I have the following mutt procedure (defined as a function):
age () {
mutt -f /home/eric/Mail/$1 -e 'push uT~r1w!~F\n\;s=$1_aged\n\xq'
}
Two problems preventing the non-interactive use of the script:
1. When the mail folder $1_aged is not already in existance, then mutt
prompts whether it
On Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 12:54:16PM -0800, Eugene Lee wrote:
else is pushing POP3 beyond its intended design. Anyone else wanting
additional features should use IMAP. Anyone wanting IMAP-like features
But there lies the rub - 99% of users of MUAs DON'T HAVE THAT CHOICE!!!
We can't just "use
On Sat, Dec 11, 1999 at 03:46:03PM -0500, Richard Hakim wrote:
This isn't strictly a mutt question, but...I use emacs as my editor. Do
you know if there is a way to make it position the cursor at the first
empty line automatically? Also is there an e-mail writing mode? Not sure
what that
I am quite happy using mutt-1.0 and gpg.
Pgp support changed between mutt-1.0 and mutt-1.1.x.
I have read the notes on pgp in the doc directory,
but I still wonder in which way the pgp (particularly
the gpg) support was improoved ?
Excuse my curiosity,
alex
Attila --
...and then Attila Csosz said...
%
% When I change to Sent-Items it works but when I change back for example my
% Inbox folder, this folder hook affects my Inbox, so this time my Inbox folder
% looks like my Sent-Items folder.
You simply need to set a default folder-hook, since hooks
Eric --
I don't play with pushing much, so I can't tell you why your procedure
finishes properly only sometimes, but you could certainly push a
set noconfirm_create
in there as well or set up a special .muttrc for aging and use -F to
source it.
HTH HAND
:-D
--
David T-G
Chris --
Excuse me if this sounnds dumb, but...
...and then Chris Green said...
% to TRUE only when forwarding mail? I.e. I don't want to see/edit the
% headers when I'm composing and replying to mail normally but I *do*
% want to be able to edit the headers directly when I'm forwarding mail.
Rejo --
I don't see anything about your Cc: hook problem, though I suspect that
Cc: won't want to be unset but instead reset to "" or some such. To not
include the original email in the reply, though, just
set noinclude
(probably with a hook :-)
HTH HAND
:-D
--
David T-G
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 10:14:48AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Chris --
Excuse me if this sounnds dumb, but...
...and then Chris Green said...
% to TRUE only when forwarding mail? I.e. I don't want to see/edit the
% headers when I'm composing and replying to mail normally but I *do*
% want
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 03:59:01PM +, Chris Green wrote:
I only want to edit headers when forwarding mail because my most
frequent use of it is to forward UCE to a postmaster/abuse address
somewhere. It's easier to set the To: address *after* the forwarded
mail has appeared in my editor
Hi folks,
I have a strange problem, I use this mailbox for several different
forwarding addresses and I am wondering if I can configure Mutt to use the
original To address instead of the default.
Mutt is set to use thecivvie@(softhome.net|yifan.net...) and so if someone
sends me and email using
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 05:09:52PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 03:59:01PM +, Chris Green wrote:
I only want to edit headers when forwarding mail because my most
frequent use of it is to forward UCE to a postmaster/abuse address
somewhere. It's easier to
Chris --
...and then Ralf Hildebrandt said...
% On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 03:59:01PM +, Chris Green wrote:
%
% frequent use of it is to forward UCE to a postmaster/abuse address
%
% a) Press h to display the headers
% b) Consider using a semi automatic tool like "adcomplain.pl" or
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 11:59:21AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
What he said, only I'd use spamcop.net because I know about it. It's not
only about saving time; it saves you from having to parse the headers
yourself (though you get to see what they are, if you want), it already
knows all of the
Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else wanting additional features should use IMAP.
But there lies the rub - 99% of users of MUAs DON'T HAVE THAT
CHOICE!!! We can't just "use IMAP", the choice isn't there!
Then MAKE it happen! You are here, trying to push Mutt into conforming
Alexander Dvorak t2069 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have read the notes on pgp in the doc directory, but I still wonder
in which way the pgp (particularly the gpg) support was improoved ?
As near as I can tell, PGP support was changed to be more flexible, so
that any command that might be sent
On 1999-12-13 14:12:23 -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
As near as I can tell, PGP support was changed to be more
flexible, so that any command that might be sent to PGP, or
another encryption program, can be formatted and scripted using
the command variables, instead of being hard-coded into
* Thomas Roessler [1999.12.11]:
[snip]
sendlib.c) a bit - depending on a suitable option (say,
set_envelope_from), mutt could just pass "-faddress" to sendmail.
[snip]
Sorry, it's off topic.
I'm on a one-user linux box and use the 'sendmail -f' to change the
'envelope-from' from my
18 matches
Mail list logo
