* On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to use mutt without the sendmail server on my
machine. I find sendmail configuration quite abstruse. Can I
directly make Mutt connect to my ISP's outgoing SMTP server.
Not with just Mutt by itself, but you might want to
John Iverson wrote:
* On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to use mutt without the sendmail server on my machine. I
find sendmail configuration quite abstruse. Can I directly make Mutt
connect to my ISP's outgoing SMTP server.
Not with just Mutt by itself, but you
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:54:33PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
Hrm. That sounded like a good explanation. Was there any change
in the bounce function?
Not that I recall. It's always pretty much just resubmitted the message
as is, but with new envelope recipients.
Shouldn't it add a
Just want to add that I switched to postfix (from sendmail)
about 3 months ago and have never looked back..
I found the configuration to be easy, especially compared to
sendmail.
Will Yardley wrote:
John Iverson wrote:
* On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to
* W. D. McKinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-11 06:00]:
(my vimrc wraps, sorry.)
i was forced. sheesh.
(1) change your vimrc
(2) change the setting
(3) :set paste
(4) use 'pastetoggle'
knowledge is power!
Sven
--
..and give us our daily RTFM..
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Chris Grossmann wrote:
Just want to add that I switched to postfix (from sendmail)
about 3 months ago and have never looked back..
I wonder if anybody on the list knows of any sites comparing the
performance and reliability of both Sendmail and Postfix? I can
only find
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-11-02 08:38]:
* W. D. McKinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-11 06:00]:
(my vimrc wraps, sorry.)
i was forced. sheesh.
(1) change your vimrc
(2) change the setting
(3) :set paste
(4) use 'pastetoggle'
knowledge is power!
Sven
--
..and give
Hello all,
I have a very complicated mutt configuration which includes several
lines in the form:
send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] set from=David Benfell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mutt 1.3.28i (2002-03-13) complains that Benfell is an unknown
variable. I'm subscribed to a lot of mailing lists with a
* On 2002.07.11, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
postfix is also a bit less complicated than sendmail to configure (and
harder to misconfigure).
Sendmail configuration is usually quite easy (that is, unless you're
doing complicated things with it). It's
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 06:44:46PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
Thanks to you and John Iverson and Will Yardley for the responses.
It turned out to be my mailcap entry. I had this:
text/html; links %s; nametemplate=%s.html
when I really needed this:
text/html; links -dump %s;
David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* On 2002.07.11, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
postfix is also a bit less complicated than sendmail to configure (and
harder to misconfigure).
Sendmail configuration is usually quite easy (that is, unless
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:20:53AM +0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to use mutt without the sendmail server on my machine. I
find sendmail configuration quite abstruse. Can I directly make Mutt
connect to my ISP's outgoing SMTP server.
Sendmail configuration to to what
Hi David,
On Tuesday, July 9, 2002 at 4:10:21 PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/mutt-users-199919-200207.mbox.bz2
It's 12.3 GB, ranging from 10/1999 to present. I won't keep it up for
long -- a few days, maybe.
Thank you very much, David! A little more than
At 13:30 +0200 11 Jul 2002, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:54:33PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
Not that I recall. It's always pretty much just resubmitted the message
as is, but with new envelope recipients.
Shouldn't it add a Resend-To: header?
It does,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-11 11:20]:
Hi, I would like to use mutt without the sendmail server on my
machine. I find sendmail configuration quite abstruse. Can I directly
make Mutt connect to my ISP's outgoing SMTP server.
Regards Amit
I'm using sSMTP.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:01:40AM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
Actually, it did, but only on the second attempt. I'm guessing that
mutt is applying the send-hooks before asking who I'm addressing the
e-mail to.
Which at least is a different problem. How do I fix this one?
from the
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:01:40AM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:22:19 -0400, Dan Boger wrote:
try:
send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'set from=David Benfell [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
?
does that help?
Actually, it did, but only on the second attempt. I'm guessing
Hi,
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-07-11 01:30]:
* Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-10 21:19]:
For quite some time I have a problem veryfying PGP signatures.
I get 'Falsche Unterschrift' (wrong signature) messages on
these mails though others seem to be able to verify them.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 09:04:09PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
When I ssh in from my X11 desktop to my server (both Debian 3.0) and
start sessions under GNU Screen (v. 3.09.11), among which are Mutt (v.
1.3.28) instances, I get a weird effect with Mutt's internal pager:
If I highlight text from
Hi,
* Thorsten Haude [02-07-11 21:28:53 +0200] wrote:
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-07-11 01:30]:
:source contrib/gpg.rc
does it help?
Nope.
That was one of the first things I did when I discovered
those problems. Now that I know that a MTA in my mailpath
has a broken mbox parser
David Champion wrote:
* On 2002.07.11, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
postfix is also a bit less complicated than sendmail to configure (and
harder to misconfigure).
Sendmail configuration is usually quite easy (that is, unless you're
doing complicated
Hi,
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-07-11 21:33]:
* Thorsten Haude [02-07-11 21:28:53 +0200] wrote:
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-07-11 01:30]:
:source contrib/gpg.rc
does it help?
Nope.
That was one of the first things I did when I discovered
those problems. Now that I know
Hi,
* Thorsten Haude [02-07-11 22:10:53 +0200] wrote:
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-07-11 21:33]:
That was one of the first things I did when I discovered
those problems. Now that I know that a MTA in my mailpath
has a broken mbox parser I can verify a few of those bad
mails. A few
Hi,
* Will Yardley [02-07-11 22:10:53 +0200] wrote:
The postconf tool is also very useful since it lets you
query both default and current settings, and even edit
settings if necessary.
Such a feature would be cool for mutt, too. Finding config
mistakes was easier by just reporting
I'm leaving my job to return to school, and my new priorities mean i can't
really keep up with the traffic on the mutt lists anymore. Also, mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will start bouncing soon. However, if anyone has any
questions about S/MIME or the index_context patch*, you can reach me at
[EMAIL
Hi,
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-07-11 22:29]:
* Thorsten Haude [02-07-11 22:10:53 +0200] wrote:
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-07-11 21:33]:
That was one of the first things I did when I discovered
those problems. Now that I know that a MTA in my mailpath
has a broken mbox
Hi,
* Thorsten Haude [02-07-11 23:25:41 +0200] wrote:
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-07-11 22:29]:
* Thorsten Haude [02-07-11 22:10:53 +0200] wrote:
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-07-11 21:33]:
A lot of the mails i have problems with are form David (no
GMX). I checked some
* Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-11 23:24 +0200]:
A lot of the mails i have problems with are form David (no GMX).
IIRC, the last time a thread came up where people were having problems in
David's emails not verifying, the problem was traced to an MTA that was
improperly
Quoting Thomas Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
but what does infocmp show? (screen's terminfo normally doesn't say bce)
Thanks for asking. This is from one of the screen sessions, of course:
[rick@uncle-enzo]
~ $ infocmp
# Reconstructed via infocmp from file: /etc/terminfo/s/screen
Quoting Thomas Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
[my infocmp output snipped]
...and no bce. Recent versions of screen allow you to set bce in its
configuration, but you have to install a terminfo entry for screen
which adds 'bce', so it will work properly.
I fear we might be trying to solve the
i am currently running Mutt 1.4i (2002-05-29) on mandrake 8.2, with a
muttrc created with the automated muttrc builder
(http://mutt.netliberte.org/). When i am reading a message, in the pager
if i am not mistaken, and i want to scroll up to the previous line i
cannot using either the backspace
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:44:53AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
:
: On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 06:44:46PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
:
: Now if I can only figure out how to keep both entries and get Mutt to
: let me select between the two methods...
:
: You can. Just put them in you mailcap in
32 matches
Mail list logo
