders content new mail without entering each?
Put something like the following into your muttrc:
mailboxes !
* Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000816 11:12]:
This is controlled by a number of variables listed under 2.5. Forwarding
and Bouncing Mail in the mutt manual.
Personally, I only use
set mime_forward=ask-no
I'm still not "getting it". I have mime_forward set as you do to
ask-no. I
set mime_forward=ask-no
I'm still not "getting it". I have mime_forward set as you do to
ask-no. I didn't have mime_forward_rest set so it should have defaulted
to "yes" (I tried setting it explicitly to "yes" and had the same
results).
Perhaps I'm not asking the right way (or it's
Can anyone please help me?
How do I automate saving an attachment to disk without having to go through
the Mutt GUI interface?
Gerald --
...and then Gerald Manipon said...
% Can anyone please help me?
% How do I automate saving an attachment to disk without having to go through
The most automated way I've found is to pump the email through munpack,
which breaks apart all of the attachments. I've even whipped up a
How do I automate saving an attachment to a file from the command line using
mutt? I want to create a daemon that will look for emails, decode MIME
attachments, and save them to a file.
Gerald --
...and then Gerald Manipon said...
% How do I automate saving an attachment to a file from the command line using
% mutt? I want to create a daemon that will look for emails, decode MIME
% attachments, and save them to a file.
Don't use mutt for this; use procmail and grab the
* Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000816 11:59]:
If you answer "Forward MIME encapsulated? ([n]/y):", which is controlled
by mime_forward, with yes, the complete message will be attached as one
message/rfc822 attachment. Is that what you want?
Have you tried whether mime_forward_decode
On 2000.08.16, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Todd Goodman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm ultimately looking for is to edit the first text part (as when
I answer no to mime_forward) but to still have all other parts of the
orginal message attached just as they were in the original.
Use
Todd Goodman writes:
* Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000816 11:59]:
If you answer "Forward MIME encapsulated? ([n]/y):", which is controlled
by mime_forward, with yes, the complete message will be attached as one
message/rfc822 attachment. Is that what you want?
Have you tried
* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000816 14:03]:
On 2000.08.16, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Todd Goodman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm ultimately looking for is to edit the first text part (as when
I answer no to mime_forward) but to still have all other parts of the
orginal
I've got a bunch of mail files in ~/mail; procmail drops stuff there.
Each file in that dir is, uh, sourced, in my .muttrc:
mailboxes ~/mail/blah ~/mail/bork ~/mail/foo ~/mail/zort
Can I generate that list automagically? I'm imagining something like:
mailboxes ~/mail/*
--
Evan Vetere |
* Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000816 14:16]:
Todd Goodman writes:
What I'm ultimately looking for is to edit the first text part (as when
I answer no to mime_forward) but to still have all other parts of the
orginal message attached just as they were in the original.
I *think* the
Using a large mallet, Evan Vetere whacked out:
Can I generate that list automagically? I'm imagining something like:
mailboxes ~/mail/*
Close.
~$ grep mailboxes .muttrc
mailboxes `echo $HOME/mail/*`
hth
-suresh
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Lumber Cartel India - tinlcI
mallet @
Evan --
...and then Evan Vetere said...
% I've got a bunch of mail files in ~/mail; procmail drops stuff there.
% Each file in that dir is, uh, sourced, in my .muttrc:
%
% mailboxes ~/mail/blah ~/mail/bork ~/mail/foo ~/mail/zort
Yep.
%
% Can I generate that list automagically? I'm
Using a large mallet, Todd Goodman whacked out:
* Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000816 14:16]:
I *think* the only way to do this is is to go to the attachment menu
(v - view attachments), tag all attachments, and then ;-f (forward
OK. Thanks very much.
Resend message - esc e
--
On 2000.08.16, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Evan Vetere" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a bunch of mail files in ~/mail; procmail drops stuff there.
Each file in that dir is, uh, sourced, in my .muttrc:
mailboxes ~/mail/blah ~/mail/bork ~/mail/foo ~/mail/zort
Can I generate that
Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2000.08.16 15.09]:
Close.
~$ grep mailboxes .muttrc
mailboxes `echo $HOME/mail/*`
Excellent. Thanks to all who threw their two pence my way.
--
Evan Vetere | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brendan Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 16 Aug 2000:
of course, there's no good reason to use = in the first place, I
think. It's just a shortcut useful when typing...
Indeed, because internally Mutt converts the = and + shortcuts to
the full filename whenever it encouters them. So the
I don't understand this but I have a flood of "empty file"s in /tmp
produced by mutt, what is this about? I know usually there are a few,
but not this manyexcuse the ls
mutt-dsl-64-34-6-73-16908-22
mutt-dsl-64-34-6-73-16908-24
mutt-dsl-64-34-6-73-16908-26
mutt-dsl-64-34-6-73-16908-28
If you tried to use the patch I gave for urlview you may have run into some
problems compiling... I recommend getting the updated version:
http://ben.reser.org/projects/urlview-comma.patch
For those that don't know this fixes the problem with URLs with commas in them
not working with netscape.
If i were to make a perl script to ask me some questions, and store the
information.. Would I be able to pass this to vi and send from mutt?
--
/Jason G Helfman
"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always
been in your possession."
Fingerprint: 6A32 3774
41 matches
Mail list logo
