On 1999.12.31, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Shannon Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nobody here can help those organizations or individuals who have chosen to
> limit themselves to "easy" software; all we can do is make sure that when
> they step into the light there's a sane alternative ;
On 2000.05.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mikko Hänninen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 16 May 2000:
> > My second question is when I delete a mail accessing via IMAP,
> > it creates an annoying message, something like:
> >
> > DON'T D
On 2000.05.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Brendan Cully" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> don't know which clients can make use of that yet). The best option is
> just to use IMAP always or never, probably.
I don't think that's realistic, as long as non-IMAP access is possible,
for some people.
On 2000.05.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David Roche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've searched all over the docs, and can't figure out how to get the pager to
> display all Date: header fields in time converted to the local timezone. Is
> this possible?
This is not exactly what you desc
On 2000.05.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Bennett Todd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I've gotten so hooked on mutt that I'm wanting to use it for
> netnews.
>
> I know this has been discussed a lot, but as best I've been able to
> tell the focus has been on NNTP support for some reason
Alice, Bob, and Carol want to find all email that was sent from any one
of them to BOTH of the others, but that was not sent to ANY fourth
person.
I can make mutt match all messages that include Alice, Bob, and Carol:
~L alice ~L bob ~L carol
My mailbox has a message from Carol to Alice,
On 2000.05.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David Champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I attached a mailbox that contains 8
> messages: 6 that I want matched, 1 that is from Carol to Alice, Bob,
> and Dave, and 1 that does not include Bob. (The last two
On 2000.05.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David Champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A look at the source code suggests that this is a misread, though, and
> that "^" goes before any pattern component. Well, this pattern:
> ^~L alice | ^~L
On 2000.05.25, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mikko Hänninen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ~L alice ~L bob ~L carol ^~L (alice\|bob\|carol)
>
> I'm curious, do you really need the first part, the three matches?
> The last part should do their job too. Since you tried these things,
> I su
On 2000.05.25, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David DeSimone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > That's good as an option, but then the problem would be that you can't
> > have an independent stand-alone binary that works even with no
> > resource file
On 2000.05.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Manuel Arriaga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Two short config questions:
>
> - I have put "ignore (blabla)" into my .muttrc in order to keep the visible part of
>the headers in incoming mail readable, but now I would like to sort the d
On 2000.05.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David DeSimone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe the original poster (I forgot who...) would be OK with
> > "unbind * *" and "unmacro
On 2000.05.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Rob Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You mean strip sigs from quoted text in a reply? That's the editor's job
I strenuously disagree. I think we should rather say: it is the
established judgement of the Mutt development team that stripping
si
On 2000.05.30, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Say you are replying to 30 messages, for instance. And you don't want to
> send each out after you are done with your reply. Could you then create
> a macro to send these to outbox and then send say eve
On 2000.06.01, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have my urlview working lovely with netscape opening inside the same
> window, but what if I want to open in a new window?
% netscape -remote 'openURL(http://www.mutt.org/, new-window)'
--
-D.
On 2000.06.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Lars Hecking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In principle, yes, but it may even work without. Nevertheless,
> echo -n is not portable.
Unquoted backquotes turn all whitespace into plain spaces:
`ls a b c` => a b c
Quo
On 2000.06.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Nigel Tamplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running mutt on Solaris within an xterm.
> ...
> If I leave TERM=xterm, then I get colors, however the only colours that seem
> to work are white, brightyellow and black.
I'm surprised you did so well
On 2000.06.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Nils Vogels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 03:22:27PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> >
> > Nothing -- except in the minds of folks who make decisions at his company.
>
> *sigh* ... managers ... ;-)
My group runs a system with near
On 2000.06.11, in <005801bfd3a3$5bbb1320$f8a0a6d4@alderaan>,
"Daniel González Gasull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> Perhaps this is a silly question, but, is there any
> program (say catwav) which let me do something like
>
> catwav message.wav
>
> and display the mess
I warn you now - this is more than you asked for.
On 2000.06.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Andrew Eichmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the subject line. For example, if the original message's Subject:
> line is ``[BOB] What's the frequency, Kenneth?''where ``[BOB]'' is
> the mailing li
On 2000.06.18, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dennis Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello List,
> This is embarrassing. I have made letterboxes in $HOME/Mail using
> touch. These new files don't open automatically but bring up the "open
> with" dialogue when clicked. Procmail evident
On 2000.06.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Any way to put the X-Label: contents into $index_format?
My index_format has: "%?y?[%y] ?". From the docs:
The ``X-Label:'' header field can be used to further identify mailing
lists or list subject ma
On 2000.06.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David Champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2000.06.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Any way to put the X-Label: contents into $i
On 2000.06.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"clemensF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mrinal Kalakrishnan:
>
> > No it's different. If you're in a console while X is running, the
> > RunningX test will fail, because it actually tries to open the
> > display. Whereas the $DISPLAY variable still
On 2000.06.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"clemensF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> so, why in the world would one want to leave mh for mutt?
Are you asking why in the world would one want to leave:
next
next
comp
...
send
next
next
next
next
repl
send
for:
m
...
y
r
...
y
?
Multipl
On 2000.06.25, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Vincent Danen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do I undelete messages? When I try to go back to a deleted
> message, mutt won't let me... I can't move the arrow onto it. I see
Type in the message number to jump to any message, or use the
and bi
On 2000.06.29, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mark Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 12:39:26AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > > checking for iconv... yes
> > > checking whether this iconv is good enough... no
> > > configure: error: Try using libiconv instead
> > >
On 2000.06.29, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Lars Hecking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> D'oh. That's a job for procmail's MATCH and formail. No need for an
> external program.
No, but it's easier with an external program, because procmail's
$MATCHing is so weak. Here's my old procmail m
On 2000.06.30, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mrinal Kalakrishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The advantage with LinuxDoc/DocBook DTDs is that you can convert it to
> any format you like later. So you can have an online HTML version,
> plain text, PS, PDF, etc.. (like the mutt docs)
The di
On 2000.06.30, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >get them processed on Unix. Maybe that's not necessary, but I always
> >argue with any decision that (in practice) drives data or a process out
> >of the realm of portability.
>
> ... so what fo
On 2000.06.30, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"brd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed that when tryting to tag a whole thread with the -t
> combo, sometimes it will work and sometimes not. I may have to do it a
> few times before it works, but it's not the same number each time. I
> thi
On 2000.06.30, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Sergio Bruder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a way to alter the default Subject of a forwarded message?
set forward_format. The %-expansions are teh same as for $index_format.
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chic
On 2000.07.07, in <00a001bfe869$78def130$0200a8c0@mdaxke>,
"Mark D. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Which implies to me that it is possible to browse folders of an IMAP server.
> So how is that done?
In order:
c
? to list folders/enter browser
On 2000.07.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David Champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In order:
> c
> ? to list folders/enter browser
> c
> ^u
> then enter an IMAP path: e.g., {imap.demo.int/s
On 2000.07.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jason Helfman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I searched threw the manual and it looks us though you may not be able
> to tag something as unread. If this is the case, why? If I am wrong, can
> you please point me to the right place in the manual...
K
On 2000.07.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Marius Gedminas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not that I advocate adding SMTP support to Mutt [2], but I just
> ---
> [2] Well, that would be a nice thing to have if I try to compile it on
> WinNT again ;)
I don't mean to say anything about whe
On 2000.07.21, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"George Klinich III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm... I don't see the %y format documented in the manual, what is it
> suppose to do?
It's documented, but present only in the 1.3.x series.
muttrc(5):
%y `x-label:' field, if present
On 2000.07.22, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dennis Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello List,
> I am trying to correspond with a friend who uses Windows and Eudora 4.3.2 (gasp!)
>with PGP
> 6.5.3. I use mutt and gnupg 1.0.1 ;). When he invokes decrypt on my messages all
>he sees
>
On 2000.07.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David, et al --
>
> % So, short answer: Eudora can send to Mutt, but Mutt can't send to
> % Eudora, and it's Eudora's fault.
>
> FWIW, I have been able to send with mutt-0.95.4i and pgp5; my recipient
> may whi
On 2000.07.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Nils Vogels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm.. procmail sounds indeed better than mutt, but this leaves me with quite a
> new challenge: how do i make procmail run a piece of its config file only once
> a month, and not on every mail delivery ? ;-)
On 2000.07.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Sunil Shetye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > push ! 'DELETE THIS MESSAGE'
>
> Then, this series of mails will also get ignored:-)
So
push ! (~s 'DELETE THIS MESSAGE' ~f MAILER-DAEMON@)
(more or less).
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 2000.07.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ben Beuchler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good point. Fixed that but it still didn't work. It turns out that it
> was the \Cs. For some reason mutt didn't like using ^s as a macro. No
> matter what I specified there, it locked up. I checked
On 2000.07.29, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Randall Hopper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One wish I have is for there to be an alternative way to specify the
> subject such that it is stored and retrieved from the body and not the
> header, so it can be PGPed.
I'd like this, too, and s
On 2000.07.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Gregor Zattler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mit 26 Jul 2000 03:37:59 GMT]:
> > I have procmail deliver to ~/Mail/lists/listname. Each "listname" in
>
On 2000.08.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have checked this out thoroughly now and I'm convinced there is some
> sort of problem building 1.3.7 (and 1.3.6) on Solaris.
> ...
> make: Fatal error: Don't know how to make target `../types.h'
On 2000.08.15, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> push "l!~s '^DON'\\''T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA$'^M"
>
> This (I hope) anchors the string at both ends so that only messages
> with this exact subject will be matched so messa
On 2000.08.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Todd Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What I'm ultimately looking for is to edit the first text part (as when
> I answer no to mime_forward) but to still have all other parts of the
> orginal message attached just as they were in the original
On 2000.08.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Evan Vetere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a bunch of mail files in ~/mail; procmail drops stuff there.
> Each file in that dir is, uh, sourced, in my .muttrc:
>
> mailboxes ~/mail/blah ~/mail/bork ~/mail/foo ~/mail/zort
>
> Can I generat
On 2000.08.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Martin [Keso] Keseg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The two places that needed libiconv were Solaris 2.6 and Red Hat Linux
> > release 6.1.
>
> no, it;s not a problem about development computers, that's a problem of solaris.
> I was talking abo
On 2000.08.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jason Helfman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> no not while vi is open...I mean I am in mutt. I run a macro, asks me
> some questions, and passes it right to vi
Is this for new mail? You can write a macro that sets $editor to a
script which run
On 2000.08.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jason Helfman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is their a way to make this delete the thread??? If you are using
> collapsed threads on a given folder?
You can use delete-thread in a macro. For example, to bind it to
control-V in the index:
ma
On 2000.08.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, while that might be convenient, I can also see how that would cause
> problems. If you specifically set the fcc and then mutt notices that it
Yep.
> Probably :-) My bet is that it would only be a b
On 2000.08.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ron da Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Seems like mutt writes attachments to /tmp and forwards the filename
> to netscape (based on my mailcap file) and then deletes the /tmp file;
> however, seems like sometimes the file gets deleted before n
erminal...
I think the problem is that netscape -remote returns immediately once
the command is delivered, and not necesarily after the remote operation
has completed the page load.
> On Thursday, 24 August 2000 at 16:41, David Champion wrote:
> > #!/bin/sh
> > ## Wrap ns so tha
On 2000.09.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jason Helfman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have a script that does this?
If you have mh or nmh installed, I'd think that you can "inc" the mbox
to a new folder and rename that folder's directory as .../folder/cur,
then mkdir ../folder/{
On 2000.09.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Gary Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 11:15:18PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
> > Would their be a way to configure mutt to test if I am running X, and
> > based off the exit of this, 1 or 0, use a particular mutt variable
On 2000.09.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jason Helfman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 01:05:38PM -0500, David Champion muttered:
> | On 2000.09.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> | Or:
> | source `RunningX && echo .muttr
On 2000.09.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jens Askengren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> macro index ""
>
> but since delete-message automatically skips to the next it doesn't work
> as expected.
What about
macro index ""
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniver
On 2000.09.12, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Bruce DeVisser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 02:22:19PM -0700, Chris Chisolm wrote:
> >
> > I have read all the FAQs I can find and searched the man
> > page but I still have a couple questions.
> >
> > 1. How do you forwa
On 2000.09.12, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Chris Chisolm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1. How do you forward a message, including all the attachments
> that came with the message? Ideally I would include the forwarded
> main message as text and the all the attachments would be auto
> loa
Is there any way to disable this? I want the pager to treat signatures
the same as the body -- at least as far as colorizing body regexes
goes. "Color signature" won't take a regex argument; it colors the
whole signature.
Would a patch to treat this be accepted? :)
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 2000.09.14, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Lukasz Stelmach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By³a godzina 23:09:20 w ¶roda 13 wrzesieñ, gdy do autobusu wsiad³ kanar
> i wrzasn±³:"David Champion!!! Bilecik do kontroli!!!" A on(a) na to:
>
> >
On 2000.09.15, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dave Morse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I pop my mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED], and write email from home as user
> dm on a system that calls itself bomberlan.net. What is the voodoo I put
> in the .muttrc that makes mutt always send mail appearin
On 2000.09.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Wilhelm Wienemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Could you please give an URL were the nntp-support can be downloaded?
>
> http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/mutt/#nntp
>
> There is also a NNTP-patch for mutt from "Andrej N. Gritsenko"
The address [EMAIL PROTECTED] is preferred over [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2000.09.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Eugene Paskevich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P.S. How can I include cookies from fortune for example into my signature?
> Answer directly please.
You probably missed the othe
On 2000.09.23, in <2923013336.A18320@sol>,
"Peter Jaques" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm looking for some command that will mark all messages in a current
> mailbox as being read, without having to actually read them. sort of like
> ^R but for an entire mailbox (& not dependent on th
On 2000.09.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Byrial Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tag all messages, mark the tagged messages read, and finally untag
> them. Can be bound to macro if you like, for example:
>
> macro index R "T~A;WN;t" "Mark all messages read"
This is correct, of cour
On 2000.09.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jens Askengren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A GUI-mutt could be implemented by separating mutt into a backend and
> several frontends (curses, X11, etc). The frontend could be selected at
> compiletime, or loaded as a plugin/dll/.so-lib at runtim
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Andy Spiegl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce DeVisser wrote:
> > ^D on the compose menu toggles this, under Mutt 1.2.5i.
> >
> > (If I hit ? in the compose menu, it's the very first keybinding
> > described. :)
>
> Great! I just upgraded and r
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Andy Spiegl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I tried:
> send-hook '~C mutt-' 'set from="Andy Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"'
> but then from is set for the next mail, not for the current one. *argh*
This is good and correct.
> How did you guys solv
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Lukas Schroeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyways, besides this beautiful '!' next to the message, does a set
> important flag of a set of messages trigger any additional useful
> functionality like easy switching via repeated TAB-punching or
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Andy Spiegl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, you can set a compose macro to inline after adding.
> Ehmm, sounds like a good idea, but how do I do that?
>
> Sorry for the stupid question,
> Andy.
Actually, I think it was a bad idea. I guess y
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mikko Hänninen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2000:
> > > send-hook '~C mutt-' 'set from="Andy Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>&q
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jeff Howie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I also have a "color" line to highlight my flagged messages in red, and
>
> I've tried, but can't get how to do this. Can you please elucidate?
color index brightred default "~F | ~G | ~n 500-
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Lars Hecking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Example: in general, I prefer a C locale, but occasionally I do need
> certain non-ascii characters. So here's what I am using:
>
> $ grep LC_ ~/.muttrc
> set editor="LC_CTYPE=en_IE.ISO8859-15 vi"
> se
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Marc van Dongen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I just re-installed vim on my system.
> When I now try to compose a message
> after I enter the name of the recipient
> mutt does not allow me to write a message.
> Istead it displays a
>
On 2000.09.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Byrial Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:08:23 -0500, David Champion wrote:
> > Me, too. I take a different approach: I have a short wrapper script
> > that I use for invok
On 2000.09.28, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Emmanuel Anne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had a look at the docs, but could not find a way to handle bad
> attachements ie : jpeg images attached as "application/octet-stream"
> insted of "image/jpeg".
>
> Does someone know a way to view them di
On 2000.09.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the dev versions of mutt, or with 1.2.5 and patches, you can create
> and edit an X-Label: header which can contain anything you wish; you can
> even act against it with an expando. I use this to note tip
On 2000.09.30, in <2930210156.A2463@sol>,
"Peter Jaques" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can anyone come up with a procmail/formail recipe that will automatically
> detect these things & add such a header line? i tried this, but everything
> ended up in /dev/null:
>
> ##
> :0:
> * =2
On 2000.10.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Pyuesh Daya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to run two external programs to run with mutt. I am already running
>the "Shift Q" to query an external perl script which queries an Ldap ServerIs
>this possible...
>
> How do I bind an
On 2000.10.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dan Boger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> yikes! why would you want to ever overwrite a whole folder with one message?
> I'd be scared of hitting o by mistake...
Mutt treats all save files as folders. Sometimes you just want the one
message, but
On 2000.11.04, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Eric Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This "works"
> zip - *txt|mutt -s'send a zip file of all txt docs' eric -a -
Odd; it doesn't work for me. The syntax you give fails to send to the
users "-a" or "-". Putting "eric" after all options
On 2000.11.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mikko Hänninen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonathan Scott Duff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 06 Nov 2000:
> > Hi, I'm using mutt 1.2.5i and was wondering if there were some
> > convient way to match messages based on the number of paragraphs,
>
On 2000.11.22, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"john slee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i've been using mutt for a while now. one thing that's always bugged me
> (well, pretty much the only thing, now that i know about mime_forward),
> is that there's no way that i can find to have a "compose"
On 2000.12.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mark Triggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> When I write a message which has multiple addresses in the To: header,
> the force_name option (set in my .muttrc) causes the mail to be automatically
> saved to a file as the first
On 2000.12.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Charles Curley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When working on my .muttrc, it would be very nice if there were some way
> to see error messages generated by bugs in the .muttrc. Is there any such
> mechanism?
You mean just to test the muttrc file and
On 2000.12.14, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Lars Hecking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IMHO signing list email is a useless and wasteful exercise, especially
> if the sender hasn't submitted his/her keys to the public keyservers.
> In this situation, those who have configured their encry
On 2000.12.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Lance Simmons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't understand this suggestion. I don't see the word "script" used
> in the Mutt manual in a way that seems relevant, or in the xterm
> documentation. Could you elaborate?
The "script" program initi
On 2000.12.28, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am using some scripts for cleaning up some mails by setting editor
> > variable to script name. And, every time I try it, new lines get
> > added at end.
>
> Could you share this script? Or
On 2001.01.30, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Duncan Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to show messages that attachments in the index. I took a look
> at index_format but no luck at first reading. Does anyone have an idea on
> how to accomplish this?
Can't be done
On 2001.02.18, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering if it's possible to setup an alias that delivers to multiple addresses?
>
> Something like...
>
> alias foo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (foo group)
Something like that. The man
On 2001.02.22, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jay Rossiter / Signe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to unbind all keys with one, or a small series, of
> commands? I'm trying to set mutt up so that the only commands bound are
> ones that I explicitly set. I'm tired of tpyoing a k
On 2001.02.28, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dirk Laurie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ">"
> has already been prepended to the line. I want the line-break algorithm
> to do its thing before the ">" sign gets prepended.
The
On 2001.03.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mike polniak proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > Is anyone using mutt as a newsreader? Supposedly there is a nntp
> > patch for mutt. Any comments on how well this works?
>
> Vselvolod (sp
On 2001.03.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"ndrw mchl grnbrg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, slrn requires some config, just like mutt does, but all in all, I
> think it's a very good newsreader.
It's not the configuration, mainly; it's the way it works. It doesn't
accomodate the way I r
On 2001.03.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Horace G. Friend III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got pgp (ver. 6.5.8i) working outside of mutt. I can also verify signed msgs
> after I get their public keys outside of mutt.
>
> But I can't sign outgoing msgs. After selecting the (s
On 2001.03.15, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Zach Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It tells netsacpe to launch the url in a pre-existing window - the id that we
> just found in netscape.sh.
Alternatively:
netscape -remote 'openURL(http://www.foo.net/, mutt-ns)'
will open htt
On 2001.03.18, in <20010318211124.A574@madmachine>,
"phaust" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to
> > do a catch up in a news
On 2001.03.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Timothy Legant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You might not always want to move down 6 lines. Perhaps in the future
> you will add a new header (using my_hdr) to certain messages. You might
> want to consider the following instead:
>
> set editor="
1 - 100 of 636 matches
Mail list logo
