Re: smtps://smtp.office365.com:587 CONNECT_CR_SRVR_HELLO:wrong version number

2018-08-08 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# wagner_m_bre...@web.de / 2018-08-08 13:03:22 +0200: > On Aug 08, 2018 at 12:44:00, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > i'm having trouble setting up mutt for SMTP submission to office365.com. > > the error message is: > > > > SSL failed: error:1400410B:SSL routines:

smtps://smtp.office365.com:587 CONNECT_CR_SRVR_HELLO:wrong version number

2018-08-08 Thread Roman Neuhauser
hello, i'm having trouble setting up mutt for SMTP submission to office365.com. the error message is: SSL failed: error:1400410B:SSL routines:CONNECT_CR_SRVR_HELLO:wrong version number my configuration is: set my_addr = "roman.neuhauser@..." set my_pass = "..." set smtp_url =

Re: Being subscribed to a mailing list but having sender displayed in index

2002-09-05 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-05 16:00:37 +0200: I would like to have the following feature: - I am subscribed to a mailing list and - I would like to see the sender of the email as it is the case for emails that do not belong to a mailing lists. see index_format, s/%L/%F/ -- begin

Re: location of signature.

2002-09-05 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-04 18:17:34 -0500: OK. I found the messages and I am not glad about those so-called rules. Yes. Ah, so-called good manners. Such a useless junk! I THINK it is better to put the reply BEFORE quoted text and this has nothing to do with M$. It is natural (to

Re: location of signature.

2002-09-04 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-04 10:24:57 + (-0500): Hi, Everyone, Mutt automatically put the signature at the end of the email. Can I let it be put before the quoted text? yes. use Outlook. -- FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE 5:32PM up 14 days, 23:25, 8 users, load averages: 0.02,

Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software)

2002-08-28 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:15:48 +0100 From: Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software) On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:05:57AM -0500, John Buttery wrote: Anyway, just out of curiosity, how come you guys aren't using TMDA? Just haven't found it yet,

Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software)

2002-08-28 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:46:59 +0100 From: Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software) On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:34:58PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:15:48 +0100 From: Chris Green [EMAIL

Re: Reducing duplication

2002-08-21 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:31:28 -0600 From: Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Reducing duplication To: Mutt Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alas! darren chamberlain spake thus: Or skip your sent-mail folder altogether. I wanted to avoid this for portability; if I just skip

Re: Quoting the signature in replies (yes, I want)

2002-08-12 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:41:38 +0200 From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Quoting the signature in replies (yes, I want) When I reply to a message with something starting with -- in it, mutt does not quote it, probably because it assumes it is a

Re: most commonly used regex lib for awk/frep/mutt/sed?

2002-08-02 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 18:55:42 +1000 From: Erik Christiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: most commonly used regex lib for awk/frep/mutt/sed? On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: Is this too ambitious a wish? unfortunately, yes.

Re: mutt + pcre

2002-08-02 Thread Roman Neuhauser
From: Calum Selkirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 09:03:20 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mutt + pcre i somehow missed the Sven's message, so i'm replying to this one * Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [2002-08-02 13:57 +0200]: * Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: SMTP Error (MAIL FROM:), from header variable

2002-08-01 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Cc: recipient list not shown: ; Subject: SMTP Error (MAIL FROM:), from header variable From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 23:29:20 -0700 1) break your lines @ ~72 chars. 2) if you want any replies, why do you make it hard to others to reply to the list? SMTP

Re: problem about subjects in asian charsets

2002-08-01 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:58:46 +1000 From: Erik Christiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mutt users ml [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: problem about subjects in asian charsets OK, it seems then that the xterm and vim are more tolerant than mutt, when it comes to ISO8859-1 characters. They

Re: Display of non-ascii chars

2002-07-31 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:32:49 +0200 From: Erik van der Meulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Display of non-ascii chars Dear all, I have some issue with the displaying of non-ascii chars in my mail. I have to admit that I am not 100% sure that this is a mutt-issue or

Re: Display of non-ascii chars

2002-07-31 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:58:48 +0200 From: Erik van der Meulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Display of non-ascii chars On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 01:46:24PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: looks like you have $LANG set to C, POSIX, or something like

Re: RFE: regex backrefs

2002-07-31 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:57:39 -0400 From: Ricardo SIGNES [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RFE: regex backrefs I know this has been brought up before, but I just thought I'd voice my deep desire: mutt should be able to have backrefs to its regexen. If I get a 'vote' in

Re: RFE: regex backrefs

2002-07-31 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 01:25:27 +1000 From: Iain Truskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RFE: regex backrefs * Ricardo SIGNES ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01 Aug 2002 01:21]: On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 05:08:25PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: this reminds me: how hard would

Re: search-next annoyance

2002-07-22 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 08:30:25 +0200 From: Cedric Duval [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: search-next annoyance Roman Neuhauser wrote: macro pager n search-next\n ISTR there was a reason why i didn't just do this in the first place

Re: search-next annoyance [1.5.1]

2002-07-21 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 22:00:21 +0200 From: Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: search-next annoyance [1.5.1] * Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-15 19:57]: i'm getting pretty annoyed by the behavior of search-next; this is how i use

Re: search-next annoyance [1.5.1]

2002-07-21 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 22:13:41 +0200 From: Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: search-next annoyance [1.5.1] Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: * Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-15 19:57]: starting in index: search~b

Re: search-next annoyance

2002-07-21 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 00:12:38 +0200 From: Cedric Duval [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: search-next annoyance Roman Neuhauser wrote: display-message search-next at this moment, instead of just jumping to the next match, mutt prompts me

Re: search-next annoyance

2002-07-21 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 02:59:21 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: search-next annoyance it's obviously trying to be helpful, but in fact does just the opposite. i just want it to do what i told it, which is search

search-next annoyance

2002-07-15 Thread Roman Neuhauser
hi there, i'm getting pretty annoyed by the behavior of search-next; this is how i use mutt pretty often, and it doesn't exactly help to make it easier: starting in index: search~b patternenter display-message searchpatternenter exit search-next display-message search-next at this moment,

Re: substituing ~l in send-hook

2002-03-26 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:57:27 +0100 From: Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: substituing ~l in send-hook I'd like to create a generic send-hook which substitutes ~l, something like: send-hook ~l 'my_hdr Reply-To: ~l' The ~l won't be substituted in

Re: How to display texts encoded in UTF-8?

2002-03-08 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 08:34:50 +0800 From: Charles Jie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How to display texts encoded in UTF-8? Hi, My linux box has locale zh_TW.Big5 (Traditional Chinese). I have the following settings in .muttrc and it works well in most of the

Re: Breaking News: Lusers _want_ to quote email replies The Right Way.

2002-02-07 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 22:50:30 -0700 From: Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Breaking News: Lusers _want_ to quote email replies The Right Way. To: Mutt Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Really, though: this isn't a network, just one person to one person. She can read proper

rxvt-2.6.4, mutt-1.3.26i, ncurses-5.1, and ascii_chars

2002-02-04 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Hi there, yesterday I switched back from aterm (TERM=xterm-color) to rxvt (TERM=rxvt). I had some problems with display in mutt, and during the attempts to solve it I upgraded to 1.3.26i (don't use SSL, so I don't care about the bug). It works quite well, except for one thing: ascii_chars

Re: [OT] html email

2002-01-24 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:36:28 -0600 From: Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OT] html email On Jan 24, Matthew D. Fuller [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Actually, I've found that this: if(/^Content-Type: text\/html/) to $MBOXDIR/crap catches

Re: [OT] html email

2002-01-24 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 18:42:05 -0500 From: Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OT] html email * Matthew D. Fuller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 24. 2002 18:29]: snip If it catches a friend, newletter, etc, I just add the sender's address to a file called

available MDA's: are you satisfied?

2002-01-24 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Hi there, I'd like to colllect feedback on an idea that's been on my mind for some time now: looks like there's just two MDA's in use: Procmail, and Maildrop. Both have their fine (and not so fine) points, which I'll summarize briefly (YMMV): Procmail: + lots of prepackaged antispam

Re: lynx-dev Use mutt to download and distribute incoming mails to various folder?

2002-01-22 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:01:50 -0500 From: David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mutt Users' List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Neo Sze Wee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: lynx-dev Use mutt to download and distribute incoming mails to various folder? % I do not use fetchmail because the recent version

Re: maildir over mbox?

2002-01-20 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 12:08:44 -0600 From: David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mutt Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: maildir over mbox? I was just wondering what the real differences were between maildir and mbox formats? I know mbox is an appended file while maildir is a separate

Re: message-hooks

2002-01-16 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:36:55 -0500 From: Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mutt Users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: message-hooks I'm trying to do something here, maybe it's not doable - who knows? what I want is that whenever I write or reply to a certain address, that message will be

Re: how to set localization

2002-01-14 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 23:16:04 +0800 From: Willy Sutrisno [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: how to set localization * Im Eunjea ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Do you have Indonesian message file for mutt? /usr/share/locale/id/LC_MESSAGES/mutt.mo Yes, I do have

mutt mime.types

2002-01-12 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Hi there, some time ago I reported problems with mailcap handlers for tar.(gz|bz2) files. I didn't investigate it further until yesterday when I tried (and failed) to get mutt recognize a file by its extension no matter where I put the ext - MIME type mapping (i. e. /usr/local/etc/mime.types or

Re: mutt mime.types

2002-01-12 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 10:19:50 -0800 From: David Ellement [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mutt mime.types On 020112, at 17:58:56, Roman Neuhauser wrote So... could someone point me to the function which mutt uses to determine the MIME type

Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette

2002-01-11 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:27:47 -0800 From: J. Scott Dorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Anh Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette snip what=OTBS / Nah. :) He coulda just highlighted the appropriate lines (via shift-v or some such) then

Re: Possible to get the mail fetched by getmail filtered?

2002-01-10 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 01:39:54 +0800 From: Charles Jie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mutt Mail-list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Possible to get the mail fetched by getmail filtered? Thanks, Roman. 1. My getmail.log gives: Aborting... (command /usr/bin/maildrop ~/.maildroprc returned

Re: Possible to get the mail fetched by getmail filtered?

2002-01-09 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 22:08:18 +0800 From: Charles Jie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mutt Mail-list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Possible to get the mail fetched by getmail filtered? Thank you, Charles, Roman and Mark. I've tried procmail and maildrop to go with getmail but all failed. I

Re: tagging in browser

2002-01-07 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 17:35:16 -0500 From: Ken Wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tagging in browser On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 07:26:28PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: t tag-entry tag the current entry but it doesn't work

Re: set mail_check lies

2002-01-07 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:31:46 +0100 From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: set mail_check lies * René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020107 11:29]: * Philip Mak [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-01-2002 11:16]: | set mail_check configures how often (in seconds) mutt

Re: set mail_check lies

2002-01-07 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:28:09 +0100 From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: set mail_check lies I have the same problem, I only get my mail if I hit 'G' What should $mailboxes be set to? I had a look at the manual but couldn't really understand

Re: mbox trouble

2002-01-07 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 16:33:56 +0100 From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mutt-Users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mbox trouble Hi all. I have this line in .muttrc set mbox=/home/nick/Mail/mbox There is no file called mbox in Mail though? Is this something to do with using pop3

tagging in browser

2002-01-06 Thread Roman Neuhauser
/usr/local/share/doc/mutt/html/manual-6.html says: %t * if the file is tagged, blank otherwise when I press '?' in the browser, I see this: t tag-entry tag the current entry but it doesn't work: (hit 't') -- Mutt: Mailboxes [11] Tagging is not supported. This is

Re: Possible to get the mail fetched by getmail filtered?

2002-01-04 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 01:56:47 +0800 From: Charles Jie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mutt Mail-list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Possible to get the mail fetched by getmail filtered? Now I have a mail system = postfix + mutt + procmail + getmail. getmail fetches my mail in some POP3 servers. But

Re: pyurlview.py: a more flexible 'urlview'

2002-01-04 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 00:38:47 -0500 From: Maciej Kalisiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pyurlview.py: a more flexible 'urlview' Hello mutters, After finding urlview a bit limiting I have written a somewhat more flexible version of it. I figured I'd share it with

Re: Possible to get the mail fetched by getmail filtered?

2002-01-04 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:01:22 -0800 From: Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mutt Mail-list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Possible to get the mail fetched by getmail filtered? On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 08:29:55PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: as pointed out by others, you made a good

Re: pyurlview.py: a more flexible 'urlview'

2002-01-04 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:14:00 -0500 From: Maciej Kalisiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: pyurlview.py: a more flexible 'urlview' On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 02:18:16PM -0500, Roman Neuhauser wrote: quite nice, with a few nits: curses.wrapper () initializes

Re: List-Reply problems

2002-01-02 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 17:31:25 +0100 From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: List-Reply problems Hi I'm having trouble replying to this list. If I enter ,L for a 'list-reply' I get the @gbnet address come up as the To field. I now have 'subscribe [EMAIL

\222 instead of '

2002-01-02 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Hi there, looks like Outlook (specifically: X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)) does something wrong when it base64-encodes a message: single quote becomes \222. Instead of I'm not sure, mutt would display I\222m not sure. Anyone else seeing this? How can I get

Re: mail filtering with procmail

2002-01-02 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 02:58:36 +0100 From: Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mutt Users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mail filtering with procmail [...] procmail and it's use of locks is one of the greatest mysteries on earth (at least to a dummy like me) Hi Cliff, I see

Re: \222 instead of '

2002-01-02 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 20:23:04 -0600 From: Robert A. Knop Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Magnus Bodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: \222 instead of ' Windows-1252 is a superset of iso-8859-1 and includes a number of additional characters.

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

2001-12-28 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 17:09:05 +0100 From: Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter There is one guy out there who has particular and very annoying writing idiosyncracies (think Prince or B1FF). I wrote a filter to

Re: Writing bullets/lists in vim

2001-12-27 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 11:59:46 -0500 (EST) From: Philip Mak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mutt Users' List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Writing bullets/lists in vim Does anyone have a vim configuration to make writing bullets/lists easier? e.g. when I'm writing something like this: --- begin

Re: auto_view problem

2001-12-23 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 13:16:46 +0100 From: Martin Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: auto_view problem On Fri Dec 21, 2001 at 06:29:19PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: [...snip...] One idea could be to try Dave Pearson's 'mutt.octet.filter

Re: filters

2001-12-21 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 13:07:04 +0100 From: giorgian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: filters sorry if i reply only now, but i had some troubles with my mail... :( many thanks, now i use procmail and i'm almost happy. i still have a problem: there are some MLs

Re: auto_view problem

2001-12-21 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 17:14:51 +0100 From: Martin Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: auto_view problem You could try: application/x-tar-gz tar -ztf %s;copoiousoutput ^^|

Re: Can't send, wierd error message

2001-12-21 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 18:21:01 -0700 (MST) From: Steven Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Can't send, wierd error message Oops, forgot to add that my os is OpenBSD 3.0 and Sendmail is 8.12. Hope that this helps anyone who can help me. If you need any more

Re: Can't send, wierd error message

2001-12-21 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 22:15:55 -0700 From: Steven Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Can't send, wierd error message Thanks, for the tip. I didn't think to look in my .muttrc, but when I did I noticed that set sendmail=/usr/local/sbin/sendmail -oem -oi which

Re: unsubscribe

2001-12-20 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:38:29 -0700 From: Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: unsubscribe On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:26:55AM -0800, Marjo F. Mercado (dis)graced my inbox with: unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why do I

Re: auto_view problem

2001-12-18 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 14:07:56 -0500 From: John P Verel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: auto_view problem On 12/17/01, 07:32:36PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: Hi there, I started playing with auto_view, but stumbled upon a problem: roman@roman

Re: how best to use addressbook queries?

2001-12-18 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 23:37:31 -0700 From: Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: how best to use addressbook queries? I'm using abook in mutt via query_command. Wishing to address a new message to dick and jane, neither of whose email addresses I remember, I first

Re: how best to use addressbook queries?

2001-12-18 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 23:14:22 -0800 From: Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: how best to use addressbook queries? On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:01:29AM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: From: Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm using abook in mutt via

Re: Changing file browser settings for Mail folder

2001-12-17 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:27:48 +0100 From: Balazs Javor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MUTT Users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Changing file browser settings for Mail folder Hi, I was trying to change the folder_format for just my ~/Mail folder where I store my mailboxes. Hi Balazs,

Re: Mailing list replies

2001-12-17 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 23:36:49 +0100 From: Andreas Landmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mailing list replies While we're on the subject of the difference of subscribe and lists, can anybody tell me how to get the functionality of subscribe (I.E. Mail-Followup-To

Re: Mutt file browser question

2001-12-17 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 19:13:08 +0300 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mutt file browser question From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have all my mail sorted in a number of mailboxes and when I change from one to another (i.e. go to file browser and select needed mailbox) cursor is always at the

auto_view problem

2001-12-17 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Hi there, I started playing with auto_view, but stumbled upon a problem: roman@roman ~ grep tar-gz /usr/local/etc/mime.types application/x-tar-gztgz tar.gz roman@roman ~ grep tar-gz ~/.mailcap application/x-tar-gz; tar tzf -;copiousoutput [-- Attachment #2:

Re: setting content-type of attachments

2001-12-13 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 18:49:15 + From: Bruno Postle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mutt Users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: setting content-type of attachments On Sun 02-Dec-2001 at 07:34:42PM +0100, René Clerc wrote: how does Mutt derive what to set the Content Type of attachments to?

Re: Negative scores and regexp questions

2001-12-13 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 16:55:39 +0100 From: Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mutt Users' List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Negative scores and regexp questions On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 04:23:51PM +0100, Christian Ordig wrote: On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 06:00:36AM -0500, David T-G

Email HowTo

2001-12-13 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Hi there, here's the promised document. It's still in early stages, but should give you an idea about what it'll look like, and where I'm heading with it. Another thing I should mention is the fact that I still haven't gotten around to putting more energy into the coverage of the programs that

Re: setting content-type of attachments

2001-12-13 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:14:35 + From: Bruno Postle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mutt Users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: setting content-type of attachments On Thu 13-Dec-2001 at 11:53:10AM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: I would be interested if somebody had a better solution

Re: are options replaced or and'ed?

2001-12-11 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:10:24 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: are options replaced or and'ed? From: Peter Jay Salzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] setting an option like lists, are: lists '[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \

subscribe and lists commands

2001-12-11 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Hi there, the post about anding / oring values of these variables (ok, so they're listed as commands :) reminded me of one thing that was a somewhat unpleasant surprise when I started using mutt... I never got around asking about it, so here you are. :) I was quite surprised to find out that

Re: A couple of probably dumb questions :)

2001-12-10 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 12:48:04 +0100 From: Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: A couple of probably dumb questions :) On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 09:07:35AM +, Thomas Hurst wrote: * Thomas Hurst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Unfortunately, short of

Re: Email HowTo [was: Re: Searching big gobs of e-mail]

2001-12-10 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Hi there, thanks everyone for the kind responses. See below for comments. From: Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Email HowTo [was: Re: Searching big gobs of e-mail] Very, very good idea. I found that many people know about email, and you can even find people eating

Re: spamcop forwarding redux

2001-12-10 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:30:38 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: spamcop forwarding redux From: Peter Jay Salzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] combining all 3 ideas that were posted to this list, i have: macro pager \Cf forward-message[EMAIL PROTECTED]\n\n there are still two

tag-(thread|pattern) in pager

2001-12-10 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Hi there, I'd like to be able to use tag-thread, tag-subthred, tag-pattern in the pager view. Looks like they're not defined in the pager map (1.3.23i) are there any plans to include them in pager map, and if not, would I (as someone who is not very good in C) be able to hack this in myself?

matching in hooks

2001-12-05 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Hi there, I started playing with hooks, and can't get one thing to work: Let's say I want to have a different signature when mailing/replying to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I put this in my .muttrc: send-hook . 'set signature = ~/bin/signature|' send-hook '~e john@doe\\.com' 'set signature=FUBAR' When

a hook entered upon sending a message?

2001-12-03 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Hi there, is there a means to let mutt perform an action on the message it sends out _when_ it sends it? All the documented hooks take place long before this happens... To be more specific, I'm looking for a way to delay the inserting of the signature until the moment the message goes off. I

function mail unavailable in the browser menu

2001-12-03 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Hi there, what is the rationale behind making the mail function unavailable in the browser menu? The need to enter a mailbox just to send a mail has bothered me for some time, and when I finally went to bind it, I realized I was out of luck... :| -- FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE 7:47PM up 41 days, 6:30,

Re: Limiting max text width

2001-11-29 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 05:52:19 -0500 From: David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mutt Users' List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Limiting max text width ...and then Odhiambo Washington said... % % A quick and dumb one: How do I limit my e-mails to

problematic behavior

2001-11-10 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Hi there, I don't know whether this is really a bug, or something configurable, but I have this problem with mutt (1.3.23i) I'd like to have solved. This is when it shows up: enter an embox do nothing in it AFTER it's got new mail go to the mailboxes view enter a different mbox I end up in

Re: color

2001-11-09 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 13:20:53 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: color On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Roman Neuhauser wrote: Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:54:42 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL

Re: color

2001-11-01 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:56:52 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Daniel Farnsworth Teichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: color On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Daniel Farnsworth Teichert wrote: When I was first messing around with Mutt I had similar

Re: color

2001-11-01 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 06:39:01 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: color On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Roman Neuhauser wrote: If xterm-color is incorrect, what should the value be? BTW, 1.2.5

Re: color

2001-11-01 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:54:42 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: color On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Roman Neuhauser wrote: what was $TERM before you set rxvt.termName ? just xterm. xterm

Re: PGP

2001-10-29 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 21:04:51 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PGP From: Stephen E. Hargrove [EMAIL PROTECTED] i'm trying to get mutt working with GnuPGP. mutt.org states: Go to the contrib subdirectory of the source tree. You'll find three files there, pgp2.rc, pgp5.rc, and

no color in 1.3.23i

2001-10-22 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Hi there, I have 1.3.23i running on FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE (installed from the port), and looks like I can't get color support. I had 1.2.5i on this box (colors worked just fine), also installed from the port, deinstalled it, and installed the 1.3.23i version. Same ~/.mutt/muttrc, which _is_ used

Re: no color in 1.3.23i

2001-10-22 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:32:18 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: no color in 1.3.23i Hi there, I have 1.3.23i running on FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE (installed from the port), and looks like I can't get color support. I had 1.2.5i on this box (colors