On Tuesday, September 13, 2022 at 14:34:39 +, Nacho via Mutt-users wrote:
> In 2022 I find astonishing how much of Microsoft's antispam seems
> to rely on lists (addresses, IP blocks…). Leading to annoying
> false positives, with rates well higher than Google's.
Those "false positives" are
On 2022-09-12, Mihai Lazarescu wrote:
>> Mihai Lazarescu wrote on Mon, 12 Sep 2022 at
>> 15:07:37 EDT in :
>>
>> > Only Microsoft (outlook.com, hotmail.com) seem to filter the whole
>> > IP block, but I am too lazy to ask the provider to fix or change
>> > provider altogether.
[...]
> 1. [...] Fo
> In 2022 I find astonishing how much of Microsoft's antispam seems
> to rely on lists (addresses, IP blocks…). Leading to annoying
> false positives, with rates well higher than Google's.
Those "false positives" are clearly made on purpose to boycott independent mail
providers, it doesn't matt
lf a year ago. Before, everything was rolling
> just fine (for more than 10 yrs). No dead ends of my outgoing mails.
> After transferring the domain over to the new hoster, some destinations
> did not receive my mails. Either filtered into spam, some got denied
> (where I got a nice SMTP error
arket share. Deciding that it's OK to not worry about
them suggests a very different attitude toward email reliability and
interoperability than most people would choose.
I never claimed that my specific case is universal:
1. I only have one contact on Hotmail and then I can use Google
SMTP.
(Replying to Mihai, but keeping Bastian's subject-line change...an operation
which Mutt is not great at, but better than most...I dunno what to do with
In-Reply-To/References: here, tho.)
Mihai Lazarescu wrote on Mon, 12 Sep 2022
at 15:07:37 EDT in :
> It took some work to set it up, but that'
d ends of my outgoing mails.
After transferring the domain over to the new hoster, some destinations
did not receive my mails. Either filtered into spam, some got denied
(where I got a nice SMTP error reply) and some just got silently
dropped.
This took me some time to figure out with each desti
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 10:57:41PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> As I see it, the SMTP configuration to use is fully determined by the
> from address of the mail to be sent.
>
> [...] there shouldn't be any need for interactivity. For each outoging
> mail, pick up the rig
smtp-queue doesn't really have or need much
> configuration.) So, if that's what you meant, then yes, it's possible.
>
>
> CASE 2
I am definitely in that case. Thanks for having raised the point,
because it was obvious to me but, fortunately for everybody, not
ev
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 08:53:23PM +0200, Daniel Tameling wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 03:58:02PM +, Sam Kuper wrote:
>> - Test/tweak/re-test msmtp until working. (E.g. using Mutt or GNU
>> Mailutils's `mail` command to send emails from the command-line,
>> with relevant command-
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 07:01:52PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> 1. Am I correct that it will be possible, when calling smstp-queue, to
> specify which smarthost to use?
>
> In other words, am I correct that this will let me associate one smart
> host (SMTP configuration) to e
Daniel Tameling (2022/08/12 20:53 +0200):
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 03:58:02PM +, Sam Kuper wrote:
> > - Test/tweak/re-test msmtp until working. (E.g. using Mutt or GNU
> > Mailutils's `mail` command to send emails from the command-line,
> > with relevant command-line options set so
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 03:58:02PM +, Sam Kuper wrote:
> - Test/tweak/re-test msmtp until working. (E.g. using Mutt or GNU
> Mailutils's `mail` command to send emails from the command-line,
> with relevant command-line options set so as to ensure that msmtp is
> used as the MTA).
Thanks a lot, Sam!
Everything you write makes sense.
Just one question and one remark, if you don't mind.
1. Am I correct that it will be possible, when calling smstp-queue, to
specify which smarthost to use?
In other words, am I correct that this will let me associate one smart
host
eue, if
> network is available. Is this understanding correct?
`msmtp-queue -r` tells msmtp to try to send the emails from
msmtp-queue's queue to your mail provider's SMTP server. In order for
that to succeed, you need to have a network connection - otherwise the
attempt will time
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 06:23:56PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Sorry if the question is off-topic, hopefully not completely though.
>
> I am wondering what's the best way to use different SMTP servers to send
> mails, depending on which e-mail accou
Hello Sam, many thanks for your interesting response!
Sam Kuper (2022/08/11 17:43 +):
> Consider using msmtp for sending, and msmtp-queue for queueing:
>
>
>https://lists.mutt.org/pipermail/mutt-users/Week-of-Mon-20210208/002485.html
My understanding is that, on one side, mutt would call msm
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 06:23:56PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> So far I use exim4 to send e-mails but I didn't see a way to specify
> which "smarthost" to use to send e-mails e.g. on the sendmail command
> line. So, even if I could use mutt send hooks to choose which
Dear all,
Sorry if the question is off-topic, hopefully not completely though.
I am wondering what's the best way to use different SMTP servers to send
mails, depending on which e-mail account I am currently using (the From
address).
I do realise that the two things (the SMTP server us
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:32 -1000, Baron Fujimoto wrote:
> - I don't seem to have /usr/lib/libsasl2.2.dylib
Me neither actually, but it still works:
# ls /usr/lib/libsasl2.2.dylib
ls: /usr/lib/libsasl2.2.dylib: No such file or directory
# otool -L ~/bin/mutt
/Users/robin/bin/m
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Robin Sommer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 16:22 -1000, Baron Fujimoto wrote:
Our org's email is hosted by Gmail (via GSuite). I had been using
neomutt (built from MacPorts) successfully for years.
Maybe I can point you in some useful direction: I had exactly this
pro
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021, Will Yardley wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 04:22:04PM -1000, Baron Fujimoto wrote:
The following in my muttrc was used successfully util this problem began:
set smtp_url = smtp://u...@example.org@smtp.gmail.com
Do you have smtp_authenticators (unset by default) set
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 13:48 +, I wrote:
> so things must have reverted. But it's all still working fine
I take that back: the problem persists when linking against MacPorts'
libsasl2. Linking against the system's library lets SMTP work for me.
Robin
--
Robin Somme
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 16:22 -1000, Baron Fujimoto wrote:
> Our og's email is hosted by Gmail (via GSuite). I had been using
> neomutt (built from MacPorts) successfully for years.
Maybe I can point you in some useful direction: I had exactly this
problem with a self-built mutt recently after
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 08:26:11PM -0800 or thereabouts, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 04:22:04PM -1000, Baron Fujimoto wrote:
> > The following in my muttrc was used successfully util this problem began:
> > set smtp_url = smtp://u...@example.org@smtp.gmail.co
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 04:22:04PM -1000, Baron Fujimoto wrote:
>
> The following in my muttrc was used successfully util this problem began:
>
> set smtp_url = smtp://u...@example.org@smtp.gmail.com
Do you have smtp_authenticators (unset by default) set?
set smtp_url =
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 04:22:04PM -1000, Baron Fujimoto wrote:
Our org's email is hosted by Gmail (via GSuite). I had been using
neomutt (built from MacPorts) successfully for years. Recently though,
I can no longer send email successfully using GMail's SMTP servers. I
get the
Our org's email is hosted by Gmail (via GSuite). I had been using neomutt (built from
MacPorts) successfully for years. Recently though, I can no longer send email
successfully using GMail's SMTP servers. I get the error, "No authenticators
available". IMAP still wor
So this is the correct line you must have in your .muttrc file?
set imap_user = "usern...@gmail.com"
Just substituting your username for "username."
Thanks,
DR
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 8:30 PM Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 07:14:10PM -0500, D.J.J. Ring, Jr. wrote:
> >Doe
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 07:14:10PM -0500, D.J.J. Ring, Jr. wrote:
Does that mean that this line has to be set to just username and not
the usern...@gmail.com
set imap_user = "usern...@gmail.com"
Should be:
set imap_user = "username"
No, I believe the $imap_user for gmail needs to have the "@g
blem that
> >I am having is that I can not send emails via Gmal, but I can receive just
> >fine.
>
> Have you manually set hostname in your muttrc? It looks like it is set
> to your gmail login. Mutt's SMTP client uses $hostname in the EHLO
> command, but gm
ve just
> >fine.
>
> Have you manually set hostname in your muttrc? It looks like it is set
> to your gmail login. Mutt's SMTP client uses $hostname in the EHLO
> command, but gmail doesn't appreciate it being an email address, instead
> of your actual hostname.
>
>
having is that I can not send emails via Gmal, but I can receive just
fine.
Have you manually set hostname in your muttrc? It looks like it is set
to your gmail login. Mutt's SMTP client uses $hostname in the EHLO
command, but gmail doesn't appreciate it being an email address, ins
(ECDHE-ECDSA/CHACHA20-POLY1305/AEAD)
[2020-11-26 17:10:56] Connected to smtp.gmail.com:465 on fd=5
[2020-11-26 17:10:56] 5< 220 smtp.gmail.com ESMTP k31sm3554405qtd.40 - gsmtp
[2020-11-26 17:10:56] 5> EHLO usern...@gmail.com
[2020-11-26 17:10:56] 5< 501-5.5.4 HELO/EHLO argument &q
r now then. Maybe the IMAP GSSAPI handler
can be ported over to be used for SMTP too. I'll take a look at that
for next cycle...
Perhaps you could try an external MTA? msmtp's website seems to mention
working with GSSAPI. They use a different SASL library, so you might
have bette
ication name: mycompany\\myuser
>
> Just a thought - should that be a double backslash or a single
> backslash?
I may need go back and test this next week. But the current config works for
imap, and I have smtp_url="smtp://$imap_u...@server.com:587" in muttrc.
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 01:53:15PM +, isdtor wrote:
[2020-11-05 13:35:13] SASL: GSSAPI Error: Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code
may provide more information (Server not found in Kerberos database)
At this point, I'm just guessing, as I have almost no experience with
Kerberos. The mess
> Try running mutt at debug level 2 and see what it prints. There should be a
> message:
> smtp_authenticate: Trying method XXX
> for each method, and then hopefully something inside the SASL authentication
> starting with:
> smtp_auth_sasl:
>
> I don't know what the problem is, but pe
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 05:48:52PM +, isdtor wrote:
The --with-gss is actually only used for IMAP authentication. For SMTP,
Mutt's (simple) implementation relies entirely on SASL. Is it possible you
don't have the modules installed for SASL's GSSAPI support?
If you
> The --with-gss is actually only used for IMAP authentication. For SMTP,
> Mutt's (simple) implementation relies entirely on SASL. Is it possible you
> don't have the modules installed for SASL's GSSAPI support?
>
> If you're on a Debian derivative, try ins
that the smtp server requires "250-AUTH GSSAPI NTLM", and also,
that I had built this mutt without gss. So I rebuilt with gss
The --with-gss is actually only used for IMAP authentication. For SMTP,
Mutt's (simple) implementation relies entirely on SASL. Is it possible
you do
; What could be the problem here? I have the same settings configured under
> thunderbird, and sending works fine there.
I figured out that the smtp server requires "250-AUTH GSSAPI NTLM", and also,
that I had built this mutt without gss. So I rebuilt with gss
Configure options: &
gured under
thunderbird, and sending works fine there.
Thunderbird did complain about server certs twice, once for the incoming and
once for the outgoing server, for which I created permanent exceptions. mutt, I
think, asked once. Is the problem then that the smtp server cert is missing?
And how
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 04:29:35PM +0200, Philipp Gesang wrote:
this was indeed an issue in cyrus-sasl which thanks to a patch by
Simo Sorce is now fixed in master:
https://github.com/cyrusimap/cyrus-sasl/commit/ca6c587cc9da51235b125a97e841fa786aaad7ff
Thank you Philipp, for taking the initia
:33AM +0200, Philipp Gesang wrote:
> > > > I’ve come across a use after free in sasl calls when
> > > > authenticating using digest-md5 against an smtp server:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the trace.
> > >
> > > > PS: Bringing this up here because mu
hen
> > > authenticating using digest-md5 against an smtp server:
> >
> > Thanks for the trace.
> >
> > > PS: Bringing this up here because mutt is what crashes for me.
> > > As far as I can see, mutt follows the example code provided
> > >
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 06:38:40AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 08:59:33AM +0200, Philipp Gesang wrote:
I’ve come across a use after free in sasl calls when
authenticating using digest-md5 against an smtp server:
Thanks for the trace.
PS: Bringing this up here
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 08:59:33AM +0200, Philipp Gesang wrote:
I’ve come across a use after free in sasl calls when
authenticating using digest-md5 against an smtp server:
Thanks for the trace.
PS: Bringing this up here because mutt is what crashes for me.
As far as I can see, mutt
Hi,
I’ve come across a use after free in sasl calls when
authenticating using digest-md5 against an smtp server:
--8<-- free 1 --->8--
#0 free_rc4 (text=text@entry=0x21d3460) at digestmd5.c:1227
#1 0x7f1fa8416b92 in make_client_response
Hi Ben -- Thanks. I did see it a few days ago (it is well indexed on
Google!), but while it would provide good search, it leaves most of the
other requirements off the list.
Probably I should have also stated one of the other requirements, which
is that I'm looking for a single tool which can prov
-imap should be able to
sync from gmail to the local store.
- Provide an SMTP server or sendmail-like command line interface for
mutt to use to send mail
I'd just use the local mail system. For exanmple, my Mac comes with
postfix preinstalled; I've just configured i
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 17:26:31 -0800, Jonathan Gold wrote:
> I currently use the mbox format, fetchmail, procmail, and msmtp, but it
> is a bit unwieldy and doesn't give me the SQL search interface I'd like.
It isn't postgres, but have you looked at notmuch? It has mail-oriented
search tools bui
directly,
filtering by headers and bodies (attachments not so important)
- Provide an IMAP server on localhost to be mutt's interface to the
postgres mailstore.
- Provide an SMTP server or sendmail-like command line interface for
El día viernes, octubre 26, 2018 a las 03:47:03p. m. -0500, Hokan escribió:
> This rejection is the result of the "percent hack" implimented on
> sendmail, postfix and, perhaps, other mail servers.
>
> Nothing to do with Mutt.
Yes, it's a bit off-topic. And, thanks for the pointer to that "perce
very failed: returning message to sender
>
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
>
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>
> jw%leserin
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
jw%leserini-...@gmx.de
host 172.16.28.206 [172.16.28.206]
SMTP error from remote
I find that sending a empty email with a ~12M attachment using SMTP directly
will cause a SMTP session error at the end. Is that a mutt problem or the SMTP
server (which is Gmail) problem?
Yubin
--
Yubin Ruan <http://fastdrivers.org>
, "fe...@crowfix.com" wrote:
It was smtp_url. The definition in the mutt manual says
smtp[s]://[user[:pass]@]host[:port]
and I guess I got it confused with http://user:pass@domain, so had
smtp://me:p...@corp.com@smtp.office365.com:port
but
It was smtp_url. The definition in the mutt manual says
smtp[s]://[user[:pass]@]host[:port]
and I guess I got it confused with http://user:pass@domain, so had
smtp://me:p...@corp.com@smtp.office365.com:port
but it should be
smtp://m...@corp.com:p...@smtp.office365.com:port
t;
> > What I need help with is the configuration. If K-9 can talk to
> > smtp.office365.com, surely so can (neo)mutt. What am I doing wrong?
> >
>
> I use the following with office 365:
> --
> set folder=imaps://%40:$my_pass_@outlook.office365.com
> set
Given the number of typos in your email ("lookout", "Ubunto",
"smtp.offic365.com"), are you sure that you have the protocol
("smtp" vs. "smtps"), server, port, & credentials typed properly?
-tkc
On 2017-10-01 15:35, fe...@crowfix.com wro
on. If K-9 can talk to
> smtp.office365.com, surely so can (neo)mutt. What am I doing wrong?
>
I use the following with office 365:
--
set folder=imaps://%40:$my_pass_@outlook.office365.com
set smtp_url = "smtp://@:$my_pass_@smtp.office365.com:587"
set imap_check_subscribed=yes
set im
I doubt very much this is a bug in (neo)mutt.
I also didn't think there was enough difference in the two for it to matter
that I post here.
What I need help with is the configuration. If K-9 can talk to
smtp.office365.com, surely so can (neo)mutt. What am I doing wrong?
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017
You do realize that you are using NeoMutt, which is a fork of Mutt?
Actually, you did paste the correct place to ask for assistance in your
message...
On 2 Oct 2017, at 0:35, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
To learn more about NeoMutt, visit: http://www.neomutt.org/
If you find a bug in NeoMutt, ple
I have K-9 email on my Android phone, and it can send email to outlook just
fine. But mutt on my Ubunto 17.?? system cannot send email; it always gets
"SASL authentication failed".
Here is what K-9 has for its outgoing server:
SMTP serversmtp.office365.com
On 04.02.17 17:04, sunrise wrote:
>
> Are there any suggestions for which MTA would be most suitable for
> this purpose (sending queued messages on a system that is not online
> when composing messages)?
They would all handle that, straight out of the box. Mail spooling is a
basic MTA function. (
interface, so that we old folks
>could move over painlessly. But now my muscle memory is Postfix oriented.)
>
>> I use Postfix and both send and receive mail using SMTP as my desktop
>> machine is on all the time. Thus I have no need for POP3/IMAP mail
>> collection.
>
&g
Thanks for your input; I will definitely be looking at the possibility of
using offlineimap. I am on a dial up connection - does offlineimap handle
dropped
connections well?
Thanks again.
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 21:57:21 + (UTC)
Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
>On 2017-02-03, sunrise wrote:
>> I wo
On 2017-02-03, sunrise wrote:
> I would like to start using mutt but am somewhat intimidated by all the
> possible options
> in the muttrc config file. Would someone be willing to provide me with a
> basic muttrc I
> could use to get started?
>
> Here is what I'm looking for:
>
> * POP3 (one pro
o that we old folks
could move over painlessly. But now my muscle memory is Postfix oriented.)
> I use Postfix and both send and receive mail using SMTP as my desktop
> machine is on all the time. Thus I have no need for POP3/IMAP mail
> collection.
As my machine is shut down each night, I
maintainer, configuration of exim4 is simple and quick.
>
... and if you're on a distribution where Postfix is the standard
that's also pretty easy to set up. I personally prefer Postfix from
the ease of configuration point of view.
I use Postfix and both send and receive mail using SMT
On Thu, February 2, 2017 10:37 pm, sunrise wrote:
> I already had getmail set up but didn't have msmtp installed.
If exim4 is installed and configured, there is no need for msmtp, unless you
need the profile feature of msmtp which gives you the ability to send
messages through any of a number of s
sses" and
"/etc/exim4/password-client".
> One question I still have is: What are the advantages of using getmail
> and msmtp versus using mutt's built in POP3 and SMTP capabilities?
The author and maintainer of getmail has taken great pains to ensure that
getmail4 w
) for retrieving messages
* SMTP for sending
* Mail stored in maildir format in $HOME
Using Mutt 1.5.21
Thanks!
I think there is an example .muttrc in /etc/mutt
--
dale | http://www.dalekelly.org
p fire again in the mailing
>list and please consider updating the wiki with your use case when
>you succeed.
Thanks a lot for both replies; I feel I am now several steps closer to getting
a working
system. I already had getmail set up but didn't have msmtp installed.
One question I still have is: What are the advantages of using getmail and
msmtp versus
using mutt's built in POP3 and SMTP capabilities?
Thank you for your time.
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 08:44:34PM -0600, sunrise wrote:
> I would like to start using mutt but am somewhat intimidated by all the
> possible options
> in the muttrc config file. Would someone be willing to provide me with a
> basic muttrc I
> could use to get started?
This is what I have:
set
On Thu, February 2, 2017 8:44 pm, sunrise wrote:
> I would like to start using mutt but am somewhat intimidated by all the
> possible options in the muttrc config file. Would someone be willing to
> provide me with a basic muttrc I could use to get started?
That's why they make search engines; you
I would like to start using mutt but am somewhat intimidated by all the
possible options
in the muttrc config file. Would someone be willing to provide me with a basic
muttrc I
could use to get started?
Here is what I'm looking for:
* POP3 (one provider) for retrieving messages
* SMT
use SMTP
How do you "directly send" without using SMTP?
with the default sending mechanism that came with it before I configured
SMTP variables
I believe the default is to use the "sendmail" command to submit the
message to the local mail delivery system. (But it s
use SMTP
How do you "directly send" without using SMTP?
with the default sending mechanism that came with it before I configured
SMTP variables
I believe the default is to use the "sendmail" command to submit the
message to the local mail delivery system. (But it s
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 20:23:49 -0400, dale wrote:
> On 07/28/2016 07:39 PM, dale wrote:
> >On 07/28/2016 04:10 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> >>On 2016-07-28, dale wrote:
> >>
> >>>I get a reply from my ISP when I try to directly send, no message when I
>
On 07/28/2016 07:39 PM, dale wrote:
On 07/28/2016 04:10 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2016-07-28, dale wrote:
I get a reply from my ISP when I try to directly send, no message when I
use SMTP
How do you "directly send" without using SMTP?
with the default sending mechanism that
On 07/28/2016 04:10 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2016-07-28, dale wrote:
I get a reply from my ISP when I try to directly send, no message when I
use SMTP
How do you "directly send" without using SMTP?
with the default sending mechanism that came with it before I config
On 2016-07-28, dale wrote:
> I get a reply from my ISP when I try to directly send, no message when I
> use SMTP
How do you "directly send" without using SMTP?
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! I don't understand
On 07/28/2016 01:46 PM, hy...@lactose.homelinux.net wrote:
dale writes:
my ISP doesn't allow direct email
set smtp_url="smtp://d...@dalekelly.org@smtpout.secureserver.net:25"
I get the following messages
Connecting to smtpout.secureserver.net...
Could
dale writes:
>my ISP doesn't allow direct email
>set smtp_url="smtp://d...@dalekelly.org@smtpout.secureserver.net:25"
>I get the following messages
>Connecting to smtpout.secureserver.net...
>Could not connect to smtpout.secureserver.net (Interrupted system call).
I used to use Mutt on Ubuntu from the repository and got it to work
except for smtp TLS, my ISP doesn't allow direct email, still doesn't I
get a reply mail saying so
I am now using
Debian GNU/Linux 8 (jessie) 64-bit
and
Mutt 1.5.23-3 which came installed as I saw in the package
El día Saturday, April 16, 2016 a las 03:25:31PM -0400, Xu Wang escribió:
> > I understand this config value for the $sendmail proc, as the man page
> > also explains. Does this really also affect the built-in SMTP client
> > functionality?
>
> Yes I understand the sam
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Thursday, April 14, 2016 a las 07:59:56PM -0700, Claus Assmann
> escribió:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016, Xu Wang wrote:
>>
>> > I use mutt's built-in SMTP client. I would like to press 'y'
El día Thursday, April 14, 2016 a las 07:59:56PM -0700, Claus Assmann escribió:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016, Xu Wang wrote:
>
> > I use mutt's built-in SMTP client. I would like to press 'y' and
> > immediately be able to move on to my next email without waiting. I
&
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016, Xu Wang wrote:
>
>> I use mutt's built-in SMTP client. I would like to press 'y' and
>> immediately be able to move on to my next email without waiting. I
>
> Did you check th
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016, Xu Wang wrote:
> I use mutt's built-in SMTP client. I would like to press 'y' and
> immediately be able to move on to my next email without waiting. I
Did you check the fine manual?
3.234. sendmail_wait
Type: number
Default: 0
Specifies the number o
Dear all,
I use mutt's built-in SMTP client. I would like to press 'y' and
immediately be able to move on to my next email without waiting. I
understand why it is important to wait---if the email send failed,
then it is important for you to know that. But is it possible to be
notif
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 07:38:41PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
>> Unfortunately,
>> mutt -H - < email_file
>> does not work when email_file has embedded attachments. To see this
>> use mutt to write an email, attach two PDF files, and then use t
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * Xu Wang on Sunday, April 03, 2016 at 19:38:41 -0400
>> Unfortunately,
>> mutt -H - < email_file
>> does not work when email_file has embedded attachments. To see this
>> use mutt to write an email, attach two PDF files, and then use the
>>
* Xu Wang on Sunday, April 03, 2016 at 19:38:41 -0400
> Unfortunately,
> mutt -H - < email_file
> does not work when email_file has embedded attachments. To see this
> use mutt to write an email, attach two PDF files, and then use the
> above command on that email file.
>
> Send the email to yours
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 07:38:41PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
> Unfortunately,
> mutt -H - < email_file
> does not work when email_file has embedded attachments. To see this
> use mutt to write an email, attach two PDF files, and then use the
> above command on that email file.
>
> Send the email to yo
Unfortunately,
mutt -H - < email_file
does not work when email_file has embedded attachments. To see this
use mutt to write an email, attach two PDF files, and then use the
above command on that email file.
Send the email to yourself. You should see that the attachments were
not sent correctly.
I
;> > > > > > everything).
>> > > > > > e.g. I want to keep the message ID the same. How can I used mutt's
>> > > > > > build-in smtp to send the email? Basically i want mutt to just send
>> > > > > > the email that is already wr
t; > > wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 01:19:12AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
> > > > > > Suppose that I have a full email (i.e. with headers and everything).
> > > > > > e.g. I want to keep the message ID the same. How can I used mutt'
1 - 100 of 623 matches
Mail list logo