begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:04:14AM +0100:
Just wondering why 1524 is so important to you...
You lost me. To the best of my knowledge, I have never discussed
RFC1524 in this or any other mailing list, prior to this exchange.
RFC1521 is important to me
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-25 19.58 +0100]:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:18:11:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote:
begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:12:41AM +0100:
Not that I know, but it is quite dangerous to talk about Outlook in the
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:25:21:AM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote:
begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:04:14AM +0100:
Just wondering why 1524 is so important to you...
You lost me.
You lost me. We lost us. ;-)
To the best of my knowledge, I have never
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002, Martin Karlsson wrote:
And now all Solaris-users can enjoy the MS Outlook
Express-experience ;-)
http://www.microsoft.com/unix/ie/evaluation/outlookexp/default.asp
And if it's anything like IE for Solaris, it sucks. Ever since 3.0,
Netscape IMO has gotten more and
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 02:09:41:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Care to give some examples?
if [ muttversion != 1.5.0 ]; then
source ~/.mutt/setup/nntp
fi
But you're right, this one may be done with a bash script. But - to me -
it looks ugly havin a good mail client and some sort of
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 02:50:29:PM +0100 Sven Guckes wrote:
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-22 01:40]:
At least connditionals are absolutely missing
in mutt's config file functionality.
.. and also missing with setup files
for elm, pine, outlook, ...
All mail clients suck.
Rocco Rutte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 02:09:41:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Care to give some examples?
if [ muttversion != 1.5.0 ]; then
source ~/.mutt/setup/nntp
fi
Quoting the fine manual section 3.0:
In addition, mutt supports version
Hi Rob!
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Care to give some examples?
folder-hook =folder 'push T~r1m\n' if [ ~T ]; then 'push \;s=archiv\n' fi
--
[ markus hubig ] [ mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ debian/gnu linux (sid) ]
[ vorholzstrasse 6 ] [ saft: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [
begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:12:41AM +0100:
Not that I know, but it is quite dangerous to talk about Outlook in the
context of mail clients.
Oh, it is a mail client, it's just not an Internet mail client.
At the very least, it doesn't read
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:18:11:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote:
begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:12:41AM +0100:
Not that I know, but it is quite dangerous to talk about Outlook in the
context of mail clients.
Oh, it is a mail client, it's just not an
begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 07:58:17PM +0100:
At the very least, it doesn't read RFC1521-compliant mails as
recommended in the standard.
Which has status informational only.
Ok, first, wrong, it's standards-track, not informational.
However, it *IS* the
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 03:14:14:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote:
begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 07:58:17PM +0100:
At the very least, it doesn't read RFC1521-compliant mails as
recommended in the standard.
Which has status informational only.
Ok,
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-22 01:40]:
At least connditionals are absolutely missing
in mutt's config file functionality.
.. and also missing with setup files
for elm, pine, outlook, ...
Btw: which mailers *have* a setup language?
ok - emacs. any else?
Sven
At 8:50 AM EST on March 24 Sven Guckes sent off:
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-22 01:40]:
At least connditionals are absolutely missing
in mutt's config file functionality.
. and also missing with setup files
for elm, pine, outlook, ..
Btw: which mailers *have* a setup
begin quoting what Rob Reid said on Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 03:01:35PM -0500:
If mutt could pass variables like the current folder to the environment, then
this mutt needs a scripting language, but no, that's bloated, and
which one would we use? thread would probably recur less frequently.
It
--KdquIMZPjGJQvRdI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Rob Reid spake thus:
If mutt could pass variables like the current folder to the environment, =
then
this mutt needs a scripting language, but no, that's
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-24 14:09:41 -0700]:
Alas! Rob Reid spake thus:
If mutt could pass variables like the current folder to the environment, then
this mutt needs a scripting language, but no, that's bloated, and
which one would we use? thread would probably recur
At 4:09 PM EST on March 24 Rob 'Feztaa' Park sent off:
Alas! Rob Reid spake thus:
If mutt could pass variables like the current folder to the environment, then
this mutt needs a scripting language, but no, that's bloated, and
which one would we use? thread would probably recur less
On Sun 24-Mar-2002 at 02:09:41PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
I can't think of anything that can be done with a scripting language
built into the .muttrc that can't be done with a bash script being
evaluated with backticks inside the regular .muttrc. (but then again,
I haven't put
Alas! Rob Reid spake thus:
I don't understand why mutt so desperately needs a scripting language.
I wasn't saying it does.
Sorry, I didn't mean _you_ were saying that, but some people have and I
didn't get why.
What's wrong with the backtick evaluation that the .muttrc already has?
20 matches
Mail list logo
