Re: reply-to alternatives

2002-10-04 Thread José Romildo Malaquias
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 09:57:35PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: On Thu, 03 Oct 2002 the mental interface of Hanspeter Roth told: Which newsreader is most similar to mutt? slrn. Ask Sven ;-) Is there a set o key bindings to slrn similar to the default one found in mutt? Where can it

Re: reply-to alternatives

2002-10-03 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Oct 02 at 21:08, Will Yardley spoke: [snipping a lot] Most mail clients either blindly honor Reply-To: OR give the user an option (or allow you to configure it either way). And maybe there are also mailers which expect another header rather than Reply-To. So if I knew those I could

Re: reply-to alternatives

2002-10-03 Thread Sven Guckes
* Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-03 09:19]: The majority of ansers I get in deed come from mail clients that do honor Reply-To. But occasionally I realize that I get answers at the address that's not mentioned in the Reply-To header. then the Reply-To is *not* honored. is this a

Re: reply-to alternatives

2002-10-03 Thread Kurt Lieber
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:55:53PM +0200 or thereabouts, Sven Guckes wrote: Now if the only reason Reply-To is not honored is the configuration of the one's MUA that's answering me, I have to accept that. But if there is _another reason_ for this and I can do something about it, I'd just

Re: reply-to alternatives

2002-10-03 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Oct 03 at 10:20, Kurt Lieber spoke: He was asking if there were other headers that other MUAs used instead of Reply-To. Presumably, Mutt could then be configured to add those *in addition to* the normal Reply-To header. IMO, perfectly on topic and a subject which I'm interested in

Re: reply-to alternatives

2002-10-03 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Oct 03 at 14:55, Sven Guckes spoke: if the reason is *anotehr MUA then this is *not* the forum to discuss it. comp.mail.misc exists. Is there a mailgateway for comp.mail.misc or comp.mail.headers? Which newsreader is most similar to mutt? -Hanspeter

Re: reply-to alternatives

2002-10-03 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Thu, 03 Oct 2002 the mental interface of Hanspeter Roth told: On Oct 03 at 14:55, Sven Guckes spoke: if the reason is *anotehr MUA then this is *not* the forum to discuss it. comp.mail.misc exists. Is there a mailgateway for comp.mail.misc or comp.mail.headers? Which

Re: reply-to alternatives

2002-10-03 Thread Sven Guckes
* Elimar Riesebieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-03 19:58]: if the reason is *anotehr MUA then this is *not* the forum to discuss it. comp.mail.misc exists. Is there a mailgateway for comp.mail.misc or comp.mail.headers? yes. there are are several news services which offer an email

Re: reply-to alternatives - comp.mail.misc

2002-10-03 Thread Sven Guckes
* Kurt Lieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-03 15:01]: if the reason is *anotehr MUA then this is *not* the forum to discuss it. comp.mail.misc exists. He was asking if there were other headers that other MUAs used instead of Reply-To. Presumably, Mutt could then be configured to add those

Re: reply-to alternatives

2002-10-03 Thread Will Yardley
Hanspeter Roth wrote: On Oct 03 at 14:55, Sven Guckes spoke: if the reason is *anotehr MUA then this is *not* the forum to discuss it. comp.mail.misc exists. Is there a mailgateway for comp.mail.misc or comp.mail.headers? Which newsreader is most similar to mutt? As a mutt-user (and

Re: reply-to alternatives

2002-10-02 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Oct 01 at 17:32, Will Yardley spoke: Most people probably don't *see* it, because most people don't read all the headers of their email messages and there are precious few mail It is probably up to the *MUA* rather than to people to see the Reply-To header. As of Mutt it can be told

Re: reply-to alternatives

2002-10-02 Thread Will Yardley
Hanspeter Roth wrote: On Oct 01 at 17:32, Will Yardley spoke: Most people probably don't *see* it, because most people don't read all the headers of their email messages and there are precious few mail It is probably up to the *MUA* rather than to people to see the Reply-To

Re: reply-to alternatives

2002-10-01 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Oct 01 at 01:13, Sven Guckes spoke: * Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-30 20:12]: are there alternative headers to Reply-To: and Mail-Followup-To: used by other MUAs? we could tell you - but then we'd have to kill you. Why? It isn't a fight against Reply-To and

Re: reply-to alternatives

2002-10-01 Thread Will Yardley
Hanspeter Roth wrote: I'm just wondering why some people don't honor Reply-To or Mail-Followup-To. Maybe they choose to ignore it. Or maybe their mailer is expecting another header therefore. Most people probably don't *see* it, because most people don't read all the headers of their email

Re: reply-to alternatives

2002-09-30 Thread Sven Guckes
* Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-30 20:12]: are there alternative headers to Reply-To: and Mail-Followup-To: used by other MUAs? we could tell you - but then we'd have to kill you. of course there are more headers - and all of them are probably only supported by this one mailer.