On 2001.08.03, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"John Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just talking to someone about mutt flagging mail with + when it's to
> you and T when it's to you and other, etc, and we were just wondering if
> mutt either does or could have a flag for emails which are fro
On 2001.08.01, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey people.
>
> When a thread is collapsed, is there a way to tell that there are replies
> beneath the top-level message? I've been playing with collapsing threads, but
> after it's collapse
On 2001.07.30, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Andrey R. Urazov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, it's not hard to write it. And it's what was supposed while writing mutt
>manual.
> it could look something like:
> ps -e|grep -q netscape
Not if you left netscape running on your console w
On 2001.07.29, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Simon Collyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to do something not so simple here it appears.
>
> What I am trying to do is load the external editor
> in a new window, eg trying to be able to reply to multiple
> seperate message
On 2001.07.25, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jens Paulus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 10:44:11AM -0700, Dominique Pelle wrote:
> > How about attaching another mail to the email you want
> > to send?
>
> I know about this attach-message function. The disadvantage is tha
On 2001.07.18, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ed Robitaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ed Robitaille wrote>
> > In order to turn on color in xterm enter the
> > following line in ~/.Xdefaults
> >
> > *customization: -color
> >
> > This will turn on color in all apps that use color in an xte
On 2001.07.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Louis LeBlanc [mutt-users] <17/07/01 23:51 -0400>:
> > Hey all. I am trying to get the vvv port for FreeBSD built, but it
> > keeps dying on some wchar code. Any ideas what the hangup is there?
On 2001.07.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Biju Chacko [mutt-users] <17/07/01 12:56 +0530>:
> > If you can easily run external programs from it, then look into 'par'.
>
> Or fmt - which, as part of the GNU textutils package you can reaso
On 2001.07.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Chris Fuchs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Then, when you'd like to reformat text, highlight it in visual mode and
> >hit 'gq' and it should wrap nicely. That's what I do, anyway...
> >
>
> Thanks, looks like I'll add vim to my mutt learning cu
On 2001.07.14, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Brendan Cully" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday, 14 July 2001 at 18:58, David Champion wrote:
> > On 2001.07.14, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > "John P. Verel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 2001.07.14, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"John P. Verel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am I the only one who'd been stymied at how to print from within vim?
Am I the only one who's never wanted to print from inside... hmm, which
is more portable: (el|n)?vi(s|m|per), or (el|n)?vi[sm(per)]
On 2001.07.14, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mark Ferlatte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use a procmail rule for that:
>
> :0 c :
> $MAILDIR/Archive/`date +%Y-%m`
>
> Which copies all incoming mail into a -DD mbox format mailbox, and
> then lets the message continue through any other ru
On 2001.07.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David Champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On exitting mutt is it possible to save
> > messages automatically dependig on headers to different folders.
> > For example: mails from mutt-users g
On 2001.07.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Szabo Attila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On exitting mutt is it possible to save
> messages automatically dependig on headers to different folders.
> For example: mails from mutt-users go to the mutt folder???
Sure. For example:
macro i
On 2001.07.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ailbhe Leamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> simple ESC+q. However, I found par, and now I need to know how to make
> elvis use it. Oh, and make it use a ~/.exrc file, so I can have pretty
> colours while editing.
"" Par lines from my .exrc. Note l
On 2001.07.10, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Eugene Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 06:41:05AM +0700, Efata wrote:
> :
> : I have fetch email from my friend with attachment file 2.8 MB. And I read
> : this email with mutt and I view attachment and save it. But after I
On 2001.07.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to source different mutt config files somehow based on a shell
> script type thingie?
>
> I guess I could have my .zshrc copy the appropriate mutt config file to
> .muttrc based on where i'm
On 2001.07.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Thomas E. Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Jesper Holmberg wrote:
>
> > Suresh: thanks, vt100 seems to work the best. I haven't figured out
> > how to get color out of an xterm under Solaris anyway, so the black
> > and white
On 2001.06.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jason A. Fager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to figure out how to make changes to color and/or scoring
> based on the contents of the Importance: header (this seems to be
> what Outlook uses to flag messages as high/low priority). It s
On 2001.06.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Brendan Cully" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> yeah, don't use kerberos 1.0 with openssl. There's a namespace
> collision on the crypto library. If you can't upgrade your kerberos,
> you could try merging the openssl and krb5 crypto libraries into on
On 2001.06.02, in <20010602072318.A375@bloatware>,
"Thomas Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:19:41PM -0700, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> > I recently added a Sparc Ultra1/170 running Solaris 2.8 (aka Solaris 8) to
> > my network. I have gcc-2.95.2 installed on it
On 2001.05.28, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Louis LeBlanc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all. I have an unusual request here.
> I noticed that for any message, if you look at the attachments menu
> ('v'), you will always see the message itself as an attachment (which
> makes perfect sense
On 2001.05.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"adam morley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If you look on Sun's site, there is a link to a company that is
> > doing the porting work for GNOME to Solaris. Last time I looked
> > they hadn't quite got 1.4 packaged, but it was expected real soon
On 2001.05.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Joane Lispton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >What I would like to do is have the mail coming from
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >I figure the place to do this is either in Muttrc or ssmtp.conf.
>
> Just set
>
> host= beec
On 2001.05.06, in <6_VECC.A.XuH.KQf96@mostproper>,
"Mr. Wade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd be interested, though, in how he managed to get the
> index_format to display "the number of attachments if there are
> attachments" as he said.
A patch:
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc
On 2001.05.06, in <1lgg_B.A.r8G.Qoe96@mostproper>,
"Mr. Wade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Efata wrote:
> > How I give sign or color to message (message have child only)
> > in collapse thread?
>
> I think you are asking how to specify index colors for a message
> that is part of a collap
On 2001.05.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Tim Legant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nope, it's working the way it should. Comments are stripped first. This
> is true of just about every programming / configuration language in the
> world. I say "just about" because someone will probably po
On 2001.04.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Eric Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> like this:
> colour index brightred black "~?"
Check this thread:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/message/16502
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago
On 2001.03.30, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carlos Puchol proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > Reading /var/spool/mail/me... 1869 (33%)
>
> > this saturates my modem line for a little while.
>
> > is there some way to turn it
> > off or
On 2001.03.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Andre Majorel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have large mailboxes (archives of Usenet groups) that I would
> like to sort by thread. Thought of tagging all articles in the
> box and saving them to another mailbox (otT^;C) but how do you
> do that fr
On 2001.03.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dave Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have trouble with sending messages, intermittently with another
> list. I use sendmail and my ISP's SMTP. Mutt shows me sending, a
> copy ends up in record, that's the end of my knowledge. I know that
> t
On 2001.03.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Timothy Legant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You might not always want to move down 6 lines. Perhaps in the future
> you will add a new header (using my_hdr) to certain messages. You might
> want to consider the following instead:
>
> set editor="
On 2001.03.18, in <20010318211124.A574@madmachine>,
"phaust" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to
> > do a catch up in a news
On 2001.03.15, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Zach Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It tells netsacpe to launch the url in a pre-existing window - the id that we
> just found in netscape.sh.
Alternatively:
netscape -remote 'openURL(http://www.foo.net/, mutt-ns)'
will open htt
On 2001.03.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Horace G. Friend III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got pgp (ver. 6.5.8i) working outside of mutt. I can also verify signed msgs
> after I get their public keys outside of mutt.
>
> But I can't sign outgoing msgs. After selecting the (s
On 2001.03.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"ndrw mchl grnbrg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, slrn requires some config, just like mutt does, but all in all, I
> think it's a very good newsreader.
It's not the configuration, mainly; it's the way it works. It doesn't
accomodate the way I r
On 2001.03.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mike polniak proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > Is anyone using mutt as a newsreader? Supposedly there is a nntp
> > patch for mutt. Any comments on how well this works?
>
> Vselvolod (sp
On 2001.02.28, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dirk Laurie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ">"
> has already been prepended to the line. I want the line-break algorithm
> to do its thing before the ">" sign gets prepended.
The
On 2001.02.22, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jay Rossiter / Signe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to unbind all keys with one, or a small series, of
> commands? I'm trying to set mutt up so that the only commands bound are
> ones that I explicitly set. I'm tired of tpyoing a k
On 2001.02.18, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering if it's possible to setup an alias that delivers to multiple addresses?
>
> Something like...
>
> alias foo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (foo group)
Something like that. The man
On 2001.01.30, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Duncan Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to show messages that attachments in the index. I took a look
> at index_format but no luck at first reading. Does anyone have an idea on
> how to accomplish this?
Can't be done
On 2000.12.28, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am using some scripts for cleaning up some mails by setting editor
> > variable to script name. And, every time I try it, new lines get
> > added at end.
>
> Could you share this script? Or
On 2000.12.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Lance Simmons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't understand this suggestion. I don't see the word "script" used
> in the Mutt manual in a way that seems relevant, or in the xterm
> documentation. Could you elaborate?
The "script" program initi
On 2000.12.14, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Lars Hecking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IMHO signing list email is a useless and wasteful exercise, especially
> if the sender hasn't submitted his/her keys to the public keyservers.
> In this situation, those who have configured their encry
On 2000.12.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Charles Curley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When working on my .muttrc, it would be very nice if there were some way
> to see error messages generated by bugs in the .muttrc. Is there any such
> mechanism?
You mean just to test the muttrc file and
On 2000.12.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mark Triggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> When I write a message which has multiple addresses in the To: header,
> the force_name option (set in my .muttrc) causes the mail to be automatically
> saved to a file as the first
On 2000.11.22, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"john slee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i've been using mutt for a while now. one thing that's always bugged me
> (well, pretty much the only thing, now that i know about mime_forward),
> is that there's no way that i can find to have a "compose"
On 2000.11.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mikko Hänninen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonathan Scott Duff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 06 Nov 2000:
> > Hi, I'm using mutt 1.2.5i and was wondering if there were some
> > convient way to match messages based on the number of paragraphs,
>
On 2000.11.04, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Eric Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This "works"
> zip - *txt|mutt -s'send a zip file of all txt docs' eric -a -
Odd; it doesn't work for me. The syntax you give fails to send to the
users "-a" or "-". Putting "eric" after all options
On 2000.10.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dan Boger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> yikes! why would you want to ever overwrite a whole folder with one message?
> I'd be scared of hitting o by mistake...
Mutt treats all save files as folders. Sometimes you just want the one
message, but
On 2000.10.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Pyuesh Daya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to run two external programs to run with mutt. I am already running
>the "Shift Q" to query an external perl script which queries an Ldap ServerIs
>this possible...
>
> How do I bind an
On 2000.09.30, in <2930210156.A2463@sol>,
"Peter Jaques" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can anyone come up with a procmail/formail recipe that will automatically
> detect these things & add such a header line? i tried this, but everything
> ended up in /dev/null:
>
> ##
> :0:
> * =2
On 2000.09.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the dev versions of mutt, or with 1.2.5 and patches, you can create
> and edit an X-Label: header which can contain anything you wish; you can
> even act against it with an expando. I use this to note tip
On 2000.09.28, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Emmanuel Anne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had a look at the docs, but could not find a way to handle bad
> attachements ie : jpeg images attached as "application/octet-stream"
> insted of "image/jpeg".
>
> Does someone know a way to view them di
On 2000.09.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Byrial Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:08:23 -0500, David Champion wrote:
> > Me, too. I take a different approach: I have a short wrapper script
> > that I use for invok
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Marc van Dongen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I just re-installed vim on my system.
> When I now try to compose a message
> after I enter the name of the recipient
> mutt does not allow me to write a message.
> Istead it displays a
>
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Lars Hecking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Example: in general, I prefer a C locale, but occasionally I do need
> certain non-ascii characters. So here's what I am using:
>
> $ grep LC_ ~/.muttrc
> set editor="LC_CTYPE=en_IE.ISO8859-15 vi"
> se
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jeff Howie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I also have a "color" line to highlight my flagged messages in red, and
>
> I've tried, but can't get how to do this. Can you please elucidate?
color index brightred default "~F | ~G | ~n 500-
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mikko Hänninen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2000:
> > > send-hook '~C mutt-' 'set from="Andy Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>&q
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Andy Spiegl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, you can set a compose macro to inline after adding.
> Ehmm, sounds like a good idea, but how do I do that?
>
> Sorry for the stupid question,
> Andy.
Actually, I think it was a bad idea. I guess y
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Lukas Schroeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyways, besides this beautiful '!' next to the message, does a set
> important flag of a set of messages trigger any additional useful
> functionality like easy switching via repeated TAB-punching or
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Andy Spiegl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I tried:
> send-hook '~C mutt-' 'set from="Andy Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"'
> but then from is set for the next mail, not for the current one. *argh*
This is good and correct.
> How did you guys solv
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Andy Spiegl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce DeVisser wrote:
> > ^D on the compose menu toggles this, under Mutt 1.2.5i.
> >
> > (If I hit ? in the compose menu, it's the very first keybinding
> > described. :)
>
> Great! I just upgraded and r
On 2000.09.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jens Askengren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A GUI-mutt could be implemented by separating mutt into a backend and
> several frontends (curses, X11, etc). The frontend could be selected at
> compiletime, or loaded as a plugin/dll/.so-lib at runtim
On 2000.09.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Byrial Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tag all messages, mark the tagged messages read, and finally untag
> them. Can be bound to macro if you like, for example:
>
> macro index R "T~A;WN;t" "Mark all messages read"
This is correct, of cour
On 2000.09.23, in <2923013336.A18320@sol>,
"Peter Jaques" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm looking for some command that will mark all messages in a current
> mailbox as being read, without having to actually read them. sort of like
> ^R but for an entire mailbox (& not dependent on th
The address [EMAIL PROTECTED] is preferred over [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2000.09.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Eugene Paskevich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P.S. How can I include cookies from fortune for example into my signature?
> Answer directly please.
You probably missed the othe
On 2000.09.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Wilhelm Wienemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Could you please give an URL were the nntp-support can be downloaded?
>
> http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/mutt/#nntp
>
> There is also a NNTP-patch for mutt from "Andrej N. Gritsenko"
On 2000.09.15, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dave Morse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I pop my mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED], and write email from home as user
> dm on a system that calls itself bomberlan.net. What is the voodoo I put
> in the .muttrc that makes mutt always send mail appearin
On 2000.09.14, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Lukasz Stelmach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By³a godzina 23:09:20 w ¶roda 13 wrzesieñ, gdy do autobusu wsiad³ kanar
> i wrzasn±³:"David Champion!!! Bilecik do kontroli!!!" A on(a) na to:
>
> >
Is there any way to disable this? I want the pager to treat signatures
the same as the body -- at least as far as colorizing body regexes
goes. "Color signature" won't take a regex argument; it colors the
whole signature.
Would a patch to treat this be accepted? :)
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 2000.09.12, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Chris Chisolm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1. How do you forward a message, including all the attachments
> that came with the message? Ideally I would include the forwarded
> main message as text and the all the attachments would be auto
> loa
On 2000.09.12, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Bruce DeVisser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 02:22:19PM -0700, Chris Chisolm wrote:
> >
> > I have read all the FAQs I can find and searched the man
> > page but I still have a couple questions.
> >
> > 1. How do you forwa
On 2000.09.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jens Askengren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> macro index ""
>
> but since delete-message automatically skips to the next it doesn't work
> as expected.
What about
macro index ""
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniver
On 2000.09.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jason Helfman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 01:05:38PM -0500, David Champion muttered:
> | On 2000.09.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> | Or:
> | source `RunningX && echo .muttr
On 2000.09.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Gary Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 11:15:18PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
> > Would their be a way to configure mutt to test if I am running X, and
> > based off the exit of this, 1 or 0, use a particular mutt variable
On 2000.09.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jason Helfman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have a script that does this?
If you have mh or nmh installed, I'd think that you can "inc" the mbox
to a new folder and rename that folder's directory as .../folder/cur,
then mkdir ../folder/{
erminal...
I think the problem is that netscape -remote returns immediately once
the command is delivered, and not necesarily after the remote operation
has completed the page load.
> On Thursday, 24 August 2000 at 16:41, David Champion wrote:
> > #!/bin/sh
> > ## Wrap ns so tha
On 2000.08.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ron da Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Seems like mutt writes attachments to /tmp and forwards the filename
> to netscape (based on my mailcap file) and then deletes the /tmp file;
> however, seems like sometimes the file gets deleted before n
On 2000.08.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, while that might be convenient, I can also see how that would cause
> problems. If you specifically set the fcc and then mutt notices that it
Yep.
> Probably :-) My bet is that it would only be a b
On 2000.08.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jason Helfman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is their a way to make this delete the thread??? If you are using
> collapsed threads on a given folder?
You can use delete-thread in a macro. For example, to bind it to
control-V in the index:
ma
On 2000.08.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jason Helfman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> no not while vi is open...I mean I am in mutt. I run a macro, asks me
> some questions, and passes it right to vi
Is this for new mail? You can write a macro that sets $editor to a
script which run
On 2000.08.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Martin [Keso] Keseg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The two places that needed libiconv were Solaris 2.6 and Red Hat Linux
> > release 6.1.
>
> no, it;s not a problem about development computers, that's a problem of solaris.
> I was talking abo
On 2000.08.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Evan Vetere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a bunch of mail files in ~/mail; procmail drops stuff there.
> Each file in that dir is, uh, sourced, in my .muttrc:
>
> mailboxes ~/mail/blah ~/mail/bork ~/mail/foo ~/mail/zort
>
> Can I generat
On 2000.08.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Todd Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What I'm ultimately looking for is to edit the first text part (as when
> I answer no to mime_forward) but to still have all other parts of the
> orginal message attached just as they were in the original
On 2000.08.15, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> push "l!~s '^DON'\\''T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA$'^M"
>
> This (I hope) anchors the string at both ends so that only messages
> with this exact subject will be matched so messa
On 2000.08.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have checked this out thoroughly now and I'm convinced there is some
> sort of problem building 1.3.7 (and 1.3.6) on Solaris.
> ...
> make: Fatal error: Don't know how to make target `../types.h'
On 2000.07.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Gregor Zattler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mit 26 Jul 2000 03:37:59 GMT]:
> > I have procmail deliver to ~/Mail/lists/listname. Each "listname" in
>
On 2000.07.29, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Randall Hopper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One wish I have is for there to be an alternative way to specify the
> subject such that it is stored and retrieved from the body and not the
> header, so it can be PGPed.
I'd like this, too, and s
On 2000.07.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ben Beuchler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good point. Fixed that but it still didn't work. It turns out that it
> was the \Cs. For some reason mutt didn't like using ^s as a macro. No
> matter what I specified there, it locked up. I checked
On 2000.07.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Sunil Shetye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > push ! 'DELETE THIS MESSAGE'
>
> Then, this series of mails will also get ignored:-)
So
push ! (~s 'DELETE THIS MESSAGE' ~f MAILER-DAEMON@)
(more or less).
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 2000.07.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Nils Vogels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm.. procmail sounds indeed better than mutt, but this leaves me with quite a
> new challenge: how do i make procmail run a piece of its config file only once
> a month, and not on every mail delivery ? ;-)
On 2000.07.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David, et al --
>
> % So, short answer: Eudora can send to Mutt, but Mutt can't send to
> % Eudora, and it's Eudora's fault.
>
> FWIW, I have been able to send with mutt-0.95.4i and pgp5; my recipient
> may whi
On 2000.07.22, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dennis Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello List,
> I am trying to correspond with a friend who uses Windows and Eudora 4.3.2 (gasp!)
>with PGP
> 6.5.3. I use mutt and gnupg 1.0.1 ;). When he invokes decrypt on my messages all
>he sees
>
On 2000.07.21, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"George Klinich III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm... I don't see the %y format documented in the manual, what is it
> suppose to do?
It's documented, but present only in the 1.3.x series.
muttrc(5):
%y `x-label:' field, if present
On 2000.07.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Marius Gedminas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not that I advocate adding SMTP support to Mutt [2], but I just
> ---
> [2] Well, that would be a nice thing to have if I try to compile it on
> WinNT again ;)
I don't mean to say anything about whe
On 2000.07.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jason Helfman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I searched threw the manual and it looks us though you may not be able
> to tag something as unread. If this is the case, why? If I am wrong, can
> you please point me to the right place in the manual...
K
On 2000.07.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David Champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In order:
> c
> ? to list folders/enter browser
> c
> ^u
> then enter an IMAP path: e.g., {imap.demo.int/s
On 2000.07.07, in <00a001bfe869$78def130$0200a8c0@mdaxke>,
"Mark D. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Which implies to me that it is possible to browse folders of an IMAP server.
> So how is that done?
In order:
c
? to list folders/enter browser
On 2000.06.30, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Sergio Bruder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a way to alter the default Subject of a forwarded message?
set forward_format. The %-expansions are teh same as for $index_format.
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chic
501 - 600 of 636 matches
Mail list logo
