Hi,
* Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-15 00:41]:
I cannot verify (April only):
With neither 1.5.0 nor 1.3.27 (except for S/MIME of course).
Thorsten
--
Alles ist richtig, auch das Gegenteil.
- Kurt Tucholsky
msg27166/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
* Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-15 00:38]:
Add this one to the list I just can't verify. I cannot find any
suspicious dots here.
Thorsten
--
Death to all fanatics!
msg27167/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Tucholsky
Maybe use signatures in English in an English list?
Cheers, Rocco.
msg27169/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
verify OK those 2 mails, but can't verify 4 others
(gpg: BAD signature from ...) on the 325 PGP signed mails from April.
Their IDs are:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey, that's one of mine and guess what... It verifies okay
here.
Last minute before sending: Well, I found what's happening, at least
a broken MTA involved.
--
Shawn McMahon| McMahon's Laws of Linux support:
http://www.eiv.com | 1) There's more than one way to do it
AIM: spmcmahonfedex, smcmahoneiv | 2) Somebody thinks your way is wrong
msg27173/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Is there anywy to get mutt putting the gpg/pgp signature check report
'after' the message, instead of top?
--
ais, ais/at/pobox/dot/com
Registered Linux User #93375 - - - 2:348/610@fidonet
GnuPG key: 1024D/5C4839A5 2002-02-07
There's a race between programmers making better idiot-proof SW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Mike Schiraldi on Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 02:41:09PM -0500:
Is there anywy to get mutt putting the gpg/pgp signature check
report 'after' the message, instead of top?
That could be bad, as people could end their email with a fake report
However, there is still the status bar to help in the confirmation (and
designed for that purpose).
If i write a message to the mutt list, sign it with my key, and forge a from
header that makes it appear to come from you, the status bar will display,
PGP signature successfully verified
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 08:12:51PM +, Dave Ewart muttered:
On Tuesday, 19.03.2002 at 21:00 +0100, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 06:52:50AM -0500, R Signes wrote:
Define it.
set pgp_good_sign=Good signature
I did it. And this solves problem with encrypted
line information that signature could not be
verified. And it displays it despite of that in the message area one
can see that message is OK.
Have a look at $pgp_good_sign.
It's not defined. Please note that _mutt_ says that signature is _not_
Define it.
set pgp_good_sign=Good signature
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 06:52:50AM -0500, R Signes wrote:
Define it.
set pgp_good_sign=Good signature
I did it. And this solves problem with encrypted signed messages. But
it still complains that it could not verify signature in messages which
were _encrypted_ony_.
--
--= Michal [EMAIL
On Tuesday, 19.03.2002 at 21:00 +0100, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 06:52:50AM -0500, R Signes wrote:
Define it.
set pgp_good_sign=Good signature
I did it. And this solves problem with encrypted signed messages. But
it still complains that it could not verify
: Michal Kochanowicz PGP lokalnie (e)
-- (all)
PGP signature could NOT be verified.
Please tell me what am I missinterpreting. Note that message WASN'T
SIGNED and mutt complains
PROTECTED]
[-- End of PGP output --]
[-- The following data is PGP/MIME encrypted --]
test
[-- End of PGP/MIME encrypted data --]
- PF- 653/663: Michal Kochanowicz PGP lokalnie (e)
-- (all)
PGP signature could NOT be verified
Kochanowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[-- End of PGP output --]
[-- The following data is PGP/MIME encrypted --]
test
[-- End of PGP/MIME encrypted data --]
- PF- 653/663: Michal Kochanowicz PGP lokalnie (e)
-- (all)
PGP signature could
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:41:06PM +, Dave Smith wrote:
Maybe I'm being stupid here, but it appears that mutt and GPG are
behaving correctly. How can it verify the signature on the message
if it wasn't signed?
Or maybe I'm stupid ;) Why write anything about signature if it wasn't
signed
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:09:23PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:41:06PM +, Dave Smith wrote:
Maybe I'm being stupid here, but it appears that mutt and GPG are
behaving correctly. How can it verify the signature on the message
if it wasn't signed
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:27:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have signed this message with a bogus key, so you can see what happens.
My real key is available on www.keyserver.net.
Hmm, it doesn't appear to shout, since the key IDs don't match. I guess if
I were to create a key with an
At 5:27 PM EST on March 19 Dave Smith sent off:
The message means GPG didn't tell me that it managed to validate a
correct signature. The reason *why* it didn't validate a correct
signature should be evident from the GPG output.
I have a feeling that a while back there was a debate about
At 5:02 PM EST on March 19 David Champion sent off:
But doesn't OpenPGP sign data before encrypting it? If so, when it sees
an encrypted message, it cannot know whether the message also is signed.
Doesn't it become apparent once the message is decrypted, though?
--
Erudition, n. Dust shaken
it become apparent once the message is decrypted, though?
If the message is decrypted. I happen to get a fair amount of encrypted
mail that I can't decrypt, so I get this message (PGP signature could
NOT be verified) quite often.
Michal didn't say in his first message after setting $pgp_good_sign
]
PGP 0xC9C40C31 -=- http://codesorcery.net
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/amazon.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8l81r94d6K8nEDDERApe4AKCJpngKDNBqGABpm7OSqLBc5ySNpwCfb1f7
TNwJ5dqgKJ0NXKmQZjstfY4=
=a9fw
On the message from David Collantes, I noticed the following attachment
in mutt:
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Encoding: base64, Size:
2.7K --]
A brief search on Google identified this as an SMIME attachment.
Is this something akin
Christopher Swingley wrote:
A brief search on Google identified this as an SMIME attachment.
Is this something akin to a GPG signature? Is there some package
I need to install on my system (Debian GNU/Linux) to allow me to
verify his email message in the same way as GPG?
there are s/mime
Hi
My colegue came across some problem with mutt/GPG/PGP cooperation. It
seem that for every _encrypted_ and encrypted/signed file mutt displays
in status line information that signature could not be verified. And it
displays it despite of that in the message area one can see that message
is OK
that signature could not be
verified. And it displays it despite of that in the message area one
can see that message is OK.
Have a look at $pgp_good_sign.
- --
[!] Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP 0xC9C40C31 -=- http://codesorcery.net
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/amazon.html
-BEGIN
begin quoting what Christopher Swingley said on Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 11:33:21AM -0900:
A brief search on Google identified this as an SMIME attachment.
Is this something akin to a GPG signature? Is there some package I
Sounds like it's time for a less-brief search on Google.
msg25697
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 05:10:59PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
My colegue came across some problem with mutt/GPG/PGP cooperation. It
seem that for every _encrypted_ and encrypted/signed file mutt
displays in status line information that signature could not be
verified. And it displays
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 10:18:34PM +0100, Michal Kochanowicz muttered:
Hi
My colegue came across some problem with mutt/GPG/PGP cooperation. It
seem that for every _encrypted_ and encrypted/signed file mutt displays
in status line information that signature could not be verified
Sven, et al --
...and then Sven Guckes said...
%
% * pat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020313 12:46]:
% * Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-12-02 09:57] crowed:
% * MuttER [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020310 02:58]:
%Knute, later in this thread solved my problem.
%The .signature file was missing
def even if you hadn't intended to use sigrot itself.
As you've seen, a defined-but-not-present signature file shouldn't cause
mutt any problems, so your statements *do* appear contradictory. I don't
have to spend the time worrying about it if you don't want to, though.
David, it works now. I
~/.muttrc file without
You mean in the course of your debugging you ended up removing your
entire muttrc file and it was still hanging? Interesting.
% change. When I corrected the missing ~/.signature status, operation
% returned to normal.
Very interesting. Unfortunately, it seems
Description: PGP signature
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-13-02 10:21] crowed:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 09:56:42AM -0500, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
accidentally -- a pipe would do that. Removing your muttrc leaves the
only possibility in your /etc/Muttrc, though, which is also quite
unlikely.
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02/03/05 15:41]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8hNitWH8M1wI2iFcRApO/AJwOFPUVJn3wxcP8r26eeANYGT7fdgCgklRs
3c1l651J0OaZ86L/ae2phjE=
=+SPC
-END PGP SIGNATURE
* Thomas Huemmler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-03-02 09:46 AM EST]:
...and now for something completely different:
Sorry, if I do not add something more genuine to this thread. But could
you please send your gpg signature to a public keyserver or stop signing
your messages. Just because every
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 04:07:50PM +0100, Thomas Huemmler wrote:
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02/03/05 15:41]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8hNitWH8M1wI2iFcRApO/AJwOFPUVJn3wxcP8r26eeANYGT7fdgCgklRs
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:24:49AM -0600, John Buttery wrote:
gpg --verbose --keyserver certserverpgpcom --recv-keys 587F0CD702368857
Use something like keyserver wwwkeysukpgpnet in your options
file, where uk would be your country
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road, Belsize Park,
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-05-02 10:25] crowed:
report back if it works?
I uploaded my key to certserver.pgp.com. I've also successfully
retrieved my key from this server. Is this one not in the rotation?
Is there some other server I should be using? I have successfully
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg: key 02368857: public key imported
gpg: key C6EE66AE.825: Good subkey binding
gpg: uid 02368857.825: Good self-signature
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1
But also:
mdb@cyclone:~/$ gpg --verbose --keyserver wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net --recv-keys
PROTECTED]
PGP 0xC9C40C31 -=- http://codesorcery.net
http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/29/inv.terror.probe/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8hOwu94d6K8nEDDERAtITAJ9FfH8q47HxcY0OpW1RIx2errFDOwCfVYdb
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-05 09:24 -0600]:
This is really odd; you're not the first person to say this, but I
_did_ upload it to a keyserver, not only that but I have successfully
retrieved it as well.
I uploaded my key to certserver.pgp.com.
It looks like that server is
)
%
--
John Buttery
(Web page temporarily unavailable)
msg25034/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-05-02 11:57] crowed:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:02:55AM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
Said John Buttery on Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:24:49AM -0600:
gpg --verbose --keyserver certserver.pgp.com --recv-keys 587F0CD702368857
www
HTH and sorry for the intervenience,
Thomas
--
Thomas Hümmler * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.huemmler.de
msg25068/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
At Sat, Jan 26 2002 [22:34 -0500], Ben Logan aroused my curiosity with:
Hello Ben :-)
set pgp_sign_command=gpg --no-verbose --batch --output - --passphrase-fd 0 --armor
--textmode --clearsign %?a?-u %a? %f
pgp_sign_command is set to create old-style pgp signatures - for this
reason the
Thanks, that fixed the problem.
Ben
--
Ben Logan: ben at wblogan dot net
OpenPGP Key KeyID: A1ADD1F0
The part of the world that people find most puzzling is the part called Me.
Hello,
I noticed recently that when I send a signed message, gpg says not a
detached signature. What does that mean, and should I be concerned
about it? I'm using the gpg configuration found in the sample gpg.rc
file supplied with mutt.
I signed this message so that ya'll could see what I'm
PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg23832/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 10:34:20AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
I took a look and found your entire message twice, once bare and once
apparently as an old-style pgp message. I have no idea why it would
send two copies, but the in-line part looks interesting.
Can you
grep pgp .muttrc
Hi,
On Thu, 03 Jan 2002 Anh Lai spewed into the ether:
how do i keep adding my signature when replying? I would like to add it only
when composing a new messgae. Having my signature collect on the bottom gets
annoying sometimes.
Maybe by rebinding the 'r'eply key. Like so (untested
how do i keep adding my signature when replying? I would like to add it only
when composing a new messgae. Having my signature collect on the bottom gets
annoying sometimes.
--
Anh Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Student of Computer Engineering
* Anh Lai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 24. 2002 15:38]:
how do i keep adding my signature when replying? I would like to add
it only when composing a new messgae. Having my signature collect on
the bottom gets annoying sometimes.
If you use vim, this is what I use in my .vimrc:
au BufEnter
how do i keep adding my signature when replying? I would like to add it only
when composing a new messgae. Having my signature collect on the bottom gets
annoying sometimes.
--
Anh Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Student of Computer Engineering
Anh Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/01/2002 (18:27) :
how do i keep adding my signature when replying? I would like to add it only
when composing a new messgae. Having my signature collect on the bottom gets
annoying sometimes.
First read:
http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/elm
hi all,
Until now I have used the program signature (by Ian McDonald) launched
at the startup via .bash_profile for creating a dynamic .signature file
(something like this: signature -q .quotefile -r -t .templatefile)
Obviously in my .muttrc I have put set signature = .signature
Now I want
the mails enter the archive. Afterwards I am
not anymore interested in the signature. It already works with
inline-signatures. Simple script, simple output. For the mime-signed
mails it doesn't work. :-(
Signed mail in file testmail. Using munpack I get signature (part2) and
text (part1)
munpack -t
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:00:37AM -0800, Dairy Wall Limey wrote:
Reed Lai wrote:
Seniors,
As I remember, the signature delimiter -- in mail body is a
--
Ah... I can not understand your answer...
I mean... my question
Seniors,
As I remember, the signature delimiter -- in mail body is a
standard from RFC, but I forget which RCF is. Anybody remembers
that please tell me.
not -- but -- !
RFC 1036 (Standard for interchange of USENET messages)
Wolfgang Kaufmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Seniors,
As I remember, the signature delimiter -- in mail body is a
standard from RFC, but I forget which RCF is. Anybody remembers
that please tell me.
not -- but -- !
RFC 1036 (Standard for interchange of USENET messages)
Err, don't
* Thus spake Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As I remember, the signature delimiter -- in mail body is a
standard from RFC, but I forget which RCF is. Anybody remembers
that please tell me.
not -- but -- !
RFC 1036 (Standard for interchange of USENET messages)
Err, don't you
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:54:06AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
Wolfgang Kaufmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
not -- but -- !
RFC 1036 (Standard for interchange of USENET messages)
Err, don't you mean -- \n?
Err, don't you mean \n-- \n? :)
--
Dave Pearson: |
On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
is there any way to check normal pgp-signatures on demand like with
Theres esc P note the capitol P, that should verify cleartext sigs.
--
Don't tell me I'm burning the candle at both ends -- tell me where to
get more wax!!
-
David Clarke [EMAIL
Seniors,
As I remember, the signature delimiter -- in mail body is a
standard from RFC, but I forget which RCF is. Anybody remembers
that please tell me.
Thanks!
--
Reed Lai http://w3.icpdas.com/reed/ | ICPDAS http://www.icpdas.com
GnuPG (DSA/ElGamal) 0x7199EAD3 Reed Lai (key #1) [EMAIL
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 01:05:30PM +0800, Reed Lai wrote:
Seniors,
As I remember, the signature delimiter -- in mail body is a
--
--
Regards
Cliff
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:47:18PM +0800, Reed Lai wrote:
Seniors,
As I remember, the signature delimiter -- in mail body is a
--
Ah... I can not understand your answer...
I mean... my question is that the -- is mentioned in which RFC
Hi,
Just noticed today, that the signature in the pager is no longer
coloured. I distinctly remember it used to be coloured, but, for some
reason, it is now shown as any other part of the body.
I recompiled Mutt a few times in the last few days, and somewhere along
the way I seem to have mucked
Prahlad Vaidyanathan muttered:
Just noticed today, that the signature in the pager is no longer
coloured.
color signature magenta default # signature
There is compile option for coloring the signature.
HTH,
Michael
--
PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml
Hi,
Is there a way to toggle the display of a signature in an Email - Same
as the '\' key in SLRN ?
2 reasons :
1. Mailing lists append customary sigs which one doesn't have to read
for _every_ mail.
2. Misanthropic freaks who have 20 line sigs.
If there is no builtin way of doing this, I
Luca --
...and then Luca said...
% Hi guys,
Hi!
% can you tell me how can i show the pgp signature on the pager
% like a text plain message ?
I've waited for someone else to reply since I just didn't understand what
you asked, but I haven't seen anything else go by. When I read a signed
Hi guys,
can you tell me how can i show the pgp signature on the pager
like a text plain message ?
thanks for your attention,
Luca
, otherwise an English
one. But for certain people (like my son) I try to use
a less formal one. The relevant rules look as follows:
send-hook . 'set signature=~/Mutt/.signature'
send-hook simono@zonnet\.nl 'set signature=~/Mutt/.signature.simon'
send-hook \.nl 'set signature=~/Mutt/.signature.nl
to use
a less formal one. The relevant rules look as follows:
send-hook . 'set signature=~/Mutt/.signature'
send-hook simono@zonnet\.nl 'set signature=~/Mutt/.signature.simon'
send-hook \.nl 'set signature=~/Mutt/.signature.nl'
Now it is my understanding that the first hook that matches
should
Miguel Farah F. [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Also: one of the nice things about tin (the news reader) is that it
lets you have a random signature (there's a fixed part and a random
one, selected from the files in a directory previously declared). It'd
be nice it mutt could do that as well
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:39:20AM -0400, Miguel Farah F. wrote:
| I believe there was a vim command or option that trimmed the signature
| off when editing/quoting the message. Might want to search the
| archives.
At http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~lahvak/software/files/dotvimrc
you can find
quotes at the end of his sig, and you want to
reply on a quote ;)
If it's an option, you can turn it off temporarily in the rare cases
that you want to reply to a sig, and keep it on in the vast majority of
cases where you just want the .sig gone.
[...]
And the script signature looks like:
=20
Hi all.
I'm a new mutt user, so if the stuff I ask has already been discussed
to death, please don't /dev/null me.
When I reply to an e-mail, mutt quotes it and pases it to the editor,
including the .signature - I think it'd be nice if there was an option
called trim_signature - if on, it cuts
it to the editor,
including the .signature - I think it'd be nice if there was an option
called trim_signature - if on, it cuts everything from the LAST line
that responds to the pattern ^-- $ (BOL-dash-dash-space-EOL) upto
the end off the mail. This would save time and bandwidth, me thinks.
I
* Miguel Farah F. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [19.09.2001 17:08]:
Also: one of the nice things about tin (the news reader) is that it
lets you have a random signature (there's a fixed part and a random
one, selected from the files in a directory previously declared). It'd
be nice it mutt could do
On Sep/19/2001, Miguel Farah F. wrote:
Also: one of the nice things about tin (the news reader) is that it
lets you have a random signature (there's a fixed part and a random
one, selected from the files in a directory previously declared). It'd
be nice it mutt could do that as well
* It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
PGP signature
signature
HAND
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
PGP signature
Hello
Is it possible to associate a particular message signature to a particular mail-folder
and/or recipient ?
..apart from editing it that is !
--
Regards
Cliff
* Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-Fri-01 00:53 -0700]:
Is it possible to associate a particular message signature
to a particular mail-folder and/or recipient ?
yeah. i just did it today :)
the example for recepient is in the userguide ('sept they
set the 'from' header
and in is in.
-- Pumbaa
PGP signature
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 05:24:51AM +0800, Rino Mardo wrote:
hi. i noticed that on going out my gpg signed emails are sent as
another mime attachments which could be annoying to users who have
gui mua's. how can i setup mutt so that gpg signs all appear together
with the body of the message?
-
| formail -i Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=encrypt
:0 fBw
* ^-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
* ^-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
* ^-END PGP SIGNATURE-
| formail -i Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x
and in is in.
-- Pumbaa
PGP signature
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:20:30AM +0800, Rino Mardo wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 08:46:49PM -0400 or thereabouts, Federico Grau wrote:
hi Pumbaa,
set pgp_create_traditional=yes
from the man page:
pgp_create_traditional
Type: quadoption
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:15:41PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Hello I have a .signature file .. as below. When I respond to a
mailing list message the signature does not seem to get appended. Is
this a feature ?
Your .signature should get added when you go into your editor in
compose
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:15:41PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Hello
I have a .signature file .. as below.
When I respond to a mailing list message the signature does not
seem to get appended.
Is this a feature ?
Perhaps your editor is configured to strip signaturs
, Marinesiedlung 10 b, 29348 Eschede, Germany/RFA
Ph: +49 5142 41 63 93; Fax: 41 63 95; GSM: +49 1 70 / 2 32 81 19
PGP signature
On Sun, 09 Sep 2001 at 00:25:11 +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Hello
I am trying to use pgp (and or gpg) signatures with mutt.
I have set up the keys and directories etc.
When I try to sign the message with the option from the
p command I get an errno(2) ..no such file or directory.
pgp and
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 10:00:09PM +0200, Piet Delport wrote:
On Sun, 09 Sep 2001 at 00:25:11 +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Hello
I am trying to use pgp (and or gpg) signatures with mutt.
I have set up the keys and directories etc.
When I try to sign the message with the option from the
Hello
I am trying to use pgp (and or gpg) signatures with mutt.
I have set up the keys and directories etc.
When I try to sign the message with the option from the
p command I get an errno(2) ..no such file or directory.
pgp and gpg are both on the PATH.
Clues ?
--
Regards
Cliff
* Vineet Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08/27/01 11:50]:
or how about this?
set editor=vim '+/^ -- $/,/^-- $/-d'
Looks to me like that should delete everything between the quoted
signature and my signature on starting vim. I guess it would poop out,
though, if there is no quoted sigdash line
Can Mutt handle random signature like siggi program in window.
Thanks
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 10:07:34PM +0700, Efata wrote:
Can Mutt handle random signature like siggi program in window.
Yes. Read the FAQ.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]innominate AG
Technical Consultant Don't be afraid of what you see -
Diplom-Informatiker
Thanks your Reply, but which section number?
On Sat 14/07/2001 at 05:34PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 10:07:34PM +0700, Efata wrote:
Can Mutt handle random signature like siggi program in window.
Yes. Read the FAQ.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED
401 - 500 of 687 matches
Mail list logo
