hello,
I have to use different From address, [EMAIL PROTECTED] for all of my
mail and [EMAIL PROTECTED] to send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried a send-hook but... it doesn't work, where could I look in the
manual ?
thanks,
binny
--
folop y'a un fichier de 61 mo dans /proc c'est normal ?
Hello Benjamin,
Wednesday, December 19, 2001, 10:12:49 AM, you wrote:
I have to use different From address, [EMAIL PROTECTED] for all of my
mail and [EMAIL PROTECTED] to send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried a send-hook but... it doesn't work, where could I look in the
manual ?
IMHO the
* Benjamin Michotte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-12-19 09:12]:
hello,
I have to use different From address, [EMAIL PROTECTED] for all of my
mail and [EMAIL PROTECTED] to send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried a send-hook but... it doesn't work, where could I look in the
manual ?
thanks,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:50:14AM, Im Eunjea wrote:
send-hook . 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
send-hook '~t ml@manex\.be' 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
great, thanks... i'd forget the ~t :|
--
Eunjea
---end quoted text---
binny
--
folop y'a un fichier de 61 mo dans /proc
After I upgraded from 1.3.23 to 1.3.24 a few days ago, one of my users
started complaining that his From field was all messed up. At first I
suspected he'd made a mess of his .muttrc, but after taking time to
investigate today it seems that his .muttrc is correct.
my_hdr Christian Kjønsvik
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:18:34 +0100, Andreas Landmark wrote:
After I upgraded from 1.3.23 to 1.3.24 a few days ago, one of my users
started complaining that his From field was all messed up. At first I
suspected he'd made a mess of his .muttrc, but after taking time to
investigate today it
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:30:03PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:18:34 +0100, Andreas Landmark wrote:
After I upgraded from 1.3.23 to 1.3.24 a few days ago, one of my users
started complaining that his From field was all messed up. At first I
suspected he'd made
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 15:19:11 +0100, Andreas Landmark wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:30:03PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:18:34 +0100, Andreas Landmark wrote:
After I upgraded from 1.3.23 to 1.3.24 a few days ago, one of my users
started complaining that
hi all,
i have been using mutt for three days, and there are tons of things i
haven't figured out yet.
i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters;
initially i decided to try procmail, but it is decisely too much
insane for me: i'm a member of at least 15 MLs (plus this one :)
* giorgian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters;
initially i decided to try procmail, but it is decisely too much
insane for me: i'm a member of at least 15 MLs (plus this one :) ),
and my .procmailrc is an awful mess, so i gave up.
Giblets
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:21:24PM +0100, giorgian wrote:
hi all,
i have been using mutt for three days, and there are tons of things i
haven't figured out yet.
i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters;
initially i decided to try procmail, but it is decisely too much
Thus spake Gerhard Häring ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
What I'd like to have is a possibility to remove the spamassassin
markup and save the message from within mutt. Removing the markup with
a filter works with | spamassassin -d. But how do I then save the
filtered message? I'm using IMAP, if that
Hi,
* giorgian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-19 16:21]:
i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters;
initially i decided to try procmail, but it is decisely too much
insane for me: i'm a member of at least 15 MLs (plus this one :) ),
and my .procmailrc is an awful mess, so i gave up.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 11:37:31PM -0700, Mark Johnson wrote:
Question: How do I insert both addresses into the To: line, without typing
one out the long way?
just tag them (using t) and then say write message (m) and
they magically appear in your To:
If only one appears, make sure auto_tag
On Dec 19 at 04:21PM giorgian wrote:
[...]
now, is there a way to tell mutt to put received messages in folders
according to some matching rules?
if you're just dealing with mailing lists, getmail will likely
suffice. you can find it at freshmeat, and it's easy-as-pie to
configure.
--
tim
I've RTFM and haven't seen a way for mutt to send (not display)
multipart/alternative attachments. Is there an external program that
can be used with mutt to do this? I was considering using an existing
message as a template, but I thought I read where the boundary string
has to be unique and
Gary Johnson wrote:
Before this degenerates into a discussion of Why would you ever want
to do that? and Mail should be text/plain: The reason I want this
is that as secretary for an organization, I need to regularly
distribute a form to the members. The form was written as a Word
Roman Neuhauser muttered:
I started playing with auto_view, but stumbled upon a problem:
roman@roman ~ grep tar-gz ~/.mailcap
application/x-tar-gz; tar tzf -;copiousoutput
[-- Attachment #2: test.tar.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-tar-gz, Encoding: base64, Size: 325K --]
[-- Autoview
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:21:00AM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
well in the compose screen, you can attach as many documents as you
like, and they'll show up as MIME multipart. so compose your message,
then exit the editor and hit 'a' to attach the first document, rinse,
lather, repeat.
Ooops, proof that that X-Uptime header's not entirely useless. Just
noticed I had a locked-up proftpd process that's been there for the last
4 hours :)
* Gary Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I've RTFM and haven't seen a way for mutt to send (not display)
multipart/alternative attachments.
* Gary Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On the other hand, maybe giving them an explicit choice of formats
would be better.
Personally I'd multipart/alternate the Word version so even if word
breaks they can still read the message, and give a choice of not
including the word version at
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:02:03PM +, Thomas Hurst wrote:
* Gary Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On the other hand, maybe giving them an explicit choice of formats
would be better.
Personally I'd multipart/alternate the Word version so even if word
breaks they can still read the
Hello,
today I installed my locale and I'm trying to get mutt to work with
it... but ;) there is one problem - I could not use national chars in
subject (To and so on), because instead of them mutt produces other ascii
chars (I could not type them).
My OS is FreeBSD 4.4-Release, mutt 1.3.24i
Hi,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-18 13:32]:
Hey, he said it happenned with Crosspoint, and I'd never heard of it
until we traded some email recently. If something of which I've never
heard can do that, surely something of which I have might have the same
shot!
Wrong network, wrong
Hi,
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-18 00:02]:
It's a quote string! Get over it!
My thoughts exactly.
Thorsten
--
Question Authority!
* Gregor Zattler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011218 03:44]:
Hi Peter,
hi mutt users,
* Peter Poeml [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mon 10 Dez 2001 20:04:17 GMT]:
[...]
As mentioned before, grepmail can jump in because mutt works on single
mail boxes. Now I was curious and figured out the command for your
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 03:44:27PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
So, perhaps you should quote the name:
my_hdr From: Christian Kjønsvik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(I haven't tried and don't know if this works.)
It doesn't, same result, the From-field is perverted in a slightly
different way, it
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:13:03PM +0200, Paulius Bulotas wrote:
Hello,
today I installed my locale and I'm trying to get mutt to work with
it... but ;) there is one problem - I could not use national chars in
subject (To and so on), because instead of them mutt produces other ascii
chars
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:49:47AM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with:
defeat the very purpose of the quote signs. Wenn ich auf einmal die
Sprache wecheln würde, nur damit es für *mich* klarer ist was ich
schreibe, hätten die meisten anderen ebenfalls nichts davon.
I'm a little
Hello all, I'm having a problem with my charset in mutt 1.3.24 on Debian
Woody.
I've set my charset to iso-8859-1, but many characters display as a ?. I
had a similar problem on mandrake, but I fixed it by setting the charset
to what it is now. It's no longer working.
Any suggestions?
--
Rob
Hi Rob,
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 19. 2001 21:25]:
Hello all, I'm having a problem with my charset in mutt 1.3.24 on Debian
Woody.
Using woody, too. Make sure you have the locales package installed.
I've set my charset to iso-8859-1, but many characters display as a ?. I
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 09:39:32PM -0500, Brian Clark (dis)graced my inbox with:
Hi Rob,
hello.
Hello all, I'm having a problem with my charset in mutt 1.3.24 on Debian
Woody.
Using woody, too. Make sure you have the locales package installed.
Which one? There are many, for different
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 giorgian spewed into the ether:
hi all,
i have been using mutt for three days, and there are tons of things i
haven't figured out yet.
i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters;
initially i decided to try procmail, but it is decisely too much
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 19. 2001 23:17]:
Using woody, too. Make sure you have the locales package installed.
Which one? There are many, for different purposes. These ones might be
relevant:
icu-locales 1.8.1-2 (not installed)
locales 2.2.4-7 (installed)
That one ^^
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:33:31PM -0500, Brian Clark (dis)graced my inbox with:
icu-locales 1.8.1-2 (not installed)
locales 2.2.4-7 (installed)
That one ^^ I think. That's what I have installed. I just did a
`dpkg-reconfigure locales' and chose my preference.
I figured that was the one,
35 matches
Mail list logo
