software that has problems with '/' (because it is a path
separator), the solution is actually trivially simple. On the way in,
replace it with one of the "specials" that are not allowed in a
message ID, but IS allowed in your system's path names. On the way
out, do the reverse transformat
gt; > > mails have the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail?
> >
> > The unfathomable thing about this question is why you (or anyone)
> > should care in the slightest what your message ID looks like.
> > It's an esoteric detail about e-mail transfer, the specific
>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:13:52PM +1000, raf via Mutt-users wrote:
> > > Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing
> > > mails have the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail?
> > The unfathomable thing about this question is why you (or
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 10:53:41AM -0400, Derek Martin
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:19:09PM +, Ебрашка wrote:
> > Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails have
> > the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail?
>
> The unfathomable thin
_format=
> >
> > results in a broken message-id with the quotes inside the angle brackets
> > (Message-ID: <"xyz">)
>
> That shouldn't be the case. The outer double quotes are stripped off during
> muttrc evaluation.
>
> You may want to d
Thanks everyone for the replies and discussion, something to ponder.
Всем спасибо за ответы и дискуссию, есть над чем поразмышлять.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:33:06AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
side note: using quotes around the template screws things up, that is,
set message_id_format=""
vs
set message_id_format=
results in a broken message-id with the quotes inside the angle brackets
(Message-ID: <"xyz&q
On 09Apr2024 07:11, Michael Kjörling wrote:
On 9 Apr 2024 07:32 +1000, from c...@cskk.id.au (Cameron Simpson):
_Or_ you could "set sendmail=" to a script of your own to add a
message-id
header - that is what mutt uses to deliver the message to a mail system -
you could ad
Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 07Apr2024 13:19, Ебрашка wrote:
> > Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails have
> > the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail?
> > For example Message-Id: <43265...@example.com> consisting of random
> &
;
>
> Thought you were on that long thread about this when it changed a while
> back, but maybe remembering wrong.
I was--but I guess the source of my confusion is I don't actually care
what the message ID format is (as should no user), so I never bothered
to internalize it, but I vaguely
that.
It's possible that it was since fixed. The issue isn't with threading
_in_ a main client, I think, but with certain web archiving software in
the case where the message-id has a "/" character.
https://people.kernel.org/monsieuricon/fix-your-mutt
> Anyway, I said then, and
> m
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:19:09PM +, Ебрашка wrote:
> Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails
> have the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail?
Talk about bikeshedding :-)
--
Ian
hould care in the slightest what your message ID looks like.
> >
> > That's totally true, but I still like the classic Mutt message-id
> > format.
>
> Did you set your message ID format accordingly, then? Because the
> message I'm replying to carries this:
>
>
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 08:05:06AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 10:53:41AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> > The unfathomable thing about this question is why you (or anyone)
> > should care in the slightest what your message ID looks like.
>
> That'
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 10:53:41AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> The unfathomable thing about this question is why you (or anyone)
> should care in the slightest what your message ID looks like.
That's totally true, but I still like the classic Mutt message-id
format. Maybe it's just nos
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:19:09PM +, Ебрашка wrote:
> Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails have
> the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail?
The unfathomable thing about this question is why you (or anyone)
should care in the slightest what your mess
On 9 Apr 2024 07:32 +1000, from c...@cskk.id.au (Cameron Simpson):
> You could (a) turn on "set edit_headers=yes" so the headers are visible in
> your message and (b) have your editor startup make one?
This is what I do in order to have a UUID message-ID, which Mutt
doesn't
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:19:09PM +, Ебрашка wrote:
> Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails have
> the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail?
> For example Message-Id: <43265...@example.com> consisting of random
> digits and domain name
On 07Apr2024 13:19, Ебрашка wrote:
Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails have
the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail?
For example Message-Id: <43265...@example.com> consisting of random
digits and domain name
I think it would be enough to supply yo
to ensure the uniqueness
of the stuff left of the "@" (because they're the owners of the stuff on
the right), and can do whatever is reliably unique for them.
Regardless, just using digits only means the string needs to be a bit
longer.
Mutt uses more characters because it lets you make t
On 7 Apr 2024 18:23 +0200, from anton.sharo...@gmail.com (Anton Sharonov):
>>> For example Message-Id: <43265...@example.com> consisting of random
>>> digits and domain name
>>
>> There's a good reason for that; it help to ensure uniqueness, which prevents
>
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 09:23:07AM -0600, Charles Cazabon via Mutt-users wrote:
> Ебрашка wrote:
> > my mails have Message-ID: . Question, what
> > should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails have the same beautiful
> > message-ID as Yandex mail?
>
> My firs
Ебрашка wrote:
> my mails have Message-ID: . Question, what
> should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails have the same beautiful
> message-ID as Yandex mail?
My first question would be, why do you care what the Message-ID: field
contents look like? Virtually no-one will
Message-Id: <254061712447...@mail.yandex.ru> - this is how Message-Id
looks like when I receive an e-mail sent from Yandex mail web interface.
When I send a mail via mutt with activated option set hostname =
example.com, my mails have Message-ID: .
Question, what should I write in .muttrc t
gt;
>>>One way to get what you want is to use esmtp:
>>>
>>># muttrc
>>>set sendmail="/usr/bin/esmtp"
>>>
>>># esmtprc
>>> [...]
>>> message_id = disabled
>>> [...]
>>
>>Does that actually strip
gt;
>># muttrc
>>set sendmail="/usr/bin/esmtp"
>>
>># esmtprc
>> [...]
>> message_id = disabled
>> [...]
>
>Does that actually strip the one from mutt, or just prevent esmtp from
>_adding on if missing_. Peng Yu is trying to stop mutt addin
t;# esmtprc
>identity = u...@ho.st
> hostname = smtp.ho.st:587
> username = u...@ho.st
> password = password
> starttls = enabled
> message_id = disabled
>
># man esmtprc
>message_id
>
> Whether to set the Message-ID field of the message before sending.
> Norm
* Peng Yu [20210203 20:23:18]:
>On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 11:23 AM Will Yardley
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 08:57:32AM -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
>> >
>> > When I use mutt to construct an outgoing email, is there a way not
>> > to set the message i
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 08:23:18PM -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 11:23 AM Will Yardley
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 08:57:32AM -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
> > >
> > > When I use mutt to construct an outgoing email, is there a way not
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 11:23 AM Will Yardley
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 08:57:32AM -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
> >
> > When I use mutt to construct an outgoing email, is there a way not to
> > set the message id? Thanks.
>
> Even if Mutt doesn't set one, the firs
for many of us,
even then it doesn't matter--it is in fact the same program and it
handles whether it is an MSA or MTA internally.
> but Message-Id: is a SHOULD not a MUST.
This point is also technically true, but largely irrelevant...
Partially because of the above, but mainly because in practice
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 06:33:37PM +0100, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021, Will Yardley wrote:
>
> > Even if Mutt doesn't set one, the first MTA it hits will add one. Not
> Not really - a MTA should not make such changes.
> A MSA should do it, but Message-Id: is a
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021, Will Yardley wrote:
> Even if Mutt doesn't set one, the first MTA it hits will add one. Not
Not really - a MTA should not make such changes.
A MSA should do it, but Message-Id: is a SHOULD not a MUST.
> What exactly is your goal here?
That's the important questio
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 08:57:32AM -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
>
> When I use mutt to construct an outgoing email, is there a way not to
> set the message id? Thanks.
Even if Mutt doesn't set one, the first MTA it hits will add one. Not
setting one will also break threading. What exactly is
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 10:36:42PM +0530, Chinmaya Nagpal wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 10:46:06AM -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
This does not work. Have you tried it yourself?
I did just now; my muttrc has the following lines:
ignore *
unignore From Date To Cc Bcc Subject
and the Message-ID
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 10:46:06AM -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
> This does not work. Have you tried it yourself?
I did just now; my muttrc has the following lines:
ignore *
unignore From Date To Cc Bcc Subject
and the Message-ID header is not shown in the editor or when viewing
messa
e mutt package in my
> distribution, there are the following lines:
>
> ignore *
> unignore From Message-ID Date To Cc Bcc Subject
This does not work. Have you tried it yourself?
$ cat mycat.sh
#!/usr/bin/env bash
cat
$ cat temp.muttrc
set realname='My name'
set from=mya...@gmail.com
set
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 08:57:32AM -0600, Peng wrote in
:
When I use mutt to construct an outgoing email, is there a way not to
set the message id? Thanks.
Hi Peng,
I don't think this is possible (anymore). May I enquire as to your use case
though?
Kind regards,
Remco
> When I use mutt to construct an outgoing email, is there a way not to
> set the message id? Thanks.
I don't know if it's possible to remove the header altogether, but you
can make mutt show only specific headers by using the "ignore" and
"unignore" commands as sp
Hi,
When I use mutt to construct an outgoing email, is there a way not to
set the message id? Thanks.
--
Regards,
Peng
n it is fake.
>
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=213306
>
> Could anybody let me know if there is a way to disable the appearance
> of hostname in message-id? Thanks.
RFC 5322 says that a message ID must be globally unique. It's suggested
to use your hostname as it is almost guaran
to disable the appearance
of hostname in message-id? Thanks.
--
Regards,
Peng
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 11:39:53PM -0400, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 14:48:55 -0400, Ben Fitzgerald wrote:
> So, (assuming I have cut-and-pasted and counted correctly), the
> following should all find the message in question:
> / ~i
jxp15h8me6ucystoyuzh_t490x+hoq5dto+xxvozc5wsnh...@mail.gmail.com
>
> Lookup fails. Simple attempts to work around this such as enclosing the
> Message-ID in single/double quotes, escaping the "+" as below has no effect:
>
> / ~i "CAJxpU5h8mE6UcYStOyUzH_T490R\+hOp5dTo\+cr
UzH_T490R\\+hOp5dTo\\+crvozc5wsnh...@mail.gmail.com"
>
thanks Kevin, this worked. FYI I also had to escape = with a single slash.
So Message-ID
CAJ=12345+6789 => CAJ\=12345\\+6789
Regads,
--
Ben Fitzgerald
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 02:48:55PM -0400, Ben Fitzgerald wrote:
> / ~i "CAJxpU5h8mE6UcYStOyUzH_T490R\+hOp5dTo\+crvozc5wsnh...@mail.gmail.com"
Try doubling the \:
/ ~i "CAJxpU5h8mE6UcYStOyUzH_T490R\\+hOp5dTo\\+crvozc5wsnh...@mail.gmail.com"
--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3
Hi,
I'm trying to have org-mode store a folder and Message-ID so that
I can then have a function that will cause mutt to lookup the
message.
Works okay so far, except when I hit a message with "+" in, for
example:
cajxp15h8me6ucystoyuzh_t490x+hoq5dto+xxvozc5wsnh...@mail.gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Arkadiusz Drabczyk
<arkadi...@drabczyk.org> wrote:
> On 2015-11-01, Xu Wang <xuwang...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am frequently using ~iMSGID to search for a message ID matching
>> MSGID. However, if MSG contain
On 2015-11-01, Xu Wang <xuwang...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am frequently using ~iMSGID to search for a message ID matching
> MSGID. However, if MSG contains '$1' then that does not work. Funnily,
> if it contains $abc then it is not a problem.
Hello,
I am frequently using ~iMSGID to search for a message ID matching
MSGID. However, if MSG contains '$1' then that does not work. Funnily,
if it contains $abc then it is not a problem. I have tried escapes for
'$' but it is not working.
Kind regards,
Xu
?
Another approach. I have 4 different versions of my index_format,
depending on what I want to see (and how much), what kind of window I'm
in, etc. I have a key binding (Y) that toggles through the list. You
could do the same with index_format or status_format to display only the
message-id
Hi,
Is there a key shortcut in the index/pager to display the MessageID of the
current email?
Sounds stupid but after a while I found nothing in the documentation to do so
easily. The only way I found is cumbersome: when I hit 'r' in order to reply to
the email, my editor is spawned with the
h to view the headers. then / Message-ID. Still not great
but less cumbersome than the process you described I think.
Thanks,
--
Joshua Smith
Lead Systems Administrator WVNET
Montani Semper Liberi
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:21:30 -0400, Joshua Smith wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 02:56:23PM +0200, ybau...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there a key shortcut in the index/pager to display the MessageID
of the current email?
[...]
I usually hit h to view the headers. then / Message-ID
of the current email?
[...]
I usually hit h to view the headers. then / Message-ID. Still not great
but less cumbersome than the process you described I think.
Also, note that if you want to see the Message-Id header all the time,
you can get it to appear in the default message view
* On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 06:29PM +0200 I (tatg...@gmail.com) muttered:
* On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 02:56PM +0200 ybau...@gmail.com (ybau...@gmail.com)
muttered:
Is there a key shortcut in the index/pager to display the MessageID of the
current email?
You could also extract the message-id
really want to bind a key for that you could write a macro.
I assume you don't want to show message-id per default.
macro index i 'enter-commandignore message-identer'
macro index I 'enter-commandunignore message-identer'
macro pager I 'exitenter-commandunignore message-identer\
display
On 2015-05-26 11:59 -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
Dan You can generate your own valid message-id, and all subsequent
Dan systems should preserve it. Does that solve your problem?
Dan Just make sure you follow the format and that it is unique.
Xu Yes that would solve my problem, if I could do that from
* On 26 May 2015, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On 2015-05-26 11:59 -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
Dan You can generate your own valid message-id, and all subsequent
Dan systems should preserve it. Does that solve your problem?
Dan Just make sure you follow the format and that it is unique.
Xu Yes
Dear all,
I would like to extract the message ID from an email that I am about
the send, but before I send it. I wonder if this is impossible. From
what I read [1], the message-id is assigned either by the MUA (which I
understand to be mutt) or the first MSA. Which one is it?
For example
-in message-id
generation? Does it need to be patched?
What happens if multiple users send a message at the same moment, and it
is the same numbered message for each of them? Unlikely for human users
perhaps, but more imaginable as a byproduct of automation.
The algorithm protects against
On 2015-05-26 18:41 +, David Champion wrote:
David N.B. `backticked expressions` are evaluated only once, at the
David time the muttrc file is read. So you're issuing the same
David message-id with each outbound e-mail. Note your message-id
David above: it doesn't match the date of your
On 2015-05-26 14:42 -0500, David Champion wrote:
David The algorithm protects against repetition up to 26 messages per
David second by a single mutt process. Two separate processes will
David generate different IDs, unless you're recycling process ids more
David than once per second.
Oh, so the
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Dan Ritter d...@randomstring.org wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:40:34AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to extract the message ID from an email that I am about
the send, but before I send it. I wonder if this is impossible. From
what I read
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 02:13:03AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am guessing that you have set the 'trash' rc variable and/or the
'realdelete' offlineimap rc variable.
I don't know what either of these variables
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:44:35PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
I see. So you do not have any such archive macro? And you do not use
the All Mail workflow of Gmail?
This is correct. But I can still access All Mail
Hi,
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:44:35PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
I see. So you do not have any such archive macro? And you do not use
the All Mail workflow of Gmail?
This is correct. But I can still access All Mail over IMAP. I just
don't sync it with OfflineIMAP. It would take up too much
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:49 AM, Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Xu,
Sorry I didn't respond, I got too busy with work.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 02:00:13AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com wrote:
This helps a lot. I am
Hi Xu,
Sorry I didn't respond, I got too busy with work.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 02:00:13AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com wrote:
This helps a lot. I am starting to piece some things together. I am
not sure if I am rethreading or not.
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Xu,
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:19:35AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
If you are curious about motivation, it is because GMail treats labels
as
Hi Xu,
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:19:35AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
If you are curious about motivation, it is because GMail treats labels
as different folders. So when we sync back, to have a message marked
as read in GMail, it must be marked as read in all labels (or in
Mutt's point of view,
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Xu,
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:19:35AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
If you are curious about motivation, it is because GMail treats labels
as different folders. So when we sync back, to have a message marked
as read
Hello all,
In the pager or index, I would like to mark as read every message in
all mail boxes with the same message ID as the email that is
highlighted. How can I do
clear-flagN
to every such message?
If you are curious about motivation, it is because GMail treats labels
as different folders
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:19:35AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
Hello all,
In the pager or index, I would like to mark as read every message in
all mail boxes with the same message ID as the email that is
highlighted.
There's no way to do this in Mutt proper... it does not have the
ability
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Derek Martin inva...@pizzashack.org wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:19:35AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
Hello all,
In the pager or index, I would like to mark as read every message in
all mail boxes with the same message ID as the email that is
highlighted
Hi Guys,
I use mutt 1.4.2.2i (CentOS 5.6 x86_64) in my application to send
email. In case of calling mutt in a loop, there are emails which have
identical MESSAGE-ID ! do you expect this behavior ?
BEST,
-- afshin
* On 03 Oct 2011, afshin afzali wrote:
Hi Guys,
I use mutt 1.4.2.2i (CentOS 5.6 x86_64) in my application to send
email. In case of calling mutt in a loop, there are emails which have
identical MESSAGE-ID ! do you expect this behavior ?
It's been many years, but as I remember
-in.
The reallly best solution would be to use a own script with a combination of a
sendmail-interface.
Kind regards, Andre
--Originalnachricht--
Von: afshin afzali
Absender:owner-mutt-us...@mutt.org
An:mutt-users
Betreff: Duplicate MESSAGE-ID
Gesendet: 3. Okt. 2011 15:01
Hi Guys,
I use mutt
I see that other users of this list also show different domains in the
message-id field.
Possibly the error was due to special characters into $realname ?
El 0, Lucas J. González [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hi, today i sent a message to a corporation. They contacted me saying
something like
Hi, today i sent a message to a corporation. They contacted me saying
something like your email address is not valid.
When i asked them about the address they specified (in order to see if
they were responding to my From address or to my message-id
address), they said we just pressed the 'respond
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:41:47AM +0100, Lucas J. González wrote:
Possibly the error was due to special characters into $realname ?
My experience is that special characters put people in spam traps, not
cause failed delivery.
Sorry I can't be more helpful.
Cheers,
--
Cristóbal Palmer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 30 at 11:41 AM, quoth Lucas J. González:
I see that other users of this list also show different domains in the
message-id field.
Possibly the error was due to special characters into $realname ?
It's a possibility, but I think
Hi Lucas,
On Wednesday, January 30, 2008 at 11:41:47 +0100, Lucas J. González wrote:
El 0, Lucas J. González [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
their mail agent is looking for sender's address into the message-id
field.
No, of course not: Only spam harvesters do that.
due to special
. *
*
Hello *,
I get messages over Mailinglists which break all the times threads and
I like mutt ^6 feature to repare it. :-)
However, I het tonns of messages which HAVE a Message-ID: header but can
not repared becase they are broken
Michelle Konzack wrote: [Fri Jul 13 2007, 10:56:42AM EDT]
*
* Do not Cc: me, because I am on THIS list, if I write here.*
* Keine Cc: an mich, bin auf DIESER Liste wenn ich hier schreibe. *
* Ne me mettez pas en
Hello Aron,
Am 2007-07-13 11:46:14, schrieb Aron Griffis:
This will be automatic for anybody using mutt if you have in your
muttrc:
set followup_to=yes # default
subscribe mutt-users@mutt.org
See http://dev.mutt.org/doc/manual.html#using-lists
Who tell you this?
I use
Michelle Konzack wrote: [Fri Jul 13 2007, 12:02:41PM EDT]
Hello Aron,
Am 2007-07-13 11:46:14, schrieb Aron Griffis:
This will be automatic for anybody using mutt if you have in your
muttrc:
set followup_to=yes # default
subscribe mutt-users@mutt.org
See
Hi all!
It is possible to print the Message-ID when composing a message? In other
words, is the Message-ID available at the time of composing or does it get
generated after? Thanks!
Cheers,
--
David Collantes - http://www.bus.ucf.edu/david/
College of Business Administration, University
David --
...and then David Collantes said...
%
% Hi all!
Hello!
%
% It is possible to print the Message-ID when composing a message? In other
% words, is the Message-ID available at the time of composing or does it get
% generated after? Thanks!
AFAIK it's generated after, and I've never
Threads are lost because the decode-save function strips
the Message-ID from the header.
Is there a way around this ?
--
Regards,
Emil
--
In the amount of time
Michael Elkins muttered:
Mutt currently doesn't allow you to specify the format of the message-id
field, other than your setting of $host.
You should be able to tweak that at MTA level. Rewriting will be your
friend.
HTH,
Michael
--
PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml
Hello,
is it possible to use some wildcard for Message-ID header generation?
I would like ;) to have Message-ID geenrated according to my virtual
domain, not local hostname.
Or use some external program to generate unique message id's?
TIA
Paulius
Mutt currently doesn't allow you to specify the format of the message-id
field, other than your setting of $host. Perhaps you could use some
send-hook's that set your $host based upon which virtual domain you want to
use?
me
* Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-01-06 15:04]:
Hello,
I'd like to search for a header, specifically, the Message-ID header,
but haven't found a way to do that in Mutt yet. Do you know how?
Thanks,
Carlos.
http://mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#ss4.2
~h EXPR
Hello, using Mutt-1.2.5 here.
I'm re-writing my Message-ID headers using qmail-queue, but while
experimenting with that header for the benefit of a sendmail-using
friend, I came across this phenomenon.
If I use my_hdr to add a Message-ID header to the stuff I am sending,
Mutt will _still_ put
On 2001-03-23 06:16:39 +, Jim Breton wrote:
I'm re-writing my Message-ID headers using qmail-queue,
Why are you doing such things? You'll ruin the possibility to get
proper threading with message copies mutt may write to folders while
sending.
If I use my_hdr to add a Message-ID header
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 12:59:52PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
I'm re-writing my Message-ID headers using qmail-queue,
Why are you doing such things? You'll ruin the possibility to get
proper threading with message copies mutt may write to folders while
sending.
Actually, you're right
* Jim Breton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 12:59:52PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
I'm re-writing my Message-ID headers using qmail-queue,
Why are you doing such things? You'll ruin the possibility to get
proper threading with message copies mutt may write
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:44:12PM +0100, Jerome De Greef wrote:
RFC 822:
[...]
This identifier is intended to be machine readable and not necessarily
meaningful to humans.
[...]
That says it all ;)
No, it doesn't.
The problem is that it currently _IS_ meaningful to humans. If it were
* Jim Breton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:44:12PM +0100, Jerome De Greef wrote:
RFC 822:
[...]
This identifier is intended to be machine readable and not necessarily
meaningful to humans.
[...]
That says it all ;)
No, it doesn't.
The problem is that
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
